Title: Design-Based Research for Advancing Educational Technology
1Design-Based Research for Advancing Educational
Technology
2Goals
- Critique the state-of-the-art of educational
research. - Describe applications of design-based research.
- Encourage new thinking about why and how we do
research.
3Improving the quality of teaching and learning
through educational research is critical to our
survival.
4Global Warming
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7Dutch Floating Homes
8- The lack of scientific literacy is appalling in
even the most developed countries.
9Bad News
Oh...no!
- Most educational research has little impact on
practitioners and yields few discernable benefits.
10- The Failure of Educational Research
- Vast resources going into education research are
wasted. - They educational researchers employ weak
research methods, write turgid prose, and issue
contradictory findings.
11- The Failure of Educational Research
- Too much useless work is done under the banner of
qualitative research. - Qualitative research. yields .little that can
be generalized beyond the classrooms in which it
is conducted.
12College of EducationThe University of Georgia
- Ranked 27th of 187 education colleges in the USA
- 240 faculty members in 9 departments
- 5,000 students in 33,000 student university
13Research Productivity 1997-2001Refereed Journal
Articles (in-cites.com)
- U. of Wisconsin - 202
- U. of Georgia - 201
- U. of Michigan - 164
- Indiana U. - 161
- U. of Maryland - 146
14Georgia vs. Wisconsin
- Per pupil
- Salary
- HS Grad.
- Ranking
15It is time we put the PUBLIC back in publication!
16Bush Administration Position
- Theres been no improvement in education over
the last 30 years, despite a 90 percent increase
in real public spending per pupil. - Promotes randomized controlled trials as used in
medical research.
17Four Reform Principles
Accountability Guaranteeing Results Flexibility
Local Control for Local Challenges Research-Based
Reforms Proven Methods with Proven
Results Parental Options Choices for Parents,
Hope for Kids
18What Works Clearinghouse
The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) has been
established by the U.S. Department of Educations
Institute of Education Sciences to provide
educators, policymakers, researchers, and the
public with a central and trusted source of
scientific evidence of what works in education.
19Slavins 5 Questions for Valid Educational
Research
- Is there a control group?
- Are the control and experimental groups assigned
randomly? - If a matched study, are the groups extremely
similar? - Is the sample size large enough?
- Are the results statistically significant?
Robert Slavin
20What Works Position
- Once we have dozens or hundreds of randomized or
carefully matched experiments going on each year
on all aspects of educational practice, we will
begin to make steady, irreversible progress. - NCLB funds scientifically based research.
Robert Slavin
21It Wont Work Position
- Double blind experiments impossible in education
- Implementation variance reduces treatment
differences - Causal agents are under-specified in education
- Goals, beliefs, and intentions of students and
teacher affect treatments
David R. Olson
22Medical and health knowledge is rarely applied
sufficiently.
23Another It Wont Work Position
- The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) standards
ignore the critical realities about social,
organizational, and policy environments in which
educational programs and interventions reside. - Advocates decision-oriented evaluation research
over conclusion-oriented academic research. - Recommends extended-term mixed-method (ETMM)
designs as a viable alternative.
Madhabi Chatterji
24American Evaluation Association
- The priority given to randomized controlled
trials manifests fundamental misunderstandings
about 1) the types of studies capable of
determining causality, 2) the methods capable of
achieving scientific rigor, and 3) the types of
studies that support policy and program
decisions. We would like to help avoid the
political, ethical, and financial disaster that
could well attend implementation of the proposed
priority.
25Randomized controlled trials are the only way
well ever be able to prove what works in
education!
Randomized controlled trials promotes
pseudoscience and will limit effective change!
26Educational researchers have failed to make a
clear appeal to the public for their support.
People learn when..
27- Ellen Lageman argues that educational
researchers, in a misguided effort to be
scientific, have turned away from the pragmatic
vision of John Dewey. - She attacks the excessive emphasis on
quantitative measurement.
28- Kieran Egan argues that progressive ideas from
Herbert Spencer, John Dewey, and Jean Piaget are
responsible for the general ineffectiveness of
our schools. - He also assails the notion that education can be
improved through research as traditionally
conceived.
29Thomas Kuhn The Structure of Scientific
Revolutions
- "I'm not sure that there can now be such a thing
as really productive educational research. It is
not clear that one yet has the conceptual
research categories, research tools, and properly
selected problems that will lead to increased
understanding of the educational process. There
is a general assumption that if you've got a big
problem, the way to solve it is by the
application of science. All you have to do is
call on the right people and put enough money in
and in a matter of a few years, you will have it.
But it doesn't work that way, and it never will."
30Complexity of Interactions
- We cannot store up generalizations and constructs
for ultimate assembly into a network. - When we give proper weight to local conditions,
any generalization is a working hypothesis, not a
conclusion.
Lee Cronbach
31Learning Styles
- Research into learning styles can, in the main,
be characterised as small-scale, non-cumulative,
uncritical and inward-looking. It has been
carried out largely by cognitive and educational
psychologists, and by researchers in business
schools and has not benefited from much
interdisciplinary research.
32Dichotomies
- convergers versus divergers
- verbalisers versus imagers
- holists versus serialists
- deep versus surface learning
- activists versus reflectors
- pragmatists versus theorists
- adaptors versus innovators
- assimilators versus explorers
- field dependent versus field independent
- globalists versus analysts
- assimilators versus accommodators
- imaginative versus analytic learners
- non-committers versus plungers
- common-sense versus dynamic learners
- concrete versus abstract learners
- random versus sequential learners
- initiators versus reasoners
- intuitionists versus analysts
- extroverts versus introverts
- sensing versus intuition
- thinking versus feeling
- judging versus perceiving
- left brainers versus right brainers
- meaning-directed versus undirected
- theorists versus humanitarians
- activists versus theorists
- pragmatists versus reflectors
- organisers versus innovators
- lefts/analytics/inductives/successive processors
- versus rights/globals/deductives/
- simultaneous processors
- executive, hierarchic, conservative versus
legislative, - anarchic, liberal.
33If Sisyphus were a scholar, his field would be
educational research. - David Laberee
34Educational Technology Research
35Pseudoscience Results
Insert cone of experience example
36Pseudoscience Results
Insert cone of experience example
37Educational technology researchers are not doing
much better than other educational researchers.
38NCLB Requirements
- "every student is technologically literate by the
time the student finishes the eighth grade," and - "that technology will be fully integrated into
the curricula and instruction of the schools by
December 31, 2006."
39- Abundant technology has not led to extensive use
of computers for tradition-altering classroom
instruction. - The small percentage of computer-using
instructors only use it to maintain existing
classroom practices.
40Teachers have legitimate concerns.
- Is it simple enough for me to learn quickly?
- It it versatile?
- Will it motivate students?
- Is it aligned with skills Im expected to teach.
- Is it reliable?
- It it breaks, who will help?
- Will it weaken my classroom authority?
41Ed. Tech Research Reality
- Isolated researchers conduct individual studies
rarely linked to a research agenda or concerned
with any relationship to practice. - Studies are presented at conferences attended by
other researchers and published in journals few
people read. - Occasional literature reviews and meta-analyses
are published.
42Ed. Tech Research Reality
- Many educational technology studies claim to have
predictive goals (testing theories) and use
quasi-experimental designs with quantitative
measures. - Research reviewers usually must reject 75 percent
or more of the published studies to find the few
worthy of further review or inclusion in
meta-analyses.
43Ed. Tech Research Reality
- Dillon Gabbards 1998 literature review of
Hypermedia as an Educational Technology
highlights problems with IT research. - Major conclusion Clearly, the benefits gained
from the use of hypermedia technology in learning
scenarios appear to be very limited and not in
keeping with the generally euphoric reaction to
this technology in the professional arena.
44Ed. Tech Research Reality
- Fabos Young 1999 literature review of
Telecommunications in the Classroom Rhetoric
Versus Reality is another bad sign. - Major conclusion many of the expected
benefits of telecommunications enhancing
writing, multicultural awareness, and economic
possibilities are inconclusive, optimistic,
and even contradictory.
45Bernard et al. (2004) Meta-analysis How Does
Distance Education Compare to Classroom
Instruction?
- a very small but positive mean effect size for
interactive distance education over traditional
classroom instruction on student achievement - small negative effect for retention rate
46DE Research from 1985-2002
- 1,010 potential studies retrieved
- 232 studies met all criteria
- 599 independent effect sizes
- 47,341 students (achievement)
47Results Overall Effects
- 325 independent outcomes (total achievement)
- Hedges g 0.0122, p lt .001
- Range of findings from 2.17 to 2.66
- 177 outcomes with low methodology removed
- Hedges g 0.017, p gt .05
- Significantly heterogeneous
48Distribution of Effect Sizes
Hedgesg
Effect Sizes Ordered by Magnitude
325 independent outcomes (achievement) Hedges g
0.0122, p lt .001
49Sir John Daniel - UNESCO
- the futile tradition of comparing test
performances of students using new learning
technologies with those who study in more
conventional waysis a pointless endeavor because
any teaching and learning system, old or new, is
a complex reality. Comparing the impact of
changes to small parts of the system is unlikely
to reveal much effect and indeed, no significant
difference is the usual result of such research.
50(No Transcript)
51Chewing Gum More Effective than Interactive
Multimedia CD-ROM
- Dr. Ken Allen at NYU wanted to compare CD-ROM
with lectures - Wrigleys wanted to fund chewing gum study
- Combined study
- Gum chewers B-Abstainers C
- CD-ROM no better
52Media comparison studies are akin to comparing
copper bracelets with voodoo dolls as medical
cures.
53Experimental approaches to educational technology
research wont work in the way that they do in
medical research!
MedicalCures
GeneticsResearch
54Pasteurs Quadrant approach to research is
needed (Stokes, 1997).
Research is inspired by
55Good News
- There are new strategies for conducting
design-based research that can improve our
research so that it can become a socially
responsible enterprise.
Thank goodness!
56Educational researchers often fail to distinguish
between research goals and methods.
57Six Ed. Tech research goals
- Theoretical
- Predictive
- Interpretivist
- Postmodern
- Design/Development
- Action/Evaluation
58Theoretical Goals
- Focus on explaining phenomena through logical
analysis and synthesis of principles and results
from other studies - EXAMPLE Gagnes theory of the conditions of
learning
59Predictive Goals
- Focus on determining how education works by
testing hypotheses related to theories of
learning, teaching, performance, etc. - EXAMPLE cooperative learning and control studies
by Hooper, Temiyakarn, and Williams
Simon Hooper
60Interpretivist Goals
- Focus on determining how education works by
describing and interpreting phenomena related to
learning, teaching, performance, etc. - EXAMPLE Delia Neumans observations of disabled
children using commercial software
Delia Neuman
61Postmodern Goals
- Focus on examining the assumptions underlying
educational programs with the goal of revealing
hidden agendas and empowering disenfranchised
minorities - EXAMPLE Ann DeVaneys analysis of IT in relation
to race, gender, and power
62Design/Development Goals
- Focus on dual objectives of developing creative
approaches to solving problems and constructing
reusable design principles - EXAMPLE Sasha Barabs Quest Atlantis project
and Learning Engagement Theory
63Action/Evaluation Goals
- Focus on describing, improving, or estimating the
effectiveness and worth of a particular program - EXAMPLE Hill and Reeves four-year evaluation of
ubiquitous computing initiative.
64Methods should not be selected until goals
research questions are clear
- Quantitative
- Qualitative
- Critical Theory
- Historical
- Literature Review
- Mixed-methods
65So what does design-based research look like in
the real world?
66Design-Based Research Collective
- Goals of designing learning environments and
theories are intertwined - Development and research occur in continuous
cycles - Research on designs leads to sharable theories
relevant to practitioners - Research must account for how designs function in
authentic settings - Development of accounts relies on methods that
connect actions to outcomes
67Design-Based Research Strategies
- Define a pedagogical outcome and create learning
environments that address it. - Emphasize content and pedagogy rather than
technology. - Give special attention to supporting human
interactions. - Modify learning environments until outcome is
reached.
68Chris Dede Harvard University
River City Curriculum Situated Learning Theory
69Yasmin Kafai - UCLA
70van den Akker, Nieveen, McKenney University of
Twente
71(No Transcript)
72Design-Based Research Example
- Authentic Learning in Interactive Multimedia
Environments. - Ph.D. dissertation by Jan Herrington at Edith
Cowan University in Australia. - Supervised by Professor Ron Oliver.
- Winner of AECT Young Researcherof the Year in
1999.
73Outcome Practitioners Desired
- New teachers will use a wider variety of
assessment methods in their student teaching
experience and eventual practice.
74Learning Environment Design
- Identified the critical characteristics of a
situated learning model. - Developed an interactive multimedia learning
environment based on those characteristics.
75Situated Learning Model Herrington 1997
- Provide an authentic context reflecting the way
the knowledge will be used in real-life - Provide authentic activities
- Provide access to expert performances and the
modeling of processes - Provide multiple roles and perspectives
- Support collaborative construction of knowledge
76Situated Learning Model Herrington 1997
- Promote reflection to enable abstractions to be
formed - Promote articulation to enable tacit knowledge to
be made explicit - Provide coaching and scaffolding at critical
times - Provide for integrated assessment of learning
within the tasks.
77(No Transcript)
78Mixed Methods Design
- Videotaped preservice teachers using program
- Interviewed teachers and their supervisors in
schools during student teaching practicum - Logged usage data
79Findings
- Problem Solved
- Novice teachers acquired advanced knowledge while
engaging in higher order thinking - New knowledge and skills applied in practicum
- Design Principles
- Situated learning model is a successful design
model for interactive learning
80Authentic Learning Team
Reeves, Herrington, Oliver
81What challenges do we face in adopting
design-based research approaches?
82Design-Based Research Challenges
- Sampling bias
- Response bias
- Researcher bias
- Overwhelming data
- Confounded variables
- Dissemination
- Scaling up
Ann Brown
83Design-Based Research Collective
- We suggest that the value of design-based
research should be measured by its ability to
improve educational practice.
84Because we are a design profession (not a
discipline), educational technologists should
pursue design-based research that integrates the
desire to solve problems with the search for
knowledge.
85The status of research deemed educational would
have to be judged, first in terms of its
disciplined quality and secondly in terms of its
impact. Poor discipline is no discipline. And
excellent research without impact is not
educational. - Charles W. Desforges (2000)