Title: Prediction of Outcome after Acute Brain Injury
1Prediction of Outcome after Acute Brain Injury
- Jamie Sleigh
- Intensive Care Unit
- Waikato Hospital
2Outline/Themes
- Why bother? prediction and explanation
- 3 Dimensions of damage
- Psycho-social
- Neurological / functional
- Structural / anatomical
- Modes of imaging
- clinical, electrophysiological, anatomical,
other/CBF etc... - Spectrum of injury - mild to severe/dead
- Primary vs secondary injury
3What is the psycho-social outcome post-ICU head
injury?
- 123 adults with severe brain trauma - ICU.
- gt1SD mild, gt2SD severe.
- Evaluated 1yr post injury
- WAIS-R / D-span / symbol(attention/IQ)
- 35-60 severe
- AVLT(verbal memory) 54 severe
- COWA(executive function) 38 severe
4Clinical Prediction of Outcome?! (WAIS-R) vs
Post resuscitation level-of-consciousness (GCS)
WAIS-R
GCS
5The Spatial Imaging Smorgasbord
- Computed Tomography (CT),
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),
- (fMRI)
- Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography
(SPECT). - Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
Blood flow... Anatomical
6The Functional Imaging Smorgasbord
- EEG
- Evoked Potentials
- Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials
- Midlatency Auditory Evoked Potentials
- Visual EP
- Event related potentials
- Somato-sensory evoked potentials
7(Functional) Outcome Prediction from (Anatomical)
CT is weakFrontal Lobe CT damage vs Functional
outcome (COWA)
8Functional Outcome vs ICU Rx, and Somatosensory
Evoked Potentials (24-48hrs post injury)
9Predictive value of somatosensory evoked
potentials for awakening from coma. Crit Care
Med. 2003 Mar31(3)960-7.
10PET
Significant correlation between cognitive and
behavioral disorders and decreased cortical
metabolism in the prefrontal and cingulate
cortex in patients with severe traumatic brain
injury Fontaine A, Azouvi P, Remy P, et al
Functional anatomy of neuropsychological
deficits after severe traumatic brain injury.
Neurology 53(9)1963-1968, 1999Rao N, Turski PA,
Polcyn RE, et al 18F positron emission computed
tomography in closed head injury. Arch Phys Med
Rehab 65780-785, 1984Ruff RM, Buchsbaum SM,
Troster AI, et al Computed tomography,
neuropsychology, and positron emission
tomography in the evaluation of head injury.
Neuropsych Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 2103-123,
1989
11SPECT CBF
- Abnormal CT - 55.
- Abnormal SPECT - 80
- 39 SPECT ve, CT -ve
- 27 CT ve, SPECT -ve
- For prognosis SPECT gt CT Bavetta S, Nimmon CC,
McCabe J, et al A prospective study comparing
SPET with MRI and CT as prognostic indicators
following severe closed head injury. Nucl Med
Comm 15961-968, 1994 - Mild head injury normal CT Abdel-Dayem HM,
Abu-Judeh H, Kumar M, et al SPECT brain
perfusion abnormalities in mild or moderate
traumatic brain injury. Clin Nucl Med 23309-317,
1998 - 68 had an abnormal SPECT study.
- Focal areas of hypoperfusion were seengt75
patients
12SPECT, vs MRI, vs Clinical state
- Kesler et al, Brain Injury 200014851.
- n 52, 4/12 to 5yrs post injury
- SPECT vs MRI
- 67 agreement
- MR vs verbal memory, r -0.24
- Neuropsychological Impairment Rating vs MRI, r
0.23
13SPECT vs Behavioural and Neuropsychological
measures
- Severe TBI.
- Decreased blood flow to the frontal lobes ?
disinhibitive behavior. - Decreased blood flow in the left cerebral
hemisphere ? Social Isolation. -
- ? SPECT findings may help determine the
behavioral and psychosocial sequelae of head
trauma - Oder W, Goldenberg G, Spatt J. et al Behavioral
and psychosocial sequelae of severe closed head
injury and regional cerebral blood flow. A SPECT
study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 55475-480, 1992
14 Mild Traumatic Brain Injury / Post-Concussion
Syndrome LOClt30min, amnesia lt24hr, GCSgt12, ...
- Who goes on to PCS?
- Malingering / Litigation??
- MRI
- Evoked Potentials
- S-100B
15Event related potentials vs Post-concussion
symptoms
18-34yrs
- Gaetz - Brain Injury 200014815
- BAEP, MLAEP, Visual P100, Auditory P3(00),
CNV(auditory and visual) - Visual ERP p300
- 8/20 gt2.5SD in patients with persistent
concussion.
35-55yrs
16A troponin of the brain?Post-concussion S-100B
- Herrman et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
20017095 - n69, mild TBI patients
- Elevated S-100B (and neuron-specific enolase) gt
Neuropsychological impairment (at 6/12) - Leon Macdonald !!!!!
- CT no use
17S-100B may not correlate with MRI
- Aktar, Ped Crit Care Med 20034322.
- N 17,
- Mild TBI in paediatrics
- 7 pts MRI positive
- No difference in S-100B
18Conclusions
- Anatomical imaging (CT) is for discrete lesions
not functional recovery. - Role of SPECT is unclear.
- MRI, ERPs, and ?S-100B are predictive of MBI/Post
concussion syndrome. - Correlation is not prediction