Title: TRITIUM RADIOECOLOGY AND DOSIMETRY TODAY AND TOMORROW
1TRITIUM RADIOECOLOGY AND DOSIMETRY - TODAY AND
TOMORROW D. Galeriu, P. Davis, W. Raskob, A.
Melintescu IFIN-HH Romania AECL Canada
IKET Germany
8th International Conference on Tritium Science
and Technology September 16-21, 2007 Rochester,
New York
2Environmental Tritium Processes
3Resistance Approaches to Deposition and Exchange
- Aerodynamic resistance Ra depends on turbulence
and wind speed - Boundary layer resistance Rb depends on
turbulence, wind speed and surface properties - Total surface resistance Rc can can be split up
into canopy and ground related resistance - Canopy resistance depends on surface properties,
temperature, photosynthetically active radiation,
humidity, water content in soil - For HT deposition, ground resistance depends on
the rates of diffusion and oxidation in soil, and
is much lower than the canopy resistance
Deposition velocity1/(RaRbRc) This is also an
exchange velocity at air to plant (soil) interface
4HT is oxidized to HTO, mostly in soil by bacteria
containing the hydrogenase enzyme
After OKula and East 2000
Oxidation in the atmosphere is a very slow
process with a half-life of gt 5 years. Most
significant oxidation occurs at the
atmosphere-soil interface
5HTO vs. HT Predicted Dose
37 TBq/y chronic DCART ?/Q1?10-6 s/m3
370 TBq accidental UFOTRI distance 1200m
The only significant dose impact occurs following
oxidation of HT to HTO and subsequent HTO
exposure. For similar source terms, an HT release
has a 1-10 dose impact compared with HTO,
depending strongly on weather and soil conditions.
6Models for Routine Releases
Since meteorology is time varying and ROUTINE
RELEASES ARE TIME VARYING!, specific activity
concepts do not strictly apply as full
equilibrium is not established. The model must be
adapted to partial equilibrium and the data
averaged appropriately.
Weekly HTO release rates from the CANDU 6 reactor
at Cernavoda, Romania (2002)
7 Specific Activity Models for Tritium (EMRAS
approach)
- Transfer from Air to Plants
HTO concentration in plant water (Bq L-1)
RH relative humidity Cair tritium
concentration in air (Bq m-3) Ha absolute
humidity (L m-3) Csw HTO concentration in
soil water (Bq L-1), and ? ratio of the H2O
vapour pressure to that of HTO ( 0.909).
Relative humidity is a weighting factor that
reflects the partial equilibrium of the plant HTO
with air and soil water HTO.
8The equilibrium plant water equation can be
derived starting from a complex dynamic model
involving the transpiration flux, many transfer
resistances, the exchange velocity and the
following assumptions
- the mass of plant water is constant and
consequently the transpiration flux is linked
with the exchange velocity and water vapour
density deficit (realistic) - the concentration at the soil surface is equal
to the concentration in the root zone
(reasonable) - the soil surface, leaf and reference temperature
are the same and it is possible to define a
unique saturation humidity and relative humidity
(affordable)
The equilibrium plant water equation gives robust
and reliable results for the average
concentration averaged over a few weeks prior to
harvest.
9Soil HTO
- The soil water concentration is assumed to be
proportional to the concentration in air
moisture, with proportionality constant CRs - CRs varies between sites and a generic value can
be recommended only tentatively. - If the HTO concentration in precipitation (and
irrigation water) are known or well predicted,
better assessments can be done, including
individual contributions from wet and dry
deposition
10Transfer to Animals
- The model considers transfers from HTO and OBT in
feed to HTO and OBT in animal products - All 4 transfer coefficients can be defined using
data on animal nutrition and hydrogen metabolism
and were tested with available experimental data - The transfer coefficients show large variability
from animal to animal and productivity - The variability can be reduced by using
concentration ratios in place of transfer
coefficients - CRHTO from HTO in diet to total tritium in
produce - CROBT from OBT in diet to total tritium in
produce
11Models for Accidental (Dynamic) Releases
- The prediction of time-dependent concentrations
in plants must take into - account
- Uptake and loss of HTO in plant water (dependent
upon the canopy resistance) - crop growth
- HTO to OBT conversion via photosynthesis during
the day. Night OBT production is also important. - distribution of dry matter to plant parts
- respiration
- the water cycle
- the plant development stage at the time of
exposure
12Processes driving tritium dynamics in plants
13Canopy resistance can be linked directly to
canopy photosynthesis rate
Important parameters include air temperature,
plant development stage, photosynthetically
active radiation, leaf area index and water
deficit.
The aerodynamic and boundary layer resistances
depend on weather and crop height. These
resistances have low values at midday (50-100
s/m) and higher values (300 s/m) at night.
During the day, the canopy resistance is
comparable to the sum of the aerodynamic and
boundary layer resistances. At night, the canopy
resistance controls HTO uptake, although all
stomata do not close in some plants.
14Effect of soil grid size on HTO concentration in
soil and plants
- The upper soil (0-5 cm) concentration varies by
more than 3 orders of magnitude as the grid size
increases from 0.1 cm to 1.6 cm. - For a plant with a 30-cm rooting depth, the HTO
concentration in the plant water varies by a
factor of 4 as the grid size increases from 0.1
cm to 1.6 cm. - As a compromise between computational time and
accuracy, a grid size of 0.5 to 1 cm seems to be
acceptable. This was also the depth where
deposited HTO was found after a short term
exposure of bare soil in an experiment conducted
at FZK.
15Dynamic modeling of tritium in plants requires
knowledge of plant growth dynamics
Partition fraction of newly produced dry matter
to roots, leaves, stems and edible grain as a
function of development stage (0emergence 1
flowering 2 full maturity) Data are for maize
cultivar F320 from South Romania
Above ground dry matter dynamics for sunflowers.
Note the difference between an average cultivar
from the central EC and a local cultivar from
Romania
16Dynamic animal model
- A recent metabolic model for adult mammals is
based on the following - assumptions
- The most important body organic compartments are
the viscera (including heart), muscle, adipose
tissue, blood (plasma and RBC) and remainder
(including brain). Mass and composition are
known. - Tritium in body water equilibrates rapidly and a
single body water compartment suffices. - The loss rate from the organic compartment is
similar for intakes of HTO, OBT or OBC and can be
assessed directly from the energy turnover rate
(net maintenance) of organs . The organ specific
metabolic rate (SMR) in basal and active states
must be known. - SMR has been obtained experimentally for a few
mammals and a zero order approximation is
generally used depending on mature mass. - There is metabolic conversion of HTO to OBT and
the equilibrium value does not vary across
mammals for the ratio of OBT derived from HTO or
from intake OBT. - The energy (heat) and accompanying matter lost in
transforming the metabolisable input in net
requirements is considered as a single, fast
process.
Under these hypotheses, the model gives reliable
predictions with no calibration. However, there
are difficulties in expanding the model to
growing mammals.
17Flowchart of the Metabolic Model
HTO intake
Red blood cells
OBT intake
This figure shows the complexity of the processes
in animals. The metabolic model can be used to
build simpler models with more robust parameters.
Remainder (skin, skeleton, brain)
18Model tests (no calibration)
Sheep fed tritiated glucose acetate
Cow fed hay contaminated with OBT for 28 days.
Results are shown for the present model and
for TRIF and UFOTRI
19Uncertainties in dynamic modeling
Soybean scenario The models all overpredict in
the first few hours after exposure. The large
differences in predictions at longer times have
little significance because the concentrations
are so low. The mispredictions carry through to
the predicted OBT concentrations.
Hypothetical scenario, ingestion dose Large
variability exists in the predicted doses as well
as in the contribution of the various food items
to the dose. This degree of uncertainty makes it
difficult to manage the accident and to set
interdiction levels on food trade.
20Diurnal and seasonal effects on ingestion dose
after an accidental tritium release (calculated
with RODTRIT)
Dose is given in arbitrary units (a.u). The
plants and animals were exposed to a constant HTO
air concentration for one hour.
21The mammal model can be extended to humans,taking
into account the longer maturation period, the
larger brain (which consumes much of the
maintenance energy) and different diet.
22Human Dose Coefficients (in 1011 Sv/Bq)
ICRP as presently recommended H RBE1 ignores
the non-uniform distribution of OBT in the body
(as in ICRP) shows higher retention. E
(RBE1) RBE1 considers the non-uniform
distribution of OBT (high concentration in
adipose tissue with low radio-sensitivity). E(RBE
gt1) as above but allowing a range of RBE. New
model is probabilistic
The dose coefficients may vary with gender. The
RBE at low doses remains to be clarified.
Potentially the RBE should be increased for the
fetus.
23Tritium in the Aquatic Environment
- HTO in the body water of aquatic fauna and flora
is in equilibrium with the HTO concentration in
the surrounding water. - For routine releases, the OBT concentration is
related to the HTO concentration through a
discrimination factor. - For accidental releases, OBT is treated
dynamically with separate equations for primary
producers and consumers. For phytoplankton, we
deduced and tested an original model. For
consumers, OBT is formed in a single compartment
from HTO and OBT from food. The OBT loss rate is
taken from experimental data or from a metabolic
model for fish. The model has been tested for
plankton, mollusk and small fish. Experimental
data are needed on OBT formation and loss in
larger fish species. - Predictive power for detailed dynamics is
tributary to use of single OBT loss rate.
Improvements must await additional experimental
data. - For HTO releases of similar source strength, an
aquatic release is 10-100 times less harmful than
an atmospheric release, depending on the source
of drinking and irrigation water. - Many experimental data show higher OBT
concentrations than expected, implying the
release of dissolved organic tritium directly to
the water body.
24 Dissolved organic tritium (DOT) release to
rivers or seawater
High OBT concentrations in mollusks and fish have
been observed in some rivers and in the Severn
estuary (UK), while HTO concentrations in the
water were low. The most probable explanation is
linked with the ability of plankton, mollusks and
crustaceans to selectively uptake dissolved
nutrients from water. These nutrients, if marked
with tritium from industrial sources, will
increase the OBT concentration in the organic
matter of aquatic fauna above the levels expected
on the basis of the HTO concentration in the
water. The uptake efficiency of DOT varies
depending on the chemical form and on the species
of plankton or mollusk.
The release rate of DOT to the Severn estuary
decreased 10-fold. OBT concentrations in aquatic
organisms also dropped by a factor of 10 with an
environmental halftime of 1 year.
25 TOWARD CONCLUSIONS
- The 1990 Aiken list was amended in 1997 by Raskob
and Barry. Sensitivities and hence importance
in this list vary with both inputs and end
points. Site- and task-specific analyses must be
done to identify the most important processes in
a given application. - Areas Requiring Further Work
- plant uptake of HTO at night
- rates of OBT formation in plants, particularly
at night - dispersion in soil
- reemission from soil and plants
- rates of OBT formation and loss
- in animals
- translocation to fruits and roots
- tritium behavior in winter
- HTO concentrations in the environment following
an HT release.
26With present knowledge, it can be argued that the
expected dose to members of the public from
routine tritium releases is unlikely to be higher
than 30 µSv/a for todays nuclear facilities.
Accidental releases of HT or aquatic HTO releases
have much lower radiological impact than an
accidental atmospheric release of HTO. EU
guidance on response to accidental releases is as
follows
The next generation of models for accidental HTO
releases must be improved to decrease
uncertainties and to cope with tighter regulatory
requirements.
27Requirements for the Next Generation of Dynamic
HTO Models
- Reliable atmospheric transport and dispersion
codes (particle models) with good representation
of reemission and inclusion of turbulence,
topography etc. - Changing environmental conditions must be taken
into account - Several sub-models are needed to describe the
behaviour of tritium in soil and crops - The crop sub-model is most important and here the
plant physiological parameters must be considered - Conversion processes from HT to HTO and further
to OBT have to be modelled - Sub-models have to be based on physical
approaches knowledge from other disciplines
should be used to derive general dependencies
based on data for other substances than tritium - Site-specific information on land use, soil types
and crop genotypes should be applied, together
with realistic habits for the maximally exposed
individual.