Biology 2900 Principles of Evolution and Systematics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 77
About This Presentation
Title:

Biology 2900 Principles of Evolution and Systematics

Description:

Black-bellied seed cracker (African finch): survival to adulthood. Beak size polymorphism ... Darwin & Natural selection (Galapagos Finches ) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 78
Provided by: david146
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Biology 2900 Principles of Evolution and Systematics


1
Biology 2900Principles of Evolutionand
Systematics
  • Dr. David Innes
  • Dr. Ted Miller
  • Jennifer Gosse
  • Valerie Power

2
Announcements
  • Lab 2 (Group 2) handout ? print from course web
    page
  • Do the population genetics review
    before Lab.
  • Readings for Lab. 2 (Futuyma)
  • HWE Ch 9
    (pp. 190 - 197)
  • Genetic Drift Ch 10 (pp.
    226 231)
  • Selection Ch 12
    (pp. 273 282)
  • Gene Flow Ch 12 (pp.
    278 280)
  • http//www.mun.ca/biology/dinnes/B2900/B2900.html
  • Midterm Test Thursday Feb. 15

3
Announcements
  • Lab 3 (Group 1) handout ? print from course web
    page
  • http//www.mun.ca/biology/dinnes/B2900/B2900.html
  • Midterm Test Thursday Feb. 15

4
Evolution in the News
Science 2 February 2007Vol. 315. no. 5812, p.
597 Letters Darwin Not the First to Sketch a
Tree Charles Darwin's 1868 notebook sketch as
"the first known sketch of an evolutionary tree."
This is mistaken. Nearly 60 years earlier, in
1809, Jean Baptiste Lamarck presented an
evolutionary tree of the animals in Philosophie
Zoologique
Darwin 1868
Lamarck 1809
5
Biology 2900Principles of Evolution and
Systematics
  • Topics
  • - the fact of evolution
  • - natural selection
  • - population genetics
  • - natural selection and adaptation
  • - speciation, systematics and
  • phylogeny
  • - the history of life

6
Hardy-Weinberg TheoremChapter 9
  • Null model
  • Allele and genotype frequencies will not change
    across generations (equilibrium)
  • Assuming - random mating
  • - large population size
  • - no selection
  • - no migration
  • - no mutation

7
Hardy-Weinberg
p2 2pq q2 AA Aa aa
  • Relax Assumptions
  • ? - Mutation
  • ? - Migration
  • ? - Non-random mating
  • ? - Finite population size
  • ? - Selection - differential survival,
  • fecundity etc. among genotypes

8
Genetic Variation
  • Loss of genetic variation
  • - random genetic drift
  • - inbreeding
  • - migration
  • - directional selection
  • How can genetic variation be maintained ?

9
Maintenance of Genetic Variation
  • Balance of gain and loss of alleles
  • Ö - balance of forward and reverse mutation
  • Ö - selection - mutation balance
  • Ö - selection - migration balance
  • - heterozygote advantage
  • - frequency-dependent selection

10
Heterozygote Advantage
  • Directional selection - one allele or other fixed
  • Selection favours heterozygotes (heterosis

  • overdominance)
  • A1A2 maintains both alleles
  • A1A2 X A1A2 1A1A1 2 A1A2
    1A2A2

11
Selection FavouringHeterozygotes
  • Genotype A1A1 A1A2
    A2A2
  • p2 2pq
    q2
  • Fitness(w) w11 w12
    w22
  • 1 - s 1
    1 - t
  • w12 gt w11, w22 if s gt 0 and
    t gt 0

12
Selection FavouringHeterozygotes
  • Equilibrium
  • q
    p
  • if t 0 q 1.0 (A2
    dominant)
  • if s 0 q 0.0 (A1
    dominant)

t
s
v
v
s t
s t
v
v
13
Selection FavouringHeterozygotes
  • Example
  • t 0.80
  • s 0.90
  • Fitness

w11 w12 w22 1 - .90
1 1 - .80 0.10
1 0.20
14
v
w11 w12 w22 1 - .90
1 1 - .80
q 0.33
v
p .66
15
stable equilibrium

-
p
16
PopulationMean Fitness ( w )
  • w p2 w11 2pq w12 q2
    w22

A1A1 1.0
Directional Selection
17
Heterozygote advantage
p .66
18
, 0, -
gt 0
p
19
Selection FavouringHeterozygotes
  • Sickle-cell anemia
  • hemoglobin gene w
  • AA normal 0.9
  • AS some sickle 1.0
  • SS sickle 0.2
  • favoured in the
  • presence of malaria

20
Sickle-cell allele frequency
Malaria Zone
21
Selection FavouringHeterozygotes
  • Further information
  • http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OverdominanceHeteroz
    ygote_advantage_and_sickle-cell_anemia

22
Frequency-DependentSelection
  • Fitness of a genotype constant (w11 w12 w22)
  • Genotype may have different fitness depending on
    the environment (food, pop density etc.)
  • Genotype x Environment Interaction
  • including the frequency of other genotypes

23
Frequency-DependentSelection
  • Polymorphism 2 or more types

Predator search image selects most
common (protects rare form)
24
Rare morph protected
in population
25
Frequency-DependentSelection
  • Cepaea snail shell-colour polymorphism and
    predation by thrushes
  • - frequency in
    population
  • - frequency taken

Lab. 1
Variation maintained by crypsis
frequency-dependent selection
26
Aquatic bug and fish predator
Increased mortality when common
Decreased mortality when rare
27
Maintenance of Genetic Variation
  • Balance of gain and loss of alleles
  • balance of forward and reverse mutation
  • selection - mutation balance
  • selection - migration balance
  • heterozygote advantage
  • frequency-dependent selection

Ö
Ö
Ö
Balancing Selection
Ö
Ö
28
Population Genetics Summary
  • Synthesis of Mendelian genetics and Darwinian
    evolution
  • Hardy-Weinberg Null model
  • Genetic variation is present in natural
    populations
  • Maintenance of genetic variation a dynamic
    process

Is natural selection the only mechanism of
evolution ?
29
Natural Selection(Revisited)
  • 1. Phenotypic Variation
  • 2. Variation heritable
  • 3. Individuals vary in their success at
    surviving or reproducing
  • 4. Survival and reproduction not random (fitness
    differences)

30
Phenotypic Variation
  • Population genetics theory
  • Single-gene polymorphisms
  • AA, Aa, aa allele freq. p
    q
  • Phenotype classes discrete
  • Genotype Phenotype
  • little influence of the environment

31
Phenotypic Variation
Most traits controlled by many loci Phenotype
Genotype Environment Continuous
variation Selection acts on the whole phenotype

32
Continuous phenotypic variation
33
Quantitative Genetics(Chapter 13 299 300, 304
308)
Estimates heritable variation VP
VG VE H2
(Heritability)

VG
VG
VP
VG VE
34
Estimating Heritability
Control environment Compare individuals
with known genetic relationship
Parents - offspring (
Galapagos Finch Example)

35
Narrow- SenseHeritability h2 or hN2
VG VA VD VA additive genetic
variation VD dominance genetic variation h2

VA
VA
VP
VA VD VE
36
Additive Genetic Variance
  • Can be used to predict the response to selection.
    Why ?
  • Closer correlation between phenotype and genotype.

37
1
0
0.5
h2
Common environment ?
38
Heritability (h2)
h2 predicts response to selection
R h2 S R response
S selection differential

Selected group
S 1.6 SD units S 2.8 SD units
(50 ) (20 )
39
Response to Selection
R h2 S S selection
differential Xs - Xpop R response t
generation Xt1 - Xt

40
Response to Selection
Fig. 13.8 A
R h2 S
41
Response to Selection
Fig. 13.8 A, B, C
High h2 Higher S Higher R
Low h2 Low R
High h2 High R
42
Selection
Artificial Selection

Natural Selection
43
Selection Relaxed
Drosophila abdominal bristle number
Fig. 13.10
44
Fig. 13.9 Artificial selection domestic breed of
pigeons
45
Modes of Selection
  • Mean Variance
  • Directional , - -
  • Stabilizing 0 -
  • Disruptive 0

46
Modes of Selection
Fig. 12.1A
Favoured individuals
47
Stabilizing Selection
Fig. 13.13 Gall-making Fly in goldenrod plant
Predation
Parasitism
Gall diameter
48
Fig. 13.12 Stabilizing Selection for birth weight
49
Disruptive Selection
Black-bellied seed cracker (African finch)
survival to adulthood Beak size polymorphism
50
G x E interaction
  • The phenotype that a genotype expresses can be
    modified by the environment
  • Reaction Norm of a genotype is the set of
    phenotypes expressed in different environments

51
Experiment
  • Perennial wildflower
  • Achillea millefolium
  • (Yarrow)
  • Clausen, Keck and Hiesey (1948)

52
Experiment
  • cuttings from seven plants (genotypes)
  • transplanted same genotype to two environments
  • (Mather mountain Stanford coastal)
  • elevation high low
  • Common Garden Experiment
  • Results?

53
  • Common environment, variation within each site
    genetic
  • Stanford plants taller (avg)
  • Height of each plant a function of both genotype
    and environment

Note ranking of genotype for height differs
between the two sites (G x E)
54
Genotype x Environment Interaction
Fig. 13.19
No G x E
55
Summary
  • Most traits involve many loci
  • Quantitative genetics can be used to
    analyze evolution
  • in these traits
  • Evolutionary response can be predicted
  • ( knowing h2 and strength of selection)
  • Different patterns of selection
  • Importance of the environment

56
Principles of Evolution and Systematics
  • Darwin Natural selection (Galapagos Finches )
  • Population Quantitative genetics (Genes in
    populations)
  • Natural selection Adaptation (Form and
    function

  • Sexual
    selection)
  • Adaptation and Diversity
  • (part I part II)

57
Studies in Evolution
  • Methods of Evolutionary Analysis
  • Adaptation (Form and Function)
  • Sex and Sexual Selection
  • Life-history evolution
  • (Kin Selection and Social Behavior, Ch. 14)

58
Kin Selection and Social Behaviour
  • Evolution of
  • - Cooperation (social animals)
  • - Altruism (alarm calling)
  • Actor benefits
    Actor harmed
  • Recipient benefits Cooperation Altruism
  • Recipient harmed ?
    ?

59
Kin Selection and Social Behaviour
  • (W.D. Hamilton, Robert Trivers,
  • Richard Dawkins)
  • Kin Selection
  • Inclusive Fitness direct fitness indirect
    fitness
  • (personal)
    (relatives)

60
Kin Selection and Social Behaviour
  • Allele for altruistic behaviour will spread if
  • B r C gt 0
  • B benefit to recipient
  • r relationship between actor and recipient
  • C cost to actor
  • (B C units of surviving
    offspring)
  • JBS Haldane said that he would
    cheerfully
  • sacrifice his life for two
    brothers or eight cousins

61
Calculating Relationship (r)
sibs
62
Kin Selection
B 10
1.25
63
Kin Selection and Social Behaviour
  • Evolution of social behaviour
  • - game theory
  • - reciprocal altruism
  • Evolutionary explanation for
  • - helping behaviour
  • - alarm calls

Beldings ground squirrel
64
Kin Selection and Social Behaviour
  • Research Areas
  • kin recognition (MHC- major histocompatibility
    complex)
  • eusociality (ants, bees etc.)
  • - overlap between parent offspring
  • - cooperative brood care
  • - specialized non-reproductives
    (workers)

65
Kin Selection and Social Behaviour
  • Eusociality Evolution of non-reproductives ?
  • Sex determination Haplodiploidy

  • females ? diploid
  • males
    ? haploid
  • Coefficient of Relationship
  • among sisters 3/4 gt female
    and offspring 1/2
  • Therefore, invest in the
    production of sisters by being workers and not
    reproducing themselves

AB x C ½ AC ½ BC
66
(½ x ½ ) ( ½ x 1)
67
Kin Selection and Social Behaviour
  • Parent offspring conflict maximizing fitness
  • Parent?invest in all offspring equally
  • Offspring? attempt to receive more than
  • siblings

68
Kin Selection and Social Behaviour
  • Reciprocal Altruism (unrelated individuals)
  • Conditions
  • - cost to actor lt benefit to recipient
  • - recipient that fails to reciprocate
    punished
  • (Difficult to study)
  • Example blood-sharing in vampire bats ?

69
Methods of Evolutionary Analysis
  • Ask interesting questions
  • Answer with
  • Observations from nature
  • Controlled Experiments
  • - laboratory
  • - nature

70
Adaptations
  • Adaptation a trait, or suite of traits, that
    increases the fitness of its possessor
  • Evolutionary Biology demonstrate the evolution
    of adaptation through natural selection

71
Adaptations
  • Adaptive significance of some traits obvious
  • Other traits less obvious
  • (understanding the adaptive significance
  • requires more effort)
  • No adaptive explanation should be accepted
    because it is plausible and charming

72
Testing Hypotheses for Adaptations
  • Evolution of long necks in giraffes
  • 1. Giraffe ancestors competed for access to food
  • 2. Giraffes with the longer neck got more food
  • and consequently produced more offspring
  • Hypothesis to be tested

73
Foraging Competition Hypothesis
  • Prediction
  • When food is scare, giraffes should forage
    above the reach of their competitors
  • What is observed ?

74
Giraffes Long Neck
Fig. 9.2
Prefer to Forage at shoulder height
75
Alternative Hypothesis (1996)
  • Observation
  • Bulls fight using necks and heads as clubs
  • Alternative hypothesis
  • Neck evolved as a weapon in male-male
    competition for mates
  • (Sexual Selection)

76
Alternative Hypothesis
  • Observations consistent with hypothesis
  • 1. Male necks longer than females
  • 2. Males have heavier heads with more armor
  • 3. Social interaction
  • - dominant males have longer necks
  • and heavier heads
  • - females choose males with longer
    necks

77
Adaptations
  • Moral of the story
  • Alternative explanations must be
    considered
  • Also, - differences not always adaptive
  • - not every trait an adaptation
  • - not every adaptation is perfect
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com