Session 9 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Session 9

Description:

Composition of panels. 12. Panel Procedures: deadlines ... months from composition/terms of ... Composition of the Appellate Body. 14. Appellate review ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: Kulac
Learn more at: https://www.wto.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Session 9


1
Session 9 Government-to-government dispute
settlementprocedures
  • WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding
  • Vesile Kulaçoglu, WTO Secretariat
  • Dar es Salaam, 14-17 January 2003

2
  • WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding
  • The Work of the Working Group on Transparency in
    Government Procurement

3
Dispute Settlement in the WTO
  • a central element in providing security and
    predictability to the multilateral trading
    system
  • (DSU, Article 32)

4
DS Purpose
  • A system favouring mutually agreed solutions
  • A rule-oriented system
  • A system intended to secure withdrawal of
    inconsistent measures
  • Multilateralism v. unilateralism

5
Functions of the DS system (Art. 3.2 DSU)
  • to preserve the rights and obligations of
    Members under the covered agreements, and to
    clarify the existing provisions of those
    agreements in accordance with customary rules of
    interpretation of public international law

6
DS Principles
  • Exclusive application of WTO rules on dispute
    settlement to disputes related to the WTO
  • Uniform application to all WTO Agreements

7
Dispute settlement in the WTOOverview
  • A mechanism aimed at securing compliance with the
    Agreements
  • detailed procedures
  • automaticity in the proceedings
  • deadlines
  • implementation aimed at securing conformity of
    measures

8
Dispute settlement in the WTOOverview
  • Applies to all the multilateral agreements
  • a single set of rules for all disputes
  • only a few specific rules in some agreements
  • An integrated system

9
Main stages of the dispute settlement process
  • Consultation phase
  • Panel and Appellate Body review
  • Adoption of report by the DSB
  • Implementation

10
Function of panels (Art. 11 DSU)
  • a panel should make an objective assessment of
    the matter before it, including an objective
    assessment of the facts of the case and the
    applicability of and conformity with the relevant
    covered agreements

11
Task of panels
  • review the facts and arguments submitted by the
    parties to a particular dispute
  • Panel findings
  • Composition of panels

12
Panel Procedures deadlines
  • As a general rule, 9 months from establishment of
    panel to consideration of report for adoption (if
    no appeal)
  • 12 months where report is appealed
  • (Art. 20 DSU)
  • As a general rule, 6 months from
    composition/terms of reference to issuance of
    final report of the panel to the parties
  • (Art. 12.8 DSU)

13
Task of the Appellate Body
  • review on appeal the issues of law addressed by
    panels
  • The Appellate Body may uphold, modify or reverse
    the legal findings and conclusions of the panel
    (Art. 17.12 DSU)
  • Composition of the Appellate Body

14
Appellate review
  • Review limited to issues of law and legal
    interpretations developed by the panel (Art.
    17.6 DSU)
  • Appeal only open to parties to the dispute
  • Standing appellate Body
  • 7 members
  • persons of recognised authority and expertise in
    international trade law
  • unaffiliated with any government

15
  • Report of the Appellate Body
  • The Appellate Body may uphold, modify or reverse
    the legal findings and conclusions of the panel
    (Art. 17.12 DSU)
  • Adoption of Appellate Body report by reverse
    consensus within 30 days of circulation to Members

16
Implementation (I)
  • Within 30 days of adoption of report, Member
    concerned informs the DSB of its intentions in
    respect of implementation of the recommendations
    and rulings
  • (Article 1 DSU)
  • Recommendations
  • If violation recommendation that the Member
    bring the measures into conformity
  • (Article 19 DSU)

17
Implementation (II)
  • Determination of reasonable period of time for
    implementation
  • proposed by Member and approved by DSB, or
  • mutually agreed by the parties, or
  • determined through arbitration guideline for
    the arbitrator 15 months from the date of
    adoption (Article 21.3 DSU)

18
Implementation (III)
  • Surveillance by the DSB Status reports on
    implementation
  • If Member fails to bring measure into conformity
    within reasonable period of time, possibility of
    temporary measures compensation or suspension
    of concessions (retaliation)

19
Implementation (IV)
  • Compensation (Article 22 DSU)
  • Voluntary
  • Negotiated
  • Compatible with WTO Agreements
  • If no compensation agreed within 20 days after
    expiry of reasonable period of time.

20
Implementation (V)
  • Suspension of concessions
  • same sector/other sector/ other agreement
  • level of suspension equivalent to the level of
    nullification or impairment (Art. 22.4 DSU)
  • authorization to suspend within 30 days of
    expiry of reasonable period of time
  • arbitration on level of suspension or principles
    of Art. 22.3 DSU
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com