Surface Water Working Group - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Surface Water Working Group

Description:

Three lasers to meet mission lifetime ... PAD (star trackers/gyros) plus laser time of flight gives altitude vector of ... need to address laser lifetime ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:15
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: jmar53
Category:
Tags: group | surface | water | working

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Surface Water Working Group


1
ICESAT LASER ALTIMETRY
  • B. E. Schutz
  • Center for Space Research
  • University of Texas at Austin
  • schutz_at_csr.utexas.edu

2
ICESat
  • Ice, Cloud and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat)
    launched January 13, 2003 0045 UTC from
    Vandenberg (CA) on Delta-II
  • Primary instrument on ICESat is GLAS (Geoscience
    Laser Altimeter System)
  • NASA Earth Science Enterprise mission
  • GLAS is a NASA Goddard instrument
  • Spacecraft built by Ball Aerospace
  • Mission operations at LASP/University of Colorado
  • Science Team

3
ICESat
  • Science goals
  • Measure changes in polar ice mass balance (1.5
    cm/yr over 100 km x 100 km regions)
  • Map land topography and sea ice, and vegetation
    canopy information
  • Measure distribution of clouds and aerosols
  • Science Requirements Document (1997) provided the
    science justification, error budget, requirements
    on instrument and mission to meet the goals,
    including mission lifetime, etc.

4
GLAS Design
  • Science Requirements flow down into instrument
    design
  • Laser instrumentation
  • Three lasers to meet mission lifetime
  • Interaction between instrument design and science
    requirements
  • Example Pulse repetition rate
  • High PRR reduces lifetime
  • Wavelength of surface features
  • Design 40 Hz -gt 170 m surface sampling
  • Other laser divergence results in illuminated
    surface spot of 70 meters

5
Mission Design
  • GLAS data analysis requirements to detect
    temporal change
  • Crossovers (dictates that inclination is not
    exactly polar) ICESat 94?
  • Repeat tracks (orbit altitude requirements)
  • ICESat 8day repeat and 91 day repeat (altitude
    difference 1.5 km)
  • Flow down
  • Orbit control (1 km at equator)
  • Off nadir pointing with accuracy ? 50-100 m

6
Measurement Concept
  • Surface profile obtained from determination of
    laser spot location on Earths surface
  • Laser spot geodetic coordinates inferred from
  • POD (GPSSLR) gives position vector of GLAS
    reference point (Req lt5 cm radial achieved 2-3
    cm)
  • PAD (star trackers/gyros) plus laser time of
    flight gives altitude vector of GLAS reference
    point (Pointing Req 1.5 arc-sec -gt 4.5 m on
    Earth surface achieved 5 arcsec, but expect to
    achieve requirement)

7
Amazon Profiles
8
2003 September 29 Track
Landsat image showing confluence of Rio Tapajos
with Amazon
Prepared by Tim Urban, CSR
9
Waveforms GLA06 and GLA14
10
Confluence of Rio Tapajos with Amazon
  • Closer examination of flat area shows
    differences between GLA06 and GLA14 products
    (different analysis of digitized echo waveform)
  • GLA06 based on max peak
  • GLA14 based on entire pulse
  • Indicative of vegetation
  • Track crosses Amazon and upstream Rio Tapajos
  • Region from 2.4? to -3.2? appears to be along
    Rio Tapajos

11
GLAS Precision Estimate
  • Residuals to low degree polynomial fit to
    elevation on preceding chart represent GLAS
    precision
  • Both GLAS data products give similar result (echo
    waveform is Gaussian)
  • 40 Hz points shown (no averaging)
  • Over this water surface, the precision is lt 3 cm
  • May be remaining decimeter level altitude bias,
    but elevation slope is very accurate

12
GLAS Accuracy
  • Data product used in previous example
  • Time geodetic latitude, longitude of laser
    illuminated surface spot geodetic height above
    reference ellipsoid
  • Current accuracy estimate
  • Horizontal location of illuminated spot
  • 5 arcsec -gt 15 meters (dependent on temporal
    changes and laser pointing biases)
  • Requirement is 1.5 arcsec have not exhausted
    analysis so optimistic that requirement will be
    reached for most of the data
  • Elevation (geodetic height above reference
    ellipsoid)
  • On flat surfaces, precision is few cm, but
    remaining decimeter level range bias

13
ICESat Released Data
  • Portions of ICESat data released, available from
    NSIDC for all global data
  • Data not yet fully calibration
  • Calibration analysis continues new data release
    expected
  • 8 day period of laser 1 in March 2003 (8 day
    repeat orbit)
  • Accuracy estimate horizontal geolocation 30-45
    meters
  • 33 day period of laser 2 in October-November
    2003 (33 day subcycle of 91 day repeat orbit)
  • Accuracy estimate horizontal geolocation 15
    meters
  • Data not yet released pending further calibration
    analysis
  • 28 days of 8 day repeat cycle, laser 1
  • Laser 2
  • 8 day repeat cycle in September 2003
  • 14 additional days in September-October 2003
  • 33 days in February-March 2004

14
Surface Sampling and Orbit Evolution
15
9-day Orbit Evolution in 91-day Repeat
16
Orbit and Sampling
  • ICESat uses two orbits
  • 8-day repeat
  • 91-day repeat (with 30 day near-repeat
    subcycle)
  • Two orbits are 1.5 km difference in altitude
  • Sampling
  • 8-day repeat produces 300 km equatorial
    separation between tracks in same direction
  • 91-day repeat produces 30 km equatorial
    separation between tracks in same direction
  • 8-day near-repeat subcycle
  • In 30 days orbit evolves into nearly uniform
    track spacing with 90 km track separation
  • Visualize evolution as 30 day pattern, shift it
    eastward by 30 km for next 30 days, and again
    eastward by 30 km for next 30 days

17
Off Nadir Pointing
  • ICESat design and operations allows for pointing
    off nadir up to 5? (50 km)
  • Lay down a series of GLAS illuminated spots up
    to 50 km parallel or nearly parallel to the
    natural track
  • Off nadir pointing accuracy is 100 m
  • Enables creating tracks across a region that
    would not naturally be sampled

18
Considerations
  • No single orbit design that will meet the needs
    of all science interests
  • Can find an orbit that would repeat every day, or
    two days, etc. (determine mean orbit altitude)
  • What sampling is required?
  • A 1-day repeat would give daily sampling of
    points along or near (with off-nadir pointing)
    near the design track
  • Very limited sampling would require a
    constellation of satellites (multiple satellites)
  • Longer repeat cycles give denser track spacing,
    but less frequent temporal sampling of locations
    on or near the reference track
  • What is highest latitude of interest? (determine
    orbit inclination)
  • If optical imager included, need daylight which
    implies inclination of 98?? (but even
    Sun-synchronous can be eclipsed, so some periods
    will not have image data),

19
Laser
  • GLAS carries 3 lasers
  • Laser 1 failed after 36 days
  • Laser 2 has been operated for 90 days just
    powered off March 21, will be restarted
    May/June
  • Laser 3 not yet used
  • Future laser altimeters need to address laser
    lifetime
  • Require extensive testing of off the shelf
    components
  • Advanced ICESat under discussion in various
    versions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com