Culture of Safety - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Culture of Safety

Description:

There is a space on the sedation form for the surgical pause and site validation. ... Technology. Practices. Procedures. Policies. Culture! ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:120
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: hsc6
Category:
Tags: culture | safety

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Culture of Safety


1
Culture of Safety
  • HSC Faculty Development Program
  • Niti Armistead, MD FACP
  • October 30th, 2008

2
Objectives
  • Safety from a patients perspective
  • Case scenarios from closer to home
  • Science of safety
  • Importance of teamwork and communication
  • Theory to practice required elements

3
Josie King
  • Spot for video

4
Audience Thoughts
  • How could this story happen?
  • Could this happen at any Healthcare facility,
    including WVUH?
  • Does organizational culture have any role in
    this issue?

5
Case Scenario 1
  • Mr. Jones is a 89 year old man involved in a
    motor vehicle accident 1 month prior to
    admission. Over the month, he became
    progressively confused and lethargic. Head CT by
    PCP revealed a large left sided subdural
    hematoma. He was transferred to our facility for
    further evaluation and treatment.

6
Case Scenario 1
  • Upon admission to SICU, patients wife was
    consented for a left twist drill procedure for
    insertion of a drainage catheter. Dr Smith
    marked the site while the family was present in
    the room, while he was talking with them. Family
    left the room just prior to the procedure. RNs
    John and Susan were in and out of the room at
    various times. John was the stat nurse and Susan
    had another patient assignment. It was shift
    change and there was a lot of activity in the
    unit, including many visitors and calls.

7
Procedure
  • Dr Smith shaved a small spot on the scalp and
    prepped the area with chloraprep. He placed a
    drain on the right side of the head. There was
    no drainage noted. Immediately Dr Smith realized
    he had placed the drain on the wrong side. He
    successfully went on to place another drain on
    the left side.
  • There is a space on the sedation form for the
    surgical pause and site validation. This space
    was left blank.
  • Mr. Jones suffered no direct harm from the
    placement of either drain.

8
Case Scenario 1
  • How could this wrong-site procedure have been
    prevented?

9
Science of Safety
  • Late 1999, Institute of Medicine (IOM) published
    a report, To Err is Human Building a Safer
    Health System
  • Estimated 44,000 to 98,000 deaths from errors
  • Equivalent of a jumbo jet crashing each and
    every day in the U.S.
  • Generally not an issue of bad apples
  • Challenge build a system that catches the
    inevitable lapses of mortals1

1. Wachter, Shojania. Internal Bleeding. New
York, NY Rugged Land, 2004
10
The Swiss Cheese Model of Safety
Layers of Protection
Some holes due to active failures
Hazards
Other holes due to system design
Error Reaches Patient
James Reason, Human error
11
Science of Safety
All healthcare encounters
All errors
All adverse events
Preventable adverse events
Non-preventable adverse events
near miss
Negligent adverse events
Wachter. Understanding Patient Safety, McGraw
Hill, NY 2008
12
Quality versus Safety for example
  • Patient comes in to ED with chest pain. His EKG
    shows ST elevation, suggesting acute MI. He
    receives an aspirin and a beta-blocker and taken
    to the cath lab immediately. In the post
    procedure time, he receives his metformin and 2
    doses of ibuprofen. Patients hospital stay is
    complicated by acute renal failure.
  • Acute MI quality process measures met? Yes. This
    is publicly reported and relatively easily
    measured.
  • Was his safety optimized? No. This is not as
    easily detected!

13
Science of Safety
  • What does system-focused approach look like?
  • Technology
  • Practices
  • Procedures
  • Policies
  • Culture!
  • Culture collection of values, beliefs and
    assumptions that guide members behaviors

Pronovost et al, Implementing and Validating a
Comprehensive Unit-Based Safety program, Journal
of Patient Safety. March 2005
14
Culture of Safety
  • Culture the way we do things around here

 
Culture Eats Strategy for Lunch
15
What is a Safe Culture?
  • In a safe culture, employees are guided by an
    organization wide commitment to safety, in which
    each member upholds their own safety norms and
    those of their coworkers
  • Aviation industry experience supports an
    association between culture and error management
  • Teamwork training diverse crews to dampen steep
    and unyielding authority gradients
  • Communication clear, timely, closed, structured

16
Lessons from Other Industries
Aviation Industry
Toyota Model
  • Preflight briefings and checklists
  • Call-outs
  • Standard procedures
  • Terminology
  • Mitigate error consequences
  • Teamwork
  • Leadership
  • Every defect is learned in real time
  • Production is stopped, Any one can stop the line!
    (gidoka)
  • Defect is resolved and they learn from the defect
    (Kaizen)
  • Eliminate waste (muda)

Anyone can stop the plane
Anyone can stop the line
Q has anyone done this in healthcare??? Yes!
17
Johns Hopkins Experience Comprehensive
Unit-Based Safety Program
  • CUSP 6 steps
  • Evaluate-AHRQ Survey Tool
  • Educate on science of safety
  • Identify defects as a unit
  • Adopt interventions
  • Learn from defect and others
  • Evaluate

18
Johns Hopkins Experience Comprehensive
Unit-Based Safety Program
  • Results
  • Significant improvement in staffs perception
    about patient safety and safety climate.
  • Several safety initiatives implemented e.g. ICU
    daily goals sheet and medication reconciliation
  • Reduction in ICU nursing turnover
  • Reduction in ICU length of stay

19
Teamwork and Communication
Attending Surgeon
Anesthesiologist
Surgical RN
CRNA
Anesthesia Resident
Sexton et al. Errors, stress and teamwork in
medicine and aviation, BMJ 2000 320 745-749
20
Teamwork and Communication
  • All organizations need structure and hierarchies
  • Taken to extreme, rigid hierarchies lead to
    frontline staff not speaking up
  • Healthcare is different from aviation
  • team is very heterogeneous training, income,
    status
  • Come to expect a norm of faulty and incomplete
    exchange of information
  • When in doubt, we default to it must be OK
  • Need to change mindset to if youre not sure
    its right, assume it is wrong

21
To Err is Human, To Fail is Swiss Cheese?
Site marking done while MD distracted
No X-ray confirmation
Environmental factors
Wrong site procedure
No time out conducted
No one said stop! Lets take a time out!
22
Case Scenario 2
  • Infant was ordered calcium gluconate for low
    calcium. MD entered order for calcium gluconate
    400 mg (100mg/kg) IV push. The peds pharmacist
    (working on 6th floor) checked the initial order
    and sent labels to the IV room (4th floor).
  • The IV room tech drew up 40 ml (4000 mg), the
    dose was checked and sent to the floor.
  • The nurse administering the doses was
    uncomfortable with the syringe size (60ml) and
    called the peds pharmacy to ask if the dose was
    correct. The pharmacist double checked the dose
    in CHIP and verified the dose was correct.
    Together they decided to use a syringe pump to
    administer over 30 minutes rather than IV push.
  • Shortly after, the patient began to experience
    arrhythmias. The drug was stopped, electrolytes
    monitored, and patient sent to the PICU.

23
To Err is Human, To Fail is Swiss Cheese?
Physician order doesnt include concentration
Medication prepared in IVR on 4th Floor
Order Checked by Peds Pharmacist In 6th floor
Satellite
Medication administered to pt
Nurse calls 6th floor pharmacist and questions
dose not volume
24
Transformation to a Culture of Safety

Uniformity
Variations
Quality focus
Financial focus
Transparent
Restricted
Autocratic
Team
Practice focus
Patient centered
25
Academic Healthcare Experience
  • Common qualities shared by top performers
    included a shared sense of purpose, a hands-on
    leadership style, accountability systems for
    quality and safety, a focus on results, and a
    culture of collaboration
  • Keroack at al. Academic Medicine, 2007

26
What Does Accountability Look Like?
  • Reasonable performance expectations
  • Applied fairly, expectations similar for all
  • Proportional consequences
  • Appropriate carrots and sticks used to drive
    system to excellence
  • No blame is dominant front line culture
  • For innocent slips and mistakes
  • Clear demarcation of blameworthy acts
  • E.g. gross incompetence, failure to heed quality/
    safety rules, disruptive behavior

27
Theory to Practice Required Elements
  • Teamwork dampen authority gradients
  • Leader do introductions, explicitly welcome
    input from team members, debriefings after
    procedures
  • Communication standardized format e.g. SBAR
  • Decreased complexity
  • Independent checks need to be independent
  • Standardizing processes and practices
  • Report adverse events, learn from defects

28
Theory to Practice Required Elements
  • Strong leadership and champions
  • One persons empowerment is anothers
    depowerment!
  • Buy-in from all this is hard work!
  • Support the folks who speak up even when
    everything turns out to have been fine!
  • Become comfortable with blame free, yet holding
    people accountable, as appropriate.

29
WVUH Haunted Hospital
WHO? Everyone - All Ghosts and Goblins!
WHAT? Join the fun at our Haunted Hospital
Complete with Games, Displays, and GOODIES!
WHERE? Ruby 4th Floor Conference Rooms 3A/3B
WHEN? October 31, 2008 12p 4p
November 1, 2008 6a 10a
30
Conclusion
"You've got to be very careful if you don't know
where you're going, because you might not get
there." Yogi Berra
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com