Econ D10-1: Lecture 3 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Econ D10-1: Lecture 3

Description:

... is homogeneous of degree zero: (Walras Law) The consumer exhausts ... Prove that it is single valued and homogeneous of degree zero. Compensated Law of Demand ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 7
Provided by: johncp6
Category:
Tags: d10 | econ | lecture

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Econ D10-1: Lecture 3


1
Econ D10-1 Lecture 3
  • Individual Demand and Revealed Preference
    Choice in an Economic Environment (MWG 2)

2
The Market Choice Structure Consumption and
Budget Sets
  • Consumers choose a commodity vector x (x1, ,
    xL) from the consumption set X??L
  • Feasible choices for the consumer are determined
    by his budget set, which, in turn, is determined
    by his wealth wgt0 and the vector of commodity
    prices pgtgt0 that he faces.
  • The consumers competitive or Walrasian budget
    set is given by Bpw x 0 p.x w
  • Walrasian budget family BBpw pgtgt0, wgt0

3
The Walrasian Demand Correspondence
  • x(p,w) is a choice rule defined on the Walrasian
    budget family B.
  • MWG make the following assumptions.
  • x is a continuous, single valued function x
    ?L1 ? ?L
  • x is homogeneous of degree zero
  • ?
  • (Walras Law) The consumer exhausts his budget
    p.x(p,w)w.
  • ?

4
WARP for Walrasian Demand Functions
  • Consistency of demand If bundle x is chosen
    when (a different) bundle x? is affordable, then,
    if x? is ever chosen, bundle x must be
    unaffordable.
  • (Samuelsonian) WARP Given (p,w) and (p?,w?), if
    p.x(p?,w?)w and x(p,w)?x(p?,w?), then
    p?.x(p,w)gtw?.
  • Exercise Assume that the demand correspondence
    satisfies Samuelsonian WARP and Walras Law.
    Prove that it is single valued and homogeneous of
    degree zero.

5
Compensated Law of Demand
  • If x(p,w) satisfies WARP for all (p,w), then
    compensated demand curves are downward sloping.
  • Proof Choose (p?,w?) so that p?.xw?p?.x?
    i.e., x is exactly affordable when x? is chosen.
    Then, p?.(x?-x) 0. For x??x, WARP requires
    that x? be unaffordable when x is chosen, so that
    p.x?gtp.xw or p.(x?-x)gt0. Subtracting the former
    from the later yields (p?-p).(x?-x) ?p.?x lt
    0.For ?pk0 for all k?j, this becomes ?pj?xj lt 0
    or (?xj /?pj)lt0
  • (Q What is the significance of MWGs Prop.
    2.F.1?)

6
Differential Compensated Law of Demand and the
Slutsky Matrix
  • If Walrasian demand function is continuously
    differentiable
  • For compensated changes
  • Substituting yields
  • The Slutsky matrix of terms involving the cross
    partial derivatives is negative definite, but not
    necessarily symmetric.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com