Van Scoyoc Associates, Inc' - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Van Scoyoc Associates, Inc'

Description:

... agencies in the Bush Administration's American Competitiveness ... Example: Drill Baby, Drill....! You identify subject of research i.e., materials. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: peterw53
Category:
Tags: associates | inc | scoyoc | van

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Van Scoyoc Associates, Inc'


1
Van Scoyoc Associates, Inc.
Federal Funding Workshop Presented by Kevin
Kelly, Van Scoyoc Associates November 13, 2008
WWW.VSADC.COM CONTACT KEVIN KELLY
202.638.1950
2
Federally Sponsored Research in the Current
Fiscal Climate
3
Budget Challenges Ahead
Federal Research Funding Flat in 2009
  • As the federal government enters FY 2009 with an
    RD portfolio of 147.3 billion, an increase of
    2.9 billion or 2 due entirely to a large
    increase for DOD's RD.
  • Defense RD gains strongly with a 3.6 or 3
    billion boost to 86.1 billion in 2009, nearly
    all of which is final.
  • However the flat-funding formula of the CR
    results in a 61.2 billion total for nondefense
    RD at the start of FY 2009, a cut of 0.1
    compared to 2008.

4
Budget Challenges Ahead (continued)
  • Taking out development investments, the federal
    investment in basic and applied research totals
    58.2 billion at the start of FY 2009, a small
    244 million or 0.4 percent increase due to large
    research increases in the finalized DOD, DHS, and
    VA budgets.
  • After adjusting for inflation, the federal
    investment in research could decline for the
    fifth year in a row in 2009 if the CR's funding
    levels hold for the entire year.
  • The flat funding levels of the CR put requested
    increases for the three agencies in the Bush
    Administration's American Competitiveness
    Initiative (ACI) on hold.

5
Budget Challenges Ahead
  • Four science agencies that received additional
    2008 funding in a June supplemental start FY 2009
    at a reduced funding level.
  • The National Institutes of Health (NIH) received
    150 million in June, but without those funds in
    the 2008 base NIH begins 2009 with a budget of
    29.5B in the CR, down 150M or 0.5.
  • DOEs Office of Science loses 63M in 2008
    supplementals in the 2009 CR, for a 1.7 cut to
    3.6B for its RD portfolio.
  • NSF begins FY 2009 under the CR with 4.5B in RD
    funding, down 23M or 0.5.
  • NASA sees its RD funding fall 63M or 0.5 to
    12.2B.

6
Follow the Money
7
Follow the money
  • Development funding gains in 2009, increasing
    2.7 billion or 3.3 to 84.6B. 80 of all
    federal development goes to DOD for weapons
    systems development.
  • Defense RD currently makes up nearly 59 of the
    federal RD portfolio under the CR, since large
    DOD increases become final while most nondefense
    programs are flat funded.
  • Overall nondefense RD would decline slightly
    under the CR by 0.1 percent to 61.2 billion and
    among the nondefense missions only agriculture
    RD would show a slight uptick (up 2.6) because
    new mandatory agricultural research funds become
    available in FY 2009.

8
Follow the Money
9
Follow the Money
10
Follow the Money
11
Follow the Money
12
Who gets the Federal RD dollars?
13
Impact of an Obama Administration
  • President Obama in early 2009 will face a more
    difficult fiscal climate.
  • The financial sector rescue package will be in
    full force by early next year, with hundreds of
    billions of dollars flowing out of the U.S.
    Treasury.
  • The projected budget deficit in FY 2009 will
    almost certainly climb over the next few months,
    putting pressure on Congress President Obama to
    scale back government spending.
  • Congress may hold to their attempts to add 21
    billion to the request for domestic
    appropriations, but there is also a strong chance
    they will scale back spending when finalizing the
    remaining appropriations bills.
  • Congress supports increases for American
    Competitiveness Initiative programs and funding
    well above requested levels for biomedical
    research, environmental, and energy RD, the
    later the appropriations process goes the more
    likely it is that lawmakers will abandon or scale
    back these increases.

14
How Do Universities Grow Their Federal Research
15
Needs Assessment
  • What investments does Arkansas need to go from
    good-to-great in selected areas of research
    emphasis?
  • The University Foundation -- human and physical
    infrastructure
  • People
  • Facilities
  • Equipment
  • What is our triage intervention that creates a
    critical path to greatness.

16
How faculty can improve reach and effectiveness
  • Develop and sustain relationships with key civil
    servants at federal RD agencies by volunteering
    to serve on
  • Review panels for awards
  • Advisory Commissions or Boards
  • System whereby someone is designated to monitor
    all relevant federal RD websites that announce
    funding opportunities
  • Do an inventory of contacts your researchers may
    already have at certain agencies, past or present.

17
Setting Priorities
  • Strategic objectives
  • Assess each proposed initiative for its research
    proficiency is it
  • World Class/One-of-a-kind?
  • Competitive?
  • Emerging?
  • Identify and support the stars on the faculty
  • Most research universities rely on their top 10
  • Faculty with competitive federal funding track
    record.

18
Create a Narrow Class of Competition
  • The HBCU Research University Science Technology
    (THRUST) Initiative
  • Provided 10M to establish an initiative that
    will stimulate the competitive research and
    development capacity of the ten historically
    black colleges and universities that provide
    doctoral degrees in science-related fields.
  • Airborne Particulate Matter Research
  • Congress create a 8 million program within the
    Environmental Protection Agency for extramural,
    university based research grants on air
    particulate matter for as many as five university
    based centers on PM research.

19
Federal Research Opportunities Whats Hot and
Whats Not
20
FY09 Budget Overview
  • Physical sciences again enjoy top priority,
    biomedical research budget stays flat
  • Major increases to 3 American Competitiveness
    Initiative agencies only (NSF, NIST DOE)
  • Goal is to double these agencies budgets during
    2006 2016 time frame
  • Non ACI agencies with decent increases are DOD
    and NASA
  • Homeland Security RD also sees major increase to
    5.5 billion (10.2 increase)
  • 95 of federal RD funding is handled in just 4
    of the annual appropriations bills (C/J/S, DOD,
    EW and Labor/HHS/Education).

21
Areas of Emphasis
  • The Federal Government and its RD mission
    agencies constantly shift priorities and areas of
    emphasis.
  • Currently, the Fab 5 are
  • Nanotechnology (National Nanotechnology
    Initiative)
  • Energy Research (renewable, clean energy)
  • Homeland Security (technologies)
  • Translational health research
  • Computing network security and resilience.

22
Energy
  • The Senate would dramatically boost funding for
    DOEs energy RD programs by 22 to 2.9B in 2009
    after enormous increases in 2007 and 2008.
  • Funding for most renewable energy RD portfolios,
    energy conservation technologies, and coal
    research would climb dramatically in the Senate
    plan.
  • In fossil fuels, coal RD would soar 31 to 644M
    despite the elimination of FutureGen funding,
    including a 25 boost to 149M for carbon
    sequestration research.
  • In renewables, funding for biomass, solar energy,
    wind energy, geothermal, and hydropower RD would
    climb dramatically.
  • The total DOE RD portfolio would soar 12.7 or
    1.2B to 11B in the Senate appropriation.

23
Previous Appropriations Trends
DOE RD Budget Trends
24
Social Behavioral Sciences
  • NSF funding 233 million (up 18 million, or 8.5
    percent) for the Social, Behavioral, and Economic
    Sciences (SBE) directorate lags because of the
    ACIs emphasis on physical sciences and
    engineering.
  • In FY 2009, SBE expects to make 1,277 competitive
    awards and 810 research grants. The average award
    size is estimated to be 117,810 per year and an
    average duration of 2.5 years.
  • Recent flat funding for NIH has kept behavioral
    and social science budgets stagnant.
  • Education research and data budget increases
    focus on assessment and state data systems.
  • A National Academies reports call for increases
    in social and behavioral research related to the
    military is not reflected in the FY 2009 budget.

25
Previous Appropriations Trends
NIH RD Budget Trends
26
NIH RD Budget Trends
27
Previous Appropriations Trends
NSF RD Budget Trends
28
Previous Appropriations Trends
Defense RD Budget Trends
29
Follow the Money
30
Areas of recent DOD RD Increased Investment (6.1
6.3)
  • Army RDTE
  • Command, Control, Communications Advanced
    Technologies
  • Electronic Warfare Advanced Technology
  • Combating Terrorism Technology Development
  • Advanced Tactical Computer Science and Sensor
    Technology.
  • Navy RDTE
  • Force Protection Applied Research
  • Mine Expeditionary Warfare Applied Research
  • Warfighter Sustainment Advanced Technology
  • Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Technology Development
  • Undersea Warfare Advanced Technology.

31
Areas of recent DOD RD Increased Investment (6.1
6.3)
  • Air Force RDTE
  • Materials
  • Aerospace Vehicle Technologies
  • Directed Energy Technologies
  • Aerospace Technology Development/Demonstration
  • Global Positioning System Extension Program.
  • Defense wide RDTE
  • Information Communications Technology
  • Cognitive Computing Systems
  • Tactical Technologies
  • Counterproliferation Initiatives
  • Chemical/Biological Defense Program
  • Joint Robotics/Autonomous Systems
  • Strategic Environmental Research Program.

32
DOD - Areas of Emphasis
  • Last week Department of Defense announced plans
    to invest an additional 400 million over the
    next five years to support basic research at
    academic institutions.
  • Projects will be based on numerous academic
    disciplines, including physics, ocean science,
    chemistry, electrical engineering, materials
    science, environmental engineering, mechanical
    engineering, information sciences, civil
    engineering, mathematics, chemical engineering,
    geosciences, atmospheric science, and
    aeronautical engineering.
  • Topics for the initial funding will focus on the
    following areas of technical challenge counter
    weapons of mass destruction (WMD), network
    sciences, energy and power management, quantum
    information sciences, human sciences, science of
    autonomy, information assurance, biosensors and
    bio-inspired systems, information fusion and
    decision science, and energy and power management.

33
Homeland Security
  • Congress has finalized an appropriations bill
    providing 1.1B in fiscal year (FY) 2009 for RD
    in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), a
    9.4 or 93M increase over 2008.
  • RD on radiological and nuclear countermeasures
    in the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO)
    would fall slightly with a 5 million or 1.9 cut
    to 269M, and chemical and biological
    countermeasures RD in the Science and Technology
    Directorate would also fall (down 3.7 to 200M).
  • Large increases for RD to support other DHS
    missions such as explosives, technology
    transitions, border and maritime security, and
    protecting infrastructure, and a dramatic 56
    increase for DHS laboratory facilities to 162M.
  • University Programs funding would gain slightly
    by 1M to 50M.
  • In addition, DHS will receive 2.2B in already
    appropriated funds for Project Bioshield to
    procure biodefense countermeasures from the
    private sector for the national stockpile.

34
Agriculture
  • The Senate would add 360 million to the budget
    request for RD in the U.S. Department of
    Agriculture (USDA) in 2009, for a total of 2.3
    billion, 1.7 percent less than 2008.
  • In June, Congress finally enacted a five-year
    farm bill, the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act
    of 2008 (Public Law 110-246) to reauthorize farm
    and nutrition programs from 2008 through 2012.
    The law creates several new mandatory
    agricultural research programs
  • Provides 88 million in research funding for
    2009, but the Senate appropriation would take
    back some of the mandatory funding to retain 16
    million for organics research,
  • 36 million for specialty crops research (fruits
    and vegetables), and
  • 20 million for bioenergy research, for a total
    of 72 million in research money taken out of the
    Commodity Credit Corporations (CCC) mandatory
    funding pool and given to CSREES to administer.
  • Specialty crops research gets a head start with
    30 million in research funding for 2008 that is
    already available.

35
Arts Humanities
  • Funding Overview
  • The Presidents FY09 budget request proposes flat
    funding for NEH at 144.4 million.
  • The Presidents FY09 budget request for NEA was
    128.4 million down from 144M in FY08.

36
Arts Humanities
  • NEH Research Grants
  • Fellowships and Stipends - awarded to
    individual scholars for full-time, advanced
    research in the humanities.
  • Collaborative Research - supports scholarly
    activities conducted by teams of researchers and
    fellowship programs administered by centers for
    advanced study in the humanities.
  • NEH Education Grants
  • Professional Development - supports Summer
    Seminars and Institutes for School and College
    Teachers, Landmarks of American History and
    Culture Workshops, and Faculty Humanities
    Workshops.
  • Teaching and Learning Resources - supports
    Curriculum and Materials Development grants and
    Humanities Initiatives for Faculty at
    Presidentially Designated Colleges and
    Universities.

37
Previous Appropriations Trends
NASA RD Budget Trends
38
Nanotech - NNI Funding Trends FY04 to FY08
39
Building a Battle (Action) Plan to Grow RD
Funding at Arkansas
40
Directed Funding
  • Mechanisms at the Congressional level
  • Hard earmarks
  • Depending on agency, can provide support for
    buildings, instruments or research (paying for
    faculty time to conduct research).
  • Create a narrow class of competition
  • Not earmarked to Arkansas specifically, but
    structured in such a way to make you prohibitive
    favorite to win awards.
  • Program level expansion
  • Plus up programs in which you are involved or
    could be involved (e.g. nano).

41
Competitive Funding
  • University of Arkansas should develop contact
    plans for each agency to undertake outreach
    marketing of your research skills
  • What are our capture targets for funding?
  • How much? Which Agencies? How long?
  • Whats our brand as University of Arkansas
    each college or department?
  • Is capturing federal funds a key criteria for
    awarding tenure?
  • Do we have a marketing pitch (or road show) to
    use on a day of visits to a specific agency?

42
Partners may be key to success
  • More bang for the buck if your delegation can
    fund joint University of Arkansas requests with
    other Arkansas partners
  • Outside University Partners
  • SURA
  • Industry Partners
  • Defense Energy technologies
  • Small businesses
  • Emerging companies in fields like nanotech,
    photonic devices, environmental science,
    advanced materials.

43
How we can help you be more competitive
  • Identify current and emerging competitive funding
    at RD agencies
  • Help devise and execute a focused contact plan at
    major RD agencies
  • Help secure meetings with key program executives
    at Federal mission agencies with a road show of
    University of Arkansas capabilities to improve
    your visibility
  • Use meetings both with Congress and Agencies to
    help tailor emerging competitive RD programs
    to Arkansas' strengths
  • Provide suggested partnerships with other
    institutions/entities (political and scientific).

44
Example Drill Baby, Drill.!
  • You identify subject of research i.e., materials.
  • Must have buy-in by multiple parties at the
    University.
  • VSA will drill down and review the various
    federal funding opportunities for that subject
    area.
  • Provide you the list and plan of action to secure
    that funding opportunity.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com