International Road Federation Brussels Programme Centre Page 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

International Road Federation Brussels Programme Centre Page 1

Description:

ERF is a signatory of the European Road Safety Charter associating ... passive safety devices, porous road surfacing, driver information (VMS, road signs, etc. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:105
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Alv77
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: International Road Federation Brussels Programme Centre Page 1


1
  • European Union Road Federation
  • (ERF)
  • Infrastructure safety needs and policies

ERF is a signatory of the European Road Safety
Charter associating civil society to Europes
goal of halving the number of road deaths by 2010
2
The Voice of the European Road
  • ERF is a platform for dialogue and research at
    the service of the European road community.
  • ERF initiates and supports scientific studies and
    publications aimed at improving the knowledge of
    the European road system.
  • ERF gives the road community a consistent and
    united voice in all transport areas
  • Socio-economic contribution of roads to society
  • Sustainable road construction
  • Infrastructure financing
  • Intelligent roads
  • Safer road engineering

3
The Problem
4
The European Context (1/4)
  • Road safety levels in Europe remain preoccupying
  • EU-25 41,500 deaths, 2 000 000 road injuries and
    countless near misses every year
  • General trend show improvement in EU-15 but
    stabilisation in 10 new Member States,
  • Performance varies considerably from one Member
    States to another,
  • A structurally ageing population with lower
    cognitive abilities (night vision, etc.) and a
    higher fatality risk in the event of an
    accident.
  • ? Road Safety remains a major societal issue in
    Europe

5
The European Context (2/4)
  • Evolution of fatalities in EU-25

6
The European Context (3/4)
  • Fatalities by million vehicles

7
The European Context (4/4)
  • Old New Member States performances

8
Understanding the figures (1/4)
  • Old solve the driver approach
  • But
  • with comparable speed blood alcohol limits,
    road death ratio between European countries is
    14,
  • Single lane roads are up to four times as
    dangerous as dual carriageways,
  • a third of road deaths are attributable to
    single-vehicle crashes with a roadside obstacle
  • ? Official accident statistics significantly
    understate the importance of the road as a
    contributing factor

9
Understanding the figures (2/4)
Case study
The driver Young, inexperienced, driving fast
The car Worn rear tires
The road Wet, no protective devices
10
Understanding the figures (3/4)
How can accidents be avoided ?
  • Acting on the driver
  • More training, graduate licenses
  • Acting on the car
  • speed limitation devices, improved stability
    programmes
  • Acting on the road
  • passive safety devices, porous road surfacing,
    driver information (VMS, road signs, etc.)

11
Understanding the figures (4/4)
  • What we still find on European roads
  • Unprotected trees and street furniture
  • Poorly placed pedestrian crossings
  • Road surface defects
  • Obstructed driver visibility
  • Inadequate protective devices
  • Road signs and markings that are invisible in
    poor visibility conditions
  • No consideration for vulnerable road users

12
A shared responsibility (1/3)
The EU has legal obligations arising from the
Treaty
  • Article 71 measures to improve road safety
    integrated within CTP.
  • Article 152 public health and consumer
    protection issues.
  • Article 155 technical harmonisation and
    interoperability of the Trans European Network.
  • The 2003 RSAP translates these obligations into
    an action plan

13
A shared responsibility (2/3)
but shares the overall responsibility for road
safety
14
A shared responsibility (3/3)
and must therefore rely on a panel of measures.
  • Direct legislation (eg. Tunnel Safety Directive)
  • Data collection, comparison and analysis of best
    practices (Report on infrastructure safety
    practices)
  • Standardisation (CEN/TC226 and TC227)
  • Financial support to RD activities (RISER,
    RANKERS)
  • Consumer information programmes (EuroRAP)
  • Fiscal incentives (none tested yet)
  • Subsidiarity remains a convenient excuse for some
    MS

15
The Infrastructure Safety Directive (1/8)
Europes most ambitious legislation is still to
come
  • Framework legislation on road infrastructure
    management applicable to the TEN
  • Provides guidance to ensure safety is integrated
    at all stages of road design, construction and
    management
  • Who will it affect ?
  • Road authorities safety procedures integrated in
    all phases of road planning, design, construction
    and operation
  • Road engineers compulsory qualifications, best
    practice exchanges
  • Motorists introduction of black spots signposts
  • 1,300 lives could be saved every year

16
The Infrastructure Safety Directive (2/8)
  • Components of the Directive

Supporting measures
Safe Road Management
Accidentology Cost-benefit Research Training Best
practices
Reactive Strategies
Preventive Strategies
High accident risk road management Network
Safety Management
Impact assessments Road safety audits Safety
Inspections
17
The Infrastructure Safety Directive (3/8)
  • Preventive strategies
  • For new roads and major changes of operation
    Safety Impact Assessment.
  • At pre-opening stage Safety Audits.
  • As part of regular road maintenance Safety
    Inspections.
  • Audit report
  • delivers an idenpendent evaluation of the roads
    accident potential
  • identifies any potential safety deficiencies
  • makes recommendations to changes in the design
  • 30 of problems identified during an audit will
    occur within 5 years unless the recommendations
    are implemented.

18
The Infrastructure Safety Directive (4/8)
  • Reactive strategies
  • High accident risk roads are road sections with
    an increased probability that a serious or fatal
    accident will occur in relation to traffic
    volume.
  • Network Safety Management targets remedial
    measures to portions of the road network where
    accident cost reduction potential is the highest
  • Safety gains will be maximum during first years
    of mass eradication programmes. In parallel,
    driver should be informed by means of a sign
    detailing the safety record of the section and
    suggesting concrete actions to the motorists.
  • Signposting of high accident risk roads can lead
    to 25 reduction in injury accidents

19
The Infrastructure Safety Directive (5/8)
  • Supporting Measures
  • Detailed accident reports to detect recurrent
    patterns
  • Best practice exchange to share engineering
    measures known for their cost effectiveness
    (before and after case studies).
  • Systematic training courses for auditors leading
    to a certificate recognised throughout the EU.
  • Research programmes into cutting-edge
    countermeasures
  • Economic evaluation of remedial measures based
    on Cost-benefit assessment. E.g
  • 353 for anti-skid surfacing
  • 820 for markings and signs
  • 134 for mini-roundabouts
  • 198 for traffic calming measures
  • Source Institute of Civil Engineers, UK

20
The Infrastructure Safety Directive (6/8)
  • Status of the Directive
  • 2001 First measures targeted at Black Spots
    announced in White Paper
  • 2004 L. De Palacio confirms preparation of a
    framework directive under way
  • April 2006 European Commission opens public
    consultation around three scenarios
  • No change
  • Technical and organisation requirements fixed at
    European level
  • Technical and organisation requirements left to
    MS
  • 4 October 2006 proposal to be formally
    submitted to European Parliament and Council

21
The Infrastructure Safety Directive (7/8)
  • Reactions received
  • We strongly suggest that guidelines are issued
    to facilitate the procedures of decision making
    and design of infrastructure and that an active
    exchange on best practices will be initiated.
    Dutch Road Directorate
  • Our preference would be for an approach that
    minimised the level of
  • prescription, allowing member states freedom to
    develop or draw upon
  • appropriate procedures that best suited their
    needs UK DfT
  • It is essential for such a Directive that it is
    flexible in the sense that it must not prohibit
    any member state for using already well working
    procedures. DK Road Directorate

22
The Infrastructure Safety Directive (8/8)
  • Joint statement released on 22 May 2006
  • European road safety targets set in 2001 will
    not be met unless road authorities rise up to the
    challenge of absorbing increasing road traffic
    while offering safer driving conditions to all
    road users. We the undersigned organisations
    call for the swift release of a Directive on Safe
    Road Management as a part of a new safety deal
    linking in a realistic way all the actors of the
    safety chain.

Signatory Organisations
23
Online resources
  • Designing and keeping roadsides safe
  • Better road infrastructure, saving your life
  • Road Restraint Systems Passive safety where it
    matters
  • Position Paper on the 3rd European Road Safety
    Action Programme
  • Position Paper on the Tunnel Safety Directive
  • Road Marking Requirements for Europe
  • The Improvement of Signing in Europe
  • Guidelines to Black Spot Management
  • Engineering Safer Roads (Bi-monthly newsletter)

All publications are available at
http//www.erf.be/
24
Thank You For Your Attention
  • European Union
  • Road Federation (ERF)
  • Avenue Louise, 113
  • B-1050 Brussels (Belgium)
  • Tel (32) 2 644 58 77
  • Fax (32) 2 647 59 34
  • E-mailinfo_at_erf.be
  • http//www.erf.be
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com