The Global Water Sampling Project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

The Global Water Sampling Project

Description:

Notre Dame High School, California. Spokane Valley High School, Washington ... Canyon Wash, Aliso Canyon Wash, Tujunga Was, Western Burbank Channel, Verdugo ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: k12sc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Global Water Sampling Project


1
The Global Water Sampling Project
  • By
  • Vanessa Banuelos
  • Felisha Tolentino
  • John Lisowski
  • Riley Amos
  • Ella Sinise
  • Aj Noel

2
What is the Global Water Sampling Project?
  • The GSWP is a fresh water-testing project
    performed by high school middle school students
    across the world from India, Romania, Italy the
    United States comparing and contrasting water
    quality data they have collected from their local
    fresh water reservoir.
  • Each school collects date for seven weeks and the
    posts their results on a ceise website to compare
    data.
  • The purpose of this project is to see and test
    the physical and chemical water qualities and
    ones local fresh water source and to see how
    similar or different this data is with other
    water sites across the globe.

3
Purpose Statements
  • To evaluate the quality of the water in the LA
    River based on its interaction with chemical
    substances and organisms.
  • To come across the relationships among the data
    collected by all project participants.

4
Participants of the GWSP
  • Notre Dame High School, California
  • Spokane Valley High School, Washington
  • Eastern Area High School, Pennsylvania
  • Hempfield Education For Life Program,
    Pennsylvania
  • International School of Florence, Italy
  • Rukmini Devi Public School, India
  • High School DECEBAL, Constanta Romania

5
The Participants from Notre Dame
Ms. Kramers 10th Grade Biology Class
6
Dates of GWSP Process
  • The Global Water Sampling Project
  • was done
  • September 12, 2007
  • to
  • November 3, 2007

7
History of LA River
  • Starting point
  • - Joining of the Bell Creek and Calabasas Wash
    (southwestern part if San Fernando Valley)
  • Sources San Gabriel Mountains, Santa Susana
    Mountains
  • Major Tributaries Browns Canyon Wash, Aliso
    Canyon Wash, Tujunga Was, Western Burbank
    Channel, Verdugo Wash, Arroyo Seco, Rio Hondo
    Compton Creek
  • Flow
  • - East through the San Fernando Valley to city of
    Burbank, where it turns south and southeast,
    through the Santa Monica Mountains and the
    Verdugo Mountains.
  • - This flow is known as the Glendale Narrows.
  • Main water supplies
  • - Sewage
  • - Industrial discharges
  • - Runoff from urban cities
  • Uses
  • - Before act as a flood control channel
  • - Now living space for the homeless with
    graffiti along its walls
  • Pace of River

8
(No Transcript)
9
  • Causes of Pollution
  • - Shopping carts
  • - Oil
  • - Old tires
  • - Radiators
  • - Transmission fluids
  • - Appliances
  • Animals
  • - Canadian Geese
  • - Kingfishers Red Tailed-Hawks
  • - California Newt
  • - White Egrets
  • Plants
  • - Willow Trees
  • - Coastal Live Oak
  • - Spiny Clotbur
  • - Gourds
  • - Common sunflower
  • Invertebrates
  • - Black Fly Larvae
  • - Leaches
  • - Midge Larvae

10
Hypothesis
  • Notre Dames Hypothesis for the Global Water
    Sampling Project was that the pH, nitrogen,
    temperature, and phosphate levels at the Los
    Angeles River will be suitable for sustaining
    life.

11
Procedure
  • We tested for temperature, phosphates, pH, and
    nitrates
  • Each procedure was alike
  • We recorded date twice a week
  • For temperature, the person testing put a
    thermometer in the water. Then, he/she would wait
    and record temperature in degrees Celsius
  • For pH, Nitrate Phosphate, A sample of water
    was needed. Once he/she put some sample in a test
    tube, color indications were dropped in test
    tube. Then he/she would wait 1-10 minutes. After
    waiting, he/she would compare to other colors
    that designate pH, Nitrate Phosphate levels
  • With all the comparisons finished, tester would
    have to record readings and share data with the
    class.

12
Students Recording Data at Los Angeles River at
Balboa Park
13
Data
14
Quantative Analysis
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Qualitative Analysis
  • Nitrates, Phosphates, pH Temperature can affect
    water quality because they all have a direct
    affect on the water.
  • Factors such as air temperature, air quality, and
    natural events may have affected the results of
    our data collections because all of these factors
    affect the water we were testing.
  • The Nitrate data collected by Notre Dame High
    School was not like the nitrate collections made
    by the other schools.

19
More Qualitative Analysis
  • When comparing the Phosphate values collected
    from the Los Angeles River with the data
    collected from the other schools test sites, the
    results were not similar.
  • The average water temperature for the Los Angeles
    River was 24oC
  • The pH readings that we got were similar to the
    readings of the other schools testing at a
    river.

20
Conclusion
  • Our hypothesis stated that pH, nitrogen,
    temperature and phosphate levels at the Los
    Angles River will be suitable for sustaining
    life. Our hypothesis was correct.
  • For pH the normal range of stream water is
    between 6 8. At the Los Angeles River, the
    average was 7.9
  • Nitrogen was needed in our test site for
    organisms because nitrogen compounds are basic
    building block in animal biology. Our Nitrogen
    levels were normal meaning, organisms could
    survive.
  • Our average temperature of 24.25 degrees Celsius
    was in range.

21
Cont. Conclusion
  • Our phosphate level is within the range and was
    1ppm.
  • Our data was different compared to other global
    water quality tests, but makes sense because
    temperature change frequently can vary place to
    place.
  • If we were to participate in this project next
    year, we would make sure to get all of the data
    recorded each time we went to test. We would also
    want to test different areas at our site to see
    any differences.
  • We are very happy with our results and glad this
    project was able to teach us so much about our
    own Los Angeles River

22
Acknowledgements
  • Ms. Kramer for providing us with guidelines for
    the construction of the project as well as
    leading our class to our participation in the
    GWSP.
  • Vanessa Banuelos for providing the pictures from
    the field trip
  • Written Report Group for supplying our
    information in the final format
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com