Register vs Latch vs SRAM - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 4
About This Presentation
Title:

Register vs Latch vs SRAM

Description:

Register vs Latch vs SRAM. Delay vs. Drive Strength. Cell Area rise_delay fall_delay ... clock clk (rise edge) 0.00 0.00. clock network delay (ideal) 0.00 0.00 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:90
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 5
Provided by: howard65
Category:
Tags: sram | latch | register

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Register vs Latch vs SRAM


1
Register vs Latch vs SRAM
2
Delay vs. Drive Strength
  • Cell Area rise_delay fall_delay
  • inv_a1 9.4 318ps 192ps
  • inv_a4 15.68 241ps 140ps
  • inv_a8 47.04 200ps 100ps
  • nand2_a1 12.54 375ps 228ps
  • nand2_a4 28.22 207ps 166ps
  • nor2_a1 12.54 440ps 173ps
  • nor2_a4 28.22 338ps 123ps

3
Distribution of Gates (DMA)
  • Leaf Cell Count
    Area
  • and2_a1 642
    6214.5600
  • and2_a2 42
    487.8720
  • and3_a1 131
    1521.6960
  • and3_a2 13
    201.3440
  • aoi21_a1 180
    1742.4000
  • aoi21_a2 15
    290.4000
  • aoi22_a1 315
    3659.0400
  • aoi22_a2 9
    209.0880
  • buf_a1 130
    1006.7200
  • buf_a2 350
    3388.0000
  • buf_a4 295
    4568.9600
  • inv_a1 1371
    7962.7680
  • inv_a2 391
    3027.9040
  • inv_a4 443
    5145.8880
  • muxi2_a1 261
    4042.3680
  • muxi2_a2 22
    425.9200
  • nand2_a1 811
    6280.3840
  • nand2_a2 247
    2869.1520
  • or3_a2 1
    25.1680
  • w_and2_a4 52
    1208.0640
  • w_and3_a4 3
    92.9280
  • w_aoi21_a4 3
    116.1600
  • w_buf_a16 14
    758.9120
  • w_buf_a8 27
    731.8080
  • w_dff0_a2 221
    9412.8320
  • w_dff1_a2 1054
    57135.2320
  • w_inv_a16 13
    553.6960
  • w_inv_a32 1
    81.3120
  • w_inv_a8 74
    1719.1680
  • w_muxi2_a4 5
    193.6000
  • w_nand3_a2 16
    309.7600
  • w_nand3_a4 5
    174.2400
  • w_nand4_a2 81
    1881.7920
  • w_nand4_a4 3
    127.7760
  • w_nor2_a4 112
    2601.9840
  • w_nor3_a4 1
    38.7200
  • w_nor4_a4 3
    185.8560

4
Static Timing Analysis (DMA)
  • U6365/Q (and2_a1) 0.18
    1.95 r
  • U8360/Q (nand2_a4) 0.07
    2.02 f
  • U2034/Q (w_or2_a4) 0.12
    2.15 f
  • U8621/Q (inv_a2) 0.03
    2.18 r
  • U6362/Q (nand2_a1) 0.06
    2.24 f
  • U6363/Q (inv_a2) 0.08
    2.32 r
  • U8458/Q (nand2_a4) 0.06
    2.38 f
  • U8620/Q (inv_a2) 0.03
    2.41 r
  • U6360/Q (nand2_a1) 0.06
    2.47 f
  • U6361/Q (inv_a2) 0.05
    2.52 r
  • U2038/Q (and2_a2) 0.11
    2.63 r
  • U6358/Q (nand2_a1) 0.07
    2.69 f
  • U6359/Q (inv_a2) 0.08
    2.77 r
  • U8457/Q (nand2_a4) 0.06
    2.83 f
  • U5187/Q (inv_a1) 0.05
    2.88 r
  • U6356/Q (nand2_a1) 0.06
    2.94 f
  • U6357/Q (inv_a2) 0.08
    3.02 r
  • U8456/Q (nand2_a4) 0.07
    3.09 f
  • U8395/Q (w_nor2_a4) 0.06
    3.15 r
  • Startpoint dp_rx_pkt_adr_ff_reg_1A
  • (rising edge-triggered flip-flop
    clocked by clk)
  • Endpoint dp_rx_pkt_adr_ff_reg_25A
  • (rising edge-triggered flip-flop
    clocked by clk)
  • Path Group clk
  • Path Type max
  • Point Incr
    Path
  • ------------------------------------------------
    ---------------
  • clock clk (rise edge) 0.00
    0.00
  • clock network delay (ideal) 0.00
    0.00
  • dp_rx_pkt_adr_ff_reg_1A/CK (w_dff1_a2) 0.00
    0.00 r
  • dp_rx_pkt_adr_ff_reg_1A/Q (w_dff1_a2) 0.31
    0.31 r
  • U6194/Q (w_sbuf_a8) 0.10
    0.41 r
  • U8354/Q (nand2_a4) 0.06
    0.47 f
  • U8691/Q (inv_a4) 0.04
    0.51 r
  • U8455/Q (nand2_a4) 0.05
    0.56 f
  • U8619/Q (inv_a2) 0.06
    0.62 r
  • U8355/Q (nand2_a4) 0.05
    0.67 f
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com