Title: GEOG 346
1GEOG 346
- Week 4 The Origins of Modernist Planning and
Growth Management
2Housekeeping Items
- As you started getting organized around the City
of Nanaimo OCP/ RDN growth strategy project,
please look at the additional presentation on the
web on sustainability indicators for ideas. If
you want me to put any of the reports alluded to
on reserve, I will. We have someone coming on
Wednesday to give us the rationale and outlines
for the new OCP. - On Wednesday, from noon to 1 there will also be a
pizza and pop social next door to allow students
and faculty members in Geography to get
acquainted.
3Housekeeping Items
- Is there anybody who didn't get a sheet of tool
instructions? Think about what and when you want
to present. - Before we get into the lecture material for
today, we will review the group sketches of how
Nanaimo could have been planned. Who wants to go
first?
4City Beautiful and City Efficient
- The City Beautiful movement got its start when
architects, Daniel Burnham and John Root, were
involved in designing the 1893 World Exhibition
in Chicago. - Like Vancouvers Expo 86 or DisneyWorld, it was
full of temporary buildings that simulated the
temples, lagoons, and palaces of ancient Greece,
Rome, and 17th century France. It was full of
parks and boulevards. It was, in a word, grand.
5City Beautiful and City Efficient
- Many European cities already exhibited the same
features sweeping tree-lined boulevards,
monumental buildings, dignified and beautiful
parks and gardens. - Many Americans, after visiting the Expo, began to
ask Why cant we have cities like that? Why do
our cities have to be so ugly and drab?
6City Beautiful and City Efficient(contd)
- Burnham, and other like-minded architects, went
on to design City Beautiful plans for Chicago,
Calgary, Kitchener, Vancouver, and many other
places, with a number of the plans being funded
by business groups. - The key values they were operating with in trying
to manage the citys growth were symmetry,
coherence, and monumentality.
7City Beautiful and City Efficient(contd)
- Their influences went back to the way the ancient
Greeks and Romans laid out their cities, to the
Renaissance Italians, and to the kings of the
Baroque era and beyond. - This way of planning emphasized the public realm.
The public realm consists of streets, parks (or
other forms of open space, such as plazas), and
public buildings. As with what are called urban
designers today, the practitioners of City
Beautiful were concerned with how these elements
fit together with private buildings into a
harmonious whole.
8City Beautiful and City Efficient(contd)
- In later years, architects would tend to focus on
individual buildings, landscape architects on
landscaping for individual sites, and planners on
zoning. But, back then, the differences among
architects, planners, and landscape architects
had not yet become fixed. There was a lot of
overlap. - The City Beautiful folks saw buildings and
components of the public realm (streets and open
spaces) as defining each other. Each required the
other. But too often today, we treat public space
as space left over after planning or building.
9City Beautiful and City Efficient(contd)
- What are some major examples of the public
realm in Nanaimo? - In the past, a beautiful public realm had been
used to promote the prestige of the king or
emperor. However, people like Burnham saw it as a
way of celebrating democracy, much as Frederick
Law Olmsted had done in his work on parks. The
public realm is where the public of all classes
and backgrounds gathered to rub shoulders and to
remind themselves that they were a part of a
common civic community.
10City Beautiful and City Efficient(contd)
- This is a very geographical idea to have a
public, you need to have public spaces and public
events in those public spaces. - They also emphasized that people need public
buildings to help anchor their community spirit
and to help foster civic pride. Are there such
buildings in Nanaimo?
11City Beautiful and City Efficient(contd)
- The most prominent City Beautiful plan was the
one for the improvement of Washington, DC (1903)
which reflected the influence of French design,
with a prominent role being played by Frederick
Law Olmsted Jr. and Sr. - At the first city planning conference in the U.S.
(1909), the City Beautiful movement was
criticized for being overly concerned with
aesthetics and grandeur, while paying
insufficient attention to bread and butter
issues like housing and health issues. It was
also felt that planning needed to extend beyond
the public realm to private land.
12City Beautiful and City Efficient(contd)
- While the City Beautiful idea continued to have
some influence up through the end of the 1920s,
gradually, the idea of City Efficient took its
place, though the idea had been stirring for
quite a while. - The impetus for this came, in part, from a
growing body of case law which upheld the right
of municipalities to protect the public interest
against nuisance and to exercise police
powers to protect the public interest.
13City Beautiful and City Efficient(contd)
- This was partly motivated by NIMBY and a desire
to protect property values, and partly because of
the health and nuisance implications of
incompatible land uses and the increasing height
of buildings, with their effects on air, light,
and safety. - The elevator had been invented in 1853, and the
first steel framed building was introduced in
1885. By 1913, there were 50 buildings in
Manhattan above 20 storeys. At the dawn of the
20th century, health was a major issue vis-à-vis
the built environment and it is becoming so again.
14City Beautiful and City Efficient(contd)
- The new innovations in construction also
stimulated the growth of modernist architecture,
as typified by Le Corbusier and the Bauhaus
School. - For the most part, these architects despised the
traditional city and the ornamentation of
traditional buildings. They wanted to create a
new aesthetic suited to the Machine Age.
15City Beautiful and City Efficient(contd)
- Rather than seeing buildings as needing to fit
into their environment, they put a lot of stress
on signature buildings that made a statement
and stood out. - Many of the buildings they created proved to be
not pleasant to live in or work in and, at their
worst, the unadorned slabs (such as bank
buildings) that their work subsequently inspired
are now considered by many to be blots on the
urban landscape.
16City Beautiful and City Efficient(contd)
- Attention began to shift away from the public
realm in the prosperity years of the 20s, as
consumerism started becoming a way of life.
People became more concerned about privacy and
domesticity. - Also, there was the incredible rise to prominence
of the automobile. While streetcar ridership
peaked in 1923, by around that time there was
also one car for every person in the U.S. (85 of
all cars in the world were in the United States).
17City Beautiful and City Efficient(contd)
- The trolley companies, if not publicly owned,
were soon bought out by the automobile, oil, and
tire companies who replaced them with buses
and/or ran them into the ground. By the 1950s,
most had ceased operation. - Where streets had previously been seen as
multi-functional, now planners like Le Corbusier
and Robert Moses began to view streets solely as
arteries for traffic. As Corbu declared,
Crossroads are an enemy to traffic.
18City Beautiful and City Efficient(contd)
- The Automobile Revolution prompted designers to
come up with new community designs for the
automobile age. One such designer was Clarence
Perry, who designed the new town of Radburn, New
Jersey, which began construction in 1927. - Radburn was organized around the neighbourhood
unit, which in turn was centred on an elementary
school and its catchment area.
19City Beautiful and City Efficient(contd)
- The houses were turned in on a greenway, so that
children could walk to school in safety away from
cars. - Perry also pioneered the use of cul-de-sacs,
feeder streets, and arterials, so as to minimize
through traffic in residential areas. Though his
intentions were good, his design ideas ultimately
fed the suburban monster of subsequent decades.
20City Beautiful and City Efficient(contd)
- Before we move off City Beautiful, how important
are beauty/ aesthetics/ sense of place as a
consideration in planning and urban growth
management? Are these frills or core issues? - What is beauty? what is ugliness? Do they matter
and, if so, why?
21City Beautiful and City Efficient(contd)
- As we begin to get into the emergence of modern
urban planning, its important to remember that
planning emerged because of market failure.
The market had failed to develop healthy,
orderly, efficient cities. One manifestation of
that was the incredible speculation frenzy in the
teens and twenties that led to the subdivision of
many building lots before they were actually
needed or in the wrong places. Planning was
based on placing checks and balances on
unrestrained property rights.
22City Beautiful and City Efficient(contd)
- For instance, at a time when there were only
50,000 people living in Calgary, some 770,000
lots had already been subdivided. This negatively
affected municipalities in at least two ways. - First, it created a pattern for future settlement
which was not necessarily the most optimal or
efficient for instance, in terms of road
networks. - And, second where new subdivisions were built
on and occupied it meant having to extend
municipal services to areas that were inefficient
and costly to service. This is a problem that
remains to this day.
23City Beautiful and City Efficient(contd)
- Planning arose, in part, to reign in the chaos of
the industrial and speculative city. It was
premised on the belief that public institutions
had a constructive role to play in safeguarding
the public interest. - While planners started out with, and maintained,
many high ideals, they became increasingly
pragmatic with the 1913 economic slump and the
excessive subdivision and speculation of the
1920s.
24City Beautiful and City Efficient(contd)
- Planners began to sell themselves on the basis
that they could provide for the more efficient
and orderly development of communities, thus
saving both municipalities and the business
sector money. - Disorderly urban growth could lead to a rise in
taxes and a decline in property values, they
argued. It could decrease the attractiveness of
communities for investment.
25City Beautiful and City Efficient(contd)
- Poised between British and American influences,
Canadian planning has been a bit of a hybrid,
reflecting some of the idealism of the British
planners and some of what evolved into the
functionalism of the American. - In the U.S., in the 20s and subsequent decades,
the dominant ideology was that the role of
planners was to facilitate urban development and
growth and the efficient functioning of the urban
system, and to encourage a booming business
climate.
26City Beautiful and City Efficient(contd)
- This was the City Efficient movement.
- The ethos of this movement was well-expressed by
a Canadian commentator in 1923, who wrote that
good city planning is not primarily a matter
of aesthetics, but of economics. Its basic
principle is to increase the working efficiency
of the city.
27Zoning
- Originating in Germany, the first zoning by-law
in the U.S. was enacted in New York in 1916.
There is some debate about the first regulations
in Canada, but Toronto and Kitchener are cited as
early examples. - Zoning regulates the 1)uses of private land in
zones, 2)the density of buildings per land unit
(as measured in FSR floor space ratio), and
3)the dimensions or massing of buildings. The
main zoning classifications are residential,
commercial, and industrial.
28Zoning
- Zoning can be cumulative or non-cumulative. In
cumulative zoning, different land uses are
allowed cumulatively in different zones except
for single-family, whereas in non-cumulative, all
land uses are mutually exclusive. - Zoning is formalized in a zoning map and a zoning
text. Non-conforming uses, variances, and by-law
changes allow for flexibility.
29Modernist Planning
- Two key articles of faith of modernist planning
were and are - that the planner is a neutral, scientific
("objective") analyst of cities and land uses,
and is in the best position to determine the
public interest and the ways of meeting its
objectives, and - that we need to approach urban and regional
development with a clean slate, that there's
little we can learn from the past.
30Modernist Planning (contd)
- Four key principles of modernist thinking (in my
view) are - mechanism (thinking of cities as machines, and as
principally existing to serve machines, i.e.
cars) - functionalism (belief in eliminating
ornamentation from buildings and belief in the
value of single-purpose districts) - formalism (emphasis on the superficial 'order'
and geometry to the detriment of diversity and
vitality) - economism (tendency to put economic objectives
first, rather than balancing them against other
social considerations, and favouring private
solutions).
31Modernist Planning (contd)
- These beliefs were supplemented by elitism (the
idea that people weren't knowledgeable enough to
participate in the shaping of their own
communities), as demonstrated in the words and
deeds of people like Robert Moses and Le
Corbusier. - Le Corbusier was of the opinion that city
planning was altogether too important to be left
to the citizens. Robert Moses famously said
that more houses in the waymore people in the
way when you operate in an overbuilt metropolis,
you have to hack your way with a meat axe.
32Correlation Between Modernist Thinking
andContemporary Planning Practice
- Characteristics of Modernist Thinking and
Relation to 20th Century Planning Principles - mechanism- reliance on automobiles to get around
(Regarding mechanism, as Peter Newman and Jeff
Kenworthy note, planning became a science of
codes, plot ratios, setbacks, percentages of open
space, standardized road patterns. In essence,
the city became a machine best understood by
specialized and credentialed experts.)
33Correlation Between Modernist Thinking
andContemporary Planning Practice (contd)
- functionalism- separation of the city and region
into different functional zones that only perform
one function (e.g. industrial districts,
residential districts, commercial districts,
etc.) - formalism- tendency to ignore the public realm
(emplacement of shining commercial or corporate
office buildings, while ignoring the public
spaces between and around them also a
de-emphasis on civic symbolism and pagaentry) - economism- low density sprawl (people wanting to
retreat into private fortresses, and seeking
fulfillment of their needs through the market)
and high density CBDs, lacking in human scale,
which reflect faith in the wisdom of the market.