PRODML Project Status Report Iniative Review

1
PRODML Project Status ReportIniative Review

• Jerry Blaker
• May 17, 2006
• Houston

2
PRODML - Introduction

• What is PRODMLs scope?
• Who is building PRODML?
• How far along are we?
• www.prodml.org
• Pilots
• Final thoughts

3
PRODML Scope Statement

• Scope
• Select a part of the business for which a
  standard data exchange can be readily used.
• Limit the scope from an IT architecture
  perspective
• Document 2 usecases on how different application
  could be used together to solve real and
  relatively complex business problems
• Identify a number of typical applications that
  together can provide the required functionality.
• Constraints
• Be large enough to provide interoperability
  between a suite of applications that can be used
  in practice to solve a realistic and meaningful
  business problem,
• Be chosen such that an implementation can be
  demonstrated within 12 months.
• Interoperability should be demonstrated between
  applications from at least four different
  vendors.
• The scope should concentrate on application in
  the area of production of hydrocarbons, and more
  precisely on optimisation of an existing
  production facility using production data in a
  near-realtime fashion.

4
Scope Asset View
The Production Domain

• Decisions we can effect in a day

5
The 3 (work) Flows
6
Scope IT View
External data transfer
Data Processing / monitoring and reporting
software
AP 3
AP x
AP 4
AP 5
AP 2
AP 1



Office Domain
Application Databases
Historian

DCS and real time applications
real time apps
DCS historian

Process Control Domain
Fields instruments
7
Who is building PRODML?

• Operators
• BP
• Chevron
• ExxonMobil
• Shell
• Statoil

• Standards
• POSC

• Vendors
• Halliburton
• Invensys
• OSIsoft
• PETEX
• Schlumberger
• Sense Intellifield
• TietoEnator
• Weatherford

8
PRODML Project Timeline UpdateMay 17, 2006 -
Status
Steering Committee Meetings
Months
2
4
6
8
10
12

• Project planning
• Team Kick-Off

Steering CommitteeMarch 20, 2006 Go For Pilots
May 17, 2006

• Workshop preparation and scheduling
• Standards investigation
• Develop Scope

Content

• Conduct workshops
• Detailed Requirements
• Macro Design

• Design Communication Plan
• Develop Test Bed Scenarios

Technology

• Process mapping
• Technology assessment
• Detailed Requirements
• Macro Design

• Design POC
• Build POC

• Implementation guide outline
• Process flow documentation
• Plan Pilot

Start August 16, 2005

• Pilot

End September 1, 2006

• Project Management
• Communication

Requirements
Build Communicate
Design-Develop-Test
Implementation
Phase 1 Scope and Define
9
PRODML Current Status

• Four Pilot Teams have formed, each focused on one
  of the following Major Operating Companies, each
  with from 3 to 5 Vendors
• Shell
• Chevron
• Statoil
• BP
• Pilot Teams are implementing 4 workflows using
  the PRODML
• Milestone Dates
• 3/10/2006 - Deadline for Pilot Proposals
• 3/20/2006 - Pilots Selected and Funded
• 3/30/2006 - PRODML Pilot (v.81) Reference
  Architecture and XML Schema are Complete
• 4/03/2006 - Pilot Project Development Kick Off
• 5/10/2006 Publish V.81 RA, Schema, API
• 5/01/2006 Manual XML Templates Passed
• 6/01/2006 API applied and automation introduced
• 7/15/2006 Unit Testing Complete
• 8/15/2006 - Pilots System Testing Complete
• 8/31/2006 V1.0 PRODML Standard Published
• 8/31/2006 Transfer PRODML Deliverables to POSC
  for maintenance continued development.
• 9/31/2006 - First PRODML compliant Production
  Optimization Applications Announced

Working
10
WWW.PRODML.ORG
11
4 - Pilot Project Workflows

• Plug and Play
• Interface without the need of a central server
• Universal data structure (XML Schema and API)
• Pilot 1 Model data management
• Pilot 2 Model data management
• Pilot 3 Steady-state gas lift optimization
• Pilot 4 Dynamic field-wide optimization focused
  on momentum of water distribution used for
  flooding

12
Pilot No. 1 Model Management
TietoEnator PROSTY Production Database
Schlumberger DECIDE Data Validator
PETEX Prosper Well Model
Well Pressures Well Temperatures
Well Pressures Well Temperatures
Well Pressures Well Temperatures
Well Pressures Well Temperatures Derived Volumes
Derived Volumes Model Alerts
Field Systems with Smart Wells
Schlumberger Avocet Model Validator
Schlumberger Eclipse Reservoir Simulator
Aspentech IP21 Historian
Example XML Consumer
Derived Volumes Model Alerts
Aspentech HYSYS Facility Model
13
Pilot No. 2 Model Management
Model Alerts Data Alerts
Invensys InFusion Data Model Validator
Well Pressures Well Temperatures Metered Volumes
Invensys InFusion Notification
Derived Volumes
Well Pressures Well Temperatures
OSISoft PI Historian
PETEX Prosper Well Model
Field Systems
Well Pressures Well Temperatures
Weatherford WellFlo Well Model
Derived Volumes
14
Pilot No. 3 Gas Lift Optimization
Manual and Non-Historian Data
Sense Intellifield Portal
Optimizer Constraints Optimizer Targets
Optimizer Constraints Optimizer Targets Well
Pressures Well Temperatures
OSISoft ACE Data Distributor
Well Pressures Well Temperatures
Optimizer Constraints Optimizer Targets
Schlumberger GL Optimizer
OSISoft SiteCom Data Distributor
Optimizer Constraints Optimizer Targets Well
Pressures Well Temperatures
Well Pressures Well Temperatures
OSISoft PI Historian
Field Systems
Well Pressures Well Temperatures
Optimizer Recommendations
15
Pilot No. 4 Field Optimization
Invensys InSQL Historian
Tank Outlet Rate Take Inlet Rate Tank
Availability Tank Levels Tank Capacity
Notification Generic
Production (Allocation) Out of Scope
Disposal Well Rates
Network Models
TietoEnator Energy Components
SAP-PRA
Recommended Rates / Time Stamp Production,
Injections, Disposal Wells
Instruction Processor
Water Capacity Simulator Schlumberger RTPRO Opti
mizer
Set Points
PRODML Prod Injection Profile
Allocated Historical
Recommended Rates / Time Stamp Production,
Injections, Disposal Wells
Reporter PRODML
Landmark DSS Forecast
Well Tests
Decline Curves Production Injection
Availability Schedule Production Injectors
(Discover)
Historical Injection
Notification (Lowis)
Production Database Weatherford Lowis
Static Month Injections Rates Days On Well
Injection Target Well Injection Capacity
Well Models
16
Final Thoughts

• End goals
• Commercial applications (not a stack of paper)
• Change the software landscape in upstream
  operations
• Completion target is SOON September 2006
• How can you be involved?
• www.prodml.org