Title: Improved Steiner Tree Approximation in Graphs SODA 2000
1Improved Steiner Tree Approximation in
GraphsSODA 2000
- Gabriel Robins (University of Virginia)
-
- Alex Zelikovsky (Georgia State University)
2Overview
- Steiner Tree Problem
- Results Approximation Ratios
- general graphs
- quasi-bipartite graphs
- graphs with edge-weights 1 2
- Terminal-Spanning trees 2-approximation
- Full Steiner Components Gain Loss
- k-restricted Steiner Trees
- Loss-Contracting Algorithm
- Derivation of Approximation Ratios
- Open Questions
3Steiner Tree Problem
- Given A set S of points in the plane
terminals - Find Minimum-cost tree spanning S minimum
Steiner tree
4Steiner Tree Problem in Graphs
- Given Weighted graph G(V,E,cost) and
terminals S ? V - Find Minimum-cost tree T within G spanning S
- Complexity Max SNP-hard Bern Plassmann, 1989
- even in complete graphs with
edge costs 1 2 - Geometric STP NP-hard Garey
Johnson, 1977 - but has PTAS Arora, 1996
5 Approximation Ratios in Graphs
- 2-approximation 3
independent papers, 1979-81 - Last decade of the second millennium
- 11/6 1.84 Zelikovsky
- 16/9 1.78 Berman Ramayer
- PTAS with the limit ratios
- 1.73 Borchers Du
- 1ln2 1.69 Zelikovsky
- 5/3 1.67 Promel Steger
- 1.64 Karpinski Zelikovsky
- 1.59 Hougardy Promel
- This paper
- 1.55 1 ln3 / 2
- Cannot be approximated better than 1.004
6Approximation in Quasi-Bipartite Graphs
- Quasi-bipartite graphs all Steiner points are
pairwise disjoint
Approximation ratios 1.5 ? Rajagopalan
Vazirani, 1999 This paper 1.5 for the Batched
1-Steiner Heuristic Kahng Robins, 1992 1.28
for Loss-Contracting Heuristic, runtime O(S2P)
7Approximation in Complete Graphs with Edge Costs
1 2
- Approximation ratios
- 1.333 Rayward-Smith Heuristic Bern Plassmann,
1989 - 1.295 using Lovasz algorithm for parity
matroid problem - Furer, Berman Zelikovsky, TR 1997
- This paper
- 1.279 ? PTAS of k-restricted Loss-Contracting
Heuristics
8Terminal-Spanning Trees
- Terminal-spanning tree Steiner tree without
Steiner points - Minimum terminal-spanning tree minimum spanning
tree - gt efficient greedy algorithm in any metric space
Theorem MST-heuristic is a 2-approximation Proof
MST lt Shortcut Tour ? Tour 2 OPTIMUM
9Full Steiner Trees Gain
- Full Steiner Tree all terminals are leaves
- Any Steiner tree union of full components (FC)
- Gain of a full component K, gainT(K) cost(T) -
mst(TK)
10Full Steiner Trees Loss
- Loss of FC K cost of connection Steiner points
to terminals
- Loss-contracted FC CK K with contracted loss
11k-Restricted Steiner Trees
- k-restricted Steiner tree any FC has ? k
terminals - optk Cost(optimal k-restricted Steiner tree)
- opt Cost(optimal Steiner tree)
- Fact optk ? (1 1/log2k) opt Du et al,
1992 - lossk Loss(optimal k-restricted Steiner
tree) - Fact loss (K) lt 1/2 cost(K)
12Loss-Contracting Algorithm
- Input weighted complete graph G
- terminal node set S
- integer k
- Output k-restricted Steiner tree spanning S
- Algorithm
- T MST(S)
- H MST(S)
- Repeat forever
- Find k-restricted FC K maximizing
- r gainT(K) / loss(K)
- If r ? 0 then exit repeat
- H H K
- T MST(T CK)
- Output MST(H)
13Approximation Ratio
- Theorem Loss-Contracting Algorithm output tree
-
- Proof idea
- New Lower Bound mst - gain(H) - loss(H) ? optk
for any non-improvable steiner tree H - The total loss does not grow too fast
loss(H) ? losskln
(1(mst-optk)/lossk )
since greedy choice - similar
to greedy for setcovering
14Derivation of Approximation Ratios
General graphs ? 1 ln3 /2 mst ? 2opt partial
derivative by lossk is always positive lossk ?
1/2 optk maximum is for lossk 1/2 optk
15Open Questions
- Better upper bound (lt1.55)
- combine Hougardy-Promel approach with LCA
- speed of improvement 3-4 per year
- Better lower bound (gt1.004)
- really difficult
- thinnest gap 1.279,1.004
- More time-efficient heuristics
- Tradeoffs between runtime solution quality
- Special cases of Steiner problem
- so far LCA is the first working better for all
cases - Empirical benchmarking / comparisons