Title: Michael ALLOUCHE
1CIVIL UAV Safety Issues Airworthiness
Operational Certification aspects
The IAI-Malat background experience
- Presented by
- Michael ALLOUCHE
- Airworthiness Manager
- Israel Aircraft Industries, Malat Division
UAV-NET Stockholm, 23 October 2001
2Thinking Peaceful Civilian UAVsIn A World
Enraged by Terror?!
An Old-New Philosophical Debate
Leibnitz We live in the BEST of all possible
worlds
Voltaire We live in the WORST of all possible
worlds
A Jewish Answer We live in a world that is the
WORST of all possible worlds, but in which there
is still HOPE (Rabbi
Adin Steinsaltz, Jerusalem)
3PRESENTATION TOPICS
- Introducing the issues
- UAV Certification stalemate?
- Basic definitions terminologies
- Safety risks / Airworthiness vs Operational
- IAI-Malat Background Experience
- Airworthiness approvals
- Operational approvals
- Airworthiness safety lessons learned
- Overall safety improvement trend
- B-Hunter UAV Certification Process Highlights
4PRESENTATION TOPICS (cont.)
- UAV Safety Airworthiness Issues
- UAV Leading Particulars
- Overall Safety Objective Rationale Elements
- Hazard Risk Assessment Criteria Elements
- Defining An Airworthiness Certification Basis
- UAV Operational Design Features
- Conclusions
- The Long Shorter Way to Civil UAV Certification
5Introducing the IssuesThe UAV certification
stalemate?
- UAV industry waits for Certifying Authorities
to regulate UAV Type Certification, as awaited by
UAV operators who seek the granting of less
restricting Flight Authorizations from Certifying
Authorities who, before they invest resources in
regulating, wait to see whether or not UAVs are
really to be developed at a larger scale by UAV
industry who waits for Certifying Authorities to
regulate UAV Type Certification, as awaited by
UAV operators who seek...
6Introducing the IssuesBasic Definitions
Terminology
- CERTIFICATION Legal recognition by a
certifying authority that a product complies with
applicable requirements. - National / international law
- Relevant certifying authority
- Clearly defined product
- Applicable administrative and technical
requirements - () In red TBD for Civilian UAVs?
7Introducing the IssuesBasic Definitions
Terminology
- AIRWORTHINESS CERTIFICATION
- Type airworthiness certification
- Type design complies with applicable
airworthiness requirements aimed at showing that
it can be flown with an acceptable level of
safety. - Engineering process, safe and reliable
design - Individual airworthiness certification
Individual aircraft built in accordance with Type
Design - Production quality control oriented
process
8Introducing the IssuesBasic Definitions
Terminology
- OPERATIONAL CERTIFICATION
- Crew qualification
- Maintenance continued airworthiness
- Safe airspace integration airspace management
issue -
- Special flight permit / flight authorization
- Covers most essential airworthiness operational
safety of flight aspects. - Used in particular cases e.g. flight test
clearance or special operational use.
9Introducing the IssuesSafety / Airworthiness
vs Operational
Persons on board
UAV Safety Risks
Persons Property On Ground
Air Traffic Collision
- AIRWORTHINESS
- Safe reliable design
- Manufacturer
- OPERATIONS
- Safe Airspace Integration
- Operator
10IAI-MALAT BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE
11IAI-MALAT BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE Current
"Airworthiness approvals"
- "Covered" by customer requirements
qualification procedures - System specification requirements military
contractual procedures - System qualification / First Article Test
inspection process. - e.g. US SR-Hunter, F-Hunter, Israeli Searcher,
Heron - Ranger "certification" (type A/type B) in
Switzerland - Belgian B-Hunter Airworthiness Certification
In each case, Approval authority Military Body
12IAI-MALAT BACKGROUND EXPERIENCECurrent UAV
Operational Approvals
- Military operations
- Full control by military air traffic authorities
- Special reserved airspace areas / allocated
airways - Coordination with civilian Air Traffic control
authorities wherever required - US SR-Hunter, France F-Hunter, Swiss Ranger,
Israeli Searcher - Israeli Heron
- Civil UAV (Firebird 2001) demonstration
- Approval procedure through FAA regional offices
(through FAA waiver application form 7711-2) - Granting of FAA Certificate of Flight
Authorization (State of Montana, October 1996)
within NAS and TFR area.
13IAI-MALAT BACKGROUND EXPERIENCEAirworthiness
safety lessons learned
UAV EVENTS STATISTICS (BASED ON 100,000 FLIGHT
HOURS OF IAI UAV FLEET)
REDUNDANCY
REDUNDANCY
ANTI-ICING SYSTEM
AUTOMATION
FULL REDUNDANCY FAIL SAFE APPROACH
FAR 33 CERTIFIED ENGINE DUAL ENGINE
CONFIGURATION
14()
()
() Based upon Heron AV
15IAI-MALAT BACKGROUND EXPERIENCEB-HUNTER UAV
- EAGLE Association, Consortium led by SONACA in
teaming agreement with IAI-Malat and Thales,
Belgium. - Belgian MOD contract with specific clause related
to Airworthiness Certification
16B-HUNTER Airworthiness Certification Main Design
Features
- B-Hunter characteristics
- Basic US Hunter AV
- Upgraded Avionics payload
- Advanced GCS
- Automatic Take-Off
- Landing System.
17B-Hunter Airworthiness Certification Highlights
Outlines of the process
- B-Hunter Certification basis
- Hazard Risk Assessment Criteria
- JAR VLA tailoring
- Specific airworthiness requirements
- B-Hunter verification process
- Engineering data
- System Safety Analyses
- Hardware software qualification
- Ground tests and Flight Tests, incl. failure
handling demonstration - B-Hunter Airworthiness Certification Dossier
- Manufacturers Type Certificate
- Flight Ops Manuals, incl. normal abnormal
procedures, limitations - Final Type Certificate of Airworthiness to be
granted by BMoD at the conclusion of validation
flights in Belgium.
18UAV AIRWORTHINESS SAFETY ISSUESUAV Leading
Particulars
- Catastrophic Event Definition Loss of UAV AND
hazard on ground (or uncontrolled crash) - Airworthiness operational interrelation
- Flight Termination capability
- Communications data-link
- Ground control station
- No pilot on board
- Piloting monitoring function (automation
levels) - Handling of failure conditions corrective
actions - Definition of emergency procedures
- Unforeseen scenarios far from home
19UAV AIRWORTHINESS SAFETY ISSUESOverall Safety
Objective Rationale Elements
May We Apply Similar Rationale for Civil UAVs ?
20UAV AIRWORTHINESS SAFETY ISSUESHazard Risk
Assessment Criteria Elements
- Civil UAV issues to be solved
- Define intermediate quantitative probability
values - consistent with UAV Overall Safety Objective
- Confirm Risk Index
- Severity Definitions to be adapted according to
Civil - Context UAV Applications
21UAV AIRWORTHINESS SAFETY ISSUESDefining an
Airworthiness Certification Basis
- UAV System as a Whole
- Categorization Issue
- Prime element
- Overall System Safety Objectives
- Hazard Risk Assessment Criteria
- Additional elements
- JAR 25/23/VLA like code (UAV Airframe)
- Well thought tailoring
- Towards new JAR UAV?
- Additional criteria for UAV specific features
- GCS
- Communication Data Link
- Flight Termination
22UAV OPERATIONAL SAFETY FEATURES
- IFF transponder capable of mode S communications
- Avoid" means for other (relying on ATC or/and
TCAS of others) - Switching logic to given transponder codes (e.g.
SSR 7700 in case of total loss of communication) - Voice relay VHF radio 2-way communications
- Via air vehicle using communication data link
("ATC talks to the air vehicle") - Direct GCS-ATC communications in case of
contingency - Anti-collision strobe lights ("avoid" means for
others) - Forward vision camera and/or EO/IR sensor (See
and Avoid" enhancement) - Need to develop Technologies (cooperative e.g.
ADS-B, VDL-4...versus non cooperative, e.g. Radar
based) fully solving the See and avoid issue
23CONCLUSIVE THOUGHTSThe Long Shorter Way to Civil
UAV certification
- UAV industry has a key role to help breaking out
of the UAV certification stalemate - Pragmatic realistic way
- Short Term confidence building approach
- Long Term proven approach.
- Design technological parameters strongly
related to Overall safety Objective Hazard Risk
Assessment Criteria - UAV certification regulation cope with every
potential design choices by setting objectives
(RBO1) rather than imposing specific solutions.
- 1Regulation By Objective