Title: NWSRFS Snow Modeling
1NWSRFS Snow Modeling
- Cold Regions Workshop
- November 2004
- Andrea Holz
- NCRFC
2North Dakota, 1966
Historic NWS Photo
3SNOW-17 Model Overview
- Input Variables
- Air Temperature
- 10 days of maximum/minimum point (CCF) forecasts
- May use gridded temperature forecasts soon
(maybe next spring) - Precipitation
- 24 Hours of QPF
- 72 Hour QPF Contingency Forecasts
- Output
- Rain Melt
- Simulated Water Equivalent
- Simulated Areal Extent of Snow Cover
- Simulated Snow Depth
4Other SNOW-17 Model calculations
- Snow Pack Information
- Accumulation of snow cover
- Surface Energy Exchange
- Heat storage in snow pack
- Rain on snow event
- Snow pack ripening
- Liquid water retention
- Ground Heat Exchange
5Excavating Connelly Ditch, Minnesota, 1997
Photo Courtesy of St.Paul Corps of Engineers
6SNOW-17
- Calculated on 6 Hour Time Intervals
- Air temperature determines form of precipitation
input - Can specify precipitation type during real time
river forecasting - Can adjust melt rate based upon observed
information - Dewpoints
- Windspeeds
- Observations from the field
- Can change snow water equivalent values based on
observed data
7South Dakota, 1966
Historic NWS Photo
8Example of SNOW-17 Output with observed values
listed for comparison
Observed Snow Depth
Observed SWE
Observed AESC
9(No Transcript)
10Can create Snow Depth or SWE Areal Observations
- More than one observer in the basin
- 2 or more observers outside of the basin, yet
nearby - If one observation is missing for the day, no
value is calculated considered missing
Historic NWS Photo
11Tolerances used in Updating
- Automatically update SWE or AESC by setting
tolerances - SWE Updating occurs if sim
ob gt tolerance x ob - AESC Updating occurs if sim
ob gt tolerance
12NCRFC Tolerances
- High tolerances specified in the model prevent
forecasters from making run time SWE or AESC
modifications - To prevent automatic updates and to allow
forecasters to make real time modifications,
NCRFC does not display observed WE - Having ability to view observed WE would be
operationally beneficial
13Historic NWS Photo
14River Forecasting using the Snow Model
- Sturgeon River at Alston
- Upper Peninsula of Michigan
- Snow Melt Rain on Snow Event
- March, 2004
- For purposes of illustrating mods, observed AESC
WE are displayed
15Sturgeon River at Alston
No modifications
6 hour RAIM around 0.2 inches, March 28 - 29
FS
? Observations
Simulation ?
16SNOW-17 Output
Precipitation on March 29 is 0.28 inches of snow
0.06 inches of rain
Keep in mind Energy Exchange value for future
example
? Energy Exchange 0.5
17Rain Snow Modification
- Field observations of rain instead of snow
- Rain/snow typing might be incorrect if there is
an unknown temperature bias - Timing might be off for an event with rain
turning to snow in the evening - Change precipitation typing in 6 hour increments
- Difficult to determine which 6 hour time period
to change since output is in 24 hour time steps
18Change precipitation to Rain March 28 12Z 29 12Z
19Rain/snow Modification 24 hours
6 hour RAIM over 0.5 inches, March 28 - 29
20UADJ Mod During Rain on Snow Events
- Rain on Snow must exceed 2.5mm per 6 hours for
model to simulate an increase in melt (tenth of
an inch) - Modification can increase or decrease energy
exchange - .UADJ March 28 12Z 29 12Z
ALSM4 5.0
21Rain/snow UADJ mods
RAIM near 0.8 inches
22UADJ 5.0March 28 - 29
? Energy Exchange 0.85
23Snow Water Equivalent Change Mod
Observed values are listed in this table. Notice
3.9 inches on the 29th.
3.9 Observed Value ?
24Water Equivalent Change Mod
Changing WE during melt automatically changes
AESC . . .
Best approach have WE values set before melt
begins.
25Near Little South Pembina River, North Dakota,
1997
Photo courtesy of St.Paul Corps of Engineers
26Updating Snow Model
No Modifications
Same Example moving forward in time
Too Much Peak ?
FS
? Missed peak
27SNOW-17 Model Output
Melt already started . . .
Watton SWE
NOHRSC AESC
Watton SD
28Start run further back in carryover
Melting begins . . .
29SNOW-17 Output
No Modifications
Notice difference between Sim WE Obs WE
Energy Exchange .17 - .71
30Low Energy Exchange
Low Energy Exchange
About 15 mm of melt modeled in any 24 hours
About 15mm of melt modeled in any 24 hours
31Melt Factor Correction ModMarch 26 30, 2004
- .MFC 03260412Z 03300412Z
ALSM4 4.0 - During time of active melt
- Meteorological conditions causing abnormal
snowmelt - High dewpoints
- High windspeeds
- Difficult to forecast MFC into future
- Watch meteorological forecasts closely
- Possible temperature bias
- Rain on snow
Can also use MFC to slow down melt!
32MFC Mod Applied
33MFC 4.0 March 26 - 30
Energy Exchange Values Increase . . .
Stimulating increase in melt
Energy Exchange Values Increase .36 1.54
34Increased Energy Exchange
Increased Energy Exchange
45mm of melt ?
45mm of melt ?
35How does Late April Peak Perform Now?
Within few tenths ?
? Caught peak
36Current SNOW-17 Model
- Current output in 24 hour time steps
- Java display in 6 hour time steps?
- Possible to display observed WE without
automatically updating yet still have ability to
make WE mods? - More Water Equivalent Data!
- Other observations from the field
- Water in ditches
- Runoff under snowpack
37Photo Courtesy of NDSU