Assessing Costs and Benefits of Environmental Policies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Assessing Costs and Benefits of Environmental Policies

Description:

Also recall Tuolumne study many environmental costs excluded, costs of dam ... Red cockaded woodpecker in south. Pharmaceutical potential of natural compounds ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: Cos147
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Assessing Costs and Benefits of Environmental Policies


1
Assessing Costs and Benefits of Environmental
Policies Regulations
  • How do we quantify costs?
  • How do we quantify benefits?

2
Whose costs and benefits?
  • Recall cookbook want to account for all
    significant costs and benefits.
  • Also recall Tuolumne study many environmental
    costs excluded, costs of dam still outweigh
    benefits (lesson if you dont have to rely on
    non-use values, then dont)
  • Important to include costs benefits over time
    use NPV formulation (or ENPV if uncertainty).

3
Costs
  • Direct costs
  • Eg, equipment purchases
  • Indirect costs
  • Eg, consumers forced to buy lower quality low
    emission vehicles (LEVs)

Loss from mandate
Price
Subsidy
.
.
.
.
Q, LEVs
4
Costs (cont)
  • Lower productivity associated with requiring
    water based instead of oil based paints
  • Administrative and compliance costs

5
Benefits Types of values
  • Market values
  • Commodities traded in markets or values directly
    reflected in markets
  • Usually from direct-use
  • Often derived demand
  • Recall, markets ignore externalities may
    misrepresent public good
  • Non-market values
  • Commodities that have value to humans, but whose
    value cannot be measured within a market.
  • Includes Use and Non-Use Values

6
Use vs. non-use values
  • Use values
  • Value from consumption of a good
  • Current use, expected future use, possible use
  • Direct health impacts
  • Non-health impacts (e.g. smell)
  • Damage to ecosystems pollution degrades
    performance
  • Non-use values
  • Measurement is controversial
  • Existence value, altruistic value, bequest value

7
Examples
  • Market values
  • 1 mbf Douglas Fir
  • 1 ton SOx in RECLAIM
  • 1 ton halibut in Alaska
  • Red cockaded woodpecker in south
  • Pharmaceutical potential of natural compounds
  • Non-market values
  • Sea otters on south coast
  • Air/water quality
  • Strong swell off Coal Oil Point
  • Oil spill off Spain
  • Yosemite Natl park
  • Golden trout in Sierras

8
Measuring demand
  • Revealed preference
  • Observe a real choice in market infer value
  • E.g. Value of living near urban open space
    Compare housing prices w/ and w/o urban open
    space.
  • Hedonics, Travel Cost, Household production
  • Stated preference
  • Ask people (survey) how much they value
    environmental goods
  • E.g. Would you accept a 0.05 increase in gas
    price to require double-hull oil tankers?
  • Contingent valuation

9
Some examples of measuring demand
  • Demand for park recreation
  • Channel Islands MPA
  • Demand for health risk reductions
  • Seeps off Coal-Oil Point
  • Morbitity
  • Mortality
  • Using Benefits Transfer Methods

10
Example Natl park fees
  • Yosemite National Park charges 20 entrance fee,
    3 million visits.
  • Want to use bus to eliminate cars in the Valley
    to improve recreational experience.
  • Want to increased fee to pay for bus (10 million
    per year).
  • Will increase to 30 pay for bus?
  • Wrong calculation 103 million 30 mil

11
Change in natl park entrance fee

Revenue before fee increase ODEF
Entrance Fee
D
E
20
Demand for Park Visits
O
F
Q
Q20
12
Change in natl park entrance fee

Revenue after fee increase OABC
Entrance Fee
A
B
30
D
E
20
Demand for Park Visits
O
C
F
Q
Q20
Q30
13
Change in natl park entrance fee

Will a fee increase from 20 to 30 pay for the
bus system? ABCO-DEFO gt 10 mil?
Entrance Fee
A
B
30
D
E
20
Demand for Park Visits
O
C
F
Q
Q20
Q30
14
Human health values
  • How estimate monetary value of changes in health
    from environmental change?
  • 2 steps
  • (1) environmental change to health impact,
  • (2) change in health to where possible.
  • Distinguish between mortality (death), morbidity
    (illness)
  • Often disaggregate according to age, sex,
    physical condition, etc

15
Mortality
  • Crude mortality rate deaths per time/relevant
    populationinterpreted as probability of dying.
  • How will change affect probability of dying?
  • In expectation, how many more people will die (or
    how many fewer will die)
  • Total value /life lives.
  • Lead in water 2.5 million per death avoided,
    2.5622 1.6 billion.

16
Morbidity (sickness)
  • Chronic or acute, degree of impairment, type of
    symptom
  • restricted activity days, bed disability
    days, work loss days, symptom days
  • Clean Air Act protect individuals from adverse
    health effects.
  • Lead 1 million/non-fatal heart attack,
    628/case reduced chance of hypertension

17
Benefits transfer approach
  • See Rosenberger Loomis, 2000.
  • The application of existing information
    knowledge to new contexts
  • Useful when collecting primary data and analysis
    is impractical (cost or time)
  • 3 important features
  • Policy context must be well-defined
  • Data must meet certain criteria
  • Study site and new site should correspond

18
Example Orange County Oil Spill
  • Oil tanker spills at Huntington Beach, 2001
  • Beaches in southern Orange County closed for
    month
  • Big loss lost beach recreation days
  • Benefits transfer value of lost beach recreation
    days at other beaches

19
Sample of other studies
20
Policy context
  • Identify extent and type of impacts from proposed
    action
  • Identify affected population
  • Identify data needs of assessment
  • Type of measure, kind of value, degree of
    uncertainty, etc.

21
Study site data requirements
  • Make sure study site data analysis technique
    are sound
  • Study site analysis contains details (for
    comparison) of physical socioeconomic
    characteristics, reports statistics

22
Correspondence between sites
  • Similar expected change in resource quality and
    quantity.
  • Markets in two sites are similar demographics
    are similar.
  • Condition and quality of environmental good is
    similar.

23
Limitations of benefit transfer
  • Quality of original study
  • The more primary studies, the better.
  • Primary data vs. summary statistics (may limit
    ability to conduct new analysis).
  • Characteristics of sites may differ,
  • Assumptions made in original study that do not
    apply.

24
Approaches to benefit transfer
  • Value transfer
  • Point estimate(s) from study site
  • Identify change, translate into physical impact
    (e.g. use), identify applicable study sites,
    select (range of) benefit measures, calculate
    value.
  • Function transfer
  • Demand or benefits function from study site.
  • Identify change, translate into physical impact,
    identify applicable study sties, determine if
    demand function available, adapt demand (benefit)
    function to fit new site.

25
Next 2 lectures
  • Stated Preference/ Constructed Markets
  • Contingent Valuation
  • Revealed Preference
  • Hedonics
  • Travel Cost
  • Household Production
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com