Safety-Critical Systems 6 Certification - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Safety-Critical Systems 6 Certification

Description:

In non-critical environment code is accepted, when tests are passed. ... Add barriers: hard/software locks for critical parts ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: CT5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Safety-Critical Systems 6 Certification


1
Safety-Critical Systems 6Certification
  • T 79.232

2
Quality Management
  • Quality and systematic actions to gain it, are
    essential for producing a safety system.
  • Quality Product or service satisfies needs
  • Standards - ISO 9001

3
Certification
  • Prosess to indicate conformance with a standard
    checked by an authorised body.
  • National Safety Authority, Goverment
  • International institutes, certified bodies
  • Follow given guidelines, like IEC 1508 or CENELEC
    norms

4
Safety-Critical Systems Summary

5
V - Lifecycle model
Requirements Model
Requirements Analysis
Test Scenarios
Test Scenarios
System Acceptance
Requirements Document
Functional / Architechural - Model
System Integration Test
Systems Analysis Design
Specification Document
Software Design
Module Integration Test
Software Implementation Unit Test
6
I - Requirements
  • Requirements are stakeholders (customer) demands
    what they want the system to do.
  • Not defining how !!! gt specification
  • Safety requirements are defining what the system
    must do and must not do in order to ensure
    safety. Both positive and negative functionality.
  •  

7
I - Requirement Engineering Right Requirements
  • Ways to refine Requirements
  • - complete linking to hazards (possible
    dangerous events)
  • - correct testing modelling
  • - consistent semi/formal language
  • - unambiguous text in real English
  •  

8
I - Semi-formal Requirements
  • Requirements should be inambigious, complete,
    consistent and correct.
  • Natural language has the intepretation
    possibility. More accurate description needed.
  • Using pure mathematic notation not always
    suitable for communication with domain expert.
  • Formalised Methods are used to tackle the
    requirement engineering. (Structured text,
    formalised English).

9
I - Hazard formalisation
10
I Multiple Hazards
11
I - Hazard example
12
I - Hazard Analysis
  • A Hazard is situation in which there is actual or
    potential danger to people or to environment.
  • Analytical techniques
  • - Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA)
  • - Failure modes, effects and criticality
    analysis (FMECA)
  • - Hazard and operability studies (HAZOP)
  • - Event tree analysis (ETA)
  • - Fault tree analysis (FTA)

13
Fault Tree Analysis 1
The diagram shows a heater controller for a tank
of toxic liquid. The computer controls the heater
using a power switch on the basis of information
obtained from a temperature sensor. The sensor is
connected to the computer via an electronic
interface that supplies a binary signal
indicating when the liquid is up to its required
temperature. The top event of the fault tree is
the liquid being heated above its required
temperature.
 
14
Fault event not fully traced to its source
Basic event, input
Fault event resulting from other events
OR connection
15
I - Risk Analysis
  • Risk is a combination of the severity (class) and
    frequency (probability) of the hazardous event.
  • Risk Analysis is a process of evaluating the
    probability of hazardous events.
  • The Value of life??
  • Value of life is estimated between 0.75M 2M
    GBP.
  • USA numbers higher.

16
V - Lifecycle model
Requirements Model
Requirements Analysis
Test Scenarios
Test Scenarios
System Acceptance
Requirements Document
Functional / Architechural - Model
System Integration Test
Systems Analysis Design
Specification Document
Software Design
Module Integration Test
Software Implementation Unit Test
17
II - Designing for Safety 1
  • Faults groups
  • - requirement/specification errors
  • - random component failures
  • - systematic faults in design (software)
  • Approaches to tackle problems
  • - right system architecture (fault-tolerant)
  • - reliability engineering (component, system)
  • - quality management (designing and producing
    processes)

18
II - Designing for Safety 2
  • Hierarchical design
  • - simple modules, encapsulated functionality
  • - separated safety kernel safety critical
    functions
  • Maintainability
  • - preventative versa corrective maintenance
  • - scheduled maintenance routines for whole
    lifecycle
  • - easy to find faults and repair short MTTR
    mean time to repair
  • Human error
  • - Proper HMI

19

II Design - Fault Tolerance
  • Fault tolerance hardware- Achieved mainly by
    redundancy Redundancy- Adds cost, weight, power
    consumption, complexityOther means- Improved
    maintenance, single system with better materials
    (higher MTBF)

20
V - Lifecycle model
Requirements Model
Requirements Analysis
Test Scenarios
Test Scenarios
System Acceptance
Requirements Document
Functional / Architechural - Model
System Integration Test
Systems Analysis Design
Specification Document
Software Design
Module Integration Test
Software Implementation Unit Test
21
III - Safety-Critical Software 1
  • Correct Program
  • Normally iteration is needed to develop a
    working solution. (writing code, testing and
    modification).
  • In non-critical environment code is accepted,
    when tests are passed.
  • Testing is not enough for safety-critical
    application Needs an assessment process
    dynamic/static testing, simulation, code analysis
    and formal verification.

22
III - Safety-Critical Software 2
  • Dependable Software
  • Process for development
  • Work discipline
  • Well documented
  • Quality management
  • Validated/verificated

23
III - Safety-Critical Software 3
  • Designing Principles
  • Use hardware interlocks before computer/software
  • New software features add complexity, try to
    keep software simple
  • Plan for avoiding human error unambigious
    human-computer interface
  • Removal of hazardous module (Ariane 5 unused
    code)

24
III - Safety-Critical Software 4
  • Designing Principles
  • Add barriers hard/software locks for critical
    parts
  • Minimise single point failures increase safety
    margins, exploit redundancy and allow recovery.
  • Isolate failures dont let things get worse.
  • Fail-safe panic shut-downs, watchdog code
  • Avoid common mode failures Use diversity
    different programmers, n-version programming

25
III - Safety-Critical Software 5
  • Designing Principles
  • Fault tolerance Recovery blocks if one module
    fails, execute alternative module.
  • Dont relay on run-time systems

26
III - Safety-Critical Software 6
  • Reduction of Hazardous Conditions -summary
  • Simplify Code contains only minimum features
    and no unnecessary or undocumented features or
    unused executable code
  • Diversity Data and control redundancy
  • Multi-version programming shared specification
    leads to common-mode failures, but
    synchronisation code increases complexity

27
Verified software process
28
V - Lifecycle model
Requirements Model
Requirements Analysis
Test Scenarios
Test Scenarios
System Acceptance
Requirements Document
Functional / Architechural - Model
System Integration Test
Systems Analysis Design
Specification Document
Software Design
Module Integration Test
Software Implementation Unit Test
29
Testing
  • Testing is a process used to verify or validate
    system or its components.
  • Testing is performed during various stage of
    system development. V-lifecycle diagram.
  • Module testing evaluation of a small function
    of the hardware/software.
  • System integration testing investigates
    correct interaction of modules.
  • System validation testing a complete system
    satisfies its requirements.

30
Home assignments
  • 1.12 (primary, functional and indirect safety)
  • 2.4 (unavailability)
  • 4.18 (tolerable risk)
  • 5.10 (incompleteness within specification)
  • 7.15 (reliability model)
  • 9.17 (reuse of software)
  • 11.2 Textual specification
  • 11.18 Z-language
  • 12.7 Dynamic testing
  • 12.20 Constructed environment
  • Please email your home assignments by 12 May 2005
    to herttua_at_eurolock.org
  • References OFFIS, I-Logix, KnowGravity
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com