UCC Law - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

UCC Law

Description:

3) ECJ Judgment May 2006- implications for environmental ... Implications of ECJ judgment. ECJ constitutional monopoly on inter-state dispute resolution? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: bri6160
Category:
Tags: ucc | judgment | law

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: UCC Law


1
UCC Law the Environment
  • The MOX Plant Dispute- Implications
  • Joanne Blennerhassett
  • UCD Law School

2
Sellafield MOX (mixed oxide) plant
  • 1) Background to litigation Ireland v England
    OSPAR UNCLOS
  • 2) ECJ - jurisdictional overlap
  • 3) ECJ Judgment May 2006- implications for
    environmental dispute resolution?

3
Timescale
  • 1992 BNFL applied for permission to build-
    EIA carried out
  • 1994 consent given to build plant
  • 1995 plant completed
  • Dec 2001 authorization to operate granted

4
Litigation- The Arbitral Tribunal Stage
  • June 2001 OSPAR Convention Proceedings
  • July 2003 OSPAR arbitral tribunal rejected
    Irelands claims
  • October 2001 UNCLOS arbitral tribunal Annex VII
  • June 2003 UNCLOS tribunals jurisdictional
    concern because UNCLOS is a mixed agreement
  •  
  • UKs objection to jurisdiction of UNCLOS tribunal
    on basis of EC law.
  • Could result in two competing decisions.
  • 24 June 2003 -UNCLOS tribunal order to suspend
    proceedings while ECJ ruled on issues of
    Community Law raised by the case

5
ECJ Decision
  • UNCLOS adopted by EC by Council Decision 98/392
  • Convention provides its own dispute settlement
    procedure.
  • Under the EC Treaty, MS obliged not to submit
    disputes in relation to the application or
    interpretation of Community law to any court or
    tribunal other than ECJ
  • ECJ held
  • -Ireland breached Articles 10 EC 292 EC and 193
    EURATOM Treaty instituting proceedings under
    Conventions regime without informing and
    consulting with Community institutions
  • -failure to comply with duty of co-operation
    under Art 10 EC and Art 192 Euratom.

6
Implications of ECJ judgment
  • ECJ constitutional monopoly on inter-state
    dispute resolution?
  • Fora such as those under UNCLOS are now
    redundant?
  • EC MS lose freedom to decide before which forum
    they wish to bring a dispute
  • Practical repercussions and disadvantages?
  • Procedural advantages lost?
  • Different legal nature and consequences of an ECJ
    decision

7
Further action?
  • Irelands case will not proceed under UNCLOS
  • Community level- European Commission
  • - Actions under EURATOM Treaty
  • Commission decision 15 Dec 06- THORP
  • UK Appeal to ECJ Case T/121/06
  • - Nuclear Package
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com