Monitoring and Prescoring Activities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Monitoring and Prescoring Activities

Description:

Teachers turn in evidence-based assessments every nine-weeks. All evidence-based assessments reviewed by team according to division pacing chart ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: VirginiaDe
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Monitoring and Prescoring Activities


1
Monitoring and Prescoring Activities
  • 2008 - 2009 Alternate and Alternative Assessments
    Administrators Update Workshop
  • Virginia Department of Education
  • August 2008

2
Agenda
  • Monitoring
  • Collections of Evidence (COEs)
  • Course Work Compilations (CWCs)
  • Prescoring COEs and CWCs
  • Activity
  • Questions

3
Monitoring
  • Periodic and systematic review of evidence-based
    assessments in the development process with
    opportunities for feedback and intervention.

4
What Monitoring is Not
  • Checking with the teacher
  • Flipping through an evidence based assessment
  • Review without feedback

5
Why Monitor?
  • To create better COEs and CWCs.
  • To increase the alignment between the students
    level of achievement and the evidence presented
    in the COE or CWC.
  • To catch potential problems early.
  • To prevent the mad dash before the COEs and
    CWCs are due.

6
Why COEs and CWCs Fail
  • Missing evidence to support the SOL
  • Missing SOL
  • Use of unacceptable evidence
  • Use of evidence not aligned with the SOL
  • Ungraded or incorrectly graded evidence
  • Missing or incomplete SEI tags

7
Monitoring Decisions
  • Who will monitor?
  • How will you train them?
  • When will monitoring occur?
  • Who will receive feedback?
  • How will feedback be given?
  • What are your intervention options?

8
Components of Monitoring
  • Trained Reviewers
  • Feedback Loops
  • Intervention Options

9
Trained Reviewers
  • Persons with Content Knowledge and Testing
    Program Knowledge
  • School Test Coordinator
  • Assigned or Hired Staff
  • Building Level Teams
  • Central Office Level Teams

10
Feedback Loops
  • Teachers preparing collections
  • Principals
  • VAAP, VAAP, VSEP Leaders
  • Trainers/Technical Assistance
  • Providers

11
Intervention Options
  • Individualized Consultation and Support
  • Peer or small group sessions
  • Attendance at Local Training
  • Access to state and local SOL or assessment
    resources

12
A Sample Monitoring Plan
  • School-based Review Teams created and trained
  • Teachers turn in evidence-based assessments every
    nine-weeks
  • All evidence-based assessments reviewed by team
    according to division pacing chart
  • Team report shared with principal and central
    office
  • Central office dispatches Content Teams

13
A Sample Monitoring Plan
Select And Train School-Based Monitoring Teams
Monitoring Teams review COEs/ CWCs every 9 weeks.
Monitoring Teams report to the Principal and
School Test Coordinator.
Interventions are scheduled as needed.
Feedback is provided to teachers.
14
Prescoring
  • A detailed review of evidence-based assessments
    prior to submission
  • Compared to scoring rules
  • Prior to scoring
  • Opportunity for feedback and intervention

15
What Prescoring is Not
  • A mad dash to create a collection of evidence

16
Prescoring Decisions
  • Who will prescore?
  • How will you train them?
  • When will prescoring occur in relation to the
    submission date?
  • Who will receive feedback?
  • How will feedback be given?
  • What are your intervention options?

17
Why Prescore?
  • To provide a last check to ensure that all the
    scoring rules have been followed
  • To ensure that no last-minute detail has been
    overlooked
  • To provide an opportunity to make changes before
    the COE/ CWC is submitted

18
Rule 1- Evidence Must Show Individual Student
Achievement
  • Does the evidence show any level of achievement
    according to the SOL/ ASOL being defended?
  • Is the evidence on grade level?
  • Are all of the SOL addressed (stems and bullets)?

19
Rule 2- Evidence Must Be Student-Generated
  • Has the evidence been copied from the blackboard,
    textbook, or computer?
  • If the evidence is from a group project, is the
    achievement of the particular student clearly
    identified?
  • If the evidence is a worksheet, are there
    examples or directions that provide answers?

20
Rule 3 - Evidence Must Be Labeled with SEI Tag
  • Does each piece of evidence have a completed SEI
    tag with
  • Content area
  • SOL
  • Bullet (s)
  • Demonstrated or Inferred checked

21
Rule 4- Evidence Must Address Accommodations,
Captions and Grading
  • If accommodations have been used, are they
    documented in the evidence?
  • Does each picture have a caption that clearly
    address the students level of achievement?
  • Has the work been graded accurately with correct
    and incorrect answers clearly identified?

22
Media Considerations
  • Do videotapes and audiotapes have transcripts?
  • With an SEI Tag
  • Are videotapes and audiotapes clearly labeled
    with SEI tags?
  • On the case, not on the DVD
  • Is equipment/software needed to review the media
    clearly identified on the case?

23
Organizational Considerations
  • Is the evidence organized according to the
    scoring worksheet?
  • Are all required state and local forms completed?

24
Sample Prescoring Plan
  • PHASE 1 - Building Level Review
  • Submitting teacher review
  • School-based oversight teams review
  • Building Administrator review and sign-off
  • PHASE 2 - Central Office Review
  • Submitted from schools
  • Reviewed by central office teams
  • Return to schools to correct identified errors or
    omissions

25
Tools for Prescoring
  • VGLA Implementation Manual
  • Teacher Checklist for Collection of
    Evidence .54
  • Administrator Checklist for Collections of
    Evidence...55
  • VSEP Implementation Manual
  • Teacher Checklist for Course Work Compilation
    ..75
  • Administrator Checklist for Course Work
    Compilation.76
  • Completed CWC Submission Checklist...78
  • VAAP Implementation Manual
  • Teacher Checklist for Collection of
    Evidence..89
  • Administrator Checklist for Collections of
    Evidence..91

26
Monitoring Prescoring Results
  • Reduces or Eliminates COEs and CWCs with
  • Missing evidence
  • Unacceptable evidence (copied from textbooks,
    homework, hand-over-hand)
  • Inaccurate or ungraded evidence

27
Monitoring Prescoring Results
  • Eliminates Surprises!
  • Ensures collections required for students
    educated outside of the division are completed
  • Prevents incomplete collections in the division
  • Prevents collections not driven by IEP, 504 or
    LEP Student Assessment Participation Plans

28
Planning
  • Use the Activity Sheet in your packet
  • Work alone or with those sitting nearby
  • Begin to plan your divisions monitoring and
    prescoring activities
  • Use the Planning Sheet to continue to plan at
    your division.

29
Questions
  • Division of Student Assessment and School
    Improvement
  • (804) 225-2107
  • Student_Assessment_at_doe.virginia.gov
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com