Title: New Reproductive Technologies
1New Reproductive Technologies
- Presented by
- Christina, Katie, Lisa R.,
- Lisa V., Shelley
2Overview
- Infertility
- -Failure to conceive after at least one year of
unprotected coitus - -80 million people affected worldwide
- Primary vs. Secondary Infertility
- -primary no prior pregnancy
- -secondary infertility following a
- prior pregnancy
3New Reproductive Technologies/Assisted
Reproductive Technologies
- Methods developed to prevent or control the
natural process of reproduction and to help
individuals who cannot reproduce. - Comprises of methods that cause conception when
it does not occur naturally, monitor or attempt
to improve conception, prevent conception, stop
reproduction after conception, or handle problems
with compromised newborns. - (www.ibis.sfu.ca/cmns353/Projects/GroupF/R-D
efn)
4Types of NRTs
- In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)
- -involves removing eggs from ovaries,
fertilizing in lab, and then replacing embryos
into uterus. - Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI)
- -injection of single sperm into cytoplasm of an
oocyte. - Gestational Carrier (Surrogacy)
- -implanting of the fertilized embryo into the
uterus of a woman (carrier).
5Knowledge and NRTs
6Models of procreative knowledge
- Different belief systems about human reproduction
exist
7Models of procreative knowledge
- Monogenetic inheritance
- a.k.a. preformation model
- Men carry preformed fetuses in their sperm and
plant these into womens wombs - In Egypt, this scientific tradition dates back to
at least 4000 years ago
- Duogenetic inheritance
- Sperm-ovum union theory
- Equal contributions of ovum and sperm
- Model on which NRT is based
8Cognitive dissonance and class
- Lower to middle class, educated Egyptians are
well versed in the duogenetic sperm-ovum theory - Lesser educated people are much less likely to
espouse this view of women as egg producersthey
are likely to deem womens eggs as much less
important, either contributing less than half,
little or nothing at all to conception itself
(Inhorn 2003, 65).
9Consequences of Introduction of NRTs in Egypt
- Cognitive dissonance
- -Women have eggs that can be removed and
returned to their bodies in different forms.
This problematizes the idea that children are
conceived through heterosexual marital
penetrative male-orgasmic sex - -Men do not contribute everything to the
procreation of offspring - -Womens eggs contribute actual biogenetic
substance to the creation of offspring.
Contribution is of equal weight. This gives
woman biological ownership of their children.
10Duogenetic model and women
- Introduction of duogenetic inheritance model has
heightened the pre-existing level of blame
based on women for reproductive failures (Inhorn
2003, 65). - Infertility problems seen as a problem of female
reception of mens sperm
11Acquisition of scientific knowledge
- Acquisition of type and level of knowledge
depends on class - Middle and upper class literate people
- -Books and other printed materials
- -From doctors and other patients
- Illiterate lower class
- -Mainly media, some knowledge from physicians
12The Media and NRTs
- Media promotes awareness of NRTs by providing
information through science and health reportage. - Media have covered ongoing developments in the
global arena. - Media have created a lively, public, moral debate
on the uses of NRT in Egypt and abroad. - Media helps to set the moral standard of NRT
applications. - Media have served to normalize NRT to a certain
degree over time.
13Multiple gamble quiz50/50 chance
- Many Egyptians experience infertility as a
disease. Is this a cultural or an explanatory
model? - I read a lot periodicals, newspapers, books.
Because we are suffering for sixteen years, Im
following up on this (in Inhorn 2003, 73). Is
this a cultural or an explanatory model?
14Religion and NRTs
15Arguments
- Religion (Sunni Islam Coptic Christianity)
NRTs are interwoven phenomenon - -Visible in
- a) Infertility methods available in
- Egypt
- b) the practice of legal system,
- religious institutions, clients
- practitioners behaviour
16Arguments (contd)
- Religion as a constraint (analytical conclusion,
not empirical conception) - -Emic vs Etic distinction (Inhorn 2003, 89)
17Arguments (contd)
- Anthropologists
- Have done too little to examine the global spread
of sensitive reproduction technologies and how
local religion/moral effect decision-making
(Ethno-ethics -- Gammeltoft in Inhorn 2003, 91) - Must become more involved in bioethical debates
(Inhorn 2003, 91)
18Ethical vs. Moral concepts
- Kleinman distinguishes between dominant
bioethical discourse local moral worlds
(Inhorn 2003, 92)
19Bio-ethical discourse
- International codes of bioethics built on 4
universal bio-ethical principles - - respect for autonomy
- - beneficence
- - nonmaleficence
- - justice
- Western philosophical tradition dominant,
ethnocentric approach to health and health care
20Bio-ethical discourse (contd)
- Codified, abstract expert knowledge about the
good - Little applicability to local lived experience
- ?focus on local moral worlds
- the commitments of social participants in a
local world about what is at stake in everyday
experience (Kleinman 1995, 45).
21Conclusions of Inhorns religion chapter
- Reproduction NRT are subject to competing
institutions (Shore). - -However, in Egypt, the religious institutions
provide guidelines for morally correct behaviour.
Unlike other places in the world religious
prohibitions against surrogacy and third party
donors are followed in practice, and not
contested (Shore, 100-119)
22Conclusions of Inhorns religion chapter (contd)
- Islamic religious stress on biogenetic
relatedness (Strathern 2003, 120) - -pure lineage knowledge of descent ? marriage,
inheritance and incest issues (Inhorn 2003,
105-7) - -adoption prohibitions change adopted childs
name, lack of feelings and conception as own
child (Inhorn 2003, 109) - ?reasons for popularity of IVF/ICSI (no other
choice) (Inhorn 2003, 120)
23Conclusions of Inhorns religion chapter (contd)
- Paradox
- -NRT reinforces local conceptions of family,
biological relatedness (local morals). - -But, creates insecurity regarding 3rd-party
donation pure lineage, mixing of sperm, misuse
(corrupted morals)
24Conclusion of Inhorns religion chapter
- Through NRT local moral worlds are compared
- -Egypt morally superior to the West
- Religion is a constraint
- -ideal woman motherhood
- -but religion limits the technological options
(Inhorn 2003, 121)
25Critique and data
- Why the coherence between religious
institutions/prohibitions practice? - Inhorn has been criticized for overestimating the
coherence between religious prescriptions and
peoples practice in Egypt. According to the
critics Inhorn does not distinguish between what
people say they do and what they do (Inhorn
2003, 89).
26Critique and data (contd)
- To refute this critic Inhorn provides data that
says - Egypt has experienced a religious revitalization
in the last two decades (Inhorn 2003, 100). - Informants express the importance of moral
acceptability to be a good muslim (Inhorn
2003, 101). - Infertility, the use of all available
technologies and the (un)successful outcome of
IVF is conceptualized as one Gods will (Inhorn
2003, 102).
27Critique and data (contd)
- Selection of physicians and country affected by
religious considerations. - The informant consults religious experts on moral
concerns (Inhorn 2003, 103). - Bargaining with God successful IVF for
religious act/symbol (Inhorn 2003, 103).
28Critique and data (contd)
- Correlation between local morals and religious
restrictions against 3rd party donation is
visible in practice - Clinic practice caution of mixing,
video-surveillance, emphasis on moral standards. - Client behaviour constant need for reassurance
of doctors standards, viewing doctor as
responsible to God (Inhorn 2003, 116-8).
29Critique and data (contd)
- Although Inhorn provides data as evidence, she
points to a weakness in her research The
interview setting only done interviews in
clinic settings ? observed how practice may
change in other settings (ex. Conflicts in home),
observed the work in the IVF laboratories (Inhorn
2003, 27-8). - One might speculate that Inhorn would get
different data about official morals/norms from
overhearing casual conversations, than direct
interviews.
30Feminism and NRTs
Reading Franklin, S. (1995) Postmodern
Procreation A Cultural Account of Assisted
Reproduction.
- Reproduction is a significant focus of
feminist theory and politics because of the way
in which its control has been seen as
instrumental to the subordination of women in a
patriarchal culture (Franklin 1995, 323). - Reproduction is increasingly subject to (and the
object of) the hegemonic gaze of the clinician,
and his (or, increasingly in the field of
assisted reproduction, her) technological
apparatus of monitoring, management, and
surveillance is perceived as threatening
(Franklin 1995, 323).
31Infertility in India
- Reading Bhardwaj, A. (2003) Why Adoption is Not
an Option in India The Visibility of
Infertility, the Secrecy of Donor Insemination,
and Other Cultural Complexities
- Infertility issues in India share some
similarities with those of Egypt - - fear of third party involvement
- adoption is not an acceptable solution because it
disrupts the parent-child bond
32Infertility in India (contd)
- Emphasis and pressure on having children
(especially sons) because they are seen as the
perpetuation of the self if a man cannot have
children, he is faced with the consequence of a
complete genetic death - Third party involvement is more widely (although
secretly) accepted in India because it ensures
the link between mother and child remains intact
33Infertility in India (contd)
- Concerns are focused on the outcome of a
pregnancy (i.e. the means used to become
pregnant, whether its IVF, AID, or surrogacy,
dont matter as long as the pregnancy has a
successful outcome) - Efforts to overcome infertility are undertaken
with a greater amount of secrecy, the outcomes
and attempts of which are often kept secret from
the community and sometimes even the families
34Infertility in Japan
Reading Lock, Margaret (1998) Perfecting
Society reproductive technologies, genetic
testing, and the planned family in Japan.
- Similar beliefs regarding fertility and
infertility issues - -fear of third party involvement, adoption seen
as last option if an option at all - Lock mentions the term BIOPOWER
- -term used to describe power and control which
is exerted on an individual by more dominant
institutions
35Infertility in Israela look at ultraorthodox Jews
Reading Kahn, S.M. (2002) Rabbis and
reproduction The uses of New Reproductive
Technologies among Ultraorthodox Jews in Israel.
- Definition of Ultraorthodox
- NRTs widely available to all Jewish citizens at
no cost up to 2 children - Overt pronatalist country
- Primary goal of ultraorthodox women dedicate
lives to bearing children - -infertile women seek out treatments under
strict rabbinic guidance - Mashgichots individual responsible in
monitoring every procedure to ensure no mixing of
sperm or eggs
36Infertility in Israela look at ultraorthodox Jews
- Does artificial insemination with Jewish donor
sperm from 3rd party constitute adultery? (Kahn
2002, 289) - ?Rabbinic definition of adultery illicit sexual
union between Jews - -Jewish donor sperm from 3rd party adultery
prohibited - -non-Jewish donor sperm from 3rd party not
adultery allowed - ?Because Jewishness is traced through the
matriline (mother)!!
37Religion Discussion
- My baby must be mine, and from my husband. This
is logical. A mother will never feel this is her
child if it is from another mans donated sperm
or ova. Its only natural. Everything must occur
naturally. If the child is from the father and
mother, they will feel this is actually our baby.
If not, well not be a family. You feel youre
acting, making a movie, living a life that is not
true. (in Inhorn 2003, 108)
38Religion Discussion (contd)
- What does the quote express?
- How does this quote relate to the definition of
Reproductive gone awry (Jenkins Inhorn 2003,
1832)? - Can the quote be seen as actively
reproducing/constructing culture/cultural
models? If so, how?
39Informed opinion questions
- Do you agree with Inhorn that knowledge poses one
of the most fundamental arenas of constraints on
the utilization of NRTs in Egypt? In Canada? - Do you think that the introduction of NRTs in
Egypt will eventually replace the monogenetic
inheritance model?