Root Cause Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 54
About This Presentation
Title:

Root Cause Analysis

Description:

Focus on too big a problem (saving the world) Root Cause Analysis. How to get ... Was the resident a known fire risk? Resident falls out of his wheelchair ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:364
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 55
Provided by: kom77
Category:
Tags: analysis | cause | root

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Root Cause Analysis


1
Root Cause Analysis
2
Root Cause Analysis
  • Definition
  • process for identifying the basic or
    contributing factors that underlie variations in
    outcomes
  • Used to examine adverse events
  • Definition adverse events are unwanted things
    happening as used here, often they happen over
    and over again
  • Used to examine close calls
  • Used to identify trends to prevent further
    occurrences

3
Root Cause Analysis
  • Most problems do not have an obvious solution -
    that is why they remain problems
  • Or, you may not have realized that a problem even
    exists
  • Example, what should your facilitys rate of
    restraint use be?
  • What about pressure ulcers?
  • These dont mean that the facility isnt doing a
    good job, just that it could do better!
  • Real objective is to improve the process at the
    fastest possible rate
  • Root Cause Analysis leads to suggestions for
    improvement

4
Root Cause Analysis
  • Errors usually result from faulty design of
    process, not worker negligence
  • Poor design puts staff in situations where errors
    are likely to occur
  • Example No sink in room or hand sanitizers
    (missed hand washing)
  • Example No cleanser near bathroom (stinky rooms)
  • Root cause analysis provides a path to figure out
    how to correct problems and prevent further
    occurrences
  • Assigning blame does not prevent reoccurrence

5
Root Cause Analysis
  • Need to ask Why? Why? Why?
  • Identify underlying functions leading to poor
    outcome
  • Determine main or most important cause and all
    the contributing factors you can think of
  • Usually begins by measuring components or pieces
    of process
  • Think about each step in the process, and how it
    can be measured

6
Root Cause Analysis Techniques
  • Organize a team with representation from a
    variety of departments
  • Who will be included in
  • Brainstorming
  • Identify barriers to favorable outcome
  • Collect data and sort to identify common threads
    or trends
  • Use fishbone

7
Root Cause Analysis
The next step is for the team to brainstorm on
possible causes Six categories. 1.
Communication 2. Training 3.
Staff Fatigue/Scheduling 4. Environment
and Equipment 5. Rules/policies/Procedures
6. BarriersFor each category the team
needs to decide if it was a factor in the event
being reviewed.
8
Root Cause AnalysisRules of Causation
  • Causal statements must clearly show cause and
    effect relationships
  • Reader needs to understand and follow your logic
    in links (cause -effect conclusions)
  • Negative descriptors such as poorly or
    inadequate are not used in causal statements
  • Broad, negative words do not describe actual
    conditions
  • Each human error must have a preceding cause
  • Must investigate why the error occurred

9
Root Cause AnalysisRules of Causation
  • Each procedural deviation must have a preceding
    cause
  • Example why are steps to a procedure missed by
    the nurse?
  • (example Why is a daily pain assessment not
    performed?)
  • Failure to act is only causal when there was a
    pre-existing duty to act
  • Duty may be assigned through regulation or
    standards of practice

10
Root Cause Analysis1. Communication
The area of communications include questions such
as Was the resident correctly identified?
Was existing documentation of treatment plans
clear?
11
Root Cause Analysis2. Training
  • Training includes questions such as
  • Was training provided prior to the start of the
    process?
  • Were the results of the training monitored over
    time?

12
Root Cause Analysis 3. Staff Fatigue/Scheduling
  • Questions in this section may include
  • Did scheduling allow personnel adequate sleep
  • Was the environment free of distractions?
  • Was fatigue properly anticipated?

13
Root Cause Analysis4. Environment and Equipment
  • Some questions for this area are
  • Had there been an environmental risk assessment
    of the area?
  • Was there a maintenance program in place to
    maintain the equipment involved?

14
Root Cause Analysis 5. Rules/Policies/Procedures
  • Some sample questions for this area include
  • Were there written up-to-date policies and
    procedures that addressed the work processes
    related to the event?
  • Were relevant policies/procedures clear,
    understandable, and readily available to all
    staff?

15
Root Cause Analysis6. Barriers
  • This area includes questions such as
  • What barriers were involved in this event?
  • Would the event have been prevented if the
    existing barriers had functioned correctly?

16
Root Cause AnalysisStatements
  • Root Causes explain the teams findings about
    what must be fixed
  • Root Causes guide everything else that follows
  • (task assignment, actions, outcome measures)
  • Strong Root Causes set up success

17
Root Cause AnalysisStatement
  • The first step is writing a Root Cause Statement
    is to pick the contributing factor that the team
    feels is the strongest. The root cause statement
    is written according to five simple rulesFIVE
    RULES
  • Show Cause and effect
  • Nothing negative about people
  • Fix systems, not people
  • Fix norms, not people
  • Duty to act

18
Root Cause Analysis Cause and Effect
  • WRONG
  • A nurse was fatigued
  • RIGHT
  • With overtime, nurses are often scheduled more
    than 40 hours a week as a result, fatigued
    nurses are more likely to misread instructions

19
Root Cause Analysis Rule 2. Nothing negative
about people
  • WRONG
  • Poorly written procedure
  • RIGHT
  • The restraint procedure has 8 point font and no
    illustrations so staff dont use it, increasing
    the likelihood that restraints are applied
    incorrectly.

20
Root Cause Analysis Rule 3. Fix systems not
people
  • WRONG
  • Staff did not notice the resident was missing
    for at least 8 hours
  • RIGHT
  • Due to a malfunction in the door/vest wandering
    alarm, a resident was able to elope undetected

21
Root Cause Analysis Rule 4. Fix norms not
people
  • WRONG
  • Staff are waking patients at night
  • RIGHT
  • Bathing policies and prn med passes need to be
    adjusted to respect resident sleeping preferences

22
Root Cause Analysis Rule 5. Duty to act
  • WRONG
  • The nurse did not check for STAT orders
  • RIGHT
  • The absence of an assignment for nurses to check
    for STAT orders increased the likelihood that
    STAT orders would be missed or delayed

23
Root Cause Analysis Where do teams get stuck?
  • Lack of information (e.g., few interviews, few
    references, limited or no simulation, limited
    time, etc.)
  • Focus on too narrow a problem (saving one
    particular patient)
  • Focus on too big a problem (saving the world)

24
Root Cause Analysis How to get teams un-stuck
  • Do more interviews
  • Check the literature
  • Check with professional colleagues (contact
    similar facilities in different parts of the
    country)
  • SIMULATE the event
  • Do some more brainstorming
  • Find the time to do the best job possible
  • Engage the medical director

25
Root Cause Analysis How to get teams un-stuck
  • Stick to/focus on the situation at hand
  • Focus on what can be done to help other
    residents, families or staff in the future
  • Select bite-sized actions/outcome measures for
    events that you know occur frequently
  • look for volunteers, use short cycles of change,
    fix one thing at a time

26
Root Cause Analysis Action
  • Set reasonable/attainable goals
  • Link goals to measurement
  • Choose an action that fits the root cause
  • Avoid outcomes like training, writing a
    policy, pay more attention
  • Instead pick a stronger approach such as
    standardize, checklist, Equipment fix,
    Timeline for multiple actions
  • Make changes that have the highest potential
    impact facility-wide but test changes in one area
    first
  • Assign who, as well as when

27
Root Cause Analysis Resident Reports Pain
  • While passing her in the hallway a new Certified
    Nursing Assistant told the Charge Nurse that a
    resident was complaining of pain. During
    orientation the CNA was told to always inform the
    Charge Nurse of resident changes that could
    indicate pain. The Charge Nurse is an agency
    nurse who is currently working a double and
    replied to the CNA, She just wants attention. I
    dont think she is really in pain. and kept
    walking down the hall.

28
Root Cause Analysis Resident Reports Pain
  • Was communication from the CNA adequate?
  • Was the CNA oriented to the pain management
    program?
  • Was the Charge Nurse following the policy and
    procedure and standards of care?
  • Reason?

29
FISHBONE DIAGRAM GROUPINGS
30
Root Cause AnalysisFishbone Diagram People
  • Lets look at the nurse and CNA
  • Fatigue (short staffing, personal problems)
  • Communication (lack of information regarding the
    process)
  • Training (lack of orientation or ongoing
    training, lack of competency checks)
  • Lack of supervision
  • Other

31
Root Cause AnalysisFishbone Diagram Policies
Procedures
  • Procedures/ Rules/Policies
  • No written policy and procedure
  • Failure to follow the policy/procedure
  • Standards of practice not known
  • Standards of practice not followed
  • Lack of supervision to assure process is followed
  • Lack of orientation or information regarding the
    process and/or resident needs
  • Other

32
Root Cause AnalysisFishbone Environment
Equipment
  • Using the fishbone diagram
  • Equipment/Environment (examples)
  • Medication for pain hard to obtain - locked away
    from medication cart
  • Furniture not comfortable resulting in
    exacerbation of pain
  • Improper restraint leading to immobility and pain
  • Inadequate supplies for positioning
  • Assistive equipment not fitted for resident,
    causing pain

33
(No Transcript)
34
The PDSA Cycle for Learning and Improvement
35
Root Cause Analysis Tips (continued)
  • Participation of leadership of the organization
    is important
  • Participation of individuals most closely
    involved is necessary
  • Cannot be contradictory
  • Doesnt leave obvious questions unanswered

36
Root Cause Analysis Summary
  • Look at all information.
  • Investigate thoroughly
  • Use the Fishbone Diagram
  • Propose many solutions.
  • Look at the process
  • Pick one intervention for testing in a small area
  • (PDSA)

37
76 yo with burns
  • Harry Owens, a former a landscaper, is 76 yo
    widower and resident at Rolling Meadows NH, has
    Alzheimers. He helps with the flowerboxes on the
    unit. Harry has two sons and a daughter. The
    boys live out of state and his daughter
    Catherine visits after work.
  • Harry is oriented to self and recognizes familiar
    faces. Although, Harry uses a w/c to wheel
    himself throughout the unit, he is often found in
    the kitchen snacking or rummaging through
    closets. He has a snap-on belt on his wheelchair,
    which he can not self release for safety and
    positioning. He c/o about the belt every time it
    is put into place. He attempts to get out of the
    wheelchair to ambulate on his own if hes not
    belted in. Last wk the housekeeper found Harry
    twice rummaging through other residents personal
    closets and personal belongings.
  • He was found by the housekeeper lying on the
    floor in another residents room with burns to
    his chest and arms. A partially burned snap-on
    belt was attached to his wheelchair. He was last
    seen in front of the nurses station waving to a
    CNA who was returning from her break to have a
    cigarette.
  • He was sent to the hospital where they diagnosed
    Harry as having 3rd degree burns to his chest and
    arms.

38
With your team consider the following questions
  • When during the day is the person at risk?
  • What is the best treatment and what are your
    strategies for accomplishing it?
  • What are the potential barriers to that
    treatment?
  • What conflicts are there between treatment
    protocols and the individuals patterns or
    rhythms?
  • How can these conflicts be reconciled to achieve
    the best outcomes
  • What conflicts exist between the treatment
    protocols and the institutional pressures (i.e.
    Schedules, other departments needs)
  • How can you reconcile these to support your care?
  • Look at the HATCh model. In each of the domains
    what is needed to care for this individual?

39
HATCh Holistic Approach to Transformational
Change
Environment
Care practices
Workplace practices
40
The analysis (1/3)
Were flower boxes easily accessible?
Where activities scheduled at this time?
Resident on independently wheeling self on unit
Resident is a fall risk according to fall
assessment
Snap-on belt used to maintain position in
wheelchair?
Snap-on belt used to maintain position in
wheelchair?
Did staff receive training for the restraint and
facility protocols?
Are other restraint alternatives available?
Resident complains about the snap-on belt
41
Analysis (2/3)
CNA left cigarette lighter at the nurses station
How was the ignition source obtained?
Why was this restraint device used?
What was the ignition source?
Resident falls out of his wheelchair
Resident is wearing a snap-on belt
Snap-on belt ignites and breaks
Staff member called in sick
Was a reduction ever put into place?
Was the resident a known fire risk?
Why is snap-on belt combustible?
Short staffed. When returning from break CNA was
called to assist co-worker
42
Analysis (3/3)
Resident not seen for 15 minutes
Short staffed. When returning from break CNA was
called to assist co-worker
Resident used lighter that CNA left at nurses
station
Snap-on belt breaks and resident slips out
Resident found burnt, lying on the floor
Resident treated and transferred to the local
burn unit
Staff member called in sick
43
Esther 77 yo post hip pinning
  • EXERCISE Esther is a 77-year-old widowed F,
    living independently at home. Her daughter lives
    close by and visits frequently. 6 d ago, Esther
    Fx R hip from a fall at home. At the hospital,
    hip was pinned. Since her admission to the SNF
    2d ago, she c/o significant postop pain for which
    she has a prn pain medication scheduled. PT and
    OT were ordered but Esther refused therapy
    stating, she was not ready to move too much.
    The therapy director has mentioned to the DON
    that her physician should be called because it is
    getting difficult to justify Medicare coverage.
    She stays perfectly still for long periods of
    time with her eyes closed. Her preferred
    position is supine with the head of the bed
    elevated and a pillow under the affected right
    leg. She rings the call light frequently for the
    bedpan and for pain medication. She is eating
    small amounts of a soft diet.

44
With your team consider the following questions
  • When during the day is the person at risk?
  • What is the best treatment and what are your
    strategies for accomplishing it?
  • What are the potential barriers to that
    treatment?
  • What conflicts are there between treatment
    protocols and the individuals patterns or
    rhythms?
  • How can these conflicts be reconciled to achieve
    the best outcomes
  • What conflicts exist between the treatment
    protocols and the institutional pressures (i.e.
    Schedules, other departments needs)
  • How can you reconcile these to support your care?
  • Look at the HATCh model. In each of the domains
    what is needed to care for this individual?

45
95 yo with pressure sore
  • Aunt Sharlie is 95 yo with a h/o CAD, DM and
    severe PVD. She weighs 98 lbs, is 50 tall and
    has dementia. Aunt Sharlie scoots around the
    facility in her wheelchair using her L foot to
    propel herself. She can stand and take a few
    steps.
  • When staff attempt to reposition her she refuses
    and says Leave me alone, will ya? She eats
    small amounts of finger foods, spits out most of
    her pills, and is hard to slow down because of
    her activity level. Prior to her residence at the
    nursing home she was an avid gardener and enjoyed
    walks in the park.
  • She developed a pressure ulcer on the right heel
    last summer, which resulted in an above-the-knee
    amputation in November. During this time she also
    developed a stage III pressure ulcer measuring
    4x3x2 at the coccyx. The pressure ulcer has
    healed, but she is still at high risk. A Foley
    catheter is being used to manage incontinence and
    keep the coccyx dry.

46
With your team consider the following questions
  • When during the day is the person at risk?
  • What is the best treatment and what are your
    strategies for accomplishing it?
  • What are the potential barriers to that
    treatment?
  • What conflicts are there between treatment
    protocols and the individuals patterns or
    rhythms?
  • How can these conflicts be reconciled to achieve
    the best outcomes
  • What conflicts exist between the treatment
    protocols and the institutional pressures (i.e.
    Schedules, other departments needs)
  • How can you reconcile these to support your care?
  • Look at the HATCh model. In each of the domains
    what is needed to care for this individual?

47
88yo F with Adverse drug event
  • An 88 yo F with dementia, a HTN, and CAD s/p CABG
    went from NH to ED for worsening confusion. She
    had been in hospital 6 wks ago for urosepsis, and
    allergy to levofloxacin was noted.
  • Initial evaluation revealed leukocytosis and
    pyuria, but no fever or flank pain. The ED MD
    concluded that a UTI was the most likely cause of
    the altered mental status, and prescribed
    levofloxacin.
  • The first dose was given on the medical floor
    shortly after the patient arrived.
  • Over the next 6h, patient became increasingly
    agitated and required sedation and restraint. She
    developed a diffuse erythematous rash across the
    chest and back, swollen lips and tongue, and
    audible wheezes ? anaphylactic reaction! In the
    ICU she was treated with IV steroids,
    antihistamine, and inhaled beta agonists. The
    levofloxacin was changed to an intravenous
    cephalosporin.
  • After the event, the patients paper chart was
    brought to the ICU from the Medical Records
    Department. The D/C summary from last admission
    reported an allergic reaction to levofloxacin.
    Her daughter, arriving later that evening, was
    exasperated to learn of her mothers condition.
    She said, Youre supposed to help her get
    better, not worse!

48
Questions
  • Should the nursing home physician confer with the
    Emergency Department physician at the time of ED
    evaluation?
  • Should a demented patient wear a medical alert
    wristband?
  • Is there a trade-off between clinicians attempts
    to provide timely care such as rapid
    administration of antibiotics and other
    treatments and safety?

49
Interviews
  • The Emergency Department Physician
  • I saw the patient and requested her records. I
    thought about treating her UTI with a
    cephalosporin, but the nurse told me the patient
    had very thin veins and tenuous IV access. I
    thought a quinolone made sense because you can
    take it orally. I reviewed the transfer sheets
    from the nursing home record and saw no note of
    an allergy. Unfortunately the patient was too
    sick to tell me about her allergies. I wish Id
    waited for the chart to come up from Medical
    Records, but there was a trauma case coming in
    and we needed the bed.
  • The floor nurse
  • It was a busy day. We had 4 admissions all at
    once. I settled the pt and went on to help the
    other nurses. I administered all my pts meds,
    but I didnt get a chance to sit down and do my
    paperwork until the end of the shift. I then
    remembered hearing about the pts last admission
    and recalled there was an allergy to
    levofloxacin. But by then, she was already
    wheezing and swollen. We all rely on the doctors
    and pharmacists too much to get the order right.

50
Interviews
  • The pharmacist
  • What a catastrophe! I remember receiving the
    order for levofloxacin. The pharmacy computer
    showed that the patient had no known drug
    allergies. We dispensed the drug and sent it up
    to the floor. Although the pharmacy computer
    keeps a record of every drug allergy that is
    brought to our attention, there is no consistent
    way that the information gets to us. If it is
    written in an admission note or discharge summary
    but not on the physician order sheet, there is no
    way we would learn of the allergy. We do the best
    we can, but we need some help from the
    clinicians.
  • The daughter
  • I am beyond exasperated. I know that things are
    busy and that the doctors and nurses here try to
    do the right thing, but they ought to know better
    than to give my mother a medicine shes allergic
    to. If you cant get a simple thing like that
    right, how can patients expect that youll get it
    right when you do something complicated? Whats
    so hard about saving allergy information in a
    single place so everyone can find it? I know all
    about my mothers allergies and medications. Why
    couldnt somebody give me a call?

51
(No Transcript)
52
80 yo M with pressure sore
  • Charlie is an 80-year-old retired police officer,
    admitted to Happy Hills NH a few months ago with
    L hip fx, NIDDM, dementia, and peripheral
    neuropathy. He is 5, 9 and weighs 146 lbs, alert
    and pleasantly confused. Ambulation is poor. He
    sits in a straight back chair most of the day.
    Occ. he wanders on the unit looking for his
    patrol car and top-secret documents (an elopement
    risk!). Upon admission the nursing staff
    immediately initiated a plan of care to prevent
    the development of a pressure ulcer, including
    placement of an air mattress on his bed and a
    cushion in his chair. He has a sacral Stage II,
    although its improved some, and measured at 6 x
    5cmx0.5 this morning. Staff has been asked to
    place him in bed for an hour in the late morning
    and then again late afternoon to relieve
    pressure. He is continent of urine on occasion
    and staff state His brief is always heavily
    soaked with urine when we change him q 2h
  • Last week Charlie became more confused and his
    food intake lessened. Staff noticed a blister on
    his L heel, possibly caused by his poor fitting
    shoes when he does wander in the hall in pursuit
    of crooks.The nurse promptly notified the
    residents daughter and MD of the blister, as
    well and the residents overall health decline.
    MD ordered dietary supplements, a foam foot
    elevator while in bed, and an Rx for the blister.
    He continued to lose weight, and blood sugars are
    now unstable, and his L heel blister worsened to
    the where the nurses described it in their
    documentation as a stage II PU draining large
    amounts of foul smelling exudate.

53
With your team consider the following questions
  • When during the day is the person at risk?
  • What is the best treatment and what are your
    strategies for accomplishing it?
  • What are the potential barriers to that
    treatment?
  • What conflicts are there between treatment
    protocols and the individuals patterns or
    rhythms?
  • How can these conflicts be reconciled to achieve
    the best outcomes
  • What conflicts exist between the treatment
    protocols and the institutional pressures (i.e.
    Schedules, other departments needs)
  • How can you reconcile these to support your care?
  • Look at the HATCh model. In each of the domains
    what is needed to care for this individual?

54
  • Stefan Gravenstein, MD, MPH, CMD
  • Clinical Director
  • 401-528-3200
  • sgravenstein_at_qualitypartnersri.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com