Limitations in Studies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 71
About This Presentation
Title:

Limitations in Studies

Description:

CSI 36-39 Gy with posterior fossa boost to 54Gy vincristine, adjuvant chemo ... boost to 54 Gy to posterior fossa. Patient's received baseline testing ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 72
Provided by: Aar16
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Limitations in Studies


1
(No Transcript)
2
Neurocognitive Outcomes of Radiation Therapy in
Children
  • Aaron S. Kusano, SM
  • University of Washington School of Medicine

3
Outline
  • Topic Choice
  • Background/Current Practices
  • Studies of Neurocognitive Effects
  • Predictive Model Research
  • Interventions
  • Conclusion

4
Why this topic?
  • Balancing act of treatment objectives
  • Implications in Patient Counseling/Education,
    Multidisciplinary Care and follow up
  • Increasing survival increasing long term side
    effects
  • Challenging research
  • growing body of literature
  • study design
  • advancing technology and alternate approaches

5
Background
  • Childhood cancer survivors have
    changes/difficulties in
  • 1)Attention 2)Social Skills 3)Social
    Competence
  • 4)Internalization 5)Externalization 6)Social
    Isolation
  • 7)Mood and Behavioral Disorders
  • 40-100 of long term brain tumor survivors have
    some form of cognitive dysfunction

Glauser TA, Packer RJ Cognitive deficits in
long-term survivors of childhood brain tumors.
Childs Nerv Syst 72-12, 1991 Schultz et al.
Behavioral and Social Outcomes in Adolescent
Survivors of Childhood Cancer A report from the
Childhood cancer survivor study.
6
Background
  • Survivors of pediatric brain tumors have lower
    rates of high school graduation and employment
    relative to the overall population
  • There is fairly consistent evidence of increased
    neurocognitive morbidity with higher treatment
    doses and younger age at the time of treatment

Hoppe-Hirsch E, Brunet L, Laroussinie F, et al
Intellectual outcome in children with malignant
tumors of the posterior fossa Influence of the
field of irradiation and quality of surgery.
Childs Nerv Syst 11340-346, 1995 Kelaghan J,
Myers MH, Mulvihill JJ, et al Educational
achievement of long-term survivors of childhood
and adolescent cancer. Med Pediatr Oncol
16320-326, 1988 Suc E et al. Brain tumours under
the age of three. The price of survival. A
retrospective study of 20 long-term survivors.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1990106(3-4)93-8
7
Pathophysiology
  • Destruction of oligodendrocytes and endothelial
    cells
  • Microvascular changes
  • Endothelial injury leads to toxic reactions
  • Formation of free radicals
  • Cell swelling, increased vascular permeability,
    ischemia, edema and cell death
  • Evident on MRI with white and gray matter changes

8
Medulloblastoma
9
Epidemiology of Medulloblastoma
  • Embryonal tumor
  • 20 of pediatric CNS tumors
  • Median age at presentation 6 years
  • 30-40 of patients have CSF spread at time of
    diagnosis
  • 5 year survival rates for children with standard
    risk medulloblastoma approaches 80

10
Medulloblastoma Risk Categories
  • Average Risk (2/3)
  • Agegt3 years
  • Resection with lt 1.5cm2 residual
  • No metastasis
  • High Risk (1/3)
  • Agelt3years
  • Resection gt 1.5cm2 residual
  • Metastasis

11
Current Practices
12
Categories
  • Standard Risk
  • High Risk
  • Infants

13
Standard Risk
  • Age gt 3 years and
  • less than 1.5 cm2 of residual tumor and
  • No metastasis
  • Treatment
  • CSI 23.4 Gy with posterior fossa boost to 54 Gy
    vincristine, adjuvant chemo
  • Event free survival at 4 years85 (CCG/POG
    A9961)

Packer RH, Goldwein J, Nicholson HS, et al
Treatment of chilcren with medulloblastomas with
reduced-dose craniospinal radiation therapy and
adjuvant chemotherapy A childrens Cancer Group
Study. J Clin Oncol 172127-2136 Grill J, Renaux
VK, Bulteau C, et al Longterm intellectual
outcome in children with posterior fossa tumors
according to radiation doses and volumes. Int J
Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45 137-145, 1999
14
High Risk
  • Age lt 3 years OR
  • greater than 1.5 cm2 of residual tumor OR
  • metastatic disease
  • Treatment
  • CSI 36-39 Gy with posterior fossa boost to 54Gy
    vincristine, adjuvant chemo
  • POG 9031 demonstrated those with M1 disease had
    event free survival at 5 years of 65

15
Infants (lt3yo)
  • Surgery?intensive chemotherapy is primary
    treatment
  • Radiotherapy reserved for salvage therapy
  • Worse prognosis
  • Lower rate of complete resection
  • Higher rates of leptomeningeal seeding at
    diagnosis

16
Cognitive Measurement
17
Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT)
  • Ability to
  • Read words
  • Comprehend sentences
  • Spell
  • Math calculations

18
Weschler Intelligence Scale
  • Full Scale IQ
  • Indices
  • Verbal Comprehension (vocab, comprehension)
  • Perceptual Reasoning (block design, picture
    concepts)
  • Processing Speed (timed coding activities)
  • Working Memory (repeating codes, sequences)

19
DSM-IV Criteria based on IQ Scores
  • 50-55 to 70 Mild Mental Retardation
  • 35-40 to 50-55 Moderate Mental Retardation
  • 20-25 to 35-40 Severe Mental Retardation
  • 20-25 and below Profound Mental Retardation

20
Mulhern(1998)- Neuropsychologic functioning of
survivors of childhood medulloblastoma
  • POG 8631/CCG923
  • Treatment of average risk medulloblastomas
  • Hypothesis
  • Children treated with lower initial radiation
    levels would experience less intellectual
    toxicity than those receiving higher levels
  • Also younger subjects suspected to have poorer
    outcome
  • Mulhern RK, Kepner JL, Thomas PR, et al
    Neuropsychologic functioning of survivors of
    childhood medulloblastoma randomized to receive
    conventional
  • or reduced-dose craniospinal irradiation A
    Pediatric Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol
    161723-1728, 1998

21
Mulhern et al (1998)
  • Randomized to 36Gy or 23.4Gy craniospinal
    radiation
  • Both groups receiving boost to 54 Gy to posterior
    fossa
  • Patients received baseline testing
  • Surviving patients in 1996 with no progressive
    disease were eligible for study

22
Groupings
  • Young (Y) Age lt 9 years
  • Old (O) Age gt 9 years
  • Standard dose radiation (SRT) 36 Gy
  • Reduced Dose (RRT) 23.4 Gy
  • Predicted trend of scores
  • Y/SRT lt Y/RRT lt O/SRT lt O/RRT

23
Subjects
  • Of 35 eligible participants, only 22 patients
    completed follow up testing
  • Wechsler Scales of Intelligence
  • Wide Range Achievement Test III
  • Age 4.1-19.0 years (median 8.85)
  • 13 treated with SRT, 9 treated w/ RRT

24
Mulhern et al (1998)
25
Mulhern et al (1998)
26
Mulhern et al (1998)
27
Mulhern et al (1998)
28
Mulhern et al (1998)
29
Conclusions
  • Predicted ordering of distributions was seen for
    Performance IQ, Full Scale and Attention Index
  • Unable to confirm significant differences in IQ
    change as a function of age or dose
  • Distribution of scores was in the ordered
    direction for Reading and Arithmetic
  • 12/22 subjects were receiving or had received
    special educations services with similar
    proportions in each treatment group

30
Limitations
  • Small numbers, low power, dichtomization of
    continuous variables
  • No longitudinal analysis

31
Studies of Neurocognitive Decline
32
Question
  • What is the pattern of neurocognitive loss?
  • Loss vs. lack of gain vs. both?

33
Palmer et al. ( 2001 )- Patterns of Intellectual
Development Among Survivors of Pediatric
Medulloblastoma A Longitudinal Analysis
  • Children could lose previously acquired
    information and skills, similar to adult dementia
    conditions
  • OR
  • Children could continue to acquire new
    information and skills but at a slower rate than
    healthy age-related peers

Palmer et al. ( Patterns of Intellectual
Development Among Survivors of Pediatric
Medulloblastoma A Longitudinal AnalysisJournal
of Clinical Oncology, Vol 19, No 8 (April 15),
2001 pp 2302-2308
34
Palmer et. al (2001)
  • 44 Patients
  • Histologically confirmed MB before age 17
  • More than 1 psychological follow up with testing
  • No evidence of progressive disease
  • CSI Dosages
  • 33 treated with 35.2-38.4
  • 7 treated with 23.4-25Gy
  • 4 treated with gt40Gy
  • All received posterior fossa boost 49.2-55.8

35
Palmer et. al (2001)
  • Median 3 examinations per patient
  • Age Range at treatment 1.73-12.88 (mean 7.84)
  • Years since XRT 1.9-12.6 (mean 5.2)

36
Palmer et. al (2001)
37
Palmer et. al (2001)
38
Palmer et. al (2001)
39
Palmer et. al (2001)
40
Palmer et. al (2001)
41
Conclusion of Palmer Paper
  • Declining pattern of functioning over time since
    completion of XRT
  • Patients continue to acquire new knowledge but at
    a fraction of the rate
  • Age at XRT ( lt8.02 vs gt8.02) was an effect
    modifier
  • CSI dose (lt35.2 vs gt36.0) were significantly
    different in their effects on IQ

42
As technology changes, can we develop better
predictive models for cognitive decline?
43
Merchant et al. (2006) Modelling Radiation
Dosimetry to Predict Cognitive Outcomes
  • Some studies had shown no difference in cognitive
    decline when comparing doses
  • Conventional boost treatments to the entire
    posterior fossa?40 of the entire brain receiving
    prescribed dose of 54-55.8 Gy (Mulhern et al
    2004)
  • In an effort to reduce radiation dose and volume,
    attention now focuses on the manner in which the
    primary site is treated

Merchant et al. Modeling Radiation dosimetry to
predict cognitive outcomes in pediatric patients
with CNS embryonal tumors including
medulloblastoma. Int. J. Radiation Oncology bio.
Phys. Vol 65, No 1, pp 210-221, 2006
44
Volume, not just dose
  • SJMB96 trial- Patients treated with 23.4 Gy CSI
    with conformal posterior fossa radiation to 36 Gy
    and conformal primary site radiation to 55.8 Gy
    had IQ decline of 2.4 points per year
  • Similar patients treated with 23.4 Gy CSI and
    conventional posterior fossa radiation to 55.8 Gy
    had decline of 5.2 IQ points per year

45
Merchant et al. (2006)
  • Goal Model the effects of the entire
    distribution of dose to specific volumes of brain
    on longitudinal IQ after radiation therapy

46
Patients
  • 39 patients, newly diagnosed embryonal tumors
  • 14 average risk (lt1.5cm2 residual, M0)
  • 25 high risk

47
Treatment
  • Avg Risk 23.4 Gy CSI, conformal posterior fossa
    boost to 36Gy and conformal primary-site boost to
    55.8Gy
  • High Risk 36-39.6 Gy CSI with conformal
    primary-site boost to 55.8 Gy.

48
Testing
  • Neurocognitive testing performed at
  • Post surgery
  • 1 year
  • 2 years
  • 5 years

49
Dosimetry
  • Composite Radiation Dosimetry
  • Merged 3D CSI dosimetry with 3D Primary site
    dosimetry
  • Normal volume contours made for
  • Total (entire) brain
  • Supratentorial brain
  • Infratentorial brain
  • Temporal lobes
  • Dose volume data then extracted

50
Statistical Analysis
  • Linear Mixed Model with Random Coefficients
  • IQ dependent variable
  • Distribution of dose divided into intervals
  • Covariates
  • Fractional volume receiving dose over specified
    interval
  • Age, extent of disease, risk classification

51
Part 1
  • Determine effect of dose-volume distribution on
    the change in IQ score over 5 different volumes
    of brain tissue
  • Total Brain
  • Supratentorial Brain
  • Infratentorial Brain
  • Temporal lobes (right and left)

52
Example Total Brain
age years time months
53
Total Brain Volume
Supratentorial
Infratentorial
54
Left Temporal Lobe
Right Temporal Lobe
55
Mean Dose
56
Supratentorial model application
57
Conclusions of Merchant et al.
  • Prediction of outcomes on basis of CSI dose alone
    will lose relevance over time
  • Theyre approach is but one, requiring further
    validation
  • Limitations
  • Assumption of linearity
  • Limited follow up
  • Inability to account for other factors that might
    affect patient outcome

58
So what can we do?
59
Cognitive Remediation
  • Luria-the brain is not a static organ and
    functional reorganization of neuro pathways can
    occur after a CNS insult
  • NIH consensus statement in 1998 supports use of
    cognitive rehabilitation
  • Educational intervention has been shown to be
    effective in addressing academic delays in
    children treated with cranial radiation for ALL

Anderson VA et. Al. Cognitive and academic
outcome following cranial irradiation and
chemotherapy in children A longitudinal study.
Br J Cancer 82255-262
60
Ecological
  • Importance of educating patients, caretakers,
    PCPs and teachers
  • Classroom accommodations
  • Impact of childs disease on the family

61
Pharmacotherapy
  • Mulhern et al. (2004) study of 83 ALL and BT
    survivors
  • Methylphenidate
  • Double blind, 3 week home crossover study
  • Placebo vs. 0.3mg/kg vs. 0.6mg/kg
  • Compared to placebo, parents and teachers
    reported attentional and social improvements
  • Ultimate effect on academic achievement?

Mulhern RK et al. Short-term efficacy of
methylphenidate a randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled trial among survivors of
childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Dec
122(23)4795-803
62
Conclusions
  • Clear association between radiation therapy and
    cognitive decline
  • Decline appears to be progressive
  • Continued research with larger sample sizes and
    validation of predictive models
  • Important point to address initially and during
    follow up

63
Thanks!
64
Additional Slides
65
Palmer et al
66
Palmer et al
67
Ris et al. (2001) Intellectual Outcome After
Reduced-Dose Radiation Therapy Plus Adjuvant
Chemotherapy for Medulloblastoma A Childrens
Cancer Group Study
Ris et al. (2001) Intellectual Outcome After
Reduced-Dose Radiation Therapy Plus Adjuvant
Chemotherapy for Medulloblastoma A Childrens
Cancer Group Study. J Clin Oncol 193470-3476.
68
  • Recently, treatment protocols have been developed
    to reduce this morbidity. This can be
    accomplished by simply decreasing the overall
    dose of RT to the brain or by combining such
    reductions in RT dose with adjuvant chemotherapy.
    Such approaches have shown promise in producing
    survival and tumor recurrence rates comparable to
    those of conventional therapy
  • Deutsch M, Thomas PR, Krischer J, et al Results
    of a prospective randomized trial comparing
    standard dose neuraxis irradiation (3600 cGy/20)
    with reduced neuraxis irradiation (2340 cGy/13)
    in patients with low-stage medulloblastoma A
    combined Childrens Cancer Group-Pediatric
    Oncology Group Study. Pediatr Neurosurg
    24167-177, 1996
  • Bailey CC, Gnekow A, Wellek S Prospective
    randomised trial of chemotherapy given before
    radiotherapy in childhood medulloblastoma
    International Society of Paediatric Oncology
    (SIOP) and the (German) Society of Paediatric
    Oncology (GPO)SIOP II. Med Pediatr Oncol
    25166-178, 1995

69
Script your long term side effect discussion for
  • 7 year old boy, newly diagnosed medulloblastoma

70
Script your long term side effect discussion for
  • 7 year old boy, newly diagnosed medulloblastoma
  • 65 year old woman, newly diagnosed CNS lymphoma

71
Pharmacotherapy
  • Meyers et al.- 30 patients with malignant gliomas
    exhibiting neurobehavioral slowing
  • All patients met the DSM IV criteria for
    personality change secondary to medical condition
  • 5 mg of MPH BID and titrated up by 10mg every 2
    weeks
  • Dramatic improvement in psychomotor speed, memory
    , executive functioning, mood and ADLs were seen
    even in with progressive disease.

Meyers CA, Weitzner MA, Valentine AD, Levin VA.
Methylphenidate therapy improves cognition, mood,
and function of brain tumor patients. J Clin
Oncol. 1998 Jul16(7)2522-7.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com