Top level: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Top level:

Description:

Hare-hounds exercise for global mode-parameter estimation based on an artificial ... improve mode estimation methods, start hare-hounds exercise ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: caroluss
Learn more at: http://hmi.stanford.edu
Category:
Tags: hare | level | top

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Top level:


1
Top level
  • Easy remote browsing, viewing, comparing, up to
    3-d lead time, with easy access to archived data
  • Standardized meta data SDO, Solar-B,
    absorbing/expanding existing sets
  • AIA (Start with) low-level products (images,
    PFSS, but not DEM, NLFFFs, until a consensus
    tool is ready)

2
Data product/methods lists
  • Largely agreement that the current baseline lists
    are adequate, but
  • Need for specialized on-demand computing to be
    flexibly inserted into the pipeline(s)
  • Evolve definition of pipeline and interfaces
  • Evaluate required computer resources after
    compilation of data products involved
  • Interest in co-aligned BCoronal (difference)
    images
  • Need for deep-focusing pipeline methods/tools for
    tachocline studies
  • Testing of algorithms requires
  • Artificial data Forward-modeled CZ for
    helioseismic inversions, both local and global
  • Artificial data for thermal studies
    comparison/development of methods, and spectal
    codes line lists

3
Desires with problems
  • Evolving global vector-B as input for wind
    modeling, even though not clear how to use it
  • Better understanding of near-surface physics to
    estimate/model mode frequencies (asphericity,
    mode excitation, and near-surface shear).

4
Working groups / meetings (I)
  • Hydrodynamic loop models (Warren, )
  • Spectral modeling (Warren, Boerner, Weber, )
  • Non-Linear Force-Free Field modeling consortium
    (Schrijver, Metcalf, )
  • Comparison of global local methods where they
    overlap Rhodes, Haber, to cross-validate
    methods
  • Continuation of LOHCO helioseismology (ring,
    time-dist., holography) Komm, Haber,
  • Horizontal flows, tracking Welsh
  • Synaptic map algorithms intercomparisons
    Hoeksema

5
Working groups / meetings (II)
  • Workshop on using modes, helioseismology, surface
    flows, inversion techniques for understanding the
    magnetic, energetic dynamic connection between
    CZ (near surface) and the corona. Abbett
  • Event detection for coronal oscillations De
    Pontieu,
  • Definition of optimal observing modes for
    transient studies Nita,
  • Hare-hounds exercise for global mode-parameter
    estimation based on an artificial data set Hill
  • Forward model of CZ including fields/flows
    Stein, Toomre, Kosovichev, Miesch, Mukunda

6
Working groups / meetings (III)
  • EVE/AIA cross-calibration, including 2006 rocket
    flight TRACE/EIT/Solar-B-XRT Boerner, Eparvier,
  • Farside-image acoustic/magnetic calibration
    Lindsey
  • Time-distance holography with emphasis on flows
    and propagation speeds Braun, Birch
  • Improve speed/reliability of vector-B inversions
    ???
  • Improve speed/reliability of ambiguity resolution
    for azimuthal-B ???

7
Working groups / meetings (IV)
  • Definition teams
  • Keywords for data structures (Larsen, )
  • Documentation/tutorial on interfacing code for
    pipeline modules (Larsen)
  • Community
  • Science Team meetings (2007, 2008, )
  • Community workshops (LWS1/SOHO19 March 2007
    lws1.lmsal.com, or soho19.lmsal.com )

8
Resource needs
  • SDO supercomputer facility
  • SolarSoft continuation or development of
    alternative?
  • HeliospaceGeospace dynamics summary for
    solar/heliospheric/ geospace communities (LWS
    task)
  • Enhanced SRT, TRT, and SDO core science team
    funding in support of development of tools and
    methods for community

9
AIA Operational modes
  • Coronal oscillations
  • Review 1600/1700/WL nesting
  • Potential with high-freq observing.
  • Transient studies
  • High-freq observing needed to find/map conjugate
    footpoints for particle precipitation

10
Coordination needs
  • Chromospheric field information (vector-B, H?)

11
  • Spectral analysis workshop (including atomic
    data), and working group, before DEM analysis
    (warren, boerner, weber)
  • Hydrodynamic loop model atmospheres, solar-B loop
    modeling workshop warren
  • Baseline vector magnetic magnetic data products
    well accepted gurman
  • Numerical simulations h5 parchevsky stein
    include magnetic field and flows on
    helioseismology primary AR scale, then SG
    scales. 10 million CPU hours for generating the
    forward-modeling data set to test inversion codes
    on - have discussions about SG facilities for
    SDO project.
  • Abbett M1/H2 Magnetic/helioseismic WG for
    smaller workshop.
  • Coronal seismology analytical models begin to
    incorporate atmosphere, which promises advances.
    Automatic detection of waves for workshop by end
    of o6 early 07. Baseline UV ops for AIA gain
    much if 1600/1700 were alternated at 20s cadence.
    Also much interest for high frequency waves.
  • DeRosa/Linker S3. Full-sun best guess at vector
    field for wind modeling. Important no solution.
  • Transients C1, Nita No particular data product,
    but special modes maybe required, exposure
    control a concern formulate best practice WG.
    Conjugate footpoint studies require 2s cadence,
    maybe. Cause of transients quick generation of
    coaligned B and AIA data cubes. Difference image
    of AIA and B.
  • H1/Todd

12
  • WG for dynamo and local-helioseismology as part
    of the ongoing workshop
  • H6 global helioseismology improve mode
    estimation methods, start hare-hounds exercise
  • S2 EUV calibration need AIA/EVE cross-cal WG,
    maybe also Solar-B plan for crosscall
    TRACE/EIT/EVE-rocket flight.
  • H1 local helioseismology tools to map
    tachoclyne, but no pipeline tools to study.
    Coordination for Solar-B high-res. Seismology
    Sasha. Need calibrate of farside images to
    fluxes. WGs local helio Komm, time dist
    hologrophy, and global helioseismology and ring
    and local to compare overlaps areas. Insufficient
    funding. and dedicated supercomputer resources
  • H4 techniques Duvall, Haber identified list
    of issues, plans for WG through telecons/blog.
  • Local helioseismology/Rasmus no specific need
    for new data products, but codes for standard
    pipeline largely ready but inversions and travel
    time calculations remain research topics. Need
    documention how to integrate into JSOC. Concern
    on resources to improve tools to HMI quality data
    set. Pipeline needs to be flexible for later
    upgrades.
  • H3 Sarbani/Jesper Science of helioseismology
    add surface shear layer, asphericity, and
    mode-excitation. Still need to improve the
    forward modeling problem, before inversion can be
    properly done. Shear layer variability may need
    shorter time series products, but longer for
    tachoclyne.
  • Charlie/Junwei H9 not yet started listed techn.
    Challenges to be discussed

13
  • Jesper vector field session baselined inversion
    methods, including perhaps vertical field
    gradients. Concern speed of codes of B inversion
    and of ambiguity resolution codes are really
    really slow, optimistic about reaching goals
    before launch.
  • C7/M5 Zoran/Fuselier. Heard magnetospheric and
    solar-wind, and user perspective. Big interest
    also in background solar wind model
    (preconditioning of CME propagation) questions
    on how to use global model vector magnetograms.

14
  • Gurman Most working ggroup leads are non-pi
    group members. How will they get funded.
  • Should we explicitly estimate what
    the working group cost really is?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com