Title: Review of Lecture 10
1Review of Lecture 10
- Collisions
- Impulse Linear Momentum
- Momentum Kinetic Energy in Collisions
- Inelastic Collisions in 1 Dimension
- Elastic Collisions in 1 Dimension
- Collisions in 2 Dimensions
2Rotational Motion
- So far, we have been dealing mainly with
translational motion - Now we will move on to rotational motion the
motion of something that is spinning about an
axis - Specifically we will examine the rotation of a
rigid body around a fixed axis
3Rotational Variables
- We have at the right an arbitrary rigid body
which is rotating about an arbitrary axis - This axis is called the rotation axis or axis of
rotation
4Rotational Variables
- You can see that any point within the body will
describe a circle as it moves around the rotation
axis - Every point within the body will move through the
same angle during the same time period
5Rotational Variables
- We also have a reference line in our diagram
which is normal to the rotation axis and rotates
with the body (e.g., it is embedded within the
body)
6Rotational Variables(Angular Position)
- The angular position of the line is the angle of
the line relative to some fixed reference
direction which we take as the zero angular
position - This could be the x axis, the y axis or some
other direction fixed in the xy plane
7Rotational Variables(Angular Position)
- Looking down from above now, we can see that the
angular position is being measured w.r.t. the
positive x axis
8Rotational Variables(Angular Position)
- The angleis in this case expressed in
radians as s is the length of the arc described
by the line of length r rotating through the
angle ?
9Rotational Variables(Angular Position)
- If you havent worked in radians before, then
here is a quick overview - There are 2p radians in a complete circle
- Thus 1 rad 57.3º 0.159 revolution
- Unlike using degrees, we do not reset our angle
in radians to 0 (zero) when we pass the zero
angular position, e.g., twice around a circle
would be 4p radians
10Rotational Variables(Angular Position)
- Note also that there are no units for an angle
measured in radians - This is because the definition of an angle
measured in radians is simply the ratio of 2 real
numbers (with whatever units they may happen to
have)
11Rotational Variables(Angular Displacement)
- Just as we can have a linear displacement, we can
also have an angular displacement which is
defined as
12Rotational Variables(Angular Displacement)
- By convention, angular displacements are taken to
be positive when the rotation is in the
counterclockwise direction - Remember the phrase Clocks are negative
13Rotational Variables(Angular Velocity)
- Carrying the linear analogies one step farther,
we can define an angular velocity as the angular
displacement made over some period of time ?t
14Rotational Variables(Angular Velocity)
- The average angular velocity is
thereforeand is usually measured in
radians-per-second or revolutions-per-second (or
revolutions-per-minute a.k.a. rpm)
15Rotational Variables(Angular Velocity)
- To get the instantaneous angular velocity we
simply make our ?t very small and in the limit we
get
16Rotational Variables(Angular Acceleration)
- Lets take this one last step and introduce
angular acceleration - Just as we could have average and instantaneous
angular velocity, so too can we have average and
instantaneous angular acceleration - And we will define them in just the same fashion
as we did their linear counterparts
17Rotational Variables(Angular Acceleration)
- Lets start with average angular acceleration
which is defined as the change in angular
velocity over some time period
18Rotational Variables(Angular Acceleration)
- And similarly for the instantaneous angular
acceleration we have - Note Angular acceleration is typically measured
in radians/s2 or sometimes revolutions/s2
19Rotational Variables
- Sample Problem 10-1
- Checkpoint 1
20Are Angular Quantities Vectors?
- Recall that we have often dispensed with the
vector notation when we have a particle moving in
a straight line along an axis - We can do this because we dont really need a
vector a plus or minus sign will suffice to
tell us which direction the particle is moving
21Are Angular Quantities Vectors?
- We can do the same with an object that is
rotating around a fixed axis it can be rotating
either clockwise or counterclockwise
22Are Angular Quantities Vectors?
- We represent the angular velocity as a vector ?
pointing along the axis of rotation - This is quite different from any vectors we have
previously used the vector in this case doesnt
point in the direction of motion but rather
points at right angles to it
23Are Angular Quantities Vectors?
- We use a right-hand rule to define the direction
for the angular velocity - Curl your right hand around the rotating object
such that your fingers point in the direction of
rotation - By definition then, your thumb points in the
direction of the angular velocity
24Are Angular Quantities Vectors?
25Are Angular Quantities Vectors?
- Angular acceleration a is also a vector
quantity and it follows the same rules - Note that angular displacement however generally
cannot be represented as a vector - This is because in order to be a vector, a
quantity must follow all of the rules of a vector
26- In particular, a vector must follow the rules of
vector addition which says that the order of the
vectors being added doesnt make any difference - However, angular displacements fail this test
- Lets see why
27Rotation with ConstantAngular Acceleration
- When we were working with constant linear
acceleration we had a nice set of equations that
allowed us to solve for various quantities given
a certain set of known values - The same happens in the case of constant angular
acceleration and in fact the equations look very
similar
28Rotation with ConstantAngular Acceleration
- What has been done in Table 10-1 (page 247) is
that the variables for linear displacement,
velocity and acceleration have simply been
replaced with their angular equivalents - So for example
29Rotation with ConstantAngular Acceleration
- Checkpoint 2
- Sample Problem 10-2
30Relating the Linear andAngular Variables
- While all of the particles of a rigid rotating
object move with the same angular velocity, the
linear velocity of a specific particle will vary
with its perpendicular distance r from the axis
of rotation - Lets start with the angular position
31Relating the Linear andAngular Variables
- Looking at the picture to the right, we can see
that a particle at a distance of r from the axis
will move a distance s along a circular arc given
a change in the angle ?
32Relating the Linear andAngular Variables
- Thus the relationship between linear distance
(along the arc of the circle in this case) and
the angle of rotation is
33Relating the Linear andAngular Variables
- Note that the angle ? must be measured in radians
in this case (where one revolution is equal to 2p
radians) - Differentiating the position equation with
respect to time will give us the velocity
equation
34Relating the Linear andAngular Variables
- Notice that the linear velocity vector is always
tangent to the circle - Given that the angular speed is constant we can
see that the linear speed is also constant
35Relating the Linear andAngular Variables
- If the linear speed of a point on a rotating body
is constant, then the body is undergoing uniform
circular motion - The period of rotation is given by
36Relating the Linear andAngular Variables
- Substituting back into the equation relating
linear velocity to angular velocity we get
37Relating the Linear andAngular Variables
- Now lets differentiate the linear velocity
equation to get the linear acceleration of our
rotating object
38Relating the Linear andAngular Variables
- Remember that the acceleration we just calculated
is the tangential acceleration (thus the t
subscript) - We already know the radial component of the
acceleration from our study of uniform circular
motion
39Relating the Linear andAngular Variables
- We can see that the radial acceleration component
is present whenever the angular velocity is not
zero
40Relating the Linear andAngular Variables
- The tangential acceleration component however is
present only when the angular acceleration is not
zero
41Relating the Linear andAngular Variables
- Checkpoint 3
- Sample Problem
42Sample Problem
- An astronaut is riding in a centrifuge with a
radius r 15 m - At what constant angular speed must the
centrifuge rotate if the astronaut is to have a
linear acceleration of magnitude 11g?
43Sample Problem
- Since the angular speed is constant, we know that
the angular acceleration is zero - So we also know that the tangential component of
the linear acceleration is also zero
44Sample Problem
- The only component of acceleration that is left
is the radial acceleration which iswhere ar
11g
45Sample Problem
46Sample Problem
- What is the tangential acceleration of the
astronaut if the centrifuge accelerates at a
constant rate from rest to the angular speed we
just calculated in 120 seconds?
47Sample Problem
- We know that the tangential component of angular
acceleration is given byand that
48Sample Problem
- Combining these two equations gives uswhere
?2 2.68 rad/s, ?1 0, t2 120 s,t1 0 and r
15 m - Doing the calculations gives us the resultat
0.034 g
49Kinetic Energy of Rotation
- If we want to calculate the kinetic energy of a
rotating object (say a circular saw blade) we
would be tempted to start with the familiar - But we know from our previous study of rigid
bodies that this will only give us the kinetic
energy of the center of mass which, in the case
of a circular saw blade, is zero (we hope!)
50Kinetic Energy of Rotation
- Lets instead decompose our saw blade into lots
of small masses (particles) which we know will be
moving at different velocities (depending on
their perpendicular distance from the axis of
rotation)
51Kinetic Energy of Rotation
- This series of terms can be expressed
aswhere mi is the mass is the ith particle
and vi is the linear speed of the particle and
the sum is taken over all of the particles in the
body
52Kinetic Energy of Rotation
- We already know that the values vi will not be
the same for all particles so lets make that
substitution now - This term is called the rotational inertia or the
moment of inertia of the object
53Kinetic Energy of Rotation
- So we get as a result
- Now lets compare this with our previous
definition of kinetic energy
54Kinetic Energy of Rotation
RotationalInertia
55Kinetic Energy of Rotation
- Note that while the formulas are somewhat
different, they both describe kinetic energy - The difference is only that in one case the
object is moving in translation and in the other
case the body is rotating - Clearly it is also possible that a body is moving
in both ways
56Kinetic Energy of Rotation
57Calculating the Rotational Inertia
- We know that rotational inertia depends on the
distribution as well as the velocity of masses
that are rotating around a fixed axis - So for small numbers of simple masses, we can
calculate the rotational inertia directly
58Calculating the Rotational Inertia
- For objects with a continuous mass distribution,
we need to move from the summation to an
integralwhere we integrate over the mass of
the object
59Calculating the Rotational Inertia
- Lets take a simple example a thin rod rotating
about the long axis (figure (c) in Table 10-2) - Imagine a thin slice of therod it would look
like aflat plate - Also assume it hasuniform density ?
60Calculating the Rotational Inertia
- A mass element in the plate would have a
volumewhere rdr is the infinitesimal change
in radius (at radius r), d? is the change in
angle and dl is the thickness
61Calculating the Rotational Inertia
- We can therefore express the mass element dm
aswhich results in
62Calculating the Rotational Inertia
- We can break this down into three integrals as
follows (where I have inserted the limits over
which you need to evaluate the integrals)
63Calculating the Rotational Inertia
64Calculating the Rotational Inertia
- We know that the density of the rod is uniform,
so the mass is simply - Factoring that into the previous equation we get
the following for the moment of inertia of a thin
rod about its long axis
65Calculating the Rotational Inertia
- Lets imagine two masses m separated by a distance
L and rotating about a point halfway between them
66Calculating the Rotational Inertia
67Calculating the Rotational Inertia
- Now lets change the system so that the axis of
rotation is through one of the masses
68Calculating the Rotational Inertia
69Calculating the Rotational Inertia
- From this we can see that even though the
configurations of the two systems are identical,
they have different moments of inertia just
because the axis of rotation was changed
70Parallel-Axis Theorem
- For objects that have a continuous mass
distribution we can always use the
equationto find the moment of inertia of any
object about a specific axis by evaluating the
integrals at the appropriate limits
71Parallel-Axis Theorem
- But there is a shortcut we can use if we already
know the moment of inertia of the object around
an axis that passes through the center of mass
and if that axis is parallel to the (new) axis in
question
72Parallel-Axis Theorem
- Given these constraints, the moment of inertia
around the new axis iswhere h is the
perpendicular distance from the new axis to the
axis passing through the center of mass, and M is
the mass of the object
73Parallel-Axis Theorem
- Lets go back to our example of two balls of mass
m separated by a massless rod of length L
74Parallel-Axis Theorem
- We know that the moment of inertia is
75Parallel-Axis Theorem
- Now lets change the system so that the axis of
rotation is through one of the masses but this
time we will calculate the new moment using the
parallel-axis theorem
76Parallel-Axis Theorem
77Parallel-Axis Theorem
- Lets do another problem of this type
- We can see from table10-2 that a hoop
ofdiameter R spunaround any axishas a moment
ofinertia I ½ MR2
78Parallel-Axis Theorem
- Now lets move the rotation axis to a new
location as shown by the dotted line - Using the parallel axis theorem we see that
79Parallel-Axis Theorem
- Checkpoint 5
- Sample Problem 10-7
80Torque
- When you try to swing a door, its clear that it
is easier to move the door if you apply the force
farther away from the axis of rotation (e.g., the
hinges) - Its also clear that the application of the force
is most efficient if the force is applied
perpendicular to the plane of the door
81Torque
- Lets look at an object that is rotating about a
fixed axis O - A force F is applied at point P which is at a
position r relative to the axis O - Note also that the force F is applied at an
angle F relative to the vector r - For simplicity we also assume that the force F
is in the plane of the screen
82Torque
- Lets decompose the force into its components
relative to the vector r - The radial component is labeled Fr (FcosF)
- The tangential component is labeled Ft (FsinF)
83Torque
- It should be clear that the ability to rotate the
door depends only on the tangential component of
the force - And as we noted earlier, the farther away the
force is applied from the axis of rotation, the
easier it is to rotate the object
84Torque
- So the ability to rotate an object using an
external applied force depends on the tangential
component of the applied force, and the distance
that force is applied from the axis of rotation
85Torque
- We therefore define torque to be the product of
these two values - Torque comes from the Latin word meaning to
twist
86Torque
- By rearranging things a bit in the previous
equation we can equivalently see thatwhere
r? is the perpendicular distance from the
rotation axis O to an extended line running
through the vector F at point P
87Torque
- The extended line is called the line of action
and the value r? is called the moment arm - Clearly if the force is applied completely
tangentially, then the moment arm is just r
88Torque
- A word of caution
- You can see that the SI units for torque are Nm
(force times distance) which also are the units
for work - Work can also be expressed in joules(1 J 1 Nm
), but torque is never expressed that way
89Torque
- In the next chapter we will spend more time with
torque and examine its properties as a vector - For the moment however, it is sufficient to just
treat it as a scalar - If an object rotates counterclockwise (as seen
from a position above the axis of rotation), then
the torque is positive and vice versa (remember
that clocks are negative)
90Torque
- Also note that torques obey the superposition
principle, e.g. when several torques act on a
body, the net torque (or resultant torque) is the
sum of the individual torques
91Torque
92Newtons 2nd Law for Rotation
- We know that Newtons 2nd law is
- We also know there are formulas that relate the
angular and linear equivalents for displacement,
velocity and acceleration
93Newtons 2nd Law for Rotation
- So we should be able then to come up with an
rotational equivalent to Fnet ma and we can
it iswhere tnet takes the place of Fnet, I
takes the place of the mass m, and a (the angular
acceleration) takes the place of the linear
acceleration a
94Newtons 2nd Law for Rotation
- The proof of this is straightforward and is shown
on page 257 - Note that the angular acceleration must (as
always) be measured in radians/sec2
95Newtons 2nd Law for Rotation
- Checkpoint 7
- Sample Problem 10-8
96Sample Problem 10-8
- We have a disk with massM 2.5 kg and a
radiusR 20 cm mounted on a fixed, frictionless
axle - A block of mass m 1.2 kg hangs from a massless
string which is wrapped around the disk several
times - Find the acceleration of the block, the angular
acceleration of the disk and the string tension
97Sample Problem 10-8
- As usual, we begin by drawing the free body
diagrams - Starting with the block we see that our force
equation turns out to be - We have the acceleration a in this equation, but
we cant solve for it yet as we dont know the
value of T
98Sample Problem 10-8
- Moving on to the disk, we can see that the torque
on the disk is(since the disk is turning
clockwise, the torque is negative)
99Sample Problem 10-8
- But we also can express the torque in terms of
the moment of inertiaand we know thatfor
a flat plate rotating as this one is
100Sample Problem 10-8
- Combining all of these we getwhich is fine
except that that dont know what a is (so that we
can solve for T)
101Sample Problem 10-8
- But wait we can relate a to the tangential
component of the linear acceleration at (which
also just happens to be a in this case) - Rearranging that we get
102Sample Problem 10-8
- Plugging that back into our previous equation we
get - We can now substitute this result back into our
equation for the motion of the block
103Sample Problem 10-8
- When we do that we get
- Now that we know a we can solve for T and get
104Sample Problem 10-8
- Finally, we can solve for a and get
105Sample Problem 10-8
- As a final check lets see what happens when M
0
106Work and RotationalKinetic Energy
- Recall from Chapter 7 that the work done on an
object can be expressed as the change in
translational-related kinetic energy - Suppose that the change in the kinetic energy is
the only change in the overall energy of the
system thus
107Work and RotationalKinetic Energy
- For motion confined to a single axis (lets say
the x axis) we havewhich reduces towhen
the force is constant and the displacement goes
from xi to xf
108Work and RotationalKinetic Energy
- And finally, the power is
- Now lets consider what happens in the rotational
case
109Work and RotationalKinetic Energy
- In this case suppose that the change in the
rotational kinetic energy is the only change in
the overall energy of the system thus
110Work and RotationalKinetic Energy
- The corresponding equation for work in the
rotational case iswhich reduces towhen
the torque is constant and the angular
displacement goes from ?i to ?f
111Work and RotationalKinetic Energy
- And finally, the power is
- Note Table 10-3 (on page 260) which provides some
corresponding relations between translational and
rotational motion
112Work and RotationalKinetic Energy
- So now lets pull all of this together into one
last sample problem
113Sample Problem 10-11
- We have a sculpture consisting of a thin hoop of
mass m and radius R 0.15 m and a thin radial
rod also of mass m and length L 2.0 R arranged
as shown - Suppose the sculpture can rotate about the x axis
as shown
114Sample Problem 10-11
- In terms of m and R, what is the sculptures
moment of inertia I about the rotation axis?
115Sample Problem 10-11
- We begin by realizing that we can break the
problem down into components the hoop and the
rod which can be solved for separately - The individual results can then be added together
for the final result - So lets start with the hoop
116Sample Problem 10-11
- From Table 10-2h we can see that the moment of
inertia for the hoop about its diameter is - And also from Table 10-2e we see that the rod has
a moment of inertia about its center of mass of
117Sample Problem 10-11
- We assert that the rotation axis of the rod is
parallel to the rotation axis of the hoop - As a result, we can use the parallel-axis theorem
to calculate the moment of inertia of the rod
about the hoops rotational axis which results
inwhere h is the distance between the rods
COM and the rotation axis of the hoop, and m is
the mass of the rod
118Sample Problem 10-11
- This results in
- Substituting in L 2.0 R we get
119Sample Problem 10-11
- Adding the rods and the hoops moments together
we get
120Sample Problem 10-11
- Assume that the sculpture starts from rest in the
position shown and is given a very gentle nudge
to cause it to rotate (the rotation due entirely
to gravity) - What is the angular speed ? when the sculpture is
inverted?
121Sample Problem 10-11
- To solve this we need to do two things
- We need to relate the sculptures angular speed ?
to the sculptures kinetic energy K at the bottom
of the rotation, and - We need to relate the kinetic energy K at the
bottom of the rotation to the sculptures total
mechanical energy
122Sample Problem 10-11
- Lets start with the formula for the conservation
of mechanical energy - We know that
- We also know that as the sculpture rotates, the
kinetic energy is related to its angular speed
by
123Sample Problem 10-11
- Now lets attack the potential energy side
- We know thatwhere ?y represents the change in
position of the sculptures center of mass - So we get
124Sample Problem 10-11
- Now we need to know what the sculptures COM is
doing - For this we will use the fact that we can
represent our two objects (the rod and the hoop)
as point masses at their respective centers of
mass
125Sample Problem 10-11
- The COM of the hoop is at y 0 and the rods COM
is at h (which we know is 2R)
126Sample Problem 10-11
- So we get as our initial COMand we can see
by symmetry that when the sculpture is inverted
the COM will be
127Sample Problem 10-11
- So from this we can see that
- Pulling everything together we get
128Sample Problem 10-11
- Substituting in I 4.83R2 and ?ycom -2R and
then solving for the angular speed ? we get
129Next Class
- Homework Problems Chapter 104, 15, 33, 41, 55,
65 - Read sections Chapter 11