FINC 3310 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

FINC 3310

Description:

Stock A Prob. Return E(RA) ( )2 Weighted. 0ptimistic .2 .5 .19. ... OR, use bp and the CAPM. and E(Rp)=6 1.135(11-6)=11.675% Using the SML in Capital Budgeting ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: john826
Category:
Tags: finc

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FINC 3310


1
FINC 3310
  • Chapter Thirteen
  • Risk, Return, and the Security Market Line

2
I. Expected Returns and Risk
  • The quantification of risk and return is a
    crucial aspect of modern finance. It is not
    possible to make good (i.e., value-maximizing)
    financial decisions unless one understands the
    relationship between risk and return.
  • And, rational investors like returns and dislike
    risk.
  • Here, we are looking to the future, at the
    possible returns and the riskiness associated
    with them. A tractable way to look at things is
    the use of "states of nature" and probabilities,
    kind of like scenario analysis.

3
Using expectations
  • The expected return is defined as
  • And the variance of expected returns is
  • That is, from E(R) and s2(R) we can look at
    riskiness of expected return on an asset.

4
Using expectations An Example
  • Stock A Prob. Return Weighted Return
  • Optimistic .2 .50 .10
  • Expected .6 .20 .12
  • Pessimistic .2 -.15 -.03
  • .19 E(RA)
  • Stock B Prob. Return Weighted Return
  • 0ptimistic .2 .05 .01
  • Expected .6 .20 .12
  • Pessimistic .2 .35 .07
  • .20 E(RB)
  • Now, calculate s2 of each...

5
Using expectations An Example
  • Stock A Prob. Return E(RA) ( )2
    Weighted
  • 0ptimistic .2 .5 .19 .09610 .01922
  • Expected .6 .2 .19 .0001 .00006
  • Pessimistic .2 -.15 .19 .11560 .02312
  • s2.04240
  • s2 .04240 so sA.20591
  • Stock B Prob. Return E(RB) ( )2
    Weighted
  • 0ptimistic .2 .05 .2
    .0225 .0045
  • Expected .6 .2 .2 0 0
  • Pessimistic .2 .35 .2
    .0225 .0045
  • s2.009
  • s2 .009 so sB .09487

6
Returns and Risk in Portfolios
  • Let weights be 50/50 on A B
  • State Prob. Return Weighted
  • O .2 (.5)(.50)(.5)(.05) .275 .055
  • E .6 (.5)(.2)(.5)(.20) .20 .12
  • P .2 (.5)(-.15)(.5)(.35) .10 .02
  • .195
  • What about portfolio variance?

7
Returns and Risk in Portfolios
  • State Prob. Rps E(Rp) ( )2 Weighted
  • O .2 .275 .195 .0064 .00128
  • E .6 .20 .195 .000025 .000015
  • P .2 .10 .195 .009025 .0018051
  • s2.00310
  • s2 .00310 so s .055678
  • NOTICE
  • (.5)(.20591).5(.09487).15039
  • which is NOT s2(Rp)...WHY?

8
Returns and Risk in Portfolios
  • What happens when assets are combined into a
    portfolio?
  • The expected return of the portfolio is a
    weighted average of the expected returns of the
    individual assets.
  • The standard deviation of returns is not a
    weighted average of the assets' standard
    deviations.
  • Lets look at why this is so...

9
Announcements, Surprises, and Expected Returns
  • What affects an assets return? We must
    consider
  • systematic risk
  • unsystematic risk
  • And, for both of these, the key to risk is the
    idea that unanticipated information is what leads
    to price changes. Consider the components of an
    assets actual return
  • R E(R) U
  • and U

10
Announcements, Surprises, and Expected Returns
  • Look at U again
  • R E(R) m e
  • and m and e are
  • What happens to e as more assets are added to
    the portfolio?

11
Portfolio Diversification
Average annualstandard deviation ()
Diversifiable risk
Nondiversifiablerisk
Number of stocksin portfolio
1
10
20
30
40
1000
12
Systematic Risk and Expected Returns
  • KEY ECONOMIC ARGUMENT 1 Because unsystematic
    risk can be diversified away, there should be no
    compensation (reward) for bearing that risk.
    This can be restated very directly - an asset's
    expected return depends only on its systematic
    risk.
  • Our measure of systematic risk an asset's beta,
    or b

13
Defining Beta
  • What does beta measure? The relationship of an
    asset's returns to the returns on the "market
    portfolio". More explicitly, beta is defined as
  • b 1.0 is the "average" or market beta

14
Systematic Risk and Expected Returns
  • KEY ECONOMIC ARGUMENT 2 In equilibrium, the
    risk premium per unit of systematic risk must be
    equal across assets. That is, the price of risk
    is a market wide phenomenon, not an
    asset-specific one. This relationship is given
    as

15
Systematic Risk and Expected Returns
  • How can we use this to determine any asset's
    return as a function of its risk? First, let
    asset j above be the market portfolio. What is
    its beta? Let Rj be the return on the market,
    and rewrite the relationship above as
  • and rearrange to obtain
  • E(Ri) Rf biE(Rm) - Rf
  • This is the equation of the Security Market Line
    (SML), derived from the Capital Asset Pricing
    Model (CAPM).

16
Risk, Returns, and the CAPM
  • The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) - an
    equilibrium model of the relationship between
    risk and return.
  • What determines an assets expected return?
  • The risk-free rate - the pure time value of money
  • The market risk premium - the reward for bearing
    systematic risk
  • The beta coefficient - a measure of the amount of
    systematic risk present in a particular asset

17
Using CAPM Some examples
  • Asset Invested b E(Ri)
  • A 10,000 1.7 ?
  • B 15,000 .65 ?
  • C 25,000 1.2 ?
  • If Rf 6 and Rm 11, what are the E(Ri)?
    And, what is bp and E(Rp)?

18
Using CAPM Some examples
  • E(RA) 61.7(11-6)14.5
  • E(RB) 60.65(11-6)9.25
  • E(RC) 61.2(11-6)12.0
  • OR, use bp and the CAPM
  • and E(Rp)61.135(11-6)11.675

19
Using the SML in Capital Budgeting
  • We know that for a project or investment to be
    attractive what must be true?
  • How does this relate to CAPM and the SML?

20
Using the SML in Capital Budgeting
  • Assume Rf 6, Rm 12
  • Project b IRR RRR
  • X 1.1 14 ?
  • Y 0.8 10.5 ?
  • Z 1.4 17 ?
  • Think of RRR like E(R) from CAPM.

21
Using the SML in Capital Budgeting
  • Over the line Þ positive NPV (why?)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com