Final Point Presentation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Final Point Presentation

Description:

Quality Attribute Scenarios - 1 ... Attribute. Aid-distribution needs to be able to change over time. Business Goals ... Attribute. Specific services for ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: karim
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Final Point Presentation


1
  • Final Point Presentation

also know as The infamous EOSP
Team OverHEAD Karim Jamal Clinton Jenkins
2
Overview
  • Other Folks
  • Project Background
  • Practicum Goals
  • Process
  • Architecture
  • Looking Back
  • Quotes

3
Other Folks
  • Jesse Lecy
  • Client
  • Michael Johnson
  • Project Sponsor
  • Anthony Lattanze
  • Mentor
  • Gil Taran
  • Technical Advisor

4
Project Background
  • Decision Support System for Effective Aid
    Distribution (DSS4EAD).
  • Currently, aid distribution organizations work
    disparately. Our goal is to provide a central
    system that they can use to share their data so
    that educated decisions regarding aid
    distribution can be made on a global scale.
  • An optimization tool that computes how best to
    distribute aid would also be useful.

5
In a nutshell
Currently
Desired
6
Practicum Goals
  • Meet success criteria for project Goal Met
  • Central repository should house all data
  • Offline client application should be able to
    connect to repository
  • Offline client application should perform
    optimization calculations
  • Online system will provide a means to view
    community profiles
  • Apply software engineering practices to project
    Goal Met
  • To see how, tune in next weekor just take a look
    at the next few slides for some examples

7
Process - 1
  • We chose the Architecture-Centric Design Method
    (ACDM)
  • Emphasizes architecture, which is important to
    the system since the quality attributes are
    primary concerns (i.e. scalability,
    modifiability, security, portability)
  • These are important because other developers are
    going to further develop this in the future
  • Allowed us to obtain, refine, and identify risky
    requirements early on in the lifecycle, which was
    important since the client was not readily
    available in the summer

8
Process - 2
  • Provides guidance on the steps to follow in order
    to conform to the process
  • Supports an iterative approach to development
  • Relatively lightweight
  • Does not require too much overhead for a
    two-person team
  • Requires just enough documentation to allow us to
    apply our software engineering knowledge
  • Our mentor is the creator of ACDM, and so we had
    immediate access to him regarding any
    ACDM-related questions

and we wanted to make him happy ?
9
Architecture
CC View
Online Subsystem
Naming Service
Repository
Web Browser
Database
Server
Optimization Tool
Offline Subsystem
Local Database
Legend
Naming Service
Web Browser
Database
Connection- Only occurs once
Optimization Tool
Server
Continuous connection
Local Database
10
Adherence to Architecture
  • Did our architecture survive design and
    development?...Mostly Yes
  • One documented exception is auto-generating a SQL
    query within the Optimization Tool instead of on
    the Server.
  • Introduces a dependency on the structure of the
    database
  • Architectural Tradeoff In this case, we chose
    performance over maintainability

11
Schedule since MPP
12
Almost done
Hang in there
13
Looking Back - 1
  • What made Tony giddy and jump for joy
  • Project management, tracking, and oversight went
    very well, because
  • Wiki was updated regularly
  • We always kept him up-to-date on our schedule
  • Every time the schedule slipped, we knew the
    cause and presented him with an updated schedule
    that adjusted for the slip

14
Looking Back - 2
  • What Tony doesnt know
  • The Design phase is very difficult to do
    remotely co-location makes it much easier
  • We underestimated how complex and time-consuming
    laying out the infrastructure would be
  • We underestimated the effort hit we would take
    due to job interviews and traveling
  • Resulted in highs-and-lows in weekly effort
  • System was not as thoroughly tested as planned
  • Client was supposed to test after each iteration
    but was busy with traveling and moving

15
Looking Back - 3
  • What we would do differently next time
  • To remedy problems during Design phase
  • Agree on a coherent high level view of the design
    while we were still co-located
  • While not co-located, set up a designated time
    every day that we would discuss the Design and
    any other issues
  • Could be done using Instant Messenger, Skype,
    Phone, etc.
  • To remedy problems during Iteration 1
  • Construct some more prototypes dealing with
    various aspects of the infrastructure
  • Dive further into lower levels of the
    infrastructure during the Design phase

16
Looking Back - 4
  • What made the customer happy?
  • See Quotes
  • What did the customer want to see more of?
  • The customer wanted more feedback on what we
    considered difficult to do. This would have
    allowed him to make better decision on priority
    and scope.
  • Higher visibility into when we ran into
    difficulties, so he could decide if it was worth
    the effort to fix the problem or to move on to
    other more important areas.

17
Looking Back - 5
  • Other lessons
  • ToDo list doesnt work if you dont put anything
    in it
  • Running JBoss on your laptop is not fun it does
    make for a good heater, though
  • Unsolvable problems in JBoss go away if you
    restart it and curse at it enough
  • Rebuilding the database the night before the
    customer presentation leads to very little sleep
  • Throwing balls around in the cave always has
    interesting results
  • Poker alone is not enough to earn back your
    tuition

18
Quotes
  • From Client
  • Looks great!
  • The entire process went very well.
  • Im amazed at the ground you guys covered! You
    covered a lot of domains.
  • From Us
  • Dang, were broke!

19
Looking Back 5.5
  • One more lesson
  • Doing Live Demos can be very dangerous
  • Speaking of which, heres a Live Demo!!!

20
(No Transcript)
21
Optimization Tool Results
22
Questions
Thanks
for taking all our money
Dont ask us hard questions Leave us with a
good memory of this program? What did we ever do
to you? Good recommendations from us means more
business for youuhh, we mean more software
engineers who want to make a differenceyeah,
thats it
23
Detailed Schedule - 1
24
Detailed Schedule - 2
25
Business Goals - 1
  • Combine organizations knowledge into a central
    location so that this knowledge can be shared on
    a global scale
  • Reduce the likelihood that organization workers
    will input erroneous data into the system
  • Fraud protection
  • Provide a simple, but feature-rich interface to
    the user

26
Business Goals - 2
  • Provide a foundation for future work that the
    client wishes to be done
  • Provide a demonstration vehicle for the client to
    sell to organizations

27
Artifacts Created - 1
  • Project Management Artifacts
  • Practicum Proposal
  • Statement of Work
  • Project Management Plan
  • Project Schedule
  • Architectural Drivers Specification
  • Notional Architecture
  • Database ER Diagram
  • Experiments Document
  • Detailed Design
  • Test Plan

28
Artifacts Created - 2
  • Project Management Artifacts (contd)
  • Iteration Checklists
  • Technical Manual
  • Other Project Artifacts
  • Code for infrastructure prototype
  • Model for integer solver
  • Experiment artifacts
  • Code Artifacts/Deliverables
  • Source and war, ejb3 files for Online System
  • Source and jar files for Optimization Tool

29
Quality Attribute Scenarios - 1
30
Quality Attribute Scenarios - 2
31
Quality Attribute Scenarios - 3
32
Quality Attribute Scenarios - 4
33
Freedom!!!
Were finally FREE
See ya suckers (in class for some of us, still)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com