Title: Dynamic Traffic Assignment VIII: Applications of Simulation
1Dynamic Traffic Assignment VIII Applications of
Simulation
Haris N. Koutsopoulos Northeastern
University M.I.T. Summer Professional Program
1.10s Modeling and Simulation for Dynamic
Transportation Management Systems July/August
2003
2Outline
- Introduction
- Microscopic Simulation Applications
- MITSIMLab
- Case Studies
- Mesoscopic Simulation Applications
- DynaMIT-P
- Case Studies
- Conclusion
3Introduction
- Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)
- Characteristics
- Dynamic and Stochastic
- Complex Interactions
- Needs
- Decision Support Systems for operations (real
time) - System Design and Evaluation
- Emerging Tools
- Simulation-based
-
4Simulation-based Evaluation
- Requires large scale integration of various
components - Ability to model at sufficient level of detail
- integrated networks
- traffic prediction
- travel behavior
- dynamic interactions
- Flexibility
- control strategies
- surveillance system
- sensitivity to design parameters
- Computational efficiency
5Microscopic Traffic SimulationApplication Needs
6MITSIMLab
- A simulation laboratory for ITS
- Evaluation
- dynamic performance (stability and robustness)
- interactions
- Design (ATMS, ATIS, APTS)
- Development of new technologies and algorithms
7MITSIMLab A MIcroscopic Traffic SIMulation
Laboratory
- Traffic Management Center (TMS) -
Transit Operations Control Center (OOC)
- Traffic Surveillance Systems -
Transit Surveillance Monitoring Systems
(AVL, APC)
- Control and Routing Devices -
Transit Control and Traveler Information
Systems
MITSIM - Traffic Flow Simulator - Transit
Flow Simulator
8Dynamic Traffic Management
- Traffic Control
- Intersection control
- Generic controller
- Transit signal priority
- Freeway control
- ramp metering
- mainline control
- Emergency response
- Route Guidance
- Variable Message Signs (VMS)
- Radio
- In-vehicle units
- Generic Overall Logic
- Pre-timed
- Reactive
- Predictive
9Traffic Management Framework
10Generic Controller
11Bus Transit
- Supply
- Demand
- Transit surveillance monitoring
- Operations Control Center (OCC)
12Bus Supply
- Supply
- Network
- Schedule and fleet assignment
- Driving behavior
Bus 1113
Route 43
Stop 33
13Bus Demand
- Base level
- Stop-specific dwell time
- Aggregate level
- Average passenger
- arrival rate
- Alighting rate
- Disaggregate level
- O-D flow
- Passenger attributes
- Passenger choice
-
14Bus OperationsControl Center (OCC)
- Schedule- and headway-based operations control
- Holding
- Transit signal priority
- Unconditional priority
- Conditional priority
- Schedule
- Headway
- Load
15Travel Behavior
- Route Choice
- Pre-trip
- En-route
- Models
- path- based
- link-based
16Incidents
- Location
- Start time
- Duration
- Severity
- Length
- Rubber-necking
17Surveillance System
- Sensors and detectors
- point
- loop detectors, radar, over-height detectors
- point-to-point
- probe -vehicles
- area
- CCTV
- External Emergency Reports
18Output and GUI
- Detailed data on
- speed
- flow
- queue length
- travel time
- vehicle trajectories
- sensor measurements
- Visualization/Animation
- Network editor
19Details Matter Look-ahead
- Common approach myopic
- Drivers aware of next link only
- Problematic in urban settings
- Excess weaving and merging due to late lane
changes
- MITISM path awareness
- Look-ahead
- Look-ahead distance distribution
20Importance of Look-ahead
- without look-ahead with look-ahead
21Importance of Look-ahead
Time Period
- MITSIM
- Without look-ahead
- With look-ahead
- Observed
Vehicle Count
Time Period
22Computational Results
- Central Artery Network
- Experiment
- SGI Indigo2 R4400
- 143 nodes, 171 links
- 170 lane-kms
- 1 hour of operations
23Applications
- Evaluation
- Traffic operations
- Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)
- Advanced Traffic Management Systems
- Advanced Traveler Information Systems
- Advanced Public Transportation Systems
- Emergency Response
- Design Refinement
- Algorithms
- Strategies
- Geometric Design
24Framework
Evaluation loop
25Discussion
- Scope of applications of micro-simulation
- Intersections ? networks
- Calibration
- Large number of parameters
- Data availability
- Interpretation of results
- Validation
26Calibration
Demand
Supply
- Driving behavior
- Car-following
- Lane-changing and gap acceptance
- Desired speed distribution
- Travel behavior
- Path choice set
- Habitual travel times
- Route choice model
27Case Studies
- Applications
- Central Artery
- Stockholm
- Des Moines, IA
- Research and Development
- Evaluation of DTA systems
28The Central Artery/Tunnel Network
- Approximately 110 lane-miles
- Loop detectors
- Lane Control Signals
- VMS
29Emergency/Incident Management
- Incident in tunnel strategy
- Closure as soon as incident is detected
- Opening as soon as incident is cleared
30No Delay
Delay in Opening
31Lane Control Signs (LCS)
- Provides lane specific information to drivers
- Three states
- Green ?
- Yellow X
- Red X
- Reduction of delays due to weaving
32LCS Design Options
- Design alternatives
- Design 1 2 Red X 2 Yellow X
- Design 2 1 Red X 4 yellow X
- Design 3 1 Red X 6 yellow X
- Various scenarios under incident conditions
- Conclusion
- 1 red, 4 yellow LCS configuration most effective
33Application Example Evaluation of Ramp Metering
Algorithms
- An important control strategy to improve freeway
flow
34ALINEA
- Feedback control, local ramp metering algorithm
- Attempts to maintain a target occupancy on the
mainline - Simple, transferable, low implementation cost,
efficient, flexible
35FLOW
- Area wide control
- Metering rate function of
- Local Metering Rate (LMR)
- from Occupancy-Metering rate look-up table
- Bottleneck Metering Rate (BMR)
- based on influence zones (bottleneck sections)
- Queue length adjustments
Bottleneck Section
36Case Study
37Results
- Effect of demand
- For ALINEA, travel time reduction at all demands
except 80 - For FLOW, travel time reduction at 110 and 120
demand - Effect of bottleneck
- under no bottleneck, ALINEA is better.
- with bottleneck, FLOW is better (at very high
demand)
38Transit Signal Priority
- Stockholm
- 6 signalized intersections
- 4 bus stops
- headway 7.5 minutes
39Validation Queue Lengths
40Transit Signal Priority
41Transit Signal Priority Results
100 Demand
140 Demand
42Des Moines, Iowa
- Reconstruction of I-235
- Through downtown Des Moines, IA
- 16 Miles long
- Alternate Routes Parallel major arterials and
Freeway - Construction staging
- Network level impact of construction
- Congestion mitigation
- Signals, ramp metering and route diversion
43Des Moines, Iowa
- LARGE Network
- 2500 Links, 200 Signalized and and 100
un-signalized intersections - 15, 000 O-D pairs
- 30, 000 vehicles at one time in the network
44ATIS (DTA) Evaluation
45Information
Sensor Data
MITSIMLab
46Case Study Central Artery / Tunnel
- Impact of predictive information
- informed drivers
- O-D error
- Update frequency
47Impact of Predictive Guidance
without guidance
with guidance
48Results Informed Drivers
- Prediction Horizon 20 min
49Results O-D Error
- Assumes 30 guided drivers
50Results Update Frequency
- Assumes 30 guided drivers
51DynaMIT-P
- Short-term planning
- Modeling elements
- Demand simulator
- Supply simulator
- Dynamic demand-supply interactions
- Characteristics
- Stochasticity
- Sensitivity to ATIS / ATMS designs
- Flexible time horizons
52DynaMIT-P Applications
- Short-term planning applications
- Work zones
- ATIS/ATMS
- Evaluation of strategies
- Base case
- ATMS evaluation
- ATIS evaluation
- predictive
- instantaneous
- VMS
- Link (location) -based
- Path-based
53VMS Evaluation
- Period 715 to 815
- Incident
- 720-745
- 60 capacity reduction
- Scenarios
- Base case (no VMS)
- Instantaneous VMS
- Predictive VMS
54Average Travel Time (sec)
55Impact of Incident
Incident, no VMS
56Impact of Incident
Predictive VMS
57Conclusion
- Simulation is a valuable tool
- Increasing number of simulation applications
- appropriate scope and range
- Calibration
- aggregate
- transferability
- Education/Training
- Hardware-in-the-loop
- Operator-in-the-loop