TECHNOLOGICAL%20PROGRESS%20AND%20GROWTH:%20THE%20GENERAL%20SOLOW%20MODEL - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

TECHNOLOGICAL%20PROGRESS%20AND%20GROWTH:%20THE%20GENERAL%20SOLOW%20MODEL

Description:

The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005. TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS AND GROWTH: THE GENERAL SOLOW MODEL ... The characteristic polynomial is and the associated root is. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:234
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: qedEcon
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TECHNOLOGICAL%20PROGRESS%20AND%20GROWTH:%20THE%20GENERAL%20SOLOW%20MODEL


1
Chapter 5 second lecture
Introducing Advanced Macroeconomics Growth and
business cycles
TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS AND GROWTH THE GENERAL
SOLOW MODEL
2
The complete Solow model
3
Analyzing the Solow model (see previous lecture)
  1. Define and
  2. From we get
  3. From and we get
  4. Dividing by on
    both sides gives

4
  1. Inserting gives the transition
    equation
  2. Subtracting from both sides gives the Solow
    equation
  3. Dividing by on both sides to get the modified
    Solow equation

5
Previous lecture
  • Using the transition equation and the transition
    diagram we showed convergence to steady state
    .
  • We derived some relevant steady state growth
    paths e.g.
  • We showed that there is balanced growth in steady
    state with and growing at the same
    positive growth rate, , and with a constant
    real interest rate, .
  • We discussed structural policy aimed at affecting
    steady state.
  • We showed and discussed empirics for steady
    state The model substantially underestimates
    the impact of the structural parameters on GDP
    per worker!

6
This lecture
  • Comparative analysis in the Solow diagrams.
  • The convergence process.
  • Growth accounting.

7
The Solow diagram
8
The modified Solow diagram
9
Comparative analysis in the Solow diagrams
  • Initially the economy is in steady state at
    parameters and . The savings rate
    increases permanently from to .

10
(No Transcript)
11
  • Old steady state and
    , and and both grow at rate ,
    the lower line below
  • New steady state and
    , and and grow at rate , but along a
    higher growth path, the upper line above.

12
  • Transition grows from up to
    . The growth rate of jumps up and then
    gradually falls back to zero. From
    follows that . Hence, during the
    transition, grows at a larger rate than ,
    and jumps up and then falls gradually back to
    . The growth rate of jumps too, since
    .

13
Convergence in the Solow model
  • The modified Solow diagram again

There is accordance with conditional
convergence Two countries with the same

14
The process of convergence empirically
  • What does the model tell us more precisely about
    the process of convergence , i.e., how does
    growth in each country depend on structural
    parameters and initial position?
  • Using the transition equation,
  • we derive a formula for the growth rate of .
    To do this we linearize around steady state etc.
  • Differentiating wrt. and evaluating in
    steady state gives
  • Its easy to see that .

15
  • Mathematical note consider a differentiable
    function, going through the point
    , so . Then If furthermore,
    then
  • Use (1) on in to
    find that
  • This is an approximation of the dynamics of the
    Solow model, and its a linear one!
  • The linear difference equation implies stability
    of , since .

16
  • Use again ,
    this time on
  • Use this to rewrite
  • Use that from one has
  • The convergence property in each period, a
    constant fraction of the remaining gap is
    closed. The rate of convergence is

17
  • We now derive the solution to the difference
    equation
  • The characteristic polynomial is
    and the associated root is . The complete
    solution to the homogeneous equation is .
  • A specific solution to the non-homogeneous is
    , implying that the complete solution
    is
  • For the constant to fit with the initial
    situation .
  • Hence the solution is

18
  • Using the solution for etc. gives
  • Inserting for and our
    expresssion for gives the convergence
    equation
  • Rewrite slightly

19
  • Assuming that and are the same in all
    countries, this suggests a regression
    equation
  • OLS estimation across 90 countries over the
    period 1960-2000 gives
  • Plotting against gives

20
(No Transcript)
21
  • Positive aspects significant parameters,
    relatively high R2 etc. This does not crucially
    conflict with the assumption of the same and
    in all countries. But
  • We have two estimates of the rate of convergence
  • From theory
  • From empirics
  • Together with an estimated of and
    this gives
  • The model substantially overestimates the rate
    of convergence!
  • Confronted with empirics, the Solow model does
    quite well, both with respect to its steady state
    and its convergence prediction. However, in both
    cases there is an empirical problem of
    magnitudes. It could have been better, but its
    still a very well-performing model.

22
Growth accounting
  • With data for and (which
    often is availible) and with we can
    compute as a residual. We call this the
    Solow residual.
  • Why not growth accounting in levels?

23
Growth accounting per capita (worker)
  • With data for and and with we
    can once more compute the Solow residual, .
  • We can use this residual to check the underlying
    technological growth

24
Conclusions, the general Solow model
  • Implications for economic policies are more or
    less the same as those derived from the basic
    Solow model.
  • The model implies convergence to a steady state
    with balanced growth and with a constant,
    positive growth rate of GDP per worker. Thus, the
    steady state prediction of the model is in
    accordance with a fundamental stylized fact.
    However, the underlying source of growth,
    technological progress, is not explained.
  • The steady state prediction performs quite well
    empirically, but the model underestimates the
    effect of the savings rate and the growth rate of
    the labour force on income per worker.
  • The convergence prediction also performs well
    empirically, but the model overestimates the rate
    of convergence.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com