ENA Update Alan Jenkins Chief Executive - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

ENA Update Alan Jenkins Chief Executive

Description:

The Government thinks the hard work is done, and is minting money (but keep that ... Unclear if Trevor Mallard is here to stay. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: AlanJe8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ENA Update Alan Jenkins Chief Executive


1
ENA UpdateAlan JenkinsChief Executive
2
Politics of Power
  • No parties want to own electricity this year
  • The Government thinks the hard work is done, and
    is minting money (but keep that in perspective -
    lt500m in electricity SOE surpluses vs tax take
    of gt70 bn).
  • National wont want to polarise farmers on the
    one hand or consumers on the other.
  • No great minor party interest except from the
    Greens.

3
Politics of Power
  • Unclear if Trevor Mallard is here to stay. If
    the Government needs either the Greens or NZ 1st
    then energy could be a sacrificial portfolio.
  • A belief that the Electricity Commission will
    keep any Minister honest!
  • Theres an increasing risk that the
    Commission/Crown will end up underwriting future
    generation, by default.

4
Politics of Power
  • So expect a political focus on what were
    traditionally fringe issues (sustainability,
    conservation, consumer complaints).
  • Whether the Electricity Commission can keep the
    politicians on track will depend heavily on who
    they are.

5
What about Transmission?
  • Everything seems back to front!

6
Transmission
  • Transpower have to plan without a Power Plan.
  • Generation decisions are divorced from
    transmission ones.
  • Big judgement calls for the Electricity
    Commission
  • Be risk averse?
  • How much faith should they have in green
    alternatives and distributed generation?
  • What will the politicians let them do anyway?
  • Will they become the central planner by default?

7
Transmission vs Distribution
  • We face a risk, especially in the longer term,
    that transmission will grow at the expense of
    distribution.
  • Theres no rigid demarcation.
  • Transpower have a better allowed rate of return
    under the ComCom regime.
  • Once theyve got through the bulge of their next
    big build phase, theyll be likely to look
    downstream.
  • Its therefore important to avoid top-down
    thinking.

8
Generation Retailing
  • Very much the domain of the Govt, the Electricity
    Commission, and the SOEs.
  • However, power security quality are likely to
    become increasingly reliant on distribution
    fixes.
  • Also, Commerce Commission delving deeper into
    energy markets.

9
Generation Demand
  • We shouldnt lose sight of the pressures of
    rapidly rising demand and uncertain future
    supply. The 1984 Energy Plan looked out to 2004
  • Total consumer energy demand was forecast to be
    460 PJ this year, which was a bit conservativeit
    reached 500 PJ last year (bear in mind this is up
    from a base of 300 PJ in 1984). Total electricity
    generation was forecast to reach between 34,000
    and 44,000 GWh and it looks as though it will be
    just above that higher growth estimate if you
    account for different treatment of distributed
    generation Whirinaki in the MEDs stats.

10
Some grounds for feeling uneasy

TWh
Equiv in place
X
X
X
X ?
11
Distribution
  • Issues and uncertainties are mounting.
  • Reinvestment and new investment are very badly
    incentivised.
  • Distributors have been regulated away from key
    services they are good at (distributed
    generation, metering load management,
    controlling energy losses, customer community
    relations, even R D).
  • Traditional supportive relationships with
    transmission and generation have been eroded.

12
Distribution Investment
  • Margaret Beardow explains it well

Past distribution investment

Future investment needs
1940
2050
2005
13
Distribution
  • Regulation has the potential to stifle
    distributors.
  • Companies will necessarily breach thresholds as
    they invest in renewal, risking further
    constraints. Commerce Commission is sympathetic,
    but real risk of politicians intruding.
  • Spending on anything other than the old poles
    wires assets may well be penalised (ODV has been
    retained too).

14
stifling effect of regulation
  • As just one example, distributors have had major
    successes with innovation (from the single wire
    earth return system, through to controlled hot
    water systems, and to Whispergen) and have also
    supported RD work in parallel fields such as
    wind energy.
  • The CPI-X regulatory regime suppresses this type
    of spending cross-subsidies are to be avoided
    unless they are government-driven.

15
customer focus
  • Increasing regulatory pressure towards being
    demand driven.
  • Small customers ill-equipped to do this.
  • Spin from others a constant problem (waste
    money on advertising self-promotion?).
  • Also strong top-down drives to invest to reduce
    transmission load peaks, not to optimise system.
  • Myth of customer choice very little scope to
    give smaller individual customers choice.

16
even poles and wires
  • The customer poles issue is another casualty of
    regulatory rigidity.
  • Many (around 100,000) are gt40 years old.
  • A lot have been neglected or abused.
  • Most were orphaned by the Electricity Act 1992
    even controlling vegetation under them has been
    forgotten.
  • Distributors are the only parties able to fix the
    problem, but customer poles are not recognised by
    the thresholds regime.

17
Distributors and Distributed Generation
  • The market discriminates against DG
  • Remote generators get free transmission
  • A little bit of DG means a big drop in the local
    nodal energy price
  • Transmission charges are driven by system peaks,
    not average loads
  • Back-up generation has been run down, and hedging
    is difficult (especially for distributors).

18
Distributed Generation
  • The distribution industry is at a cross-roads
  • Should we be creating active networks, able to
    support a haphazard mix of windmills, solar
    arrays and mainstream power?
  • Should we become a driving force in DG investment
    (assuming the Govt lets us)?
  • Or should we stick to our knitting because
    regulation and SOE dominance issues make it all
    too hard?

19
Resources are a Key Issue
  • The whole electricity industry is heading towards
    a parallel investment boom.
  • Well be trying to build distribution lines, the
    Grid, generation and system support with the same
    workers, engineers and financial support
    structures (notably the power price).
  • Well also be competing with everything from
    roading and water to municipal waste disposal for
    those resources.

20
Summing Up
  • The Electricity Commission has a huge task with
    transmission (and perhaps reserve energy), and
    its processes are overhung by political
    uncertainty.
  • Pretty soon it will have an even bigger task with
    generation, unless the market is somehow kicked
    into action.

21
Summing Up
  • Giving distributors the incentives and the
    flexibility necessary to contribute to the wider
    industrys resource needs is the key to
    reforming reform.
  • The industry needs to focus urgently on
    minimising the impacts of boom bust
    investment.

22
ENAs Priorities
  • All of the above. Getting rid of the distortions
    and perverse signals of poorly structured
    regulation is our central focus.
  • Promoting joint protocols and concerted
    approaches by members is another.
  • So is getting decision-makers to understand the
    impacts of their decisions.
  • Finding the resources to do this is a challenge.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com