Communitydriven Ontology Construction and Maintenance: Combining Human and Computational Intelligenc

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Communitydriven Ontology Construction and Maintenance: Combining Human and Computational Intelligenc

Description:

6. Fensel, D., Ontologies: A Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce. ... Gruninger, M. and M. S. Fox (1995). Methodology for the design ... –

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: katharina3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Communitydriven Ontology Construction and Maintenance: Combining Human and Computational Intelligenc


1
Community-driven Ontology Construction and
MaintenanceCombining Human and Computational
Intelligence
  • PhD Seminar, Vienna
  • Katharina Siorpaes
  • September 2007

2
Contents
  • Problem Statement
  • Observations and Motivation
  • Contribution
  • Approach
  • Related Work
  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Conclusion
  • Publications

3
Problem Statement
  • Academia
  • Real-world ontolgies
  • ?

4
Observations
  • Break with language as a resource
  • Language and lexical resources need to be better
    integrated with building ontologies
  • Discourse that led to a definition is usually not
    available

Ontologies formal vs. Informal 17
5
Observations (contd)
  • Conceptual Dynamics Bottleneck 15

6
Observations (contd)
  • Ontology Perspicuity Bottleneck
  • Group of engineers
  • Commitment requires understanding
  • Constructs (such as subClassOf)
  • Intended meaning of elements
  • Only communication channel ontology
    serialization
  • ? user community no or limited control over
    evolution of ontology

Ontology Perspicuity Bottleneck 4
7
Motivation
8
Motivation (contd)
  • Preliminary evidence for this assumption
  • Fact Almost 1.5 Million stable concepts in the
    English version of Wikipedia

Hepp, M., K. Siorpaes, and D. Bachlechner
Harvesting Wiki Consensus Using Wikipedia
Entries as Vocabulary for Knowledge Management.
IEEE Internet Computing, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp.
54-65, Sept-Oct 2007.
9
Contribution
  • A methodology (and implementation) for
    community-driven Ontology Construction in order
    to...
  • Show how ontology engineering can benefit from
    combining (collective) human and computation
    intelligence
  • Investigate incentive structures for ontology
    building inspired by Web 2.0

10
Approach
11
Approach Methodology and Ontology Lifecycle
12
Lightweight Ontologies
  • Trade-off between expressivity and what lay
    people can understand and use
  • Classes
  • Datatype and object properties
  • Instances
  • Subsumption hierarchy (subClassOf)
  • Mapping constructs

"We expect the majority of the ontologies on the
Semantic Web to be light-weight. ()
Our experiences all point to light weight
ontologies as the most commonly occurring
type. (Davies, Fensel et al. 2002)
Expressivity-Communitysize-Frontier 4
13
Related Work
  • Collaborative Ontology Building
  • Tadzebao and WebOnto (Domingue, 1998)
  • DILIGENT (Vrandecic et al., 2005)
  • OntoEdit (Sure et al., 2002)
  • HCOME Methodology (Kotis and Vouros, 2005)
  • Ontology Maturing (Braun et al., 2006)
  • DOGMAMESS (De Moor, De Leenheer et al. 2006 )
  • Semantic Wikis
  • Makna 11 and IkeWiki 12
  • Semantic Wikipedia 13
  • Platypus Wiki 14

14
Implementation
  • Sesame 2.0 Triple Store
  • Sesame 2.0 Java API
  • Java JSP

15
Implementation (contd)
16
Evaluation Methodology
  • Release of the prototype to different communities
    (Semantic Web/Computer Science, Industrial
    Partners in Project, ...)
  • Analysis of data
  • Comparison of domain ontologies produced in the
    (1) traditional and (2) community-driven ontology
    engineering approach
  • Dimensions (preliminary)
  • Domain coverage
  • Stability of concept definitions
  • Cost
  • Precision of usage

17
Conclusion
  • Lack of domain ontologies
  • Limited user involvement
  • Wiki philosophy is a way to allow many users to
    contribute and to tap the collective intelligence
    of a community
  • Ontology construction can benefit from the
    integration of external resources
  • Methods to combine human and computational
    intelligence

Group solutions usually outperform the groups
individuals solutions 20, 21, 22
18
PhD-related Publications
  • Siorpaes, K. and M. Hepp, OntoGame Towards
    Overcoming the Incentive Bottleneck in Ontology
    Building, in Proceedings of the 3rd International
    IFIP Workshop On Semantic Web Web Semantics
    (SWWS '07) co-located with OTM Federated
    Conferences. Springer LNCS Vilamoura, Portugal,
    November 29-30, 2007. (forthcoming)
  • Siorpaes, K. and M. Hepp, OntoGame Turning
    Ontology Engineering into an Online Game with a
    Purpose, in Poster and Demo Proceedings of the
    6th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC
    2007). Busan, Korea, November 11-15, 2007.
    (forthcoming)
  • Siorpaes, K., M. Hepp, and A. Klotz, The Sediment
    Metaphor Serendipity for Browsing Ontologies, in
    Poster and Demo Proceedings of the 6th
    International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC
    2007). Busan, Korea, November 11-15, 2007.
    (forthcoming)
  • Siorpaes, K., M. Hepp, A. Klotz, and M. Waltl,
    myOntology Tapping the Wisdom of Crowds for
    Building Ontologies, in Poster and Demo
    Proceedings of the 6th International Semantic Web
    Conference (ISWC 2007). Busan, Korea, November
    11-15, 2007. (forthcoming)
  • Siorpaes, K., Lightweight Community-driven
    Ontology Evolution, accepted for the Doctoral
    Consortium at the 6th International Semantic Web
    Conference (ISWC 2007) in Proceedings of the 6th
    International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC
    2007), Springer LNCS, Busan, Korea, November 11,
    2007. (forthcoming)
  • Hepp, M., Siorpaes, K., and D. Bachlechner,
    Harvesting Wiki Consensus Using Wikipedia
    Entries as Vocabulary  for Knowledge Management,
    IEEE Internet Computing , Vol. 11, No. 5, pp.
    54-65 , Sept-Oct  2007. (forthcoming)
  • Siorpaes, K. and M. Hepp, myOntology The
    Marriage of Collective Intelligence and Ontology
    Engineering , in Proceedings of the Workshop
    Bridging the Gap between Semantic Web and Web 2.0
    at the ESWC 2007. LNCS Springer Innsbruck,
    Austria, June 7, 2007.
  • Van Damme, C., M. Hepp, and K. Siorpaes,
    FolksOntology An Integrated Approach for Turning
    Folksonomies into Ontologies , in Proceedings of
    the Workshop Bridging the Gap between Semantic
    Web and Web 2.0 at the ESWC 2007. LNCS Springer
    Innsbruck, Austria, June 7, 2007.
  • Siorpaes, K., Towards Open Ontology Engineering ,
    in Proceedings of the Knowledge Web PhD Symposium
    2007 co-located with the 4th Annual European
    Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2007). Innsbruck,
    Austria, June 6, 2007.
  • Hepp, M., D. Bachlechner, and K. Siorpaes,
    Harvesting Wiki Consensus - Using Wikipedia
    Entries as Ontology Elements , in Proceedings of
    the 1st Workshop SemWiki2006 - From Wiki to
    Semantics, co-located with the 3rd Annual
    European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2006) .
    2006 Budva, Montenegro.
  • Hepp, M., D. Bachlechner, and K. Siorpaes.
    OntoWiki Community-driven Ontology Engineering
    and Ontology Usage based on Wikis . in
    Proceedings of the 2005 International Symposium
    on Wikis (WikiSym 2005) . 2005. San Diego,
    California, USA.

19
References
  • 1. Fensel, D., Ontologies Dynamic networks of
    formally represented meaning, in Rejected for
    SWWS'01, The first Semantic Web Working
    Symposium. 2001 Stanford University, California,
    USA.
  • 2. Hepp, M., D. Bachlechner, and K. Siorpaes,
    Harvesting Wiki Consensus - Using Wikipedia
    Entries as Ontology Elements, in Proceedings of
    the 1st Workshop SemWiki2006 - From Wiki to
    Semantics, co-located with the 3rd Annual
    European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2006).
    2006 Budva, Montenegro..
  • 3. Hepp, M., K. Siorpaes, and D. Bachlechner,
    Harvesting Wiki Consensus Using Wikipedia
    Entries as Ontology Elements for Knowledge
    Management. IEEE Internet Computing, 2007.
    submitted)
  • 4. Hepp, M., Possible Ontologies How Reality
    Constrains the Development of Relevant
    Ontologies. IEEE Internet Computing, 2007. 11(7)
    p. 96-102.
  • 5. Hepp, M., Güterklassifikation als semantisches
    Standardisierungsproblem. 2003, Wiesbaden
    Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.
  • 6. Fensel, D., Ontologies A Silver Bullet for
    Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce. 2nd
    ed. 2004, Berlin etc. Springer.
  • 7. Surowiecki, J., The Wisdom of Crowds. 2003,
    New York Anchor Books Random House Inc. 284.
  • 8. Domingue, J. Tadzebao and WebOnto Discussing,
    Browsing, and Editing Ontologies on the Web. in
    11th Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based
    Systems Workshop. 1998. Banff, Canada.
  • 9. Vrandecic, D., et al., The DILIGENT knowledge
    process. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2005.
    9(5) p. 85-96.
  • 10. Sure, Y., et al. OntoEdit Collaborative
    Ontology Engineering for the Semantic Web. in
    International Semantic Web Conference 2002 (ISWC
    2002). 2002. Sardinia, Italia.
  • 11. Dello, C., E. Paslaru Bontas Simperl, and R.
    Tolksdorf. Creating and using semantic content
    with Makna. in Wiki meets Semantics workshop at
    the ESWC2006. 2006. Budva, Montenegro.
  • 12. Schaffert, S. IkeWiki A Semantic Wiki for
    Collaborative Knowledge Management. in 1st
    international workshop on Semantic Technologies
    in Collaborative Applications STICA06. 2006.
    Manchester, UK.
  • 13. Völkel, M., et al. Semantic Wikipedia. in
    15th international conference on World Wide Web
    (WWW2006). 2006. Edinburgh, Scotland.
  • 14. Campanini, S.E., P. Castagna, and R. Tazzoli.
    Platypus Wiki a Semantic Wiki Wiki Web. in 1st
    Italian Semantic Web Workshop Semantic Web
    Applications and Perspectives (SWAP). 2004.
    Ancona, Italy.
  • Hepp, M., Ontology Maintenance Quantifying the
    Conceptual Dynamics in Domain Ontologies. 2007,
    DERI Innsbruck. p. 20. (submitted)
  • Paslaru Bontas Simperl, E., C. Tempich, and Y.
    Sure. ONTOCOM A Cost Estimation Model for
    Ontology Engineering. in The 5th International
    Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2006). 2006.
    Athens, GA, USA Springer.
  • Hepp, M., Possible Ontologies How Reality
    constrains Building Relevant Ontologies. Slides
    at the Logic and Information Workshop, Schloss
    Münchenwiler, November 23, 2006.

20
References (contd)
  • myOntology Project, www.myontology.org
  • Steinbock, D., et al., Collective Intelligence
    Quanitifed for Computer-Mediated Group Problem
    Solving, in Tech Report, U.o. California, Editor.
    2004, University of California Santa Cruz, CA,
    USA.
  • Marjorie, E.S., A Comparison of Indidivudals and
    Small Groups in the Rational Solution of Complex
    Problems. American Journal of Psychology, 1932.
    44 p. 491-504.
  • Lorge, I., et al., A survey of studies
    contrasting the quality of group performance and
    individual performance, 1920-1957. Psychological
    Bulletin American Psychological Assn. US, 1958.
    55 p. 337-372.
  • Hill, G.W., Group versus individual performance
    Are N1 heads better than one? Psychological
    Bulletin American Psychological Assn. US, 1982.
    91(3) p. 307-321.
  • Emigh, W. and S. Herring, Collaborative authoring
    on the web A genre analysis of online
    encyclopedias, in Hawai International Conference
    on System Sciences 2005 Hawai.
  • Viegas, F., M. Wattenberg, and K. Dave, Studying
    Cooperation and Conflict between authors with
    history flow visualizations, in Proceedings of
    CHI'04. 2004, ACM Vienna, Austria.
  • Stojanovic, L., A. Maedche, et al. (2002).
    User-driven Ontology Evolution Management. 13th
    European Conference on Knowledge Engineering and
    Knowledge Management EKAW, Madrid, Spain.
  • Korpilahti, T. and E. Hyvönen (2004). An
    Architecture for Collaborative Ontology Library
    Development. ECAI 2004 Workshop on Application of
    Semantic Web Technologies to Web Communities,
    Valencia, Spain, CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
  • Noy, N. F. and M. Klein (2004). "Ontology
    Evolution Not the Same as Schema Evolution."
    Knowledge and Information Systems 6(4) 428-440.
  • Stumme, G. and A. Maedche (2001). Ontology
    Merging for Federated Ontologies on the Semantic
    Web. International Workshop for Foundations of
    Models for Information Integration (FMII2001),
    Viterbo, Italy.
  • Kotis, K., G. A. Vouros, et al. (2006). "Towards
    Automatic Merging of Domain Ontologies The
    HCONE-merge approach." Journal of Web Semantics.
  • Zhdanova, A. and P. Shvaiko (2006).
    Community-driven Ontology Matching. 3rd European
    Semantic Web Conference (ESWC2006), Budva,
    Montenegro.
  • Lenat, D. B. and R. V. Guha (1990). Building
    Large Knowledge-based Systems Representation and
    Inference in the Cyc Project. Boston,
    Masschusetts, Addison-Wesley.
  • Gruninger, M. and M. S. Fox (1995). Methodology
    for the design and evaluation of ontologies.
    Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge
    Sharing. Montreal, Canada.
  • Gómez-Pérez, A., M. Fernández-López, et al.
    (2004). Ontological Engineering, Springer.
  • Vrandecic, D., S. Pinto, et al. (2005). "The
    DILIGENT knowledge process." Journal of Knowledge
    Management 9(5) 85-96.
  • Kerrigan, M. (2006). WSMOViz An Ontology
    Visualization Approach for WSMO. 10th
    International Conference on Information
    Visualization, London, England.
  • Gómez-Pérez, A., M. Fernández-López, and O.
    Corcho, Ontological Engineering. 2004 Springer.

21
Thank you.
  • PhD Seminar, Vienna
  • Katharina Siorpaes
  • September 2007
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com