The Role of Antibiotics in Treating URTIs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

The Role of Antibiotics in Treating URTIs

Description:

... with sore throat never attend GP ... to support use of AB's in recurrent non-strep throat. ... Sore Throat. Tonsillitis rather than pharyngitis. No strong ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: JamesMc90
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Role of Antibiotics in Treating URTIs


1
The Role of Antibiotics in Treating URTIs
  • Or
  • A small battle in the war against superbugs
  • Or
  • Tools to aid the modification of health seeking
    behaviour

2
Wheres The Evidence?
  • SIGN
  • Clinical Evidence
  • Tayside Formulary

3
(No Transcript)
4
Presentation
  • Most Patients with sore throat never attend GP
  • UK study (1975) of women 20-44 years found that
    only 1 in 18 consulted.
  • Estimated consultation rates of 0.1 per capita
    per annum 60 million
  • Illness behaviour. Dutch Study 1994

5
Diagnosis
  • Clinical exam should not be relied upon to
    differentiate between bacterial and viral
    infection. (B)
  • Throat swabs should not be carried out routinely
    in sore throat. (B)

6
Antibiotics
  • ACUTE
  • Significance of presence of bacteria remains in
    doubt.
  • Recent open study antibiotics vs. no script vs.
    delayed script no difference in main outcomes.
  • Limited info is insufficient to support
    recommendation on the routine use of ABs.
  • RECURRENT
  • No evidence to support use of ABs in recurrent
    non-strep throat.
  • If associated with GABHS limited evidence
    suggests 10 day course may ? no and freq of
    attacks.

7
Questions
  • What about Glomerulonephritis and RF?
  • Incidence in UK very low.
  • Most info on prevention is post war
  • ABs should not be used specifically to prevent
    GN and RF (B)
  • What about abscesses?
  • The prevention of suppurative complications is
    not an indication for ABs (C)
  • To relieve symptoms?
  • Is evidence that better than placebo but not
    superior to simple analgaesics
  • ABs should not be used for this purpose (A)

8
What to Use
9
Acute Otitis Media
  • SIGN 66

10
Diagnosis
  • Signs and symptoms associated with purulent
    middle ear effusion in association with signs of
    systemic illness.
  • Earache is most important
  • May resolve with perforation
  • Effusion may persist after resolution of acute
    symptoms.

11
Antibiotics
  • 8 studies of acceptable standard in 30 years
  • Large proportion of exclusions - ? Why.? Ignore
    more severe cases
  • Variable inclusion criteria
  • Only 1 trial looked at ABs in under 2s
  • Meta-analysis ABs v Placebo
  • No influence on pain in 24hrs
  • At 2-7 days only 14 control still have pain
  • Early use of ABs ? risk of pain by 40
  • ? risk of contralateral AOM but not recurrence or
    deafness.
  • ? risk of vomiting, diarrhoea and rash with ABs

12
Antibiotics 2
  • Study of predictors of poor outcome
  • In the absence of fever and vomiting ABs had
    little benefit
  • Lack of AB did not lead to a poor outcome
  • Simplest method to target minority at ? risk poor
    outcome is to select for systemically unwell.
  • About 17 children need to be treated with broad
    spec AB to avoid 1 clinical failure
  • Very few episodes of mastoiditis and suppurative
    complications.
  • ABs may have modest benefit on symptom
    resolution and failure rates in over 2s
  • Children diagnosed with AOM should not be
    routinely be prescribed ABs as initial
    treatment (B)

13
Delayed Antibiotics
  • 1 trial AB immediately vs. after 72 hours
  • Immediate AB provided symptomatic benefit after
    72 hours
  • Immediate ABs ? diarrhoea by 10
  • Only 24 parents used delayed scripts
  • Delayed antibiotic is an alternative approach
    which can be applied in Gen Practice. (B)

14
What to Use
If ABs to be prescribed the conventional 5 day
course is recommended (B)
15
(No Transcript)
16
Acute Sinusitis
  • 1Systematic Review (6 RCTs)
  • ABs effective in treating
  • Symptoms improved in significantly fewer on
    placebo.
  • No advantage of other ABs over Amoxycillin

17
What to Use
18
  • Coughs and Colds

Systematic reviews found no significant
difference between ABs vs. placebo in cure or
general Improvement.
19
Summary
  • Sore Throat.
  • Tonsillitis rather than pharyngitis
  • No strong evidence either way. Routine use not
    recommended.
  • Mainly guesswork.
  • Throat swabs of little use
  • Complications rare
  • Pen V / Erythromycin
  • AOM.
  • ABs should not be routinely prescribed.
  • Select for those systemically unwell.
  • Use delayed scripts
  • Complications rare
  • Amoxycillin / Erythromycin
  • Acute Sinusitis
  • Minimal/modest effect of ABs
  • Weigh against adverse effects.
  • Pen V / Doxycycline
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com