Alignment Requirements Introduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Alignment Requirements Introduction

Description:

Uncorrected PBEAM bugs. Horn current assumed at inner radius of inner conductor ... June 28, 2001. Wes Smart. Page 2. NuMI. Beam Element accuracy requirements ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:12
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: numi
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Alignment Requirements Introduction


1
Alignment RequirementsIntroduction
  • General method in NuMI Note L-221
  • (Oct. 96, old 3 horn beam)
  • Medium Energy Beam in TDR sect 3.6
  • Detailed data here for Low Energy Beam, but
    still
  • Uncorrected PBEAM bugs
  • Horn current assumed at inner radius of inner
    conductor
  • Target width of 3.2 mm used (latest 6.4)

2
Beam Element accuracy requirements
  • At low neutrino energies, the NuMI beam at the
    far detector is several kilometers wide, making
    it easy to hit with some neutrinos.
  • Much more demanding is the physics (energy
    spectrum test) requirement to calculate the far
    detector spectrum (without oscillations) from the
    measured near detector spectrum.

If
3
Beam Element accuracy requirements
  • Use PBEAM_WMC Monte Carlo program to find v
    energy spectra in the far and near detectors with
    an element aligned.

If element is offset by X, then FAR(X)/NEAR(X)
should have been used instead. Correction factor
RR
4
Horn 1 X2 mm Flux, Ratio at Detectors
5
RR Horn 1 X2 mm
6
Calculation Scheme
  1. Select alignment reasonably achievable
  2. Find Far Near Detector Spectra with everything
    aligned
  3. Guess several displacements (x) of one element
    find spectra
  4. Find RR for each displacement
  5. Select peaks in RR
  6. Fit RR (E peak) to Axp
  7. Find RR variation at selected alignment accuracy
  8. Repeat for all elements
  9. Compare with 2 year run stats.

7
Beam Position on Target Accuracy Estimate
Beam Position Chambers
Target

Beam
a
b
dxt transverse error at target dxc transverse
error at each chamber r b/a 9.65 / 14.63
0.66 dxt dxc 2r2 2r 10.5 Assume dxc
0.25 mm, then dxt 0.45 mm
8
RR-1Beam X on Target
9
6 GeVSensitivities
10
Add Magnet Power Supply Regulation
11
Conclusions
  • Details are preliminary due to beam line changes
    PBEAM Monte Carlo difficulties.
  • Assuming they add in quadrature, seven magnet
    strings that each produce a 0.25 mm error at the
    target are acceptable.
  • Increasing this to 0.5 mm each stretches the
    tolerance budget.
  • Anything more is not acceptable.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com