Title: Surveys of Enacted Curriculum Understanding Cognitive Demand
1Surveys of Enacted Curriculum Understanding
Cognitive Demand
- Oregon SEC Collaborative
- SEC 201
2Questions
- What is cognitive demand?
- Where is cognitive demand addressed in the SEC?
- Why is it important that teachers have an
understanding of cognitive demand before taking a
Survey of Enacted Curriculum?
3 Cognitive Demand is Expectations of student
thinking
4Cognitive Demand Categories
- Mathematics
- Memorize facts, definitions formulas
- Perform procedures
- Demonstrate understanding of mathematical ideas
- Conjecture, analyze, generalize, and prove
- Solve non-routine problems and make connections
- English Language Arts and Reading
- Memorize/Recall
- Perform procedures and explain
- Generate, create and demonstrate
- Analyze and investigate
- Evaluate and integrate
5Cognitive Demand Categories
- Science
- Memorize facts, definitions formulas
- Conduct investigations/ Perform Procedures
- Communicate Understanding of Science Concepts
- Analyze information
- Apply concepts/Make connections
- Social Sciences
- Recall/Memorize
- Process Information/ Investigate
- Demonstrate understanding/Apply
- Analyze/Hypothesize
- Synthesize, evaluate, make connections
6Cognitive Demand
- State standards and assessments have an inherent
cognitive demand. - Instructional activities also have an inherent
cognitive demand. - The SEC measures the cognitive demand relative to
content instruction.
7Where is cognitive demand addressed in the
survey?
- Instructional Content
- Part A Topics taught and time devoted to
instructional topics - What students should know
- Part B Expectations of students/cognitive
demand - What students should be able to do with what
they know
8Why is it important that teachers have an
understanding of cognitive demand before taking a
Survey of Enacted Curriculum?
It has been found that the more familiar teachers
are with reflecting on their expectations with
the content, the more prepared they will be to
take the survey. Therefore, survey data is more
accurate as the understanding of cognitive demand
increases.
9Relationships Between TaxonomiesMathematics
- Bloom Webb SEC
- Knowledge Recall Memorize Facts,
- Definitions Formulas
- Comprehension Skills Concepts Perform
Procedures -
- Application Analysis Strategic
Thinking Demonstrate Understanding - of Mathematical Ideas
-
- Synthesis Extended Thinking Conjecture,
Analyze - Generalize, Prove
-
- Evaluation Solve non-routine
problems/Make Connections
10Relationships Between TaxonomiesEnglish Language
Arts and Reading
- Bloom Webb SEC
- Knowledge Recall Memorize/Recall
- Comprehension Skills Concepts Perform
Procedures/Explain - Application Analysis Strategic
Thinking Generate/Create/Demonstrate -
- Synthesis Extended Thinking
Analyze/Investigate -
- Evaluation Evaluate/Integrate
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15Think, Pair, Share
- Independently review the three standards and
determine the level of cognitive demand you think
each one asks of students - Discuss your classification with a partner
- Share with the group how you categorized each
standard in terms of cognitive demand and be
prepared to support your choices
16 Oregon Standards and Foundations English
Language Arts Reading
- Grade One
- Listen and distinguish initial, medial, and
final sounds in single-syllable words. - Grade Six
- Read aloud grade-level narrative text and
informational text fluently and accurately with
effective pacing, intonation, and expression. - CIM
- Explain how works from literature and/or the
humanities are influenced by historical, social,
cultural, political, literary, or creative
contexts and individual experiences.
17Oregon Standards and Foundations English
Language ArtsReading Informational Text
- Grade Three
- Ask questions and support answers by connecting
prior knowledge with literal information found
in, and inferred from, the text. - Grade Seven
- Understand and analyze the differences in
structure and purpose between various categories
of informational text, including textbooks,
newspapers, instructional manuals, essays,
editorials, biographies, and autobiographies. - CIM
- Extend ideas presented in primary or secondary
sources through original analysis, evaluation,
and elaboration.
18 Oregon Standards and Foundations English
Language ArtsWriting Expository Text
- Kindergarten
- Write (unconventionally) simple messages or
directions for a specific reason - or for a
specific person or specific people. - Grade Four
- Use multiple reference materials (e.g.,
dictionary, encyclopedia, online information) as
aids to writing. - Grade Eight
- Include important ideas, concepts, and direct
quotations from significant information sources,
and paraphrase and summarize different
perspectives on the topic, as appropriate. - CIM
- Document sources.
19Oregon Standards MathData Analysis and
Predictions
- Grade Three
- Draw conclusions and make predictions and
inferences from tally charts, pictographs, or bar
graphs. - Grade Seven
- Predict and evaluate how adding data to a set of
data affects measures of center. - CIM
- Make predictions about populations based on
reported sample statistics
20Oregon BenchmarksPhysical Science Matter
- Benchmark 1 (Grade 3)
Describe changes
that occur in matter. - Benchmark 2 (Grade 5)
Identify changes in
states of matter seen in the environment. - Benchmark 3 (Grade 8)
Use the
concept of density to evaluate which objects will
float or sink in water. - CIM (Grade 10)
Recognize
that the historical development of atomic theory
demonstrates how scientific knowledge changes
over time, and how those changes have had an
impact on society.
21Oregon BenchmarksGeography
- Benchmark 1 (Grade 3)
- View and draw simple maps and pictures to
locate, describe and show movement among places. - Benchmark 2 (Grade 5)
- Use maps and charts to interpret geographic
information. - Benchmark 3 (Grade 8)
Identify the
location of major mountain ranges, deserts,
rivers, cultural regions and countries in the
world. - CIM (Grade 10)
- Use a variety of geographic representations to
analyze information and draw conclusions about
geographic issues.
22Carousal Activity
- Count off 1-5 around the room
- Think of sample activities/lessons you do or
standards you teach for each level of cognitive
demand - Use Descriptions Framework (cards) to think about
cognitive demand
23Taking a look at the survey items
- Please take the next 10 minutes to read through
some of the questions in each Instructional
Content section of the survey. Record any
questions you have, and we will address them to
the entire group at the end of this time.
24DataSurvey Output
- Reports on three (3) or more teachers only
- Currently there are three types of data displays
- Instructional Content
- 1. Contour Maps
- 2. Tile Charts
- Instructional Practice
- 3. Floating Bar Charts
25 This is a fine grain tile chart comparing
school data with state data. Listed on the left
by row are the topics in reading comprehension.
At the bottom, listed by column, are the levels
of cognitive demand. The intensity of the color
indicates a greater emphasis on topic and level
of cognitive demand.
26Emphasis on range of Cognitive Demand
- When taking the survey, it is important for
teachers to choose the one or two (three at the
most) levels of cognitive demand that are given
the greatest emphasis. If all levels of cognitive
demand are given equal weight it indicates, as on
the previous slide, that instruction is a mile
wide and an inch deep. - Higher levels of cognitive demand indicate
students have mastered the lower levels.
27Tile Chart- ELA
28Tile ChartInstructional Content Mathematics
29 Next Steps for Understanding Cognitive Demand
- Sample activities/lessons
- Descriptions for each level of cognitive demand
- Framework for thinking about cognitive demand
prior to completing survey
30- Regardless of what a state policy requires or
what a district curriculum spells out, says
Andrew C. Porter of Vanderbilt University, the
classroom teacher ultimately decides what to
teach. - Education Week, October 8, 2003
- Source Maine SEC project PPT, 2004