Barriers to Immunizations Among the Elderly - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

Barriers to Immunizations Among the Elderly

Description:

Department of Community and Rural Medicine. Department of Psychiatry and ... Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology 1995:5(2):73-77. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: berniek
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Barriers to Immunizations Among the Elderly


1
Barriers to ImmunizationsAmong the Elderly
  • The University of Alabama
  • Center for Mental Health and Aging
  • Scientific Seminar Series
  • September 22, 2003

2
Barriers to ImmunizationsAmong the Elderly
  • Melissa C. Kuhajda, Ph.D.
  • Assistant Professor
  • Department of Community and Rural Medicine
  • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine
  • College of Community Health Sciences
  • The University of Alabama

3
(No Transcript)
4
IRHR Staff
  • Director John C. Higginbotham, PhD, MPH
  • Assistant Director for Research
  • Melissa C. Kuhajda, Ph.D.
  • Assistant Director for Editorial Services
  • Leslie Zganjar
  • Assistant Director for Information/Technology
  • Mitch Shelton, Ph.D.

5
Prediction of Vaccination AmongOlder African
Americans
  • Funded by The Centers for Disease Control and
    Prevention (CDC) as a Special Interest Project
    (SIP 22-01) through the UAB Center for Health
    Promotion, School of Public Health.
  • Principal Investigator John C. Higginbotham,
    Ph.D., M.P.H.
  • Associate Professor and Interim Chair
  • Department of Community and Rural Medicine
  • College of Community Health Sciences
  • The University of Alabama
  • Research Assistant Lasonja Kennedy, B.A., M.A.

6
Prediction of Vaccination AmongOlder African
Americans
  • Investigators
  • Richard Shewchuk, Ph.D., Professor, UAB
    Department of Health Services Administration.
  • Rusty Foushee, Ph.D., UAB Center for Health
    Promotions Survey Research Unit, Department of
    Health Behavior.
  • Karen Wooten, M.A., Mathematical Statistician,
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

7
Background
  • Influenza and pneumonia deaths together are the
    sixth leading cause of death in the United States
    (DHHS, 2000)
  • Accounting for more than 30,000 deaths each year
  • Most of which occur in elderly persons (age 65
    years and older).
  • Immunizations against influenza and pneumococcal
    disease can effectively prevent serious illness
    and death (CDC, 1999).

8
  • Immunizations (influenza and pneumococcal) are
    associated with substantial health benefits for
    both healthy and at-risk seniors
  • Reduce outpatient visits (Ashby-Hughes et al.
    1999)
  • Reduce hospitalizations (Nichol et al. 1999)
  • Reduce deaths (Nichol et al. 1999)

9
  • It is recommended that adults aged 65 years and
    older receive
  • A yearly influenza vaccine (the flu shot)
  • A one-time pneumococcal vaccine (CDC, 2000)
  • 5-year boosters may be required.

10
  • Vaccination rates among the elderly have steadily
    increased over the past decade.
  • Influenza immunization rates were 64 percent in
    1998, which is almost double the rate of 33
    percent a decade ago.
  • The rates for pneumococcal vaccine have also
    increased, from 15 percent in 1988 to 46 percent
    in 1998.

11
  • However, no state in the U.S. has reached the
    pneumococcal vaccination rate recommended by
    Healthy People 2000 (CDC, 1999 The prevention
    agenda for the Nation Office of Disease
    Prevention Health Promotion US Dept of Health
    Human Services www.healthypeople.gov).
  • Therefore, it is believed that a comprehensive
    national education campaign is needed to promote
    both vaccines.

12
  • Factors that have been found to be positively
    correlated with vaccination include
  • Older age
  • Presence of lung/heart disease
  • Higher socioeconomic status
  • Receiving the vaccination in the previous year
    (Smith et al. 1999 Chapman et al. 1999)

13
  • Under-utilization of adult vaccination has been
    related to
  • Lack of knowledge of needs for immunization
  • Lack of awareness of immunization (Findlay et al.
    2000)
  • Misconception of vaccine safety and efficacy
    (CDC, 1998)
  • Lack of recommendations from health care
    providers (Morgan, 1995)

14
  • Negative perception of immunization
  • Inconvenience
  • Painful (Armstrong et al. 2001)
  • Prior experience or perception of side effects
  • Negative patient attitudes (James 1995)
  • Shortage of effective programs for vaccine
    delivery (Holt 1992)

15
Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccinations Among
Older African Americans
  • Elderly African-Americans have a higher incidence
    of invasive pneumococcal infection than
    White-Americans in the same age group (Harrison
    2000).
  • The influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rate
    has increased slightly for elderly
    African-Americans over the past decade, but
    remains substantially below that of the general
    population.
  • For example, the influenza vaccination rates of
    White-Americans was 66 percent in 1997, while for
    African-Americans, the rate was only 45 percent.

16
  • Healthy People 2010 objectives include
  • Increasing the proportion of noninstitutionalized
    adults who are vaccinated against pneumococcal
    disease and vaccinated annually against influenza
  • Reducing disparities among racial groups (DHHS
    2000).
  • The target coverage for influenza and
    pneumococcal vaccines is 90 percent (Healthy
    People 2010 Objectives 14-29a, 14-29b).

17
  • To achieve this goal, more effective
    interventions for elderly African-Americans are
    required.
  • Most studies have targeted high-risk inner-city
    minority populations.
  • Wright et al. (2000) studied the association of
    health system factors and health status with the
    delivery of preventive services in a sample of
    African-Americans age 70 and older from
    low-income neighborhoods in Cleveland, Ohio.

18
  • Armstrong et al. (2001) studied a low-income
    urban population predominated by
    African-Americans.
  • The vaccination rate for children in rural areas
    was found to be lower than in metropolitan areas
    (Luman et al. 2001), and this trend may hold for
    older populations.

19
  • Few studies have examined the immunization
    patterns of older rural African-American
    populations and their implication for disease
    prevention .
  • Whether previously recommended vaccination
    strategies will effectively improve the
    acceptance rate in this population needs to be
    further studied in order to determine the most
    cost-effective measures to increase vaccination
    coverage.

20
Objectives
  • Identify the predictors of adult immunization
    (influenza pneumococcal)
  • knowledge
  • attitudes
  • beliefs
  • barriers
  • facilitators

21
  • Compare identified predictors among older
    African-Americans and older White-Americans in
    urban and rural areas.

22
Study Aims
  • 1. Nominal Group Technique (NGT) Groups (Delbecq,
    Van de Ven, Gustafson, 1975 Miller et al.
    2000)
  • A series of idea-generating sessions with 65-
    years-old or older African-Americans and
    White-Americans in urban and rural areas of
    Alabama.
  • Summarize ideas in brief statements
  • Choose the five most important ideas
  • Rank these five ideas in terms of importance.

23
  • 2. Rating Scale Tasks
  • Use the results from the NGT group sessions to
    develop and implement a rating scale task in
    which participants will rank in order of
    importance specific barriers and facilitators to
    immunizations.

24
  • 3. Vaccination Predictors Questionnaire (VPQ)
  • Use the results from the rating scale tasks and
    the extant literature to develop and then pretest
    a low literate, minimally burdensome
    questionnaire (Vaccination Predictors
    Questionnaire, VPQ), which will assess the
    prevalence of the various predictors of
    vaccination.

25
  • 4. National Survey
  • Utilize the new and pretested VPQ to conduct a
    national survey of a representative sample of
    older African- and White-Americans from both
    rural and urban localities to determine the
    prevalence of the identified predictors and to
    determine commonalities and differences between
    ethnic, gender and/or ruralurban groups.

26
Procedure
  • Separate NGT meetings were convened with
    participants stratified by
  • 1. Vaccination Status
  • a. Those who have regularly received the
    influenza vaccine
  • b. Those who have received the influenza vaccine,
    but not regularly
  • c. Those who have never received the influenza
    vaccine
  • d. Those who have received the pneumococcal
    vaccine
  • e. Those who have never received the pneumococcal
    vaccine

27
  • 2. Race
  • a. African-American
  • b. White-American
  • 3. Residence
  • a. Urban
  • b. Rural

28
  • 4. Question
  • a. Facilitator
  • What sorts of things would make you
    decide to get a flu pneumonia shot?
  • b. Barrier
  • What sorts of things would make you
    decide not to get a flu pneumonia shot?

29
  • 40 NGT Groups were conducted
  • Urban, African-American, Facilitator Question (5)
  • Urban, African-American, Barrier Question (5)
  • Urban, White-American, Facilitator Question (5)
  • Urban, White-American, Barrier Question (5)
  • Rural, African-American, Facilitator Question (5)
  • Rural, African-American, Barrier Question (5)
  • Rural, White-American, Facilitator Question (5)
  • Rural, White-American, Barrier Question (5)

30
Alabama Counties by Percent of Population in
Poverty, 1990
Percent Poverty
Urban Groups
31
Method
  • A comprehensive cognitive mapping strategy,
    concept mapping, consisting of a blend of
    quantitative and qualitative methodology will be
    employed (Axelrod 1972, 1972, 1976 Bitonti 1993
    Young 1996 Meszaros et al. 1996 Roth et al.
    1992 Trochim 1989).
  • NGT results will inform ranking scale tasks,
    which will, in turn, inform the Vaccination
    Predictors Questionnaire (VPQ).
  • Analyses will involve multidimensional scaling
    (MDS Kruskal et al. 1978) and cluster analysis
    (Everitt 1974 Aldenderfer et al. 1984).

32
Results
  • The NGT process was found to be wearisome for
    some seniors, especially those with low literacy
    skills.
  • As a result, the NGT procedures were modified.

33
Preliminary Results...
  • Most Frequently Identified Barriers to Adult
    Vaccination
  • 1. Becoming ill from the vaccination
  • 2. Fear of needles

34
  • Most Frequently Identified Facilitators to Adult
    Vaccination
  • 1. Physician recommendation
  • 2. Desire to prevent getting the flu
    pneumonia

35
  • Other commonly identified Barriers include
  • 1. No transportation
  • 2. Concern about contraindications with
  • other medications
  • 3. Physician never mentioned it
  • (pneumonia shot only)

36
  • Other commonly identified Facilitators include
  • 1. Availability -- No patient fee
  • 2. Old Age -- Weaker immune system
  • 3. To stay healthy

37
Conclusions
  • NGT Benefits
  • Generates large number of ideas
  • Permits measures of importance of ideas
  • Allows equal opportunity to voice concerns
  • Avoids quick decision making
  • High degree of task completion

38
  • However, for our senior citizen population in
    both rural and urban areas, many participants
    with low literacy skills became frustrated with
    this demanding process.

39
  • The goal of obtaining information about the
    barriers and facilitators of adult vaccination
    appears to get lost in the complexity of the NGT
    process.
  • If NGT process is implemented with participants
    with low literacy skills, modifications are
    necessary.

40
References
  • Afessa B, Greaves W, Frederick W. Pneumococcal
    Bacteremia in Adults A 14-year Experience in an
    Inner-city University Hospital, Clinical
    Infectious Diseases 199521(2)345-51.
  • Aldenderfer MS, Blashfield RK. Cluster Analysis.
    Beverly Hills, CA Sage Publications 1984.
  • Armstrong K, Berlin M, Schwartz JS, Propert K,
    Ubel PA. Barriers to Influenza Immunization in a
    Low-income Urban Population. American Journal of
    Preventive Medicine 200120(1)21-25.
  • Ashby-Hughes B, Nickerson N. Provider
    Endorsement The Strongest Cue in Prompting
    High-risk Adults to Receive Influenza and
    Pneumococcal Immunizations. Clinical Excellence
    for Nurse Practitioners The International
    Journal of NPACE 19993(2)97-104.
  • Axelrod R. Framework for A General Theory of
    Cognition. Berkeley, CA Institute of
    International Studies 1972.
  • Axelrod R. Psycho-Algebra A Mathematical Theory
    of Cognition and Choice with an Application to
    the British Eastern Committee in 1918. Papers of
    the Peach Research Society 197218113-31.
  • Axelrod R. The Structure of Decision The
    Cognitive Maps of Political Elites. Princeton,
    NJ Princeton University Press 1976.

41
References (continued)
  • Bitonti C. Cognitive Mapping A Qualitative
    Research Method for Social Work. Social Work
    Research and Abstracts 199329(1)9-15.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
    Reasons reported by Medicare beneficiaries for
    not receiving influenza and pneumococcal
    vaccinations United States, 1996. Morbidity
    Mortality Weekly Report 199948(39)886-90.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
    Race-specific Differences in Influenza
    Vaccination Levels among Medicare
    BeneficiariesUnited States, 1993. Journal of
    the American Medical Association
    1995273(6)449-51.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
    National Center for Health Statistics. Healthy
    People 2000 Review, 1998-1999 2000.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
    Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccination Levels
    among Adults Aged gt65 Years United States,
    1997. Morbidity Mortality Weekly Report 1998
    47(38)797-802.
  • Chapman GB, Coups EJ. Predictors of Influenza
    Vaccine Acceptance Among Healthy Adults.
    Preventive Medicine 199929(4)249-62.
  • Delbecq AL, Van de Ven AH, Gustafson DH. Group
    Techniques for Program Planning A Guide to
    Nominal Group and Delphi Processes. Glenview, IL
    Scott, Foresman 1975.

42
References (continued)
  • Everitt B. Cluster Analysis. New York John Wiley
    and Sons 1974.
  • Findlay PF, Gibbons YM, Primrose WR, Ellis G,
    Downie G. Influenza and neumococcal Vaccination
    Patient Perceptions. Postgraduate Medical
    Journal 200076(894)215-17.
  • Harrison LH, Dwyer DM, Billmann L, Kolczak MS,
    Schuchat A. Invasive Pneumococcal Infection in
    Baltimore, Md. Archives of Internal Medicine
    2000160(1)89-94.
  • Holt D. Recommendations, Usage and Efficacy of
    Immunizations for the Elderly. Practitioner
    199217(3)51-52, 58-59.
  • James A. Influenza Vaccination in the Elderly.
    Journal of Investigational Allergology and
    Clinical Immunology 19955(2)73-77.
  • Luman ET, McCauley MM, Rodewald LE. A Measure of
    Success Findings from the National Immunization
    Survey. American Journal of Preventive Medicine
    200120 (Suppl.).
  • Meszaros J, Asch D, Baron J, Hershey J,
    Kunreuther H, Schwartz-Buzaglo J. Cognitive
    Processes and the Decisions of Some Parents to
    Forego Pertussis Vaccination for Their children.
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
    199649(6)697-703.

43
References (continued)
  • Miller D, Shewchuk R, Elliot TR, Richards S.
    Nominal Group Technique A Process for
    Identifying Diabetes Self-Care Issues among
    Patients and Caregivers. Diabetes Education
    200026(2)305-10, 12, 14.
  • Morgan R, King D, Turnbull C. Influenza
    Vaccination Do the Aged Reap the Benefit?
    Postgraduate Medical Journal 199571(831)22-23.
  • Nichol KL, Baken L, Nelson A. Relation Between
    Influenza Vaccination and Outpatient Visits,
    Hospitalization, and Mortality in Elderly Persons
    with Chronic Lung Disease. Annals of Internal
    Medicine 1999130(5)397-403.
  • Nichol KL, Goodman M. The Health and Economic
    Benefits of Influenza Vaccination for Healthy
    and At-risk Persons Aged 65 to74 Years.
    Pharmacoeconomics 199916(Suppl 1)63-71.
  • Roth WM, Gabel D. A Combined Method of INDSCAL
    and Cognitive Mapping for Describing Changes in
    Students Cognitive Structure. Educational
    Psychological measurement 199252(3)769-79.
  • Smith DM, Zhou XH, Weinberger M, Smith F,
    McDonald RC. Mailed Reminders for Area-wide
    Influenza Immunization A Randomized Controlled
    Trial. Journal of the American Geriatrics
    Society 1999 47(1)1-5.
  • Trochim WM. An Introduction to Concept Mapping
    for Planning and Evaluation. Evaluation and
    Program Planning 198912(1)1-16.

44
References (continued)
  • U. S. Department of Health and Human Services.
    Healthy People 2010 (conference edition, in two
    volumes). Washington, D.C. U. S. Department of
    Health and Human Services 2000.
  • Wright P, Fortinsky R, Covinsky K, Anderson P,
    Landefeld C. Delivery of Preventive Services to
    Older Black Patients Using Neighborhood Health
    Centers. Journal of the American Geriatrics
    Society 200048(2)124-30.
  • Young MD. Cognitive Mapping Meets Semantic
    Networks. Journal of Conflict Resolution
    199640(3)395-414.

45
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com