Assignment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Assignment

Description:

John Street: Effect of Political Structure on Government Control. Limits of Political Control ... John Street: The State and Technology ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:11
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: civUto
Category:
Tags: assignment

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Assignment


1
Assignment 1
  • The following assignment applies to the material
    in three of the readings in the courseware.
  • Solomon describes the ethical dilemma of medical
    intervention on premature babies
  • Suppose that a group of neonatologists, in
    response to this dilemma, were to form an
    organization called Neonatologists for Social
    Responsibility. Why would Chapman agree or
    disagree that this issue is an appropriate one
    for such an organization?
  • Discuss this organization in terms of micro and
    macro ethics described in class
  • How might the ideas of DiNorcia be applied in the
    formation of ethical guidelines for physicians
    surrounding this issue?
  • Length Between 500 and 750 words (include a
    word count)
  •  
  • Due Thursday, Jan 29, 2004 at the start of
    class

2
Government and Technology
  • McGinn
  • Strengths and Weaknesses of Government Control
  • John Street
  • Effect of Political Structure on Government
    Control
  • Limits of Political Control
  • NIMBY
  • Time Horizons of Technology Policy
  • Transnational Technologies

3
McGinn Mechanisms for Social Control
  • Government Regulation
  • Government Funding
  • Product Liability and Litigation
  • Public Participation
  • Advance Assessment
  • Legislative Limits

Question What are the strengths and weaknesses
of the different mechanisms for social control?
4
Government Regulation
  • Strengths
  • Government in a position to save lives, save
    environment
  • Can develop preventative standards
  • Govt can act as an advocate for the non-powerful
  • Weaknesses
  • Government is open to politicization
  • Rules are not necessarily context specific
  • Govt is often reactive instead of proactive

5
Government Funding
  • Strengths
  • Able to finance projects that require large
    capital investment and benefits that are
    long-term
  • Can avoid commercial interests
  • Provide basic services that are valuable but not
    profitable
  • Weaknesses
  • May sponsor projects that do not have public
    support
  • Open to lobby efforts, or influences from the
    powerful

6
Product Liability and Litigation
  • Strengths
  • Police corporations that may want to cut corners
  • Protection for consumers
  • Weaknesses
  • Helpful only after a problem occurs
  • Adds to costs of products

7
Legislative Limits
  • (e.g. Levels of AOX in pulp mill effluent 1.5 kg
    / ton)
  • (See Vincent Di Norcia reading)
  • Strengths
  • Clear way of saying NO
  • Raise public awareness to environmental/social
    concerns
  • Weaknesses
  • Tend to be restrictive measures. Less often a
    complete ban.
  • Can promote a technical fix, when a rethinking of
    the entire technology may be warranted
  • May be reactive

8
John Street The State and Technology
  • How does political structure affect how
    government policy is developed?

9
Comparison of McGinn to Street
10
Street State as regulator
  • The form of regulation depends very much on the
    type of government
  • Example Mass communications and radio in the UK
    versus the USA

11
Characteristics of Mass Communications
Political Structure
Little technological reason for different
broadcast systems!
12
Question
  • Can you think of technologies where Canada has
    more centralized regulatory control and those
    where Canada has more decentralized control?

13
State as customer
  • Certain technologies are integral to central
    functions of government
  • Military, Surveillance
  • Computer systems for taxation, welfare, etc.
  • The government is a large customer it can have
    a major impact on the design of a technology
  • Government can affect competitiveness
  • E.g. Toronto Transit Commission

14
State as customer
  • a political structure which excludes economic
    competition or political pluralism is liable to
    have a technology policy dictated by particular
    interests.(p 58)
  • but
  • a lack of central coordination can lead to the
    underdevelopment of technology policy (p 58)

15
State as Underwriter
  • State funds technological development
  • In Canada, we have
  • Crown corporations
  • Funding for research and development (NSERC)
  • In US, France and Britain, a very large
    proportion of research and development funds are
    directed to defense
  • Since the cold war -gtcivil applications for
    military RD facilities
  • Example Las Alamos National Laboratory and
    TRANSIMS

16
Limits of Political ControlNIMBY
  • NIMBY Not in my backyard
  • Democracy -gt some notion of consent.
  • How does a government handle situations where the
    costs of an action falls unevenly upon its
    citizens?
  • Public enquiries and commissions to legitimate
    action
  • Good example The Mackenzie Valley Pipeline

17
Question
  • Examples of NIMBY being a positive force in
    limiting the control of the state?
  • Examples of NIMBY being a negative force?

18
Time Horizons of Technology Policy
  • Technology policy tends to work to a longer time
    horizon than democracy. . Whilst a particular
    leadership is in power it may prefer pragmatic,
    short-term solutions to those long-term solutions
    which a coherent technology policy might need.
    (Street p. 67)

19
Problem of Transnational Technologies
  • Internet
  • Media
  • Technologies that may erode a nations cultural
    heritage (e.g. American clothing exported around
    the world, technologies that require knowledge of
    English language)
  • Pollution that crosses borders
  • To what extent can (should?) a government attempt
    to control technologies such as these?

20
Global Economics
  • How much is a government driven by (or controlled
    by) global economics?
  • Do governments have real control over bank
    mergers?
  • Heavy pressure is placed on a government to
    deregulate and allow mergers, so that firms can
    compete globally
  • Funding for RD and priorities in education
  • often driven by the desire for global
    competitiveness rather than social needs

21
To think about
  • Does a government direct the development of
    technology? Or is it forced merely to respond to
    the demands made upon it by technology?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com