Listening to Students: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Listening to Students:

Description:

In twos or threes briefly identify what you think are the ... Discrimination Draft Bill ... prove to be a Trojan horse and in a decade, the learning ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: gravest
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Listening to Students:


1
Listening to Students The Experiences of
Disabled GEES Students of Learning in HE
Mick Healey and Tim Hall University of
Gloucestershire mhealey_at_glos.ac.uk
2
Exercise 1
In twos or threes briefly identify what you
think are the main barriers and opportunities
that disabled students face in learning and being
assessed in geography, earth and environmental
sciences? 3 mins
3
Introduction
  • Disabled students face both barriers and
    opportunities in their learning in HE
  • Despite the growth of interest in the topic, the
    voice of the disabled students themselves has
    hardly been heard, beyond the anecdotal
  • Will examine GEES subjects in six universities in
    England

4
The Nature of Disability
a physical or mental impairment which has a
substantial and long-term adverse effect on his
or her ability to carry out normal day-to-day
activities Disability and Discrimination Act
(1995) 4.8 of undergraduates (21,900) in the UK
self-assessed themselves as having a disability
in 2001/02 The actual proportion may be closer
to 10
5
The Nature of Disability
Self-assessed disabilities by UK
undergraduates 2001/02 Dyslexia 37.6Unseen
disabilities (e.g. epilepsy, diabetes,
asthma) 23.5 Multiple disabilities 7.1 Deaf/Hearin
g impairment 6.4 Wheel-chair user/Mobility
difficulties 4.8 Mental health difficulties 4.2Bl
ind/partially sighted 3.5 Personal care
support 0.3 Other disabilities 12.6 Source
HESA (2003)
6
Context
  • Improved Opportunities
  • Quality Assurance Agency Code of Practice 3
  • Disability Discrimination Act (1995)
  • Human Rights Act (1998)
  • Special Education Needs and Disability Act (2001)
  • Become DDA (1995) Part 4
  • Disability Discrimination Allowance
  • Disability Discrimination Draft Bill

7
Context
  • Hurst (1996) pointed out that the lived
    experience of disabled students has been missing
    from previous studies
  • Despite the publication in the last two years of
    a number of guides to support higher education
    staff teaching disabled students (Doyle Robson,
    2002 Gravestock Healey, 2001 Teachability,
    2000), there are few studies which have responded
    to Hurst's call

8
Aim and Method
  • Aim
  • To identify and evaluate disabled students'
    experience of teaching, learning and assessment
  • Method
  • Questionnaire survey of all GEES students in six
    universities (Gloucestershire, Lancaster,
    Liverpool John Moores, Middlesex, Oxford Brookes,
    Plymouth) self-declared as having a disability
  • 80 completed questionnaires, a response of 32
    from GEES universities (2003)

9
Main Findings
  • Findings from questionnaire 
  • 14 chose the institution in the light of their
    disability
  • 15 chose field of study in the light of their
    disability

10
Barriers Related to Modes of Teaching
   
Disability-related barriers Lectures
54 Laboratories / practicals 25 Other on
campus classes 29 Fieldwork
residential 19 Fieldwork non-residential 19
Fieldwork Independent 43 Using IT
facilities 17
 
11
Barriers Related to Modes of Teaching
   
  • Look at the responses from the GEES students
    about the disability-related barriers that they
    have impacted on their learning in
  • Lectures (Box 3)
  • Independent fieldwork (e.g. associated with
    dissertation) (Box 11)
  • What conclusions do you draw from their
    responses?

 
12
Barriers Related to Modes of Assessment
   
Disability-related barriers Written
examinations 62 Coursework 63 Oral
presentations 37
 
13
Barriers Related to Modes of Teaching
   
Look at the responses from the GEES students
about the disability-related barriers which have
affected their experience of different types of
assessment (Box 12). What conclusions do you
draw from their responses?
 
14
Summary and Conclusions
  • First survey of experience of GEES disabled
    students in HE
  • Emphasised barriers they face, there are also
    many examples of good practice
  • With slight exception of lectures, over 50
    disabled students and often as many as 75 have
    NOT experienced any disability-related barriers
    with teaching and learning
  • However, up to two-thirds of GEES students
    identified barriers with different forms of
    assessment

15
Summary and Conclusions
  • Although the survey found that in many cases the
    minority of disabled students faced barriers in
    teaching, learning and assessment, for those who
    did face these barriers, they were serious in
    their impact
  • These findings suggest that using a general
    category entitled disabled students is
    problematic and devising general policies to
    support their teaching, learning and assessment
    may not always meet the specific needs of
    individuals
  • This emphasises the importance of individual
    discussion with disabled students, rather than
    assuming one solution fits all

16
Summary and Conclusions
  • It is invidious to treat disabled students as a
    separate category rather they fall along a
    continuum of learner differences and they share
    the same challenges and difficulties that face
    all students in higher education
  • Arguably in the long run the main beneficiaries
    of disability legislation and the need to make
    suitable adjustments in advance are the
    non-disabled students, because many of the
    adjustments, such as well prepared handouts,
    instructions given in writing as well as
    verbally, notes put on-line, and variety and
    flexibility in forms of assessment, are simply
    good teaching and learning practices which
    benefit all students

17
Summary and Conclusions
One unintended consequence of this (disability)
legislation is that as departments and
institutions introduce more flexible learning and
alternative ways of assessment for disabled
students, demand is likely to rise for giving
greater flexibility for all students. Disability
legislation may prove to be a Trojan horse and in
a decade, the learning experiences of all
students may be the subject of greater
negotiation. Healey (2003, 26)
18
Summary and Conclusions
Have enjoyed course SO MUCH - very diverse
modules. Just finishing now. Want to do Masters
(urban regeneration) but can't afford to. After
years of isolation / boredom / loneliness, felt
like I came back to life. Sad because my
intelligence/education / skills wasted. I
sometimes try for jobs but overqualified / under
experienced. My disabilities do not tidily fit
into a box - plus very personal (some of them).
What I am is wasted. Shame. Try to ignore/keep
busy. (Complex, multiple disability)
19
Summary and Conclusions
Paper on which this talk is based is
available GDN Web site www.glos.ac.uk/gdn
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com