Title: The various contaminants to the SZ effect
1Lecture 3
- The various contaminants to the SZ effect
- Telescopes and how they deal with the various
issues - Single dishes (radiometers and bolometers)
- Examples (OCRA)
- Interferometers
- Examples (AMiBA)
- Future prospects (Planck etc)
2SZ Practicalities
- SZ is a tiny signal - requires sophisticated
observing techniques - Various sources of contamination and confusion,
which observing techniques deal with in different
ways - Radio sources (galaxies, planets)
- Atmospheric emission, ground emission
- Primordial CMB fluctuations
3Radio Sources
- If a radio source is present in the field of a
galaxy cluster, it will fill in the SZ
decrement - This could be true for sources in front of /
behind the cluster, or indeed member galaxies - Problem greater at low frequency most sources
are steep spectrum - Can choose to observe clusters with no sources -
introduce bias - Better to subtract effects
- No high-freq. radio surveys - further complication
4Atmosphere, Ground
- Atmosphere is warm - radiates.
- Time variable emission
- Ground also a source of thermal emission
- Varies with pointing angle or telescope
- Can minimise this using a ground shield
- Various ways exist of dealing with these
contaminant signals
5Primordial CMB
- Primordial anisotropies look remarkably similar
to the SZ effect on large angular scales (tens of
arcminutes) - Seem unsurprising that telescopes such as the VSA
and CBI (built to observe the primordial CMB)
suffer drastically from this type of
contamination.... - .....We were still surprised!
6(No Transcript)
7SZ Telescopes
- 3 main types of instrument
- Single dishes. May have bolometric or
radiometric receivers. Receiver arrays are
becoming more common. - Interferometers - synthesise a large telescope
using an array of small dishes - Each has its own advantages and disadvantages
when it comes to dealing with sources of
contamination and confusion
8Single Dishes
OVRO 40m
9Simplest Case
- Measure signal received by single beam of solid
angle ?? - Provides one pixel of information
- Records signal from the sky plus parasitic
signals from the ground and atmosphere - PG(TskyTgroundTatmosphere)
- Signals from ground and atmosphere are time
variable
10Improvement Beam Switching
- Receiver with 2 beams (horn feeds), A and B
- Beam A positioned coincident with target
(cluster) so measures - PA Cluster Ground Atmosphere
- Beam B observes blank sky
- PB Ground Atmosphere
- Differenced signal measures cluster signal only.
- PA - PB Cluster
11Problems...
- Only spend half observing time on target, but
uniform signals (ground, atmosphere, CMB) are
subtracted - Configuration is asymmetrical. No problem for
the atmosphere, put potentially fails to remove
ground emission - Also susceptible to differences in receiver gain
and beamshape - Need revised strategy....
12ImprovementPosition Switching
- Start with A on target, B on blank sky. Then
swap - Switch in azimuth - comparable volumes of
atmosphere - Differenced signal twice cluster signal
- Better at removing ground emission, but beware
radio sources!
13Extensions
- Array receivers
- Multiple detectors offer increased sensitivity
and imaging capabilities - Can apply similar, or more complex, switching
- LEAD - MAIN - TRAIL
- Observe background fields either side of field
containing cluster - Offers further subtraction possibilities
14Single Dish Pros Cons
- Large dishes are very sensitive, particularly
when fitted with array receivers - Array receivers required for imaging
- Have to employ switching schemes to suppress
systematics - Some limitations on cluster observability due to
angular size vs switching strategy - Difficult to deal with radio sources - may have
to avoid cluster centres
15Detectors
- Radiometers
- Incident radiation produces a voltage
- Difficult to build at high freq., limited
bandwidth - Bolometers
- Thermal - measure temperature increase
- Sensitive to all wavelengths - often used at high
frequency, and for multi-frequency instruments - Technically challenging - require excellent
cooling
16Example OCRA
- Torun 32-m telescope, Poland. 30GHz radiometric
detectors - Currently, 2-beam receiver - prototype for focal
plane array (OCRA-p) - Observed 4 well-known clusters (Lancaster et al
2007) to verify strategy - Now observing sensible sample of 18 clusters
174 clusters Results
1818 clusters work in progress
1918 clusters work in progress
20Example OCRA
- Next phase, OCRA-F, under construction.
- 16 beam (8xOCRA-p)
- Has the ability to make SZ images, resolved for
the first time - Will also be capable of small blind surveys
- Set to be mounted on the telescope later this year
21(No Transcript)
22OCRA collaboration
The other members of the OCRA team Mark
Birkinshaw, Aziz Alareedh, Peter Wilkinson, Ian
Browne, Stuart Lowe, Michael Peel, Richard
Davis, Richard Battye, Andrzej Kus, Marcin
Gawronski, Roman Feiler, Eugeniusz Pazderski,
Bogna Pazderska
23Bolometers ACBAR
- 16-element bolometer mounted on VIPER
- Requires excellent observing conditions - located
at the south pole - Observing frequencies 150, 220 and 275GHz.
- Observed the decrement-null-increment (lecture 1)
- Blind survey complete, analysis underway
24Others worth noting
- Radiometers
- Nobeyama 45-m, Japan. 46 GHz
- OVRO 40-m / 5-m, USA. 30 GHz (Mason et al)
- Bolometers
- CSO 10.4-m (SuZIE), USA. 150, 220, 280, 350GHz
- JCMT 15-m (SCUBA), USA. 350GHz
25Interferometers
Ryle Telescope
26Interferometers
- Traditionally used to synthesise a large
telescope with an array of small dishes, thus
increasing resolution - Useful in this context for suppressing
systematics - various advantages over single dish
experiments - Can deal neatly with radio sources
- Can filter out contaminant signals
27Interferometry
? 2 Dishes, separated by a distance D
? Same resolution as a large dish of
diameter D
? Resolution ?/D
? But only samples this angular scale
Need many baselines for aperture synthesis
28Interferometry
- Measure the product (correlation) of the
voltages of the two antennas - A bit like reverse diffraction - the response for
this interferometer will be cos2 fringes
(remember Youngs slits?) - Actually measures the Fourier transform of the
sky (again, like diffracction)
29Real Interferometer
- In practice, have many pairs of antennas, usually
referred to as baselines. - n telescopes give n(n-1)/2 baselines.
- Baseline of length D is sensitive to angular
scale ??/D (resolution) - Long baselines sensitive to small scales
- Short baselines sensitive to large scales
- Evaluate response for each baseline in order to
find response of whole telescope
30Radio Sources
- Short baselines (large angular scales) sensitive
to SZ (large angular scales) radio sources (all
angular scales) - Long baselines (small angular scales) sensitive
to radio sources (all angular scales) - Measure source flux on long baselines and
subtract from short baseline data - Spatial Filtering - used to good effect by many
experiments (Ryle, OVRO/BIMA)
31High res...
Low res, after source subtraction...
Colourscale - 30GHz Contours - 1.4GHz
Colourscale - Xrays Contours - SZ
32CMB Anisotropies
- The problem of contamination by primordial CMB
anisotropies is most relevant for instruments
working on large angular scales - e.g. the VSA, also CBI
- Need multi-frequency experiments for spectral
subtraction - However, less important on smaller angular scales
(i.e. only really affects low-redshift samples)
33- 30GHz, longest baseline 3m - Dedicated source
subtractor - Suffers badly with CMB - Some
clusters drowned out
34 15 arcmin
Power in primordial anisotropies falls off with
decreasing angular scale
35Interferometer Pros Cons
- Can subtract signals from radio sources via
spatial filtering - Lack angular dynamic range - may be difficult to
produce higher resolution images - Problem of CMB contamination persists unless
multi-frequency measurements are available (but
only a large problem for a few instruments)
36Example - AMiBA
37Example - AMiBA
- Currently 7 60cm antenna, 90GHz, Hawaii.
Baselines chosen for optimum sensitivity to SZ
effect. Small enough scales for the primordial
CMB to be suppressed. - Radio sources are significantly less problematic
at this frequency, although we currently have a
large problem with ground emission.... - Huge potential as a survey instrument - will
generate extensive cluster catalogues with well
understood selection functions. Expected to find
tens of clusters per square degree - Will eventually also produce detailed images
38AMiBA Maps
39Simulated maps
?M1
?M0.3
All clusters found are too distant to be detected
by current X-ray or Optical telescopes
40AMiBA collaboration
Other team members Paul T.P. Ho, Ming-Tang Chen,
J.H. Proty Wu, Keiichi Umetsu, Mark Birkinshaw,
Chao-Te Li, Guo-Chin Liu, Kai-Yang Lin, Patrick
Koch, Yo-Wei Liao, Hiroaki Nishioka
41Next Generation
- Survey Instruments
- e.g. AMI, AMiBA, SZA, ACBAR, SPT, APEX
- Improved imaging / surveying
- e.g. OCRA, AzTEC
42The next big thing.... Planck
- CMB experiment - primordial anisotropies
including polarisation - Will solve cosmological paradigms
- Will also detect many thousands of SZ clusters -
less deep than other studies but will survey the
entire sky - Launch.....2007?.....2008?...........
43Summary 3
- Measuring the SZ effect is difficult. Requires
specialist techniques to eliminate various
sources of contamination and confusion - Two basic types of instrument - single dishes and
interferometers. Single dish detectors may be
radiometers or bolometers - Plethora of survey instruments under
construction. Will yield vast cluster
catalogues and revolutionise the field.
44Exam hints!
- Short question
- You get to take notes in. There are not many
equations. Write them down. - Have a think about potential calculations based
on the notes. - Long question
- Students usually do far better on this part
- You will receive more marks if you can quote
examples.