Title: PDO forcing in observations and model
1 PDO forcing in observations and model South
Pacific SST variations and forcing and
atmospheric feedback
2(No Transcript)
3Reconstruct SST from AR-1 process and forcing
indices, evaluate leading EOF of reconstruction
of SST, compare with coupled model output.
Schneider and Cornuelle 2005
4Schneider and Cornuelle 2005
5(No Transcript)
6Anomalous Heat Budget
7Ocean Impact on Sea Surface Temperature
anomalous advection
831
SST 160E-160W 5S-5N ann rms 0.8K
SLP EOF1 ann rms 4.5mb
9Kuroshio-Oyashio Extension Forcing and Feedback
10Decadal Variations of SST in the South Pacific
PCM 150 years of control run Austral
winter-centered annual averages Jan-Dec high
pass lt 50 years period
11South Pacific EOFs of SST, very inefficient
representation
EOF 1 2 3 4 5 6 ...
14 13 9 8 4 3
12EOF of South Pacific sea level pressure /mb
Correlation of EOF 1 2
.... with EOF of S.Hemisphere -0.88
0.87 with NINO3.4 0.37
0.24
Frequency spectra of PC are white.
13Lack of match between EOFs of SST and 1 SLP
14SST reconstruction from heat budget
anomalous advection
magnitude of terms are smaller than North
Pacific.
15Thermocline processes dominate the low frequency
variance
16High frequency meridional advection anomalies
consistent with SLP
17Thermocline memory
Thermocline depth off New Zealand
Lagged correlation of thermocline processes with
SLP Suggestive of wave propagation
Thermocline off New Zealand leading SLP no
correlation, no detectable feedback to sea level
pressure
18Conclusions
- The North Pacific Decadal Oscillations results
from the superposition of the SST response to
changes in the Aleutian Low (see also Davis 1976)
and oceanic adjustments in the Kuroshio-Oyashio
Extension. - The PDO is the dominant mode because the
atmospheric sea level pressure anomalies are
spatially organized, whilst random in time. -
- The SST variations in both hemispheres are
roughly consistent with AR-1 physics forced
directly by the atmosphere, or through a delayed
response due to ocean dynamics. - In the South Pacific of the model, no EOF of SST
clearly dominates - there is no Southern
Hemisphere counterpart to the PDO. - This reflects the lack of a spatial organization
of the SLP pattern. In the Southern Hemisphere,
SLP appears random in time and in space.
19PAU
20EOF of South Pacific SLP/mb
21(No Transcript)
22(No Transcript)
23PCM Processes in the Kuroshio-Oyashio Extension
Observations
PCM
24(No Transcript)
25PCM Feedbacks to the Kuroshio-Oyashio Extension
Correlation KOE ocean sea level leads atmosphere
by one year SLP perturbation of order of 1 mb
26Control
27- The PDO of the coupled model is dynamically
similar to observations. - Differences reflect shortcomings of the PCM mean
state. - In the Kuroshio-Oyashio Extension, PCM attributes
changes of SST largely to thermocline depth
anomalies, rather than to zonal advection. - PCM shows a consistent, local atmospheric
response to ocean induced changes in the
Kuroshio-Oyashio Extension. - The feedback does not project on the excitation
SLP pattern of the variations. - In the model, the PDO is not a climate mode.
28(No Transcript)
29The Impact of Re-emergence
30(No Transcript)
31(No Transcript)
32(No Transcript)
33PCM Forcing of the Kuroshio-Oyashio Extension
34(No Transcript)
35(No Transcript)
36- The PDO results from a superposition of forcing
by ENSO, NPI (interpreted as intrinsic
mid-latitude variability), and zonal advection
anomalies in the Kuroshio Extension PDEL. - The forcing footprints are non-orthogonal and
determine the PDO. The PDO is not a climate mode. - The contributions of the forcing are frequency
dependent. At yearly time scales, NPI dominates,
at interannual time scales anomalies NPI and ENSO
are on par, at decadal time scale, NPI, ENSO and
PDEL are of equal importance. - The impact of the PDO is a reflection of shared
forcing.
37(No Transcript)
38(No Transcript)
39Robustness of PDO Reconstruction The Tropical
Index
Deser et al. 2004 CTI not reliable tropical
index. OTI captures low frequency changes of NPI
better. How about the impact of OTI and PDO Side
point NPI is key variable, also seen by
orthogonalization.
40(No Transcript)
41'Impact' of the PDO
42Hypotheses for Pacific decadal variability
43(No Transcript)
44Atmosphere Ocean GCMs
45STD of SST (contours) and temperature at 200 m
simulated by OGCM (gt0.3C/0.6C N/S of 20N) forced
by anomlous wind stress only, SST and SSS are
relaxed to climatology. Note that only special
areas (KOE in winter) act as a window of the
surface layer to thermocline anomalies.
46(No Transcript)
47To understand the Pacific Decadal Oscillation we
need to understand the processes affecting the
leading empirical orthogonal function of SST in
the Pacific north of 20N Approach Reconstruct
SST in the North Pacific from indices of
intrinsic variability of the Aleutian Low El
Nino adjustment of the ocean circulation in the
Kuroshio/Oyashio compare leading empirical
orthogonal functions of SST reconstruction and
observations Data NCEP/NCAR reanalysis sea
surface temperature, sea level pressure and wind
stress focus on July to June averages
48July to June annual averages (Newman et al. 2003)
49(No Transcript)
50(No Transcript)
51(No Transcript)
52(No Transcript)
53(No Transcript)
54(No Transcript)
55(No Transcript)
56(No Transcript)
57If ??(x) ??0 separable
58(No Transcript)
59(No Transcript)
60(No Transcript)
61(No Transcript)
62(No Transcript)
63(No Transcript)
64(No Transcript)
65(No Transcript)
66Hypotheses for decadal variability of the
Pacific ocean integrates atmospheric
noise Oceanic wave processes communicate
anomalies to remote areas such as the western
boundary regions
67(No Transcript)
68Hypotheses for decadal variability of the North
Pacific
Ocean mixed layer
69Hypotheses for decadal variability of the North
Pacific
70Hypotheses for decadal variability of the North
Pacific
Ocean mixed layer
Ocean mixed layer
71(No Transcript)
72(No Transcript)
73(No Transcript)
74(No Transcript)
75What is the Pacific Decadal Oscillation? The
leading empirical orthogonal function of SST in
the Pacific north of 20N
76Correlation 0.53 0.57
0.74
77(No Transcript)
78(No Transcript)
79(No Transcript)
80(No Transcript)
81(No Transcript)
82(No Transcript)
83(No Transcript)
84(No Transcript)
85Tn ??n-1 ?i Fi, n
86Observed
87Observed
88Observed
89(No Transcript)
90(No Transcript)
91(No Transcript)
92(No Transcript)
93(No Transcript)
94(No Transcript)
95(No Transcript)
960.5
97(No Transcript)
98(No Transcript)
99Interactive sea surface temperature increases the
variance in the atmosphere (Barsugli and Battisti
1998). Sea surface temperatures affect the
atmosphere, but effect is weak, sensitive to
background state, and involves changes of the
storm track (e.g. Peng and Whitaker 1999).
Differences of warm (1968 to 1972) and cool (1982
to 1986) epochs