Title: Intelligent Design, Modern Science
1Intelligent Design, Modern Science Your
Grandchildrens Future
- Will the Bible be relevant in 2050?
- Will Darwinism be relevant in 2050?
2TNPC ID Blog Current Topics
- Father Jonathan from Fox News
- Where does ID belong science or philosophy
class? - ID in the IEEE
- Optical design tips from a butterfly
- Send submissions to me at john.dishman_at_comcast.net
- PLEASE PASS THE CLIPBOARD, MARK YOUR ATTENDANCE
3Proposed Schedule
Week 7 History of science part 2 including biology physics paradigm shifts
Week 8 Difficulties with Darwinism Icons of Evolution video (51 minutes-start at 909!!)
Week 9 Answers to objections to ID
Week 10 Interpretations of Genesis Analogical Framework views
Week 11 Interpretations of Genesis Day-Age Traditional 6 Consecutive 24 Hour Day views
4Icons of Evolution Reactions
- Haeckels Embryos
- Darwins Finches
- Darwins Tree of Life
- Four-Winged Fruit Flies
- Homology in Vertebrate Limbs
- Miller-Urey Experiment
5Father Jonathan
- Example of attempts to compromise with evolution
- Believes in ID, but thinks its not science
- Highly critical of Judge Jones
- Thinks both ID neo-Darwinism should be taught
in philosophy class, not science class - But there are no philosophy classes in high
school - Buys into NAS definition of science
- Breaking news another ID defeat in Ohio
- State school board reverses itself bans
critical thinking when it comes to evolution
6ID in the IEEE
- In the butterfly Princeps nireus, skylight is
captured in its wings converted into blue-green
light loved by females, through fluorescence. - Ordinarily half the light lost goes back into
wings - In P. nireus, each wing scale has a 3 layer
mirror known as a distributed Bragg reflector at
its base - Results in constructive interference that
redirects outward avoiding loss - However, some light still gets trapped at the
surface - To compensate for this P. nireus employs a
photonic crystal consisting of hollow tubes
perpendicular to the Bragg reflector
7Distributed Bragg Reflector Principles
8One-PhotonHolographic Lithography
D. N. Sharp et al., Opt. Quant. Elec. 34, 3
(2002)
10µm
huge volumes, long-range periodic, fcc
latticebackfill for high contrast
9MIT vs Princeps Nireus
Butterfly 2 MIT 1
Note the elaborate technology needed by MIT
engineers to fabricate the structure already
found in the butterfly. As the caption says it
looks like intelligent design.
10Objections to ID
- Objection 1 The design in nature appears to be
less than optimal
11From PBS Evolution
An intelligent designer, working with the
components of this wiring, would choose the
orientation that produces the highest degree of
visual quality. No one, for example, would
suggest that the neural connections should be
placed in front of the photoreceptor cells --
thus blocking the light from reaching them --
rather than behind the retina.
Incredibly, this is exactly how the human retina
is constructed. Visual quality is degraded
because light scatters as it passes through
several layers of cellular wiring before reaching
the retina. Granted, this scattering has been
minimized because the nerve cells are nearly
transparent, but it cannot be eliminated because
of the basic design flaw. Moreover, the effects
are compounded because a network of vessels,
which is needed to supply the nerve cells with a
rich supply of blood, also sits directly in front
of the light-sensitive layer, another feature
that no engineer would propose.
12The Human Retina
- Humans rods/cones behind nerves blood vessels
- Octopus rods/cones in front of nerves blood
vessels
13Optimization in eye design requires tradeoffs
between
resolution
sensitivity
speed
14Tradeoffs in the Design of the Eye
resolution
sensitivity
nerves in front of rods/cones
nerves in back of rods/cones
15Eye Design
- Placing transparent nerves blood vessels in
front of rods/cones slightly reduces resolution - But, allows the sensitivity to light to be
greatly increased i.e., allows much better night
vision because of the provision of oxygen from
blood vessels in low light - Some vertebrates with this wiring can detect a
single incident photon
16Eye design is only a small part of an overall
systems design space
- Eye is part of the total human body design
- Human body design is part of an local ecosystem
design - Local ecosystem is part of the total world
ecosystem - There are tradeoffs to be made all the way up
down the chain
17Suppose a King Kong really existed in an ecosystem
- Not just Fay Ray would be affected by his
presence!! - Note how well tuned is the overall system of
plants, animals, geology, hydrology, etc. for
life to thrive on earth
18Objections to ID
- Objection 1 The design in nature appears to be
less than optimal - Answer optimal with respect to what?
19Objections to ID
- Objection 2 A wise powerful God wouldnt have
done it this way.
The late Stephen J. Gould Professor of Geology
Zoology Harvard University
20Says Gould
- If God had designed a beautiful machine to
reflect his wisdom and power, surely he would not
have used a collection of parts generally
fashioned for other purposes..Odd arrangements
and funny solutions are proof of evolutionpaths
that a sensible God would never tread but that a
natural process, constrained by history, follows
perforce. (from the book The Pandas Thumb)
Question is Goulds statement science or
theology?
Does his audience view him as scientist or
theologian?
21Analyzing Goulds Statement
- IF God has designed a beautiful machine..
- Implication this is not a beautiful machine we
live in, therefore no God. - surely, he would have.
- Implication Gould knows how God would have done
things - Odd arrangements funny solutions.(are) paths
a sensible God would never tread - Trust me these arrangements, like the pandas
thumb, are odd and non-sensible
22Example the pandas thumb
- The panda, unlike our North American bears,
possesses a thumb that it uses to strip bamboo
leaves off the shoots. This thumb is actually an
extra digit made by the extension of the radial
sesamoid bone in the wrist. Because this is not
the typical way a thumb is formed, Gould
concludes that, "the panda must use parts on
hand.... The sesamoid thumb wins no prize in an
engineer's derby" but is the best solution
evolution can find since the "true thumb is
committed to another role (Boblin Anderson,
JASA, March, 1983)
23A Rebuttal (www.godandscience.org)
- A new study analyzed the giant panda's thumb
using computed tomography, magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) and related techniques. Contrary to
what evolutionists have previously expressed
about the "bad design," the current study shows
that the radial sesamoid bone (its "thumb") is
"one of the most extraordinary manipulation
systems" among mammals.
24Rebuttal Continued
- Evolutionists say that the design of the
Panda's thumb is bad compared to that of the
primate opposable thumb. However, the opposable
thumb is not designed for continuous grasping.
Such kind of usage can result in carpal tunnel
syndrome (just ask any laboratory technician who
has been pipetting for many years). Being a
herbivore, the Giant Panda spends nearly all of
its waking hours eating. It collects bamboo
leaves by grasping and stripping leaves from the
stalks. Contrary to what the evolutionists say,
the opposable thumb would be a bad design for the
Panda, since it could not function under the
stress of continuous use. The Panda's hand, with
its "thumb" bound to the metacarpals, is a much
stronger design able to withstand continuous use.
25Pandas Thumb Conclusion
- The radial sesamoid bone and the accessory carpal
bone form a double pincer-like apparatus enabling
the panda to manipulate objects with great
dexterity. - The authors concluded their study with the
following statement - "We have shown that the hand of the giant panda
has a much more refined grasping mechanism than
has been suggested in previous morphological
models." - Endo, H., Yamagiwa, D., Hayashi, Y. H.,
Koie, H., Yamaya, Y., and Kimura, J. 1999. Nature
397 309-310.
26Other Examples
- To see how recent research has found deeper
engineering design principles in structures
criticized by evolutionists as beneath a
sensible Designer, see - http//godandscience.org/evolution/designgonebad.h
tml - a web site by Richard Deems associated with the
Hugh Ross ministry Reasons to Believe
27Pauls view of how God would have done it
- Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and
knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his
judgments and how inscrutable his ways! - "For who has known the mind of the Lord,
- or who has been his counselor?"
- "Or who has given a gift to him
- that he might be repaid?
- For from him and through him and to him are all
things. To him be glory forever. Amen. - Rom. 1133-36
Rembrandts Apostle Paul
28Or putting it another way. ASLAN
IS NOT A TAME LION!!
29Objections to ID
- Objection 2 A wise powerful God wouldnt have
done it this way.
The late Stephen J. Gould Professor of Geology
Zoology Harvard University
30Objections to ID
- Objection 3 ID is not science since it cant
make predictions or be a basis for research,
whereas Darwinism can
31Ernst Mayer evolutionary biologist
The theory of natural selection can describe and
explain phenomena with considerable precision,
but it cannot make reliable predictions, except
through such trivial and meaningless circular
statements as, for instance The fitter
individuals will on the average leave more
offspring." Toward a New Philosophy of Biology
(1988) pp.31-32
In other words, Darwinism has no predictive power
either!
32Dembskis Research Themes
- Improving methods of detecting design
- Determine the nature of biological information
- What are the constraints on matter to handle
biological information - What empirical grounds are there to show
intelligence is indispensable for information - What is the minimal complexity required for
functionality in biological systems - Some evolution exists. How much can be allowed
before intelligence is required?
33FootnoteJames Shapiro, opponent of ID
- There are not detailed Darwinian accounts for
the evolution of any fundamental biochemical or
cellular system, only a variety of wishful
speculations. It is remarkable that Darwinism is
accepted as a satisfactory explanation for such a
vast subjectevolutionwith so little rigorous
examination of how well its basic theses work in
illuminating specific instances of biological
adaptation or diversity.
34More Dembski Research Themes
- Understand complex biological structures from an
engineering perspective looking not only at
functionality but also reliability,
repairability, manufacturability, economy, etc - Apply the study of human technological evolution
(using a tool called TRIZ) to biological systems - Was the intelligent designer programming the
future of biological invention to be revealed
over time, including for example the rise fall
of dinosaurs? - Was the intelligent designer overcoming negative
forces in his design program, for example, as a
result of the Fall?
35More Dembski Research Themes
- Evolutionary computation.
- The immune system runs an algorithmic program
that detects, tracks, attacks invaders. Is
such a program designed, or could it have evolved
along with the environment? Simulation is
needed. - Handling discontinuities.
- Are the missing links (intermediates) in the
fossil record real or imaginary. If real, the
observed complexity in the biosphere requires
huge coordination of matter information. How
much it requires intelligent how much could be
explained by natural forces?
36Finally steganography hidden messages
- Is there a user manual embedded in biological
information? For example to tell proteins how to
fold. - 1st order useful to the organism
- 2nd order useful to the scientific researcher
implanted by the designer to be discovered at the
appropriate time to confirm intelligent design
37Is steganography over the top?
- The Old Testament prophets saw hidden, the day
when the WORD would be incarnate and be The Way,
showing men how to live - Perhaps a similar, but lesser, word lies at the
heart of biological information.