Title: Agency:
1CHAPTER 29
Agency The Outside Relationship
2Quote of the Day
- There are three ways to get something done do
it yourself, pay someone else to do it, or tell a
teenager not to do it. - -- Anonymous
3Principals Liability for Contracts
- The principal is bound by the acts of an agent
if - the agent has authority, or
- the principal, for reasons of fairness, is
estopped from denying that the agent had
authority, or - the principal ratifies the acts of the agent.
4Authority
- A principal is bound by the acts of an agent if
the agent has authority. - There are three types of authority express,
implied, and apparent. - Only express and implied are actual authority,
because the agent is truly authorized. - In apparent authority, the agent seems to be
authorized, but is actually not. The principal
is still bound by the agents actions.
5Actual Authority
- Express Authority
- Granted by words or conduct that, reasonably
interpreted, cause the agent to believe the
principal desires her to act. - In ambiguity about the principals intent, the
courts look at the principals objective
manifestation not his subjective intent. - Implied Authority
- Unless otherwise agreed, authority to conduct a
transaction includes authority to do acts that
are reasonably necessary to accomplish it.
6Apparent Authority
- A principal can be liable for the acts of an
agent who is not, in fact, acting with authority
if the principals conduct causes a third party
reasonably to believe that the agent is
authorized. - An agent with actual authority may perform an act
beyond the scope of that authority. If the
action appears to the third party to be within
the scope of the authority, the principal will be
bound.
7Estoppel and Ratification Defined
- Estoppel
- No one may claim that a person was not his agent,
if he knew that others thought the person was
acting on his behalf, and he failed to correct
their belief. - Ratification
- If a person accepts the benefit of an
unauthorized transaction or fails to repudiate
it, then he is as bound by the act as if he had
originally authorized it.
8Estoppel and Ratification Distinguished
- Estoppel and ratification are easy to confuse.
- Ratification applies when the principal accepts
the benefits of the contract. - Estoppel applies when the principal does not want
the benefit of the contract, but delays in
telling the innocent third party of the mistake.
9Agents Liability Contracts
- Fully Disclosed Principal
- An agent is not liable for any contracts.
- Partially Disclosed Principal
- Third party can recover from either the agent or
the principal. - Undisclosed Principal
- Third party can recover from either the agent or
the principal. - Unauthorized Agent
- The principal is not liable and the agent is.
10Exceptions to the Rule on Undisclosed Principals
- A third party is not bound to the contract with
an undisclosed principal if - The contract specifically provides that the third
party is not bound to anyone other than the
agent, or - The agent lies about the principal because she
knows the third party would refuse to contract
with him.
11Servant and Master
- Servant does not mean slave or even butler or
maid. It means that the principal has control
over the agents work. - Employees are always servants.
- The master is the principal, or the one in
control.
12Servant vs. Independent Contractor
- Yes responses to these questions may indicate a
servant, or employee, relationship - Does the principal control details of the work?
- Does the principal supply tools and place of
work? - Does the agent work full-time for the principal?
- Is the agent paid by time, rather than by job?
- Is the work part of the regular business of the
principal? - Do the parties believe they have an
employee-employer relationship?
13Principals Liability for Torts
- A principal may be liable for the torts of a
servant but generally is not liable for the torts
of an independent contractor. - A master (principal) is liable for physical harm
caused by the negligent conduct of servants
(agent) within the scope of employment. - The principal is liable for the physical torts of
an independent contractor only if the principal
has been negligent in hiring or supervising. - Principals are only liable for torts that a
servant commits within the scope of employment.
14Scope of Employment
- Authorization
- An act is within the scope of employment, even if
expressly forbidden, if it is of the same general
nature as that authorized or if it is incidental
to the conduct authorized. - Abandonment
- The master is liable for the actions of the
servant that occur while the servant is at work,
but not for actions that occur after the servant
has abandoned the masters business.
15Negligent and Intentional Torts
- The master is liable if the servant commits a
negligent tort that causes physical harm to a
person or property. - A master is not liable for the intentional torts
of the servant unless the servant was motivated,
at least in part, by the desire to serve the
master, or the conduct was reasonably foreseeable.
16Physical Non-Physical Harm
- A master is liable for negligent conduct of a
servant that causes physical harm, if it is
within the scope of employment. - With negligent conduct of a servant that causes
non-physical harm (harm to reputation or
finances), the principal is liable only if the
servant acted with actual or apparent authority. - Misrepresentation and defamation are treated
differently from other non-physical harms. (See
next slides.)
17Misrepresentation
- A principal is liable if
- The agent makes misrepresentation,
- The agent has express, implied, or apparent
authority, - The third party relies on the misrepresentation
and - The third party suffers harm.
18Defamation
- A principal is liable if
- The agent makes a defamatory statement
- The agent has express, implied, or apparent
authority and - The third party is harmed by the statement.
19Agents Liability For Torts
- Agents are always liable for their own torts,
even if the principal is also liable. - Agents and principals are jointly and severally
liable, which means that the injured party may
sue either one or both, as she chooses. - The injured party may not recover twice, but may
recover partially from both parties. - The principal can sue the agent, if the injured
party recovers from the principal.
20It is virtually impossible to run a business
without using agents. But using an agent
dramatically increases the risk of liability.