Title: Radical Nephrectomy The Role Of Surgery In mRCC
1Radical NephrectomyThe Role Of Surgery In mRCC
- Peter Mulders
- Professor and Chairman Department of Urology
University Medical Center Nijmegen - The Netherlands
2Renal Cell CarcinomaGeneral Aspects
- RCC accounts for 3 of all adult tumors
- 100.000 deaths from RCC every year worldwide
- Most aggressive GU tumor
3Renal Cell CarcinomaGeneral Aspects
- 54 of cases present with localized disease
- 70 are not cured by surgery alone
SEER data
4Renal Cell CarcinomaSurgical Aspects
- Surgery is the primary curative treatment in RCC
- Changing techniques
- From open radical tumor nephrectomy
- to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
5Renal Cell CarcinomaSurgical Aspects
- Robsons radical tumor nephrectomy
- No-touch procedure
- Total nephrectomy and adrenalectomy
- Lymphadenectomy
6Renal Cell CarcinomaSurgical Aspects
- Partial nephrectomy similar oncological outcome
in lt4 cm tumors - Laparoscopic (partial) nephrectomy feasible
7(No Transcript)
8Prospective Randomised Study Open vs Laparoscopic
Nephrectomy (n160)
9Prospective Randomised Study Open vs Laparoscopic
Nephrectomy
10Conclusions LIDO-trial
- Laparoscopic nephrectomy
- Safe and effective
- Similar oncological results
- Quick recovery
- Better QoL
- Quicker recovery for initiating systemic
therapy
11Renal Cell Carcinoma
- 5 year survival
- 89 for localized disease
- 61 for locally advanced disease
- 9 for metastatic disease
SEER data
12Renal Cell CarcinomaRisk Factors
- Conventional risk factors
- ECOG Performance Status
- Tumor stage
- Tumor grade
- Microvessel density
- Histological subtype
- Histological tumor necrosis
- Molecular markers
- Cytogenetics
- Proliferation and anti-apoptosis markers
- Hypoxia-inducible pathway
- Cell adhesion, cell motility and invasion markers
13Renal Cell CarcinomaRisk Groups pT3a
14Renal Cell CarcinomaRisk Factors
Han K J Urol 2003170222
15Risk Group Assessment in RCC After
NephrectomyZisman A JCO 2002204559
16Renal Cell Carcinoma Risk Factors(Han K J Urol)
17- Prognosis And Surgery Of Renal Cell Carcinoma
With Extension Into The Caval Wall
18Surgery for RCC with Caval Thrombus
cavathrombus
19cavathrombus
20Risk FactorsVascular invasion T3c
- Vena cava involvement if completely resected
probably no risk factor - N44
- 27 T2N0
- 69 5y (mobile thrombus)
- 25 5y (VC wall involvement)
- 57 5y (VC wall resected)
- WHO 2002 pT3c tumor extension into vena cava
above the diaphragm is a poor prognostic sign
Hatcher et al J Urol1991
Lam et al J Urol 2005
21Risk FactorsMicroscopic Vascular Invasion
- Retrospective analysis of 180 patients
- 129 no vascular invasion
- 94 NED med FU 160 months
- 51 microscopic vascular invasion
- 39 progresion med FU 79 months
This observation is not yet confirmed as an
independent prognostic factor by others nor in
a prospective randomised study
Van Poppel J Urol 199715845
22Renal Cell CarcinomaHistological Subtypes (WHO
2004)
- Clear cell (80)
- Synonym common or conventional
- In 85 of cases associated with mutations in
the VHL gene - Papillary tumor (10)
- Chromophobe tumors (4)
- Multilocular cystic clear cell (5)
23RCC Associated Antigen G250/MN/CAIX
- Present in gt85 of all RCC, 99 of the clear-cell
subtype - No expression in normal kidney
Mulders et al, J Urol 2006 Mab G250 has clinical
efficacy in mRCC patients
24Association of CAIX Staining and Pathologic
Predictive Group and Response to IL-2 Therapy
25Survival Curves for Patients In Good and Poor
Predictive Groups.
26Adjuvant Therapy After Nephrectomy in RCC
- Aspecific immunotherapy
- IFN, IL2, Combination
- Tumor vaccine
- Modified tumor cells
- HSP
- G250 Mab
- Angiogenesis inhibitors
27RCC Adjuvant Interferon Alfa-NL Overall Survival
Messing E et al. JCO 2003211214
28RCC Adjuvant High Dose Bolus IL-2
DF survival
Overall survival
Clark J et al JCO 2003213133
29RCC Adjuvant Autologous Tumour Vaccine
- Randomised study
- N 558
- 553 included
- 276 vaccine group
- 177 treated (PT2-3b, N0-3,M0)
- 277 control group
- 202
Jocham D et al. Lancet 2004363594
30RCC Adjuvant Autologous Tumour Vaccine
- Well balanced for risk factors (T, Grade,
histology, N etc) - 5 y PFS 77.4 versus 67.8 (p0.0204)
- T2 81.3 versus 74.6 (n264) (NS)
- T3 67.5 versus 49.7 (n115) (p0.039)
- Median time to progression not reached
- Overall survival not given
Jocham D et al. Lancet 2004363594
31RCC Adjuvant
- No standard treatment.
- The results of several studies are not available
yet. - Adjuvant treatment should only be given in the
frame work of clinical studies
32mRCCThe Role of Tumor Nephrectomy
- Two prospective randomised studies performed to
address this issue - SWOG
- EORTC
33EORTC
34(No Transcript)
35(No Transcript)
36mRCCThe Role of Tumor Nephrectomy
- Flanigan NEJM 2001 SWOG 246 ptn
- R Nx IFN?2b IFNa2b
-
- n 120(92) 121(83)
- CR/PR 0/3 3.3 1/2 3.6
- mOS(m) 11 8 (p0.05)
- Mickisch Lancet 2001 EORTC 85 ptn
- mOS (m) 18 11 (plt0.05)
- Combined analysis J Urol 2004171(3)1071-6
- mOS 13.6 7.8 m (plt0.05)
37Take Home Messages
- Prognostic factors and risk group formation
should be regarded and implemented in treatment
decision - Surgery is the only chance for cure in localized
disease - Surgery can be minimal invasive with similar
oncological outcome - Surgery in combination with Interferon-alpha
gives survival benefit - BUT
38- What is the exact role of surgery in the era of
angiogenesis inhibitors? - What is the exact place of angiogenesis
inhibitors in patient who undergo surgery?
39Unaddressed Questions
- What is the role of tumor nephrectomy in
combination with anti-angiogenesis ? - What is the best timing of nephrectomy ?
- What is the effect on the primary tumor?
- Will anti-angiogensis treatment in an adjuvant
setting give benifit - ?