NextGen Reference: Single Service Points and Tiered Reference in Academic Libraries

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

NextGen Reference: Single Service Points and Tiered Reference in Academic Libraries

Description:

... to the argument between just in case and just in time collection acquisition. ... Direct patrons to locations, departments, and collections within the library ... –

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: txla
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NextGen Reference: Single Service Points and Tiered Reference in Academic Libraries


1
NextGen ReferenceSingle Service Pointsand
Tiered Reference in Academic Libraries
  • Jeff Lacy
  • Lamar University
  • jeff.lacy_at_lamar.edu

2
Single Service Point
  • A service point in a library where two or more
    traditionally separated services (e.g. reference
    and circulation) have been consolidated in a
    prominent, highly visible area providing a
    one-stop shopping experience for the student.
  • It is not necessarily the only service point,
    just a very obvious place for students to ask for
    assistance or get common services.

3
Tiered Reference is
  • ... using paraprofessionals or students to
    answer easy questions, and referring more
    challenging questions to librarians (Brunsting).
  • Tiered reference is easily combined with single
    service points.

4
How new and how common are these models?
  • Consolidated or single service points have been
    discussed in library literature for sixteen
    years, but no data on actual implementation was
    found (Bradigan).
  • A 2006 survey 404 of medium-sized academic
    libraries found that only 4.7 (11) used tiered
    reference (Brunsting).

5
Why consider a single service point?
  • A single service point requires less staffing
    than multiple service points, which saves money.
  • Students are often confused or intimidated by
    multiple service points, not under-standing the
    distinction between the services.

6
Why consider tiered reference?
  • Most research is conducted online, so traditional
    reference queries have dropped.
  • Reference areas have evolved into computer labs
    or information commons where the most common
    questions do not require a reference librarian's
    expertise to answer.

7
Example Surveys
  • Before moving to a single service point, Duke
    University's Medical Center Library discovered
    that 61 of their reference queries could be
    answered by student assistants (Murphy).
  • At the University of Arizona's Science-Engineering
    Library discovered, it was 68 (Brache).

8
Why consider tiered reference?
  • A computer lab or information commons is not the
    best environment for providing in-depth reference
    assistance, since these efforts are often
    interrupted by directional and technical queries.
  • In many libraries, academic reference librarians
    need time to develop their roles in instruction,
    liaison activity, outreach, grant writing,
    publication, and other activities.

9
Another point of view
  • The argument for tiered reference is similar to
    the argument between just in case and just in
    time collection acquisition.
  • Should reference librarians spend time that could
    be spent otherwise just in case an in-depth
    question is asked?
  • Or should reference librarians be on call for
    just in time reference consultations?

10
Bringing it together
  • It makes sense to have a place where users can
    get directions or instructions or technical help.
    But trained para-professionals and student
    workers can staff that desk. Professional
    reference librarians should be out and about
    meeting users when and where the help is needed.
    -- Steven J. Bell (Watstein and Bell)

11
Making the Transition
  • Understand the needs of the students, including
    their perception of library services.
  • Observe what students do and how the library's
    arrangement helps/hinders them.
  • Visualize how the students' experiences could be
    improved.
  • Evaluate and refine by seeking feedback.
  • (Bradigan)

12
Implementation
  • Redesign the physical space
  • Adopt new service models
  • Consider technological improvements
  • Develop improvements to staff communication
  • (Bradigan)

13
Factors to consider
  • Your library's architecture is there a good
    place?
  • Staffing Needs less staff overall, but more
    staff at one time
  • Training The most important factor requiring
    the most planning

14
Training
  • Develop a skill set based on the consolidated
    services
  • Place holds, circulate, renew, return library
    materials
  • Accept and record fees and fines
  • Distribute reserve and interlibrary loan
    materials
  • Direct patrons to locations, departments, and
    collections within the library
  • Search the library's holdings
  • Navigate the library's web site
  • Operate copiers and other office machines
  • Assist in the computer lab
  • Assist with common assignments, reference
    sources, etc.

15
Training
  • Develop training modules based on skill sets and
    learning outcomes
  • Example At the University of Arizona's
    Science-Engineering Library, basic SSP training
    takes six weeks. Complete training (sixteen
    modules) takes twelve weeks to complete.
  • Reference training involves an additional two
    months of shadowing a librarian for eight to ten
    hours a week.

16
Evaluation and Communication
  • Test and assess SSP staff
  • Annual development reviews
  • Performance evaluations per semester
  • Develop channels of continuous feedback
  • From the SSP staff to the reference librarians
    and back

17
Other training options
  • Peer-to-peer presentations
  • Intense training on newly acquired resources
  • SSP staff should attend vendor demos

18
Tiered ReferenceAdditional Concerns
  • Librarians must be on call for SSP support
  • SSP staff must understand when to refer students
    to librarians and have ready means of
    communication to do so
  • SSP staff must have a formal procedure for
    referring students to specialists who aren't on
    call

19
Potential Pitfalls
  • Lack of motivation or insufficient training.
  • Librarian disconnect. Reference librarians must
    make a greater effort to stay connected with
    students.
  • Communication breakdown. Information from the
    desk on trends and needs must get to the
    librarians, who in turn must return with
    appropriate training.
  • Librarians fail to use their extra time on new
    projects.

20
Potential Benefits
  • Students experience less confusion in the library
  • Reducing service points should reduce staff
  • Cross-trained SSP staff provide more robust and
    consistent levels of service
  • Librarians gain time for other duties and projects

21
Sources
  • Bracke, Marianne Stowell, Sainath Chinnaswamy,
    and Elizabeth Kline. Evolution of Reference A
    New Service Model for Science and Engineering
    Libraries. Issues in Science and Technology
    Librarianship 53 (2008) np. 2 Feb. 2009
    lthttpwww.istl.org/08-winter/refereed3.htmlgt.
  • Bradigan, Pamela S., and Ruey L. Rodman. Single
    Service Point It's All in the Design. Medical
    Reference Services Quarterly 27.4 (2008) 367-78.
  • Brunsting, Marlys. Reference Staffing Common
    Practices of Medium-Sized Academic Libraries.
    Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery
    and Electronic Reserve 18.2 (2008) 153-80.
  • Murphy, Beverly, et. al. Revolution at the
    Library Service Desk. Medical Reference Services
    Quarterly 27.4 (2008) 379-393.
  • Watstein, Sarah Barbara, and Steven J. Bell. Is
    There a Future for the Reference Desk? A
    Point-Counterpoint Discussion. The Reference
    Librarian 49.1 (2008) 1-20.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com