Title: The Developing Personality
1The Developing Personality
2Shortcomings of Behaviorism
- Ignored peoples ability to think, plan,
perceive, and believe. - Focused too strongly on animalsthus
reinforcement. Forgot people could problem solve
and use reason. - Forgot that people are inherently social. We
learn from those around us. We dont live in
Skinner boxes. - Did not explain how we are put into our
environmentswe choose where we live, work, and
socialize. - Social Learning Theory addresses the issues
behaviorism wanted to ignore.
3Dollard and Millers Social Learning Theory
- Habit hierarchy (unobservable)
- The behavior you are most likely to perform at a
given moment resides at the top of your habit
hierarchy your least likely behavior is at the
bottom. - The effect of rewards and punishments is to
rearrange the habit hierarchy. - Motivation and drives
- Needs produce Drives
- Primary drive (food, water, comfort)
- Secondary drive (prestige, power, love)
- Rewards MUST reduce a drive
- Frustration and aggression, the
frustration-aggression hypothesis
(displacement) - Psychological conflict (approach-avoidance
conflict)
4Dollard and Millers Social Learning Theory
- Psychological conflict (approach-avoidance
conflict)
By Stephen Hansen
5Rotters Social Learning Theory
- Expectancy value theory (belief)
- The basic assumption is that behavioral decisions
are determined by - the presence or size of reinforcements.
- beliefs about what the results of behavior are
likely to be. - Even if a reinforcement is very attractive you
are not likely to pursue it if your chances of
success seem slim. Conversely, even something
that is not particularly desirable might motivate
behavior, if the chances of getting it are good
enough. - Locus of control (generalized expectancies and
your experience) - Internal
- External
6Banduras Social Learning Theory
- Efficacy expectations (probability that you can
do something in the first placebelief in
yourself) - Observational learning (learning withOUT rewards
or punishment!) - Reciprocal determinism
7The Cognitive-Affective Personality System (CAPS)
- Walter Mischels CAPS theory combines two
important ideas about personality. - In the tradition of Kelly, the phenomenological
idea that the individuals interpretation or
construal of the world is all-important from
this perspective to understand a persons
thoughts is to understand the person completely. - A view of the cognitive system that describes
thought as proceeding simultaneously on multiple
tracks that occasionally intersect.
8CAPS Interactions Among Systems
- Mischel theorizes that the most important aspect
of the many systems of personality and cognition
is their interaction. - There is not a single output from a single,
linear, serial process. - How the person feels, what he or she thinks, and
what he or she ultimately does, involve
compromises among many different processes.
9CAPS Cognitive Person Variables
- Individual differences in personality stem from
four person variables that characterize
properties and activities of the cognitive
system. - Cognitive and behavioral construction
competenciesan individuals mental abilities and
behavioral skills (e.g., IQ, creativity, social
skills) - Encoding strategies and personal
constructsincludes a persons ideas about how
the world can be categorized and efficacy
expectations, or beliefs about his or her own
capabilities - Subjective stimulus valuesan individuals
beliefs about the probabilities of attaining a
goal if it is pursued it also includes how much
he or she values different rewarding outcomes - Self-regulatory systems and plansa set of
procedures that control behavior, including
self-reinforcement, selection of situations, and
purposeful alteration of the situations selected
also includes how people directly control their
own thoughts - Affect and Emotions
10CAPS If . . . Then . . . contingencies
- If . . . Then . . . contingencies The four
personality variables combine in each individual
to yield a repertoire of actions triggered by
particular stimulus situations. - Every individuals pattern of contingencies is
unique, and it comprises his or her behavioral
signature
11CAPS If . . . Then . . . contingencies
- Mischels goal is for if . . . then contingencies
to replace personality traits. - Advantages of the if . . . then idea
- Its specificity
- It is more sensitive to the way people change
their behavior across situations - If . . . then contingencies potentially integrate
trait conceptions of personality with social
learning and cognitive conceptions by
redescribing traits as specific behavior
patterns. - Personality traits are sometimes too broad and
vague to provide the most useful way to think
about behavior. - Integrating traits with the if . . . then idea
could perhaps make both concepts richer and more
useful.
12Learning, Thinking, and the Person
The learning approaches to personality have made
three major, lasting contributions
- They approached the goal of establishing
psychology as an objective science their work is
characterized by tight theoretical reasoning,
careful experimental design, and a style of
argument that backs up every statement with data. - They recognize better than any other basic
approach the degree to which peoples behavior
may depend on the environment and even the
specific, immediate situation. - The learning approaches have contributed a
technology of behavior change its principles can
be applied to virtually anything for example - Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) seeks to
understand and manipulate functional
relationships between behavior and the
environment it involves a systematic process of
studying and modifying observable behavior
through careful manipulations of the environment,
and tracking of behavioral outcomes it is most
frequently used in educational settings,
particularly when working with individuals with
autism and other developmental disorders it is
also used in organizations and in the area of
sports psychology. - Cognitive-behavioral therapy applies concepts of
learning to the treatment of depression, phobias,
addictions, and other emotional and behavioral
disorders. - The evidence clearly shows that techniques based
in learning theory work well in the short run,
but in the long run the evidence is less clear.
13Learning, Thinking, and the Person
- Several limitations to learning theories can be
noted - It turns out that people are more complicated
than simple theories like classical conditioning
sometimes acknowledge. - While the recent versions of social learning
theory acknowledge that people think, they still
tend to underappreciate the degree to which the
characteristic ways in which people think can
cause them to respond differently to the same
situation. - People and their behavior are much harder to
change than the learning theories suggest people
tend to remain who they are, inevitably and even
stubbornly, in the face of the strongest
pressures from the situation.
14Srivastava, John, Gosling, and Potter, (2003)
- Introduction
- Trait theorists (e.g., McCrae Costa, 1996)
posit genetic determination of genes, thus
personality should ____________ after adulthood. - Contextualist (e.g., Kwan, 2002) argue that
traits are multiply determined, specifically
_________ is very important, thus personality
should _________ after adulthood. - These views are both opposing and intriguing.
Like any good article that helps perpetuate
science, the authors sought to __________ this
argument.
15Srivastava, John, Gosling, and Potter, (2003)
- Introduction (cont)
- What has past research said? (e.g., Roberts et
al.,) - The hard plaster hypothesis states Age effects
on personality traits after age ___ should not be
significantly different from _____. - The soft plaster hypothesis states Age effects
on personality traits after age ____ should _____
the rate of change. - In the transactional view, ________ select their
________, and these ________ affect their
personality. - According to Eriksons (1950) theory of
adulthood, _______, _______, and ______ are
social roles that undergo great change from early
to mid adulthood.
16Srivastava, John, Gosling, and Potter, (2003)
- Method
- 132,515 participants were recruited from
_________. - Participants answered questions on the ___ ____
___. - Was the study longitudinal?
17Srivastava, John, Gosling, and Potter, (2003)
- Results
- The hard plaster hypothesis was tested by
comparing age _____ after age 30 to _____. If
the hard plaster hypothesis is confirmed, they
should find that this result is _________?
- The soft plaster hypothesis was tested by
comparing age slopes _____ age 30 to age slopes
_____ age 30.
18Srivastava, John, Gosling, and Potter, (2003)
Trait Rate of Change
--Change is of similar strength, but
opposite direction for women. --Increases for men.
Openness
Conscientiousness
--Change slows for both men and women.
--Change is of similar strength, but
opposite direction for women. --Slows for men.
Extraversion
Agreeableness
--Increases
19Srivastava, John, Gosling, and Potter, (2003)
Trait Rate of Change
--women show strong change and this remains
before and after 30. --men have show weak change
and this remains before and after 30.
Neuroticism
20Srivastava, John, Gosling, and Potter, (2003)
Trait Linear modeling
Openness Linear (gender x age) Conscientiousnes
s Quadratic Extraversion Linear
Agreeableness Cubic fit Neuroticism Linear
(gender x age)
21Srivastava, John, Gosling, and Potter, (2003)
--Cross-sectional design cannot differentiate
between cohort and developmental
effects. --Rejection of plaster
hypothesis. --Acknowledgement of interactionist
hypothesis. --Data does not deny biological
effects, but does present evidence of plasticity
in certain personality domains. --This presents
the idea that culture, society, and life course
can affect peoples personality as they
agehelping them adapt to circumstances.