Title: Water Quality and the Safe Drinking Water Act
1Water Quality and the Safe Drinking Water Act
2Topics
- Water quality introduction
- Drinking water treatment history
- Safe Drinking Water Act
- Risk assessments for setting standards
- Benefit analyses
3What do we mean by water quality?
- Water as the solvent
- Solutes and contaminants
- salinity
- Suspended sediments
- Microbiologic constituents
4Common dissolved solids (99)
- Cations
- Sodium
- Potassium
- Calcium
- Magnesium
- Anions
- Chloride
- Sulfate
- Bicarbonate
5Some other things we measure in Water...
- TDS (Total dissolved solids)
- EC (Electrical Conductivity)
- Hardness (concentration of Ca and Mg salts)
- pH (acidity of the water)
6Water Quality for What?
- Earliest Records of Drinking Water Treatment
- Earliest record of methods to improve the taste
and odor of drinking water date to 4000 BC - Alum used by Egyptians for clarifying water
1500 BC - Hippocrates advised people to boil and strain
water 400 BC
7Earliest Association of Diseases with Drinking
Water
- Dr. John Snow demonstrated in 1854 that cholera
in London was spread through drinking - 1856 Darcy first uses sand filtration in Dijon
- In the 1890s, studies in Lawrence, Massachusetts,
demonstrated a reduction in typhoid fever
incidence with drinking water filtration
8Water Treatment in U.S.
1871 First slow sand filter in U.S. 1896
First rapid sand filter in U.S. 1908 First use
of chlorine as a primary disinfectant 1920s Filt
ration and chlorination used widely in large
cities
9Water Treatment in the U.S.
1940s Treatment for inorganic contaminants 1970s
Treatment for organic contaminants 1980s Advan
ced water treatment methods
10Success in Early Drinking Water Protection
Typhoid Deaths Per 100,000 People
11Treatment Effectiveness in Reducing Typhoid Deaths
Detroit, Michigan
12The Safe Drinking Water Act
- SDWA enacted in 1974
- Two major SDWA amendments
- 1986
- 1996
13Key Terminology
- National Primary Drinking Water Regulation
- Sets legally enforceable standards
- Limits levels of specific contaminants that can
adversely affect public health - Maximum Contaminant Level or Treatment Technique
- National Secondary Drinking Water Regulation
- Nonenforceable guideline
- Covers contaminants that may cause cosmetic or
aesthetic effects
14Key Terminology
- Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG)
- 1412(b)(4)(A) level at which no known or
anticipated adverse effectsoccur and which
allows for an adequate margin of safety. - Not enforceable
- Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL)
- 1412(b)(4)(B) levelwhich is as close to
the maximum contaminant level goal as is
feasible. - Enforceable
15Contaminant Effects
- Adverse health effects from acute exposure
- Adverse health effects from chronic exposure
- Adverse health effects from exposure during
critical periods
16Carcinogenicity
- Category I compounds are carcinogens
- Category II compounds exhibit carcinogenic as
well as noncarcinogenic endpoints - Category III compounds are noncarcinogenic
17Types of Contaminants
- Chemicals
- Naturally occurring
- Man-made
- Microbiological
- Disinfection byproducts
18Chemical Contaminants
- Volatile organic chemicals (VOCs)
- Synthetic organic chemicals (SOCs)
- Inorganic chemicals (IOCs)
- Radionuclides
- Disinfection byproducts (DBPs)
19Microbiological
- Viruses
- Bacteria
- Total coliforms, fecal coliforms
- Others
- Protozoa
- Giardia and Cryptosporidium
20Disinfection Byproducts
- Naturally occurring organic compounds in source
water react with disinfectants to form byproducts - DBPs in chlorinated surface water may be linked
to increased risks of cancer, reproductive and
developmental effects
21Sensitive Sub-Populations
- Infants and children
- Elderly people
- Immuno-compromised individuals
- Highly exposed individuals
22What is an Adverse Health Effect?
- EPA definition
- any biological, physiological, anatomical,
pathological, and/or behavioral change that may
affect the performance of the whole organism or
reduce the ability of the organism to respond to
additional challenges.
23Toxicology Study Methods
- Some animals subjected to high doses of chemicals
- Necessary to observe statistically significant
rates of disease - Other animals exposed to lower doses of chemicals
- Necessary to provide data inputs for a
dose-response curve
24Strengths and Limits of Toxicology Studies
- Environmental factors, such as exposure to other
contaminants, can be controlled - Facilitates interpretation of results
- Uncertainty associated with extrapolating
- From high doses tested to environmentally
relevant doses - From effects on animals to effects on humans
25Epidemiological Studies
- Studies based on human exposure
- Epidemiologists seek to identify
- Risk factors associated with the occurrence of
disease - Protective factors that reduce the risk of disease
26Strengths and Limits of Epidemiological Studies
- Less effective in determining the causes of
common diseases in large populations - Difficulties correlating data across geographic
areas - Cannot definitively prove cause and effect
- Especially useful where high rates of rare
diseases occur in small populations - Provide data on the actual incidence of disease
- Dose-response and exposure estimates not needed
27Non-carcinogens
- Non-threshold type
- Lead
- Neurological and cognitive effects in young
children - Microorganisms
- Cryptosporidium, Giardia, Legionella, total
coliforms, viruses
28Carcinogens
- The MCLG is traditionally set at zero for all
carcinogens - Assumed to be genotoxic
- No threshold
- Non-zero MCLGs are possible, reflecting
non-genotoxic effect
29Maximum Contaminant Levels
- An MCL is an enforceable standard
- Set as close to the MCLG as feasible
- SDWA provides guidance on what is feasible
- Requires determination of whether benefits
justify costs (1996 Amendments)
30Benefit and Cost Analyses
- Benefits of MCL must balance costs of compliance
- Cost of compliance is an explicit concern
Benefits
Costs
31Regulations Currently Being Developed
- Disinfection by-products
- Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule
- Ground Water Rule
- Radon
- Total Coliform / Distribution System Rule
32Summary
- Standards ensure baseline of water quality in
public water supply systems - Based on risk assessments and cost benefit
analyses - Designed to minimize potential for acute and
chronic illness associated with water - Continually being reviewed and revised