Pat Okubara - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

Pat Okubara

Description:

Distinct from gene-for-gene resistance. Not as strong as gene-for-gene resistance ... insect Bradysia impatiens (fungal gnat). McConn et al. (1997) PNAS 95: 5473-5477 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:117
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: patok
Category:
Tags: okubara | pat

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pat Okubara


1
Plant Innate Immunity Host Responses to
Necrotrophic Fungi
Pat Okubara
PLP535 January 22, 2008
2
Necro- vs. Bio-
Mode of pathogenesis Nutrient acquisition Resist
ance to necrotrophs is rare
3
Defense Signaling against Biotrophs
4
Defense Signaling against Necrotrophs
5
What Is Innate Immunity?
  • Partially preformed, partially inducible
  • Part of normal plant growth, development
  • Triggered by host pathogen elicitors
  • Distinct from gene-for-gene resistance
  • Not as strong as gene-for-gene resistance
  • Durability unknown, but can lose via mutation

6
Model Systems for Dissecting Molecular Responses
  • Arabidopsis thaliana preferred dicot host
  • Small genome size (125 Mb)
  • Selfing genetic crosses give lots of progeny
  • 3-month generation time
  • Genetic stocks harboring gene knock-outs
  • Transformable with Agrobacterium
  • Detailed genetic map
  • Complete, annotated genome sequence
  • Numerous model pathogens
  • Pseudomonas syringae pvs.
  • Magnaporthe oryzae (formerly grisea)
  • Phytophthora infestans

7
Shortcomings of Model Systems
  • Not representative of all pathosystems
  • Usually not crop plants (exception rice)
  • Avoid problems that need to be addressed in
  • crop hosts repetitive DNA, transformability

8
Conventions in Molecular Biology
  • Gene, mRNA and mutant names italicized
  • PROPEP1
  • Protein names not italicized
  • AtPEP1
  • Mutant names historical, indicate phenotype
  • ein1 ethylene insensitive1 (first locus
    mutated)
  • sid2-2 second mutant allele
  • Generally, small letters indicate mutant (ein1)
    if mutation is
  • recessive wild type indicated by capital
    letters (Ein1)
  • Capital vs. small letters indicate
    genetic dominance and
  • recessiveness, resp.

9
Jasmonic Acid - Key Molecule in Innate Immunity
Methyl jasmonate
10
JA Biosynthesis and fad Mutants
Octadecanoid pathway
Membrane
Fatty acid desaturases
FAD3, FAD7, FAD8
a-Linolenic acid precursor
Lipoxygenase (LOX)
Allene oxide synthase (AOS)
11
Involvement of JA in Pythium Immunity
Wild type Arabidopsis vs. fad3, fad7, fad8
Pythium mastophorum
Observations fad triple mutant did not thrive
in the greenhouse. Pythium was isolated from
symptomatic roots.
Vijayan et al. (1998) PNAS 95 7209-7214
12
fad Mutant Showed Enhanced Susceptibility
Vijayan et al. (1998) PNAS 95 7209-7214
13
fad Mutant Harbored More Oospores
Applied MeJ Partially Reversed the Infection
Vijayan et al. (1998) PNAS 95 7209-7214
14
JA Signaling - Key Pathway in Innate Immunity
Fad3 Fad7 Fad8
JA
JAR1
Metabolic protein
COI1
Regulatory protein
Regulatory protein
JAZ1
Thi2.1 PR-4 PDF1.2
Defense (Pr) proteins
15
Identification of COI1 As a JA Pathway Regulator
Arabidopsis - Pseudomonas syringae vir
interaction
  • Mutant with insensitivity to the toxin
    coronatine
  • coi1 coronatine insensitive1
  • coi1 phenotype not restored to wild type by
    applied JA

Xie et al. (1998) Science 280 1091-1094
16
Thionin2.1-Based JA Signaling Reporter System
Agrobacterium
Loss of GUS expression in coi1
wild type
coi1
GUS conversion of colorless substrate to blue
product
Xie et al. (1998) Science 280 1091-1094
17
COI1 Independently Indentified in Other Mutant
Screens
  • Enhanced resistance to P. syringae (biotroph)
  • Non-expression of Vegetative storage protein
    gene
  • (VSP1), a JA-induced gene
  • Jasmonate insensitive mutant (jai1) of tomato
    shows similar phenotype(s) as Arabidopsis coi1
  • Connection between COI1 and JA action

18
Cloning of COI1 Gene
  • coi1 mutation between markers C83 and B23

genetic map
600 kb clone
  • coi1 mutation on either of 2 ORFs

Clone T-36 (8ks)
Xie et al. (1998) Science 280 1091-1094
19
Clone T-36 complemented coi1 phenotype
-- Restored sensitivity (stunting) to JA
Xie et al. (1998) Science 280 1091-1094
20
ORF1 (COI1) Restored Expression of Thionin-2.1
Particle gun bombardment using gold beads coated
with clone DNA
GUS expression in bombarded leaves
Xie et al. (1998) Science 280 1091-1094
21
Deduced Amino Acid Sequence of COI1
  • COI1 encodes an F-box protein
  • -- F-box conserved motif - SKP1 binding
    function
  • -- leucine-rich repeats (LRR)
    protein-protein interactions

22
F-box Proteins Function in the Ubiquitylation
Complex
  • Protein degradation
  • Altered protein function

Adapted from diagram in Zheng et al. 2002
23
COI1 Function Verified Using Biochemical
Approaches
  • Soybean COI1 protein binds cullin, ASK1 and
    RBX1 in co-immunoprecipitation experiments
  • Binds ASK1 and ASK2 in yeast two-hybrid screen

Wang et al. (2005) Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 18
1285-1295
24
Current Hypothesis of JA Signaling
JA-induced gene before COI1-mediated degradation
After COI1-mediated degradation
25
(No Transcript)
26
Ethylene Another Key Molecule in Innate Immunity
27
Ethylene Signaling Pathway
etr1 phenotype?
ein2 phenotype?
28
Evidence for Involvement of E Signaling
etr1 ein2
Arabidopsis plants
etr1 ein2 cloned genes
Agrobacterium
Transgenic tobacco expressing etr1 ein2
  • Tobacco expressing Arabidopsis etr1 and ein2
    were more susceptible to diseases in greenhouse.
  • Geraats et al. (2003) Phytopathology 93
    1078-1085
  • etr1 and ein2 tobacco sustained more damage by
    Pythium spp. Geraats et al. (2002) Mol
    Plant-Microbe Interact 15 1078-1085

29
ERF1 Overexpression Confers Enhanced Resistance
Wild type Arabidopsis-ERF1 necrotrophic foliar
pathogens
Plectosphaerella cucumerina spore
suspension Symptoms evaluated at 8 dpi
Berrocal-Lobo et al. (2002) Plant J 29 23-32
30
ERF1 Overexpression P. cucumerina
Berrocal-Lobo et al. (2002) Plant J 29 23-32
31
ERF1 Overexpression Botrytis cinerea
Berrocal-Lobo et al. (2002) Plant J 29 23-32
32
ERF1 Overexpression Altered Defense Gene
Expression
Berrocal-Lobo et al. (2002) Plant J 29 23-32
33
Innate Immunity Protects against Necrotrophic
Fungi and Wounding Insects
  • fad triple mutant sustained more damage by the
    wounding
  • insect Bradysia impatiens (fungal gnat).
  • McConn et al. (1997) PNAS 95 5473-5477
  • Tomato mutant deficient in JA signaling was more
  • susceptible to the two-spotted spider mite.
  • Li et al. (2002) Plant Physiol 130 494-503

34
necrotrophic pathogens herbivory, wounding,
elicitors
CEV1
Fad 3,7,8
CTR1
JA E
ABA
JAR1
ETR1
JA-ile
COI1 EIN2
ERF1
JAZ1
EDS8 PAD1
MYC2
Thi2.1 PR-4 PDF1.2
35
Defense Signaling against Necrotrophs
Innate immunity constitutive defense
Reduced disease symptoms
Necrotrophs
36
Novel Sources of Tolerance to Rhizoctonia solani
AG-8 in Wheat
  • EMS mutant of cv. Scarlet K. Kidwell C.
    Steber
  • cv. Chinese Spring perennial Chr 4 S. Jones
  • ABD synthetic wheat CIMMYT-Arthur Klatt

Resistance is not futile!!
37
Small Peptide Triggers of Innate Immunity
Derived from previous work on systemin, a
wound-inducible peptide causing JA-mediated
defense gene induction and anti-feeding activity
in insects. Reviewed in Ryan (2000) Biochim
Biophys Acta 1477 112-121.
  • Does Arabidopsis encode peptide elicitors of
    defense?
  • What are they?
  • How do they act?

Huffaker et al. (2006) PNAS 103 10098-10103
38
Biochemical Approach to Identifying Small Peptide
Triggers of Innate Immunity
whole Arabidopsis plants
ground to fine powder
HPLC
collected fractions
screened for ability to cause alkalinization (inte
ract with cell surface receptors)
Huffaker et al. (2006) PNAS 103 10098-10103
39
AtPep1 A Small Peptide Candidate
AtPep1
40
Obtaining the AtPep1 Gene from Its Peptide
Sequence
N-term
C-term
Searched NCBI Arabidopsis Genome Database
tblastn
Hypothetical gene At5g64900 PROPEP
41
PROPEP1 Expression Signaling Is JA- and
E-Dependent
42
PROPEP Gene Family and Orthologs in Other Plants
43
PROPEP1 Expression Is Induced by Pathogens
1Determined using RT-PCR
PROPEP1 also induced by elicitors (PAMPs).
44
Thurs. Discussion Paper Chuntao Yin Huffaker
and Ryan (2007) Endogenous peptide defense
signals in Arabidopsis differentially amplify
signaling for the innate immune response. Proc
Natl Acad Sci 104 10732-10736.
45
For Thurs. Discussion Paper
  • sid2-2 mutation in isochorismate mutase gene
    for
  • salicylic acid biosynthesis
  • npr1 mutation in SA-dependent signal regulator
    gene
  • What data support the authors hypothesis and
    what
  • anomalies did they observe?

46
pokubara_at_wsu.edu 335-7824 333 Johnson Hall
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com