Title: A Fresh Look At Machine Safeguarding
1A Fresh Look At Machine Safeguarding
- Presented By
- Jack Podojil
- CHCM, CHMM, REP, REA, ASA, CUSA
2Occupational Safety Health Act
- A new national policy was established on December
29, 1970, when President Richard Nixon signed
into law the OSHAct - The OSHA Act took effect April 28, 1971 and was
called the Williams / Stieger Act
3OSHA History
- The Congress of the United States declared that
the purpose of this piece of legislation was to
Assure so far as possible every working man and
woman in the nation safe and healthful working
conditions and to preserve our human resources.
4OSHA History
- The employer has the General Duty to furnish
each employee with employment and a place of
employment free from recognized hazards causing
or likely to cause death or serious physical
harm.
5An Employers Responsibility
- Provide a safe place of employment. (A plan)
- Provide a written safety and health plan to the
employees. - Communicate the plan to employees (Training)
- Enforce the plan.
6General Duty Clause
- For employers, the General Duty clause is used by
OSHA when there are NO specific standards
applicable to a hazard.
7ANSI Standards
- American National Standards Institute (ANSI) are
standards developed by experts in the industry.
These standards explain the hazards involved in
operating machinery. - Considered Best Practices
8ANSI Standards
- ANSI standards explain the hazards involved in
operating machinery. - ANSI standards are enforceable by law under the
General Duty Clause.
9ANSI Standards For The Safety Professional
- ANSI TR-3 Risk Assessment.
- ANSI B-11.19 Safeguarding machinery as referenced
by other ANSI B-11 standards.
10Machinery ANSI Standards Most Common.
- B11.2 Hydraulic presses
- B11.3 Press brakes
- B11.4 Shears
- B11.5 Iron workers
- B11.6 Lathes
- B11.8 Milling Drilling machines
11Machinery ANSI Standards.
- B11.9 Grinding machines
- B11.10 Metal sawing machines
- B11.21 Robotic safeguarding
- ANSI 01.1 Woodworking
12OSHA Standards
- OSHA standards are vague on many types of
machines and often conflict with each other (for
example - 1910.213 of the woodworking standard states the
top portion of a disc sander does not have to be
guarded.
13OSHA Standards
- 29 CFR 1910.212 (a)(1) of the General Machine
Guarding standard states One or more methods of
machine guarding shall be provided to protect the
operator and other employees in the machine area
from hazards created by the point of operation,
rotating part etc.
14The Problem
- It is presumed that machine designers strive to
produce safe machinery. - Today, manufactures still produce unsafe
machinery. Example guards missing, controls
inadequate, manuals that do not address the
hazards.
15The Problem
- This equipment usually sells for 500.00 or less.
Example Drill presses, saws, sanders, grinders,
etc. - Manufactures are not under OSHA jurisdiction
unless their employees are exposed to the hazard.
16The Problem
- Would you like to buy machinery that is unsafe
and expose your fellow employees to the hazards? - Would you let your family, students or children
run the equipment if you knew it was unsafe?
17Faulty Machine Design
- An effective machine guarding program must begin
with a thorough analysis of the potential hazards
found on all machinery located at a facility. - The following are examples of faulty machine
design.
18Faulty Machine Design
- Guarding missing.
- Inadequate strength of the guarding device.
- Improper color-coding of hazards.
- Emergency stops missing or not properly located.
19Faulty Machine Design
20Faulty Machine Design
- Electrical Controls and housings not properly
rated for the environments they are in. NEMA 12
for dust or moisture. - Openings too large in guards. Example back side
of drill presses and bandsaws.
21Machine Analysis
- Basically, your goal in conducting a hazard
analysis will be to identify existing or
potential hazard created by the machine
operation. - Both mechanical and non-mechanical items need to
be inspected.
22Inspect Mechanical and Electrical Items
23Determine The Steps In Operating The Machine
- What hazard(s) is the operator exposed to while
setting up or starting the machine. - What hazard(s) is the employee exposed to while
performing a particular job like operating or
conducting maintenance.
24Identify Existing or Potential Hazards for Each
Operation
- Operator wearing long clothes or jewelry?
- Does the operator have set-up or loading
unloading problems? - How is the worker positioned while operating the
machine?
25Evaluate The Cause of The Hazard
- Evaluate the cause of the hazard.
- Improper bid specifications.
- Improper monitoring installation of equipment.
- Improper training.
- Improper maintenance.
26Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC)
- Protects the public of hazards once they are
known by recalling unsafe products. - The CPSC requires that manufacturers notify the
agency within 24 hours of obtaining information
that their product does not meet a safety
regulation.
27Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC)
- Do all manufacturers follow the rules?
- No Manufacturers like Jet, Grisley, Delta, and
others produce unsafe machinery and may never
contact CPSC even after they learn of a
deficiency.
28What Can You Do?
- Get involved.
- Check CPSC web site and help report unsafe
machinery located in your state. - Develop a machine guarding committee in your area.
29State of Minnesota
- State of Minnesota forms the first machine
guarding committee for schools. - Intent of the committee is to protect children
operating industrial type machinery.
30State of Minnesota Committee Members
- Department of Children families Learning (DCFL)
- Minnesota OSHA
- Minnesota Safety Council
- Minnesota Tech Prep
- Minnesota Teachers
- ReiTech Corporation
31State Of Minnesota
- Required each school district to appoint one
person to attend an 8 hour training course in
machine safeguarding. - Required each school district to inspect and
report each piece of machinery in their schools.
32State Of Minnesota
- Required each school district to develop an
action plan to correct each piece of equipment. - Develop a preventive maintenance plan.
- Required annual refresher training.
33Lockout, Tagout Tryout
- Too many times we speak of Lock-out Tagout
(LOTO) and miss the most important feature the
tryout phase. - OSHA 1910.147 standard still ranks high on OSHAs
hit list.
34Lockout, Tagout Tryout An Accident Revisited.
- Two workers seriously injured when they failed to
tryout an electrical system that was miss marked. - As the workers were preparing to remove a breaker
they locked out the electrical system at the
main.
35Lockout, Tagout Tryout An Accident Revisited
- The circuit was changed earlier and the panel was
never remarked by the contractor. - Employees were trained in (LOTO) but never took
the final step to ensure that the energy was
dissipated.
36Lockout, Tagout Tryout Accident Revisited.
- Employees used a metal ratchet to take the
breaker out and the ratchet arched across 220 /
480 volts causing an explosion. - Employees suffered sever electrical burns.
37Lockout, Tagout Tryout
- Review your programs with your employees when you
return to your sites. - Ensure by conducting the annual audit that
everyone is educated in the proper procedures.
38Questions Answers
39