Title: U'S' Army Corps of Engineers
1U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
- Pittsburgh District
- Regulatory Branch
- Allen Edris
- (412) 395-7158
- allen.r.edris_at_lrp02.usace.army.mil
- www.lrp.usace.army.mil/
2Regulatory Program Goals
- To provide strong protection of the Nation's
aquatic environment, including wetlands. Â - To enhance the efficiency of the Corps
administration of its regulatory program. Â - To ensure that the Corps provides the regulated
public with fair and reasonable decisions.
3Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
Regulates discharge of dredged or fill material
into waters of the United States
4Is this program really such a bear?
5So What Is a Water of the U.S.?
6Definition
- Section 328.3 - Definitions.
-
- a. The term "waters of the United States" means
7Waters of the U.S.
- 1. All waters which are currently used, or were
used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in
interstate or foreign commerce, including all
waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide - 2. All interstate waters including interstate
wetlands
8Waters of the U.S.
- 3. All other waters such as intrastate
- lakes, rivers, streams (including
- intermittent streams), mudflats,
- sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie
- potholes, wet meadows, playa
- lakes, or natural ponds, the use,
- degradation or destruction of which
- could affect interstate or foreign
- commerce including any such
- waters
9Waters of the U.S.
- Such waters include
- Which are or could be used by interstate or
foreign travelers for recreational or other
purposes or - From which fish or shellfish are or could be
taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce
or - Which are used or could be used for industrial
purpose by industries in interstate commerce
10Waters of the U.S.
- 4. All impoundments of waters otherwise defined
as waters of the United States under the
definition - 5. Tributaries of waters identified in
paragraphs (a)(1)-(4) of this section - 6. The territorial seas
11Waters of the U.S.
- 7. Wetlands adjacent to waters (other than waters
that are themselves wetlands) identified in
paragraphs (a)(1)-(6) of this section. Waste
treatment systems, including treatment ponds or
lagoons designed to meet the requirements of CWA
(other than cooling ponds as defined in 40 CFR
123.11(m) which also meet the criteria of this
definition) are not waters of the United States.
12Ordinary High Water Mark
- That line on the shore or stream bank established
by the fluctuations of water and indicated by
physical characteristics -
-
13Ordinary High Water Mark
- Physical Characteristics include
-
- 1. clear natural line impressed on the bank
-
- 2. shelving
-
- 3. changes in the character of soil
14Ordinary High Water Mark
- 4. destruction of terrestrial vegetation the
presence of litter and debris, or -
- 5. other appropriate means that consider the
characteristics of the surrounding areas.
15Stream Types
16Stream Types
- Ephemeral flows during and for short duration
after precipitation events, located above the
water table year round - Intermittent flows during certain times of the
year , surface and ground water contribution - Perennial flows year-round during a normal
precipitation year, groundwater is primary source
of hydrology with some surface water contribution
17Intermittent Stream
18Is This a Water of the U.S.?
19Limits of Jurisdiction
- Non-tidal waters
- In the absence of adjacent wetlands, the
jurisdiction extends to the ordinary high water
mark, or - When adjacent wetlands are present, the
jurisdiction extends beyond the ordinary high
water mark to the limit of the adjacent wetlands.
- When the water of the United States consists only
of wetlands the jurisdiction extends to the limit
of the wetland.
20Is This a Water of the U.S.?
21YES!
- Captured stream such as those placed in culverts
or stream enclosures remain waters of the U.S.
22Changes
- Permanent changes of the shoreline configuration
result in similar alterations of the boundaries
of waters of the United States. Gradual changes
which are due to natural causes and are
perceptible only over some period of time
constitute changes in the bed of a waterway which
also change the boundaries of the waters of the
United States.
23Changes
- For example, changing sea levels or subsidence of
land may cause some areas to become waters of the
United States while siltation or a change in
drainage may remove an area from waters of the
United States. Man-made changes may affect the
limits of waters of the United States
24Is this a Water of the U.S.?
25 26End of Ordinary High Water Mark
27End of Ordinary High Water Mark
The stream channel loses definition
28Stream Mitigation under Section 404
29Authorization
- For the Corps to authorize an activity under
Section 404, the applicant must demonstrate, to
the satisfaction of the Corps, that the proposed
project represents the least environmentally
damaging practicable alternative.Â
30Mitigation Sequencing
- I. AVOIDANCE
- Taking all appropriate and practicable measures
to avoid those adverse aquatic impacts that are
not necessary requires that to permit a proposed
project, it must be the least environmentally
damaging practicable alternative.Â
31Mitigation Sequencing
- II. MINIMIZATION
- Taking all appropriate and practicable measures
to minimize those adverse impacts to the aquatic
resource that cannot be reasonably avoided. Â
32Mitigation Sequencing
- Â
- III. COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
- Implementing appropriate and practicable
measures to compensate for adverse aquatic
resource impacts. Â
33Purpose of Compensatory Mitigation
- To replace aquatic functions unavoidable lost or
otherwise adversely affected by authorized
activities
34Forms of Mitigation
- Restoration
- Enhancement
- Creation
- Preservation
35ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
- Â
- Replacement of
- 1. Chemical
- 2. Physical
- 3. Biological
 FUNCTIONS
 lost or impaired as a result of a
Section 404 authorization
36Mitigation Begins with Evaluation of Project
Related Effects
Requires understanding of baseline conditions and
predicted effects
37Consider direct indirectproject effects
38Regulatory Guidance Letter 02-02
- The purpose of this document is to provide
guidance on compensatory mitigation projects
required to offset unavoidable aquatic resource
impacts pursuant to Section 404
39Regulatory Guidance Letter 02-02
- Focuses On
- Watershed Approach
- Functional Assessment
- Stream Mitigation
- Definitions of Mitigation
- Contents of Mitigation Plans
40Watershed Approach
41Watershed Approach
- Considers entire systems and their constituent
parts. Recognizes that healthy main stem stream
reaches are only as healthy as the many
tributaries of which they are composed. - - Identifies specific functions lost or impaired
within watersheds and focuses on replacing those
functions.
42Watershed Approach
- Relies on information and input from other
federal, tribal, state, and local resource
management programs. - Recognizes the role of zoning, regional planning,
land use initiatives, and factors of local
interest.
43Functional Assessment
44Functional Assessment
- Tools used to qualitatively and quantitatively
identify the nature and extent of anticipated
adverse impacts associated with a given project,
in addition to beneficial effects associated with
mitigation projects.
45Some Examples
- The Eastern Kentucky Stream Assessment Protocol
- West Virginia Stream Assessment Protocol
(currently being developed) - EPAs Rapid Bioassessment Protocol
- West Virginia Stream Condition Index
- Water Quality sampling
46Irrespective of the Numbers Dont Lose Sight of
the Goal
FUNCTIONALREPLACEMENT
47Stream Mitigation
- So difficult it can make your hair stand on
end?
48The Goal of Mitigation is
49FUNCTIONALREPLACEMENT
Consequently it is imperative to remember that
small ephemeral and intermittent stream functions
are very different from those of perennial streams
50Mitigation Plans
- When preparing stream mitigation plans, it is
important to document baseline conditions to
substantiate that particular mitigation elements
and/or techniques area needed and are appropriate
for the given situation.
51Learn to Read the Stream
- Considerations
- 1. What are the current conditions of this stream
telling me? - 2. What do comparisons to historic conditions
tell me? - 3. Is the system in transition, or in a state of
dynamic equilibrium - 4. Are impacts affecting the system, and is so,
in what ways - 5. Would reasonably foreseeable future watershed
changes affect this system, and how?
52Learn to Read the Stream
- Considerations
- 6. Is the stream aggrading or degrading?
- 7. Is it widening or narrowing?
- 8. Are banks eroded or bare?
- 9. Is the associated riparian area vegetated or
bare? - 10. What is the stream type relative to
entrenchment ratios?
53Learn to Read the Stream
- Considerations
- 11. Does the stream exhibit appropriate sinuosity
relative to its slope and roughness? - 12. Is there sufficient input of course woody
debris? - 13. Is there a particular feature that may be
acting as grade control? - 14. Identify appropriate reference reaches for
data collection
54Determine Stream Present Type
Consider Future Stream Type
55Is the Stream Aggrading or Degrading
56Baseline Information
57Baseline Information
- Benthic macro-invertebrate sampling
58Baseline Information
- Identify any historic impacts or activities
59Wildlife Functions
- Endangered Species
- Currently there are approximately 2,500
officially listed imperiled and
endangered species, many of which utilize
aquatic resources for all or part of
their life cycle
Indiana Bat Dog
Myotis sodalis canidae
60 Wildlife Functions
- Maintain and/or enhance integrity of
the food web
61 Wildlife Functions
- West Virginia has 34 species of salamanders that
range in length from 4 inches to 2 feet. Their
habitats include to aquatic to semiaquatic
habitats such as ephemeral and intermittent
streams, riparian zones, springs, and moist,
forested hillsides. - Â
62 A Stream Mitigation Design Should
- Focus on the functions you are seeking to
replace, - Provide aquatic resource benefits commensurate
with authorized impacts, - Incorporate appropriate channel plan, profile and
dimension, - Consider needs of the watershed,
- Function as a long term sustainable system,
63 A Stream Mitigation Design Should
- Consider shear stress and identify areas of
vulnerability, - Appropriately factor for Mannings n, (roughness)
- Carefully consider and design for the most
appropriate channel size (bankfull event) - To the extent practicable incorporate elements to
enhance the physical, chemical, and biological
characteristics of the stream.
64 A Stream Mitigation Design Should
- Be compatible with other activities in the
watershed, - Wherever possible be sited adjacent to contiguous
mitigation projects or protected lands, - Use of native plants (exclusively)
- Incorporate overall habitat improvements
- Overhanging vegetation for shading
- Snags for wildlife habitat
- Fingerling escape channels, to allow downstream
escape for fry trapped in pools during dry times
of year
65Definitions of Mitigation
66Restoration
- Manipulation of the physical, chemical, or
biological characteristics of a former or
substantially degraded wetland, stream or other
aquatic resources to return natural and/or
historical functions.
67Enhancement
- Manipulation of the physical, chemical, or
biological characteristics of an aquatic resource
to heighten, intensify, or improve a specific
functions or to change the growth stage of
composition of the vegetation present, and may
include converting the site to a less destructive
land use.
68Creation
- The establishment of a wetland or other aquatic
resource where one did not formerly exist.
69Preservation
- The legal and physical protection of existing
ecologically important streams, wetlands and/or
other aquatic resources for an extended period of
time, usually in perpetuity.
70Questions ?