Introduction to Criminal Justice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Introduction to Criminal Justice

Description:

What Is The Connection Between Morality And The Law? Are laws supposed to ... concerned about the type of reasoning a legislator uses to justify making a law. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: jjop
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Introduction to Criminal Justice


1
Introduction to Criminal Justice
  • Six Concepts of Law
  • Connecting Morality and Law
  • JPS 101
  • Jerry W. Joplin

2
What Is The Connection Between Morality And The
Law?
  • Are laws supposed to be moral?
  • What is the difference between morality and the
    law?
  • Why be moral?
  • It is good for society
  • It is nice
  • God wants it that way
  • Why not be immoral

3
What is the Purpose of the Law?
  • Enforce the morality of society
  • Protect individual rights

4
What does it Mean to be Moral?
  • Follow the rules
  • Follow the Golden Rule
  • Be good to yourself
  • Do what is good for the order of society
  • Dont get caught
  • Follow a set of principles

5
Relate Rules to Principles
  • What is the difference between a rule and
    principle?
  • How do rules and principles relate to one
    another?
  • Give an example of a rule and a principle related
    to the rule.

6
Six Concepts of Law
  • Foundation of the Law
  • Focal Point of the Law
  • Formation of the Law
  • Application of the Law
  • Rationale of the Law
  • Discretion within the Law

7
Competing Philosophies
  • Idealism A method of connecting abstract ideas
    that is not dependent upon verification from in
    any concrete sense.
  • Pragmatism A method of connecting abstract
    ideas that are verified through experience in a
    concrete sense.

8
Foundation of the Law
  • The Foundation of the Law is that which legal
    philosophers narrow upon as they attempt to
    determine a foundation for the law. The focus of
    the law for the Pragmatist is Private Morality,
    while the Idealists are concerned about Public
    Morality. The nature of morality is that which
    distinguishes one legal perspective from another.
    It may be difficult to understand what Foundation
    of the Law means until all the other concepts of
    the law are more clearly understood. When
    attempting to determine where legal philosophers
    begin, one must find a theme they return to time
    after time. A connecting thread that is woven
    throughout their thinking, this is the Foundation
    of the Law.

9
Foundation of the Law
  • Idealism
  • Public Morality
  • This is what most people believe moral means.
  • Pragmatism
  • Private Morality
  • This is what every individual is capable of doing
    for oneself.

10
Focal Point of the Law
  • That upon which one focuses when trying to
    determine the most rudimentary basis of the law.
    The Foundation of the Law is some type of
    morality. The Focal Point is not the purpose of
    the law, but it gains direction from the
    Formation and leads to the Rationale of the Law.

11
Focal Point of the Law
  • Idealism.
  • Product.
  • The focus here is on the end result of the law.
    The law is justified by the product produced by
    the law.
  • Pragmatism.
  • Process.
  • The focus here is not on the end result, but how
    the law goes about fulfilling its purpose.

12
Formation of the Law
  • The concept, Formation of the Law, does not
    refer to the legislative manner in which laws are
    made, but rather to the method by which ideas are
    made into law. Therefore, the emphasis is not
    placed upon any legislative process, but it may
    be concerned about the type of reasoning a
    legislator uses to justify making a law.
    Idealists and Pragmatists differ on their method
    of forming laws. The Pragmatists strive for a
    Rational process that leads them to a logical
    conclusion regarding what should be the nature of
    law. Idealists on the other hand have a more
    Irrational approach. Both sides think they are
    more humane, one being humanely logical and the
    other being humanely emotional.

13
Formation of the Law
  • Idealist
  • Irrational
  • Pragmatist
  • Rational

14
Application of the Law
  • Application of the Law is an easily understood
    concept that refers to the manner in which the
    law is administered. It is interesting to note
    that like the Formation of the Law, the process
    of the Application of the Law is also either
    Rational or Irrational. An example of the manner
    in which the law is applied is seen in cases of
    courts affixing sentences to offenders. A
    Pragmatic judge may consider irrational human
    factors, while an Idealistic judge is concerned
    about how the violation of the law is to be
    addressed in objective terms.

15
Application of the Law
  • Idealism
  • Rational
  • Pragmatism
  • Irrational

16
Rationale of the Law
  • The purpose of the law is subjective, and as the
    other concepts indicate a perspective dependent
    upon political preferences. For the Idealist the
    purpose of the law is to Enforce Public Morality.
    The enforcement of public morality is the reason
    laws were brought into existence. When a
    violation of the law occurs it becomes the
    responsibility of the state to redress the
    violation with the sole purpose of ensuring that
    the morality of the majority is upheld. If the
    states fail to uphold the morality of the
    majority, the Idealist believes that the state
    itself may be jeopardizing its own existence. The
    Idealistic politician believes that the state has
    a right to protect itself and that the
    enforcement of morality is the basic right of the
    state.
  • The Pragmatist believes that the purpose of the
    is to protect the rights of every citizen.

17
Rationale of the Law
  • Idealism
  • To enforce moral standards
  • Pragmatism
  • To protect individual rights

18
Discretion within the Law
  • Discretion within the Law is a perplexing
    concept. The most sophisticated jurists and the
    most naïve practitioner share the ambiguity of
    this concept and both question how much
    discretion is acceptable. Jurists very often
    refer to discretion as the scope of authority
    that judges have in making their decisions.
    Whoever philosophically discusses the issue of
    discretion must at sometime or another confront
    the real world of the police officer. How does a
    police officer exercise this authority and who
    determines for the individual patrol officer the
    acceptable limits of discretion? Discretion
    within the law requires every Criminal Justice
    professional to answer the question, what is the
    relationship between morality and the law?

19
Discretion Within the Law
  • Idealism
  • Discouraged
  • Pragmatism
  • Required

20
Morality and Sexual Morality
  • Does the concept of morality change when the
    notion of sexuality is introduced?
  • Does sexual immorality harm any one?
  • Should morality be enforced by the law?
  • Should sexual immorality be punished by the law?

21
Relating Morality to the Law
  • Should there be laws against the following
  • Cruelty to animals
  • Consumption of alcohol
  • Dueling
  • Euthanasia
  • Begging
  • Endurance contests
  • Marijuana

22
Types of Power
  • Remunerative Power
  • Power relating to money or property
  • Coercive Power
  • Power that is related to use of force
  • Normative Power
  • Power that comes with the position
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com